EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- The Terror Con
Popular content
Today's Top News
Vote on Obama Labor Nominee Spells Trouble for Unions
WASHINGTON - The Senate Tuesday failed to advance President Barack Obama's nomination of a union lawyer to the National Labor Relations Board, as the debate and vote became a test of union clout in Congress.
The vote on Craig Becker's nomination - the first controversial vote since the Senate Democrats' 60-seat majority shrank by one last week - highlighted the difficulty that Democrats will have trying to push union-friendly legislation through Congress.
Only 52 senators voted to cut off debate on the nomination, eight short of the number needed, and 33 were opposed. Many senators weren't present because of an impending snowstorm.
The president could name the former union lawyer to the board with a "recess appointment," which doesn't require confirmation, while the Senate is on its President's Day break next week.
Still, the vote signals that Obama is in for a tough time pushing labor's agenda.
"It's a statement that anything friendly to organized labor won't get through the Senate as long as Republicans stand together," said Gary Jacobson, an expert on Congress at the University of California at San Diego. "The labor wing of the Democratic Party is not going to get what they were hoping for."
Becker had served as a lawyer for the Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO. Obama, speaking at a surprise news conference Tuesday, expressed frustration that Becker and other nominees are getting bogged down in the Senate.
"I respect the Senate's role to advise and consent, but for months, qualified, non-controversial nominees for critical positions in government, often related to our national security, have been held up despite having overwhelming support," Obama said.
He may have been alluding in part to the "hold" that Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., had placed on more than 70 nominees in a bid to drive White House attention to federal contracting issues in Alabama. Shelby released most of the holds Monday night.
Last week, senators advanced the stalled nomination of Martha Johnson, a nominee who'd been held up for months, to head the General Services Administration on a 96 to 0 vote. Senate Democrats blasted their Republican colleagues for blocking Johnson for a prolonged period, then unanimously voting for her.
Becker posed a different challenge for the White House, because of Democrats' efforts to push the Employee Free Choice Act, or "card check" legislation that many Democrats have pushed hard. The legislation would make it easier for workers to form unions.
Business groups think Becker would be overly sympathetic to card check laws and to union interests in general, though he told a hearing last week that he'd "respect the will of Congress."
That wasn't good enough for Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., who voiced opposition to the nominee.
"Mr. Becker's previous statements strongly indicate that he would take an aggressive personal agenda to the NLRB, and that he would pursue a personal agenda there, rather than that of the administration," Nelson said. "This is of great concern, considering that the board's main responsibility is to resolve labor disputes with an even and impartial hand."
Nelson joined a chorus of Republicans.
"Card checks should not happen because an unelected bureaucracy in the National Labor Relations Board is the one to do it. Mr. Becker would have that, obviously, on his agenda," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, D-Ill., however, lauded Becker's background, and said, "His job is to basically interpret the law as written and to implement the law as Congress has passed it. He said repeatedly, if confirmed, he will apply the law fairly and impartially."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



8 Comments so far
Show AllAnd, to think, this is one of Obama's few good nominees.
If he doesn't put this guy in through a recess appointment, isn't that just the final nail in the coffin of hope?
Michael Moore for president?
Prez. Shamwow's a polished, articulate, graceful... empty fucking suit.
He'll cave. He'll fuck the unions, just for fun.
Guaranteed, chers....
As is always the case when the issue is labor and unions, there in little comment among the CD readership. It speaks a lot about the demographic that comes here.
But I guess I should count my blessings, Huff Po and the like are far more bourgeois and coordinator-class.
This "concern" from the GOP and their Blue lap-dogs about fairness in applying labor laws would be touching if it wasn't such a pack of transparent lies. Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II the inferior, turned the NLRB on it's head. Appointing leaders that were openly hostile to labor. Vowing to NOT apply the laws fairly. Vowing instead to give the corps the benefit of the doubt on every case. Still, no filibuster of these anti-worker asswipes from the beaten and demoralized democrats. All the union haters out there need to read some history and see what union labor has worked for and accomplished for the working class. A short list:
1) Paid vacations
2) 8 hour work day
3) 40 hour work week
3) Overtime pay
4) Abolition of child labor
5) Established worker saftey standards
6) Public education system
7) etc.. etc.. etc...
Unions challenge corporate control over the lives of the individual worker and they can't stand it. The money issue is just a smoke screen. Why they really hate unions is that the boss can't just ruin an employee's livelyhood just for sport as they can and do in non-union settings or promote Suzy Rottencrotch over a qualified senior employee because Suzy doesn't mind being a whore for the boss.
Maybe the idiotic filibuster should be scrapped. Wow i'm smart, no one has ever thought of that before...
What a stupid country.
I can't believe the Democrats are allowing this to happen ! Obama is trying to help labor out and this stupid Senate is killing him. If Obama's nominee doesn't make it, then it's your fault you stupid anti-worker taxpayer mooch off senators !
Onada isn't pushing labor's agenda, anymore than he's pushing for national healthcare.
Onada makes a gesture -- an appointment he isn't going to try to get through, a position he's not going to fight for -- in order to keep hitting for the neocon agenda.