Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pennsylvania’s Gas Wells Booming—But So Are Spills
As more gas wells are drilled in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale, more cases of toxic spills are being reported. Earlier this month, Pennsylvania's environmental officials fined Pennsylvania-based Atlas Resources after a series of violations at 13 wells, including spills of fracturing fluids and other contaminants onto the ground around the sites. And just last week the agency fined M.R. Dirt, a company that removes waste from drilling sites, $6,000 for spilling more than 7 tons of drilling dirt along a public road.
The reports come on the heels of a string of other incidents that
have killed fish in one of the state's most prized recreational lakes
and released toxic chemicals into the environment.
The Atlas spills are significant because they are among the latest and because they happened repeatedly during the routine transfer of fluids. Pennsylvania's Environmental Protection Agency fined Atlas Resources $85,000 for the offenses, which took place between May and December of 2009. Many of the spills were discovered by DEP inspectors.
The violations (PDF) cited by the DEP include spills of fluids from the hydraulic fracturing process at seven sites, and failure to report a spill at one of those sites. One spill was the result of a faulty pit liner, which is supposed to insulate the ground from hydraulic fracturing fluids after they are pumped out of a well.
Atlas Resources controls more than half a million acres within the Marcellus Shale, the massive gas deposit that stretches from Tennessee to New York. The company, whose total revenue was $787.4 million in 2008, issued a statement acknowledging that it had entered a voluntary settlement with the DEP and saying that each of the incidents had been corrected. An Atlas spokesman declined a request to answer additional questions about the violations, or about the company's operations in Pennsylvania.
"If you look at this series of violations -- it's not only that there are multiple violations," said DEP spokeswoman Helen Humphreys, pointing to the fact that the same three violations were turning up at each site. "This is a pattern, and it's a problem."
The pattern -- and the problem -- extends beyond Atlas.
In December the DEP fined Chesapeake and Schlumberger, two of the biggest operators in the Marcellus Shale and in gas development nationally, for spilling hydrochloric acid, which is used for hydraulic fracturing and is corrosive. Cabot Oil and Gas, the Houston-based energy company that lists T. Boone Pickens as one of its stockholders, was fined in November for a series of spills, including a fracturing fluid spill by its contractor Halliburton.
In October Pennsylvania fined (PDF) Texas-based Range Resources $23,500 for spilling nearly 5,000 gallons of wastewater, including hydraulic fracturing fluids, into a tributary of Cross Creek Lake, a protected watershed near Pittsburgh that contains some of the state's most robust fish populations.
A DEP report (PDF) on that spill said, "The creek was impacted by sediments all the way down to the lake and there was also evidence of a fish kill as invertebrates and fish were observed lying dead in the creek."
The Range Resources spill occurred on May 26, when the company was pumping fluids from the hydraulic fracturing of three wells through a six-inch pipe to a DEP-approved impoundment. Along the way, two screws along the pipe came loose, according to the Range Resources report on the incident, allowing thousands of gallons to spill onto the ground before the company was able to shut it down.
Range Resources spokesman Matt Pitzarella said the loosened screws were a result of vandalism and that the company responded by increasing security at its sites. The fish killed in Cross Creek amounted to less than a pound of minnows, he said.
Just three weeks before the fines were announced, Range was penalized by the DEP for another accident -- this time for spilling more than 10,000 gallons of flowback water, which again resulted in a fish kill and a substantial cleanup effort. A DEP spokesman said he could not comment on that spill, because a settlement is still being decided.
"We find both of these to be unfortunate and unacceptable," said Pitzarella, who said that neither spill had any negative impacts on health or property.
Unlike previous spills -- including the recent Atlas spills -- the DEP has not issued press releases for either of the Range Resources spills, and a spokesman has not explained why.
- Posted in



14 Comments so far
Show AllThere is a solution currently available to help remedy this situation, it is called the "closed loop" drilling method!
I found the article on the "closed loop" drilling method:
http://www.propublica.org/feature/underused-drilling-practices-could-avoid-pollution-1214 .
This method should be the rule for now, not the exception! This should be Federal law/regulation, as there is drilling in 32 states! There are links on the page relating to legislation I have yet to look into, but with all the "$$$ for loopholes" flying around D.C., states should be on this, too!
The article originally claimed $10,000 in savings, which could be true if one was to factor in fines for desecrating the environment.
Cost estimates are now about $4,500 per well in additional costs. As a percentage of the total development costs of each well, $4,500 is in the low single digits. Peanuts, really, when you consider the $$$$$ that flow from these wells, once they are in operation!
The fracking process still involves potetential fracturing and leakage up the cemented borehole/casing annulus - in fact, the high pressures required for fracking would seem to almost assure leakage into the ground water happens to some degree.
The only way to prevent this would be to put groundwater monitoring/recovery wells around the gas well site. This is not much different that what a gas atation has to do around their underground tanks. The costs would not be too high, but it is the job of these oil-capitalists to scream like they are being murdered whenever even the most sensible regulations are proposed.
Pennsylvanias PaDEP is becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of big coal and oil. Don't expect mch help from them.
I wish we had the sort of activism around this issue that New Yorkers have organized. But with the much higher poverty in western Pa., I'm not hoping for much.
Enuf 11:36 --
I believe spills still occur with closed loop.
The industry is claiming it as safe but very possibly many of the spills in the article are from closed loop systems.
The fines are obviously much to small to remedy the frequent spillage occurrences.
Our county kept the closed loop fossil fools out by charging them for extra police, fire, road and school costs.
Fossil fuels are an archaic form of dwindling poisonous energy and should be discontinued as much as possible.
Renwables have been viable for decades only vested interests have prevented their implementation.
When you're done with all those spills, come on over and join the movement to grow some hemp and algae for oil. No wars and no drilling. Grow it and use it as a gift from Mother Nature !
You are correct about the hemp and algae solution. It will be a really big lift to get it going, however, especially the hemp component! (first link,below).
Big AG and Energy will be a huge problem, especially with hemp. We would probably see another 80's style farm crisis, where the farmers get the boot and Big AG comes in and reaps the profits!
Check out these links for some interesting hemp history:
http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/30
http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/37
I'm well aware of the war on drugs and the ban on cannabis. I heard that Chevron is working with Solazyme on algal oil but that was exactly 2 years ago.
http://cleantech.com/news/2337
/solazyme-to-work-with-chevron-on-algae-fuel
http://www.portfolio.com/views
/columns/natural-selection/2009
/01/07/Algae-as-Alternative-Fuel-Source/
I'll have to confess that demand will have to decrease before those two can be considered. It's similar to solar and wind vs coal.
The sheer number of wells in the offing for Marcellus gas, and for CBM from various seams guarantees that there will be spills, and though actual formulations of fracking mixtures are still shrouded in secrecy, the effects of spills already known have been toxic to all biological life it's contacted.
Is Atlas also the company that claims it has developed a breakthrough filtering and purification method? Am not yet familiar with "closed-loop" but guess that's a euphanism for eventually (if we have to, I guess) putting impossibly contaminated fluids back into the ground, albeit at lower depths.
closed loop is what it sounds like into the ground and back out without an avenue for escape. But it does not always work and the fluids get spilled as the article relates at many other locatons in the process.
Basically fracking, closed loop or not, often poisons the water tables.
Which benifits multinationals who want to commodify water ( increases scarcity)
glenn I agree. The effects of the Alabama decision have allowed the new drilling technologies to proliferate in the absence of any reasonable and responsible assessment of the possible damage due to the wide area depletion of hydraulic pressure at depth.
I'm aware of the sentiment you express wrt the comingling of the interests of gas producers and water hustlers. Don't know about that except to note the good ol' boy game of oligarchical musical chairs within the boardrooms of our masters.
Also CBM developers state that as an added bonus extracting CBM will (and realistically should) make safer mining of those (previously) drilled seams. Another prop for the "beleaguered" coal mining industry.
I wish the Harrisburg Patriot-News would provide this kind of coverage. We in the Hbg area are on the edge of the Marcellus. There are no drillers here but there are some only a few miles north and west of here. None of the information in this article, and in others I've read regarding these issues, ever appears in the newspaper located in the PA State Capitol. I've sent them articles and they've responded with "thank you"'s but I never see any reporting on same. Why?
If you haven't already, google PennEnvironment.
Nothing in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette either - zilch. And we are right in the middle of this gas field. Very little even after all life in Dunkard Creek got killed. Then, the public water supplies coming from the Mon river became practically undrinkable due to extreme hardness and salinity. Still nothing except happy-toned reports that blamed the weather.
They don't call it tie "corporate media" for nothing.
methinks the reason there is nothing in the burgh paper is because one of the major players on the "play" fields (couldn't resist) is a major league big hitter . They seem to have an interest in professional winter sports.
This new natural gas source is so attractive because substitution for coal in electic generation would reduce CO2 emissions 40% or more per unit of power generated. Substitution for home heating oil has a smaller reduction, but also reduces oil imports. It isn't just a big business thing. Its a bridge to renewable GHG free sources.
Sounds like its time for some cease and desist orders or arrests as those pesky little fines are just part of the cost of doing business.
The US EPA is not allowed to regulate this drilling. That needs to be changed because state regs and enforcement are very inconsistent.