Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Plan Considered to Buy off Taliban
Al Jazeera has learnt that a plan is being considered to pay up to $500 million to Taliban fighters to persuade them to lay down their arms.
Karzai says there are thousands of moderate Taliban elements who could be reintegrated (EPA) In advance of an international conference in London to discuss
Afghanistan's future on Thursday, Japan, the US and Britain are said to
be leading the proposal.
The scheme would offer cash, jobs and other incentives to the Taliban and fighters in other armed groups.
"The sum could be as much as between $500 million and $1bn over the next five years", Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from London, said.
He said the money would be used to persuade individual Taliban fighters that they are better off on the government's side rather than fighting on the side of the Taliban.
Parts of the funds would be spent on projects to develop the fighters' villages and building roads to their communities, he said.
Poverty and tribal concerns
Quoting the Afghan finance minister, Bays said: "Many people are not actually fighting for the Taliban but alongside the Taliban because of poverty and other local concerns, because of tribal issues."
"They [those supporting reconciliation] are hoping they may be able to peel these people away from the Taliban while, at the same time, conducting talks on a much higher level with the leaderships of the Taliban and the Hezb-e-Islami."
Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, hopes to win Western support for reconciliation and reintegration of fighters at the London conference.
He has said there are "thousands and thousands and thousands" of moderate Taliban who needs to be reintegrated in the Afghan society.
Al Jazeera's David Chater, reporting from Kabul, said talks had also been held with the group Hezb-e-Islami, in the Maldives islands, on January 23-24.
"Gulbuddin Hekmatyar [the group's leader] sent his son and two son-in-laws to the meeting," he said.
"They [government representatives and Hezb-e-Islami] decided to go set up two delegations ... One will be headed by Hekmatyar's son and the other one will be headed by the deputy head of the peace and reconciliation commission. He will go and see President Karzai and Hekmatyar's son will go and see the Taliban." Our correspondent said a Taliban leader had been due to attend the meeting but dropped out in the last minute citing health reasons.
'No international support'
In an interview to Al Jazeera, Omar Zakhilwal, Afghanistan's finance minister, confirmed that talks had been held.
"There has been engagement", he told Al Jazeera.
"But because of the lack of international support for the president's initiatives, we couldn't take the next steps of promising them what they needed to hear from us: assurances, first and foremost, with the respect to their security, and second, that they will be treated just like any other Afghan or a politician."Separately, Habibullah Fawzi, the former Taliban ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said Karzai wants to negotiate with the Taliban, but has failed failed to do so because the Afghan government's views differ from those of the US and foreign forces.
"The Afghan government could have started a dialogue with Taliban if it had had a unified stance with the international community," he told Al Jazeera.
"However, they lost that opportunity, and instead of initiating talks, the government and foreign forces started to strike Taliban fighters in several areas and on the borders and take them to detention centres like Guantanamo and others.
"This has forced Taliban to wage war."
Sanctions list
In a move leading up to the London conference, the UN Security Council panel has removed five senior Taliban officials from its sanctions list.
A statement on Tuesday said the panel had "approved the deletion of the five entries" from its blacklist of individuals subjected to a travel ban, assets freeze and arms embargo.
Karzai had been pushing for Taliban names to be removed from the list and was planning to raise the issue at a conference on Afghanistan in London on Thursday.
A Western diplomat said those removed from the list were now believed to be "moderate Taliban officials" with whom Karzai could start a dialogue.
The five were all members of the ousted Taliban government.
Wakil Ahmed Muttawakil, the former Taliban foreign minister now taken off the list, called on the UN and the US to remove all the names on their blacklists.
"[Not only] the UN list, but the US blacklist should also be reconsidered, as the names are not specified and the number is unknown. We can say that the number of those wanted by the US is between 100 and 1000," Muttawakil said.
Other beneficiaries
The other four former Taliban ministers removed from the UN list are Faiz Mohammad Faizan, Shams-US-Safa, Mohammad Musa, and Abdul Hakim.
The UN blacklist was established under UN Security Council Resolution in 1999 for the purpose of overseeing implementation of sanctions imposed on Taliban-controlled Afghanistan for its support of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.
Under the resolution, UN member states are required to impose sanctions on any individual or entity associated with al-Qaeda, bin Laden and/or the Taliban.
The list contains about 500 names, including 142 linked to the Taliban.
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies


12 Comments so far
Show AllThat's why they pay our leaders the big bucks. Because they're so smart. Of course the Afghan patriots will put down their arms and stop fighting for their country if we give him a couple of dollars. I assume if the US was invaded, all the invaders would have to do is give us a few dollars and we would stop fighting for our country and be collaborators. Especially if they threw in a new road and some plumbing fixtures.
Well placed satire! This is the kind of thing that makes "military intelligence" the oxymoron that it is.
Well said Caleb. The Taliban are like any other gun-totin, old-time-religion, fiercely independent mountain men anywhere. Do you think OUR people would accept an eternal occupation by well armed, ignant furriners in return for a few bucks? They might take the bucks, but then... would it be safe to consider them "pacified"? They would immediately start talking behind the invaders backs, in languages the troops do not understand, about how to drive out the invaders.
OK, so give them some $500 million. That's just the amount of one Wall Street company's executive bonuses. It is less than we spend on one days's fighting in the middle east.
Still, we have got to get our soldiers and mercenaries out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Haiti, Phillipines etc. etc. etc. We need them here with their families and we need the money spent on these occupations to come back home as well. We are in trouble here, with state budgets, schools, jobs, health care, housing, infrastructure, green energy. We could better use the money and troops to re-build homes and industry in Haiti, Detroit and New Orleans, for example. That would be a new kind of policy move for us, one that would do more to stop terrorists than all the lucrative military and security contracts we now issue to friends of politicians.
Joe
How does this allow corporate america to eventually get this money into their pockets?
Sanctions against "individual or entity associated with bin Laden".
Does that include entities that supplied bin Laden with arms and intelligence like the CIA?
Even though I agree that any Pastun likely to be bought off has already been.
And also the Afghans can get any infrastucture they want from the Chinese or Indians without having to deal with barbarian cyborg overlords (USA military).
And thirdly beware Obomber's false moves to placate the restless USA public.
Despite all of the above this is an open consideration of Peace.
But it will be an empty zionist like gesture if removing all invaders and the Taliban having a reasonable amount of central power is not part of the Peace Agreement.
This may be another pre 2010 election ploy by Obomber as his Hands off SS and Medicare might be, due to reports of an 18 member commission on SS and Medicare cuts enforced by Presidential edict to be created post 2010 election.
Well, if the war addicted Empire decides to negotiate some peace, this may be a way to start.
You have to negotiate with the "enemy" and forms of incentive or bribery is an old tradition in politics the world over.
The way to win is to end the war ... getting out and helping fellow Americans deal with the costs of this war and the massive debt will be the hard part if history is a guide.
If this helps, talk to Osama too.... He wants a peace in Palestine like most of our "enemies".
It's money for war and nothing more... and most everybody knows this is nowhere.
Hey Almed, isn't this great that amerika is starting it's job's program right here in Iraq--now that's outsourcing Jameal eh? LOL(in Arabic)
In 2001 Osama bin Laden was not the Taliban's commander but its paymaster. If President Bush had understood this fact no invasion of Afghanistan would have been necessary had he negotiated to become the Taliban's paymaster.
Today, paying Taliban fighters has nothing to do with bettering the governance of that country but intends to reduce US casualties while continuing with the 'surge'.
"Al Jazeera has learnt that a plan is being considered to pay up to $500 million to Taliban fighters to persuade them to lay down their arms."
Why not, worked on the Democrats regarding health care.
Will the dollars we give them have any value? We may have to resort to something that has real value. The Roman Empire used salt, maybe beaver pelts, or beaded mocasins would work. Bullets would probably be the best medium of exchange.
naah - people have been exchanging bullets for ages and it has never brought peace anywhere.
This has about it the nasty odor of Ahmed Chalabi's dirty underware. Whaddaya bet Paul Wolfowitz is in for a taste as well?