EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Sustainability Expert Urges End to Habits of Consumption
One way to live a more sustainable existence is to stop tweeting and shut down your Facebook page.
John Ehrenfeld, an author and researcher who specializes in sustainability, believes that technology has resulted in some bad human habits. (AFP/File/Loic Venance) Such actions might sound extreme to the eco-conscious generation practically raised on cell phones and laptop computers. But John Ehrenfeld, an author and researcher who specializes in sustainability, believes that technology has resulted in some bad human habits.
To understand his thinking, consider how Dr. Ehrenfeld defines sustainability. He cautions against summing it up with buzzwords such as "greening" or "sustainable development." Sustainability is "radically different" from those, he said. It is "the possibility that all life will flourish on the planet forever."
To make that happen, individuals need to stop addictive consumption and realize that technology, while a positive in many ways, "is not a solution to every problem." Dr. Ehrenfeld was the featured speaker yesterday during a round-table discussion on whether "green chemistry" can play a significant role in a sustainable economy in the Pittsburgh region.
The event, held at the Alcoa Corporate Center on the North Side, was the first in a planned series of four to be held this year and organized by the Rachel Carson Homestead Association, Sustainable Pittsburgh, the Alcoa Technical Center and Carnegie Mellon University.
The series is sponsored by The Alcoa Foundation and Bayer Corp.
Dr. Ehrenfeld, of Lexington, Mass., is executive director of the International Society for Industrial Ecology and retired in 2000 as director of the MIT Program on Technology, Business, and Environment.
Among his varied experiences was serving as head of the New England River Basins Commission in 1978-81 under an appointment by President Jimmy Carter.
His book, "Sustainability by Design: A Subversive Strategy for Transforming Our Consumer Culture," was published in 2008.
"Facebook is my poster child for what's not a good idea," said the 78-year-old grandfather of nine. The online social network "debases the value of friendship" because it focuses on a user's quantity of friends instead of the quality of those connections.
He contends that a lifestyle characterized by less consumption and better core values, such as goodness and honesty, will advance sustainability by allowing individuals to step back and reflect more deeply about how their actions and business dealings connect them with each other and with the earth.
"The challenge - contrary to conventional wisdom - is to attain sustainability, not just manage it."
Retailing giant Wal-Mart, for instance, announced plans last year to create a sustainability index designed to inform customers how "green" its products are. But Dr. Ehrenfeld said the index wouldn't adequately educate customers about why certain products are greener than others and wouldn't necessarily change consumer behavior.
Among the companies he considers to be on the right track with marketing and branding sustainable products are Green Mountain Coffee and Nike.
The other speakers at yesterday's event included Terrence Collins, professor of chemistry at CMU and director of CMU's Institute of Green Science; Robert Bear, Alcoa's corporate environmental director; and Ned Eldridge, president of eLoop, a Pittsburgh firm that provides recycling and reuse for computers and other electronic devices.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

7 Comments so far
Show AllWhile I agree with Dr. Ehrenfeld's philosophy for the most part, I'm scratching my head as to why he has a problem with social networking, which has allowed me to reconnect with dozens of old friends I couldn't previously locate.
Regarding sustainability, I am able to connect online with many friends that I otherwise see only once or twice a year. Social networking allows me more frequent visits without having to expend energy resources.
Moreover, I think it's insulting to assume that intelligent people are incapable of benefiting from social networking technologies while also realizing they're not meant to completely substitute our need to connect in person.
I think he means it's impossible to have 400 friends. What if friend #257 needs you, but you're busy with all the others...
That's not friendship.
This seems to me yet another version of "blame the victim". At best it merely criticizes a symptom of our unsustainable society - Consumerism - and doesn't even pretend to address root causes.
I'd wager that his book totally avoids the question of money and monetary policy. But a currency is a social construct that can be well-designed or poorly designed. And how it's designed has profound consequences for the overall character of the society. Our current system, with a privately controlled central bank (The Fed) that controls both the nation's currency and its monetary policy, is blatantly extractive and not at all sustainable. By means of debt-based currency subject to interest it is an effective engine of extraction and concentration of wealth.
The fundamental question of course is who OPPOSES a system that, as Ehrenfeld suggests, would create "the possibility that all life will flourish on the planet forever." The answer is the members of the economic and political elite - the plutocrats, with central bankers at the top of that class.
The difficulty is not in designing an equitable and sustainable currency and monetary policy, for those ideas already exist. The problem is how to overcome the inertia of a plainly sociopathic economic status quo so we have an opportunity to implement a sustainable system; a system of economic democracy that respects and augments our ideals of political democracy.
This is a ridiculous article. The internet's the most powerful force to pull us out of darkness, prejudice and ignorance. Facebook included.
The more people you reach (on Facebook or any other internet social network), the better your chances to improve their lives and yours, the better your chances to find people with the same backgrounds and interests. How you use this powerful social tool is what's essential.
The number of friends you have shouldn't have anything to do with the quality of the friendships, or the potential for them.
THIS DEPENDS ON THE CONTEXT OF WHAT your definition of friend
is. to claim that you have "friends" even though you have
never met them is shallow and one of the things that the
powers that be have figured out to keep the populace
occupied while they steal the world while people are
busy looking at their shiny electronic devices. i
think that robert heinlein said this in the 50's.
"how many friends are in your pocket" to make a
play on bank one ad .
You're trivializing what I wrote, you can meet someone by chance online who can become a lifetime friend or lover.
You have to keep your options open and put technology to good use.