Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Drug Money Saved Banks in Global Crisis, Claims UN Advisor
Drugs and crime chief says $352bn in Criminal Proceeds was Effectively Laundered by Financial Institutions
Drugs money worth billions of dollars kept the financial system afloat at the height of the global crisis, the United Nations' drugs and crime tsar has told the Observer.
Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were "the only liquid investment capital" available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.
This will raise questions about crime's influence on the economic system at times of crisis. It will also prompt further examination of the banking sector as world leaders, including Barack Obama and Gordon Brown, call for new International Monetary Fund regulations. Speaking from his office in Vienna, Costa said evidence that illegal money was being absorbed into the financial system was first drawn to his attention by intelligence agencies and prosecutors around 18 months ago. "In many instances, the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor," he said.
Some of the evidence put before his office indicated that gang money was used to save some banks from collapse when lending seized up, he said.
"Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities... There were signs that some banks were rescued that way." Costa declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drugs money, saying that would be inappropriate because his office is supposed to address the problem, not apportion blame. But he said the money is now a part of the official system and had been effectively laundered.
"That was the moment [last year] when the system was basically paralysed because of the unwillingness of banks to lend money to one another. The progressive liquidisation to the system and the progressive improvement by some banks of their share values [has meant that] the problem [of illegal money] has become much less serious than it was," he said.
The IMF estimated that large US and European banks lost more than $1tn on toxic assets and from bad loans from January 2007 to September 2009 and more than 200 mortgage lenders went bankrupt. Many major institutions either failed, were acquired under duress, or were subject to government takeover.
Gangs are now believed to make most of their profits from the drugs trade and are estimated to be worth £352bn, the UN says. They have traditionally kept proceeds in cash or moved it offshore to hide it from the authorities. It is understood that evidence that drug money has flowed into banks came from officials in Britain, Switzerland, Italy and the US.
British bankers would want to see any evidence that Costa has to back his claims. A British Bankers' Association spokesman said: "We have not been party to any regulatory dialogue that would support a theory of this kind. There was clearly a lack of liquidity in the system and to a large degree this was filled by the intervention of central banks."



19 Comments so far
Show AllDrug prohibition obviously works, only as usual, not for us but the elite. With big money coming in from both high black market prices and the prison-treatment-industrial complex, who is left to lose but we the people? Anybody who believes that the War on Drugs is in place for the betterment of your health and safety needs to re-think their postion.
In a perverse manner, this makes sense. The illicit drug business is a lucrative cash business, that thanks to puritanical laws that are ostrich-like in the extreme, generates monies at profit margins that would win applause at MBA classes. It also points out it that not only are corporations & rich douche bags adept at using international banks to hide funds, but today's Pablo Escobar's.
This is yet another justification to create single international trade currency for the globe, removing country currency from hands of traders and international corporations.
Of course , international trade currency will become the dirtiest of all monies. It will have money from slave owners, drug pushers, polluters etc.
Capitalist don't care about cleanliness of money. Countries can have tax policies for this international currency based on their needs.
toophat for you!
Mike Ruppert and Catherine Austin Fitts have been writing about these matters for 10 years or so on fromthewilderness.org and solari.com respectively. Also Counterpunch has contributed much on this sort of analysis.
Olde Hippie Saying:
"POT WILL GET YOU THROUGH TIMES OF NO MONEY,
BETTER THAN MONEY WILL GET YOU THROUGH TIMES OF NO POT."
(LOL)
Another old hippie saying:
"A FRIEND WITH WEED IS A FRIEND INDEED!"
Yep, and the pot market is far from the most profitable. On a volume basis, it hardly pays, in comparison to coke and heroin, f.e. Hashish pays more than pot, but not comparitively as much as heroin and coke.
This confirms my suspicions that bankers, like brokers, are really well-heeled gangsters in disguise.
I'm not sure if this is entirely accurage usage but nevertheless perceive "safe haven" banks like in Switzerland and several other countries as related to white-collar gangsterism; for I don't see how making banks operate in this manner can be ethically justified. Given human nature being what it is, such banks will inherently aid and abet drug traffickers and other for-profit criminals, as well as the crime of tax evasion.
"A British Bankers' Association spokesman said: "We have not been party to any regulatory dialogue that would support a theory of this kind.""
That bafflegab is as good as an admission to me, since there is no denial of being in on it -they just haven't talked about it a "regulatory level".
It shows two things - firstly that there is worldwide demand for drugs and since they are illegal, people are willing to pay a criminal delivery surcharge. No surprise here.
Secondly that the criminal monetary system is more robust and stable than the city-slicker collateralised debt obligation polluted major bank variety.
That bankers and criminal cartels are not much different has long been known; what's new from this article is the weakness of the former and the robustness of the latter.
What strikes me about what the British Bankers' Association spokesman said is that it's several national intelligence agencies that provided the initial reports to the UN rep. to begin with, so why would or should we think that the British Bankers' Association spokesman would have better information or knowledge than the intell. agencies? I'd think the latter should be the more credible of the two.
And why would the intell. agencies have acted wrongly by giving the information to the UN rep. instead of to bankers? Doing the reverse from what was done would strike me as unethical.
Interesting.
Maybe if there wasn't organised crime there wouldn't have been such a huge crisis.
That's a considerably simplistic statement. Wars of aggression, covert wars and wars through proxy dictatorial regimes for natural resources, and plenty more, is due to high levels of organised crime by our political, military, and corporate "leaders". That the USA is a corporatocracy is organised crime. What John Perkins, former CIA station chief John Stockwell, former CIA agent Phil Agee, and many other people tell us and have been telling us for long enough already, as well as what former USMC Major General Smedley Butler wrote about with his book, "War is a Racket", and the corporatist plot to overthrow President FDR that Smedley Butler exposed and, before Congress, testified about, all of this is about organised crime at very high levels.
AND........"According even to an official UN report, opium production in Afghanistan has risen dramatically since the downfall of the Taliban in 2001. More land is now used for opium in Afghanistan, than for coca cultivation in Latin America. In 2007, 93% of the opiates on the world market originated in Afghanistan. This is no accident."
Well, I guess now that we're extending our troops and stay in Afghanistan, we can count on our Financial Institutions staying in business.
You can read the article here:
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Afghanistan/afghanistan.html
F. William Engdahl is one of the good producers of articles that include serious mention of the poppy and heroin production in Afghanistan. The Taliban, working with the UN, had eradicated 90% or more, and am pretty sure to recall that it's more, of poppy production, which the U.S. and NATO war there since Oct. 7, 2001, has quite completely reversed.
I'm waiting for the national deficit bailout from drug money...when gangs pay off our national debt I think I'll say "Thanks!"
This is exactly the situation that Mike Ruppert discovered when he was an LAPD detective fighting CIA supplied cocaine trading in that city. He had access to an early version of PROMIS software, which was developed specifically to trace narco-dollars going into L.A. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loans. (PROMIS software was later co-opted to become the basis for the wide spread monitoring software used by DHS, CSIS, and other governments around the world that tracks and records every single e-mail, text message and cell phone call.)
Without drug money flowing freely into banks around the world, often with open government knowledge, the world economy would collapse.
Every narco-dollar put into a bank is loaned out eight-fold as investments and loans. Where the hell did you think all that liquidity came from to float all the NINJA mortgages at 0% came from?
Here in Canada it is an open secret that Scotia Bank is awash in drug money being laundered from Columbia. ANd what do you think happens to all that evidentiary drug money the police seize? After it is entered as courts evidence and (maybe) used at trial, it goes to the police budget. And we haven't even touched on the number of police departments and police officers who 'supplement' their income by being bodyguards to drug dealers, or drug dealers themselves.
I KNEW IT.
Allegations about my bank financing drug deals in Latin America have been circulating for years. Now we can just be honest about it:
BIG BANKS = ORGANIZED CRIME
How long's it going to be until I'm forced to pay protection ("Identity Theft Insurance") huh? To protect me from my own bank who keeps my password huh? How long's it going to be before they start busting kneecaps for overdue credit-card payments?
It just keeps getting stranger and stranger the further we fall down this rabbit hole.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
We spend enough on the "war on drug" that we could just buy the drugs and dispose of them. It is a well funded racket.