Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bolivian President to Deepen Social Revolution
President Evo Morales seems set to push ahead with the implementation of a new constitution to place indigenous peoples at the heart of Bolivia's government and society after his victory in Sunday's presidential election.
VP Alvaro Garcia and President Morales have been in power since 2006. (AP Photo) A poor result for the opposition suggests an easier passage for social reforms and a lessening of demands for secession by departments traditionally opposed to Mr Morales, according to analysts.
Preliminary results say that Mr Morales, an Aymara Indian and Bolivia's first indigenous president, won at least 61% of the vote, easily defeating his conservative opponents.
That is a higher percentage than he won in 2005 when he was elected for his first mandate.
If his victory is confirmed, it would also be the first time in Bolivia since 1964 that an incumbent president has won a second term - an unusual event in a country often synonymous with military coups and political instability.
The key electoral battleground was for seats in the new Plurinational Legislative Assembly. In the previous Senate, the opposition had a small majority which allowed them to block new legislation.
Under the new constitution which was ratified in a referendum last year, the method of electing senators has changed.
Exit polls suggest that Mr Morales's party, the Movement to Socialism (MAS), has won at least 24 seats in the new 36-seat senate, which would give him a two-thirds majority.
However, it is unclear if the MAS has won enough seats in the new Chamber of Deputies to win a similar majority and ensure an easy passage for the 100-plus laws necessary to fully implement a new constitution.
Final official results will be known later this week.
Breakaway regions
The preliminary results suggest that the MAS has increased its vote in the wealthier eastern departments, where the opposition to President Morales has traditionally been based.
In the Santa Cruz department for example, exit polls suggest that Mr Morales' party increased its vote to 40% from 33% in 2005.
In Tarija, Beni and Pando, MAS also improved its vote significantly.
According to Oxford Analytica, a research organisation, the degree of support in these areas "means that the prospect of secession is ever more remote".
In 2007 and 2008 there was considerable speculation that Santa Cruz and other departments might break away from the highland, more indigenous, departments where support for Mr Morales is overwhelming.
John Crabtree of Oxford University says the improved performance of the MAS was due in part to the priority the party gave to Santa Cruz in its campaigning.
"Another element was the lessening of the climate of fear amongst the migrant population there," Mr Crabtree says. "It also helped MAS that the opposition was divided and had lacklustre candidates."
Likely changes
President Morales is expected to make the implementation of the new constitution his main legislative priority at the start of his second term.
Amongst the most important changes envisaged are:
* More indigenous rights and more indigenous participation in politics
* A reworking of the judiciary, whereby indigenous systems of justice will enjoy the same status as the official existing system; judges will be elected, and no longer appointed by congress
* Power decentralised into four levels of autonomy - departmental, regional, municipal and indigenous
The key to Mr Morales' success has been his appeal to the 65% of the population who define themselves as indigenous and who see him as "one of theirs".
They have also been the recipients of increased social spending boosted by high international prices for hydrocarbons, and more taxes on foreign oil and gas companies.
Cash payments have been made to poor families to encourage school attendance.
Extra pension payments have been to the elderly, and pre-natal and post-natal care bas been extended to mothers without health protection.
Two women in El Alto, Bolivia, 25 Nov
Morales has vowed to deepen reforms focused on Indian power
Some estimates suggest that the payments reached a quarter of Bolivia's 10 million people this year.
According to recent analysis by the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), government revenue has increased by almost 20% of GDP since 2004.
The Morales government has spent massively in recent months to counteract the effect of the global recession.
CEPR says that from a fiscal surplus of 5% of GDP in early 2008 (worth several billion dollars), recent government spending meant this became a fiscal deficit in 2009.
The Bolivian economy is set to grow this year by between 2.5% and 3.5%, one of the highest anywhere in the Americas.
The IMF's director of Western hemisphere countries, Nicolas Eyzaguirre, has praised the Morales government for what he called its "very responsible" macroeconomic policies.
More state intervention?
Morales supporters say that the greater state control of the oil and gas sectors helped to boost government income.
His critics say that state intervention may work well for redistributing income, but not for encouraging investment, technical and managerial expertise and the eradication of corruption.
Government ministers say they want to attract foreign investment into new areas like the development of Bolivia's large deposits of lithium and iron ore.
"We want partners, not patrons" is the oft-repeated slogan.
"One priority for the coming years is industrialisation," says Mr Crabtree, "by which the government means adding value to raw materials by processing them."
Analysts say one key test will be whether the queue of foreign companies interested in developing Bolivia's huge reserves of lithium will turn into a concrete deal between a private company and the state.
Lithium is seen as critical for developing a new generation of battery-driven cars.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


33 Comments so far
Show AllI am deeply heartened to see the success of Morales. I hope his social revolution takes off elsewhere in Latin America . . . and then spreads way north.
Watch for the usual demonization by the US government and media.
And most awesome, for never before in this hemisphere have
the European rich not had absolute power and control.
The greater the success of Morales, the more likely the USA will respond with a coup or the need to "fight terrorism and drug traffikers".
Part of the success of Morales can be placed on the peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan who are acting to drain the us Treasury with their resistance to the occupation.
Let us hope this spreads through the rest of Latin America .
EVO and others should watch THEIR backs. the CIA and NSA and other US covert warmakers are always active, u know....
take it from John Perkins, the former CIA "economic hitman" .
This isn't just a reply to -teddy- but several of the previous comments as well:
What the heck are you talking about?!?
Evo's SECOND election which FOLLOWS the new Constitution from the recent Constituent Assembly, which FOLLOWS similar gains in Venezuela and Ecuador and more modest (but equally important) gains in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Nicaragua and other South and "Central" American States, HARDLY "needs to spread" to other countries. It REPRESENTS a "spread" to Bolivia by the most recent wave of the Democratic Revolution that has risen to history-altering proportions in the Americas ALREADY.
The U.S. Empire has already attempted to thwart this new phase of the Revolution at its source in Caracas and failed miserably. Subsequent attempts to do so at other important structural focii in Ecuador, Bolivia and elsewhere have also been roundly defeated. The minor, unsustainable, and widely seen as illegitimate success in Honduras hardly makes up for the failures in such fundamental counter-Revolutionary tacts as disruption of economic, political, and military unity or insertion of a pro-Empire alternative structure (i.e. the weak and failing attempt to play Columbia as S. America's Israel).
Far from representing some new and unique example of Anti-Imperialist and socially just Revolution, the overwhelming re-election of Evo Morales and the increased representation by the MAS in the Bolivian Legislature represents a CONTINUATION. First of the great and centuries-old Democratic Revolution that began in the 18th Century (and birthed the U.S.A.), and second in the newest phase of that Revolution that could be seen to have begun in Venezuela in 1998.
It is like you are witnessing a 16-move chess gambit 14 succesful moves in (and two from Checkmate) and saying "My gosh! A new Gambit! He'd better watch out for the counter!".
In other words, your observations are apt, but quite severely untimely.
-matti.
actually -- MATTI -- we are on the same page as to the history of these things. I have mentioned at other times that these are but the continuation of people everywhere seeking their national destiny and benefiting from their own national resources - BEFORE or outside the meddling of the USA ...i often in fact use THAT word: MEDDLING -- to show that history has shown that plenty of countries would be better off - for a long time now, HAD THE USA not obsructed their independent progress and to peacefully coexist with their neighbors.
this has been the case throughout ASIA from where I come. I KNOW this from personal experience from the Philippines - whose dictator Marcos the USA supported while he EMPTIED the Philippines' coffers and sold out its resources to US multinational corporations. i HAVE seen the results.
so - you see - know EXACTLY what you are talking about.
what I am pointing out is , as you also noted : the CURRENT phase of that "continuation" or "picking up" where they left off in these countries before the USA turned South America into its "backyard" for over a century now, starting with that Monroe Doctrine, officially.
-
Chavez and Evo Morales are the backbone of the workers
revolution that has spread like wildfire throughout the
Americas since they took office.
And quite the reverse of capitalism, where those most intelligent
are allowed to enrich themselves upon the misery of the laboring
class.
For the Bavarian Revolution adheres to the high moral principle that
we are given a different level of intelligence as a test, to see if we
pass our excessive wealth down to those less fortunate where it belongs.
It's Bolivarian Revolution, not Bavarian--looks like you might have had a Munich beer hall putsch past life. LOL.
Morales for USA president!
And Chavez for Chairman of the Fed, O my how he is
nationalizing banks and jailing their presidents.
And some of those presidents are even chavistas.
Would never happen here, or in Mexico, or just about anywhere else.
Now this is the sort of globalization I can be enthusiastic about.
Adelante con Eco.
No entiendo. ¿Que es Eco?
Evo?
Error de dedo: Evo.
Wonderful.
South America is now the hope of the world.
The big question in Venezuela, however, is this. Will the economy be controlled by bureaucratic state socialism (or some would say state capitalism) or will workers gain democratic control of their own enterprises (real socialism)?
This battle is ongoing, and fortunately we can read about it as it unfolds in
www.venezuelanalysis.com
Many, but not all, ministers in Chavez's government are on the side of the bureaucracies. The "Bolivarian Revolution" was not started by workers, and only now is the union movement beginning to get itself together - in favor, mostly, of workers' control.
www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4989
We still don't know whether the workers of Venezuela will win (as in the Soviet Union they so obviously lost), but if they do it will shape all of Latin America and then the world.
Or real economic democracy will sprout up in other places in Latin America, Bolivia perhaps. The fact that Uncle Sam is preoccupied with other regions is probably a very good thing.
A good source on Bolivia is UpsideDownWorld.org
Read, for example: http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2243/1/
During his first four years in office Morales partially nationalized Bolivia’s vast gas reserves, ushered in a new constitution written in a constituent assembly, granted more rights to indigenous people and exerted more state-control over natural resources and the economy. Much of the wealth generated from new state-run industries has been directed to various social and development programs to benefit impoverished sectors of society.
For example, Inez Mamani receives a government stipend to help her care for her newborn baby. The funding is thanks to the state-run gas company. Mamani, who also has five other children, spoke with Annie Murphy of National Public Radio about the program. "With my other children, there wasn't a program like this. It was sad the way we raised them. Now they have milk, clothing, diapers, and it's great that the government helps us. Before, natural resources were privately owned and there wasn't this sort of support."
In addition to the support for mothers, the government also gives stipends to young students and the elderly; the stipends reached some 2 million people in 2009. "I'm a teacher and I see that the kids go to school with hope, because they get breakfast there and the subsidies ... I ask them how they spend the hand-outs and some of them say they buy shoes. Some didn't have shoes before," Irene Paz told Reuters after voting in El Alto.
Thanks to such far-reaching government programs and socialistic policies, Bolivia’s economic growth has been higher during the four years under Morales than at any other period during the last three decades, according to the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research.
You know what is so funny about these things that Evo Morales - described by even the IMF , the bastion of privatization and "free market - all the time" , as having had a "responsible macroeconomic" performance..which of course INCLUDES the welfare system he is trying to expand for people to benefit from their natural resources?
it is actually reminiscent of an already long-established system in scandinavian countries - particularly NORWAY which has LONG USED its nordic sea gas and oil extractions to be the very foundation of its social welfare system..which -- hardly gets the kind of criticism from the USA because it actually works SO WELL that americans can only gawk at - despite americans' rabid , obsessive fear of "socialism".....
which is exactly what Evo Morales is trying to achieve.
it's ironic, because without the INTERRUPTIONS and OBSTACLES placed BY capitalism and the so-called "free market"
just about EVERY nation on earth, left without being colonized or exploited THROUGH the capitalist global system , would LONG AGO easily have prospered using their particular national resources - so that their people will FORM their OWN destiny and LIVE with what resources they have - as mankind ALWAYS has done - from the deserts to swamps -
BUT STILL PROSPER without the interferences and meddling and exploitation of the GLOBAL CAPITALIST SYSTEM that serves the purposes of certain nations
"to gather as much of the world's resources unto ourselves at the expense of others" (General smedley butler, US Marine, 1933 -- on describing US policies).
what EVO is doing is simply:
trying to ensure that BOLIVIA's treasures benefit the Bolivians - and NOT just a FEW nor the ones that connive with foreigners to exploit Bolivia and leave the vast majority of Bolivians with NOTHING or LITTLE..
it is not merely NATURAL - but the moral thing . and a SUCCESSFUL thing.
Norway has shown it.
Bolivia is showing it.
and THAT"s the problem with it - as far as the USA and many other countries (even developing ones like china is tempted to do and should beware of continuing ) that want to exploit resource rich countries but poor like bolivia .
if countries and peoples treated each other with real respect as fellow human beings, in the same way that members of a family treat each other lovingly and with care - living in different regions with different resources or treasures that can prosper themselves but also have different needs that other countries can exchange fairly with -- the world would be vastly different...humane, peaceful, civilized and a civilization full of love and kindness and willingness to share and help each other....which should NOT be an impossibility.
Evo I setting a good example for social responsibility. This guy is making us look like a bunch of greedy counter productive, nazi's. Thank goodness we have the CIA to help us eliminate him.
Wow!
That's what, FIVE out of twenty, or fully 1/4 of the comments to this article cynically/scaredy-cattily predicting the "CIA" or some other U.S. Empire agency will soon be thwarting Morales and his compatriots in the S. American socialist/integrationalist phase of the Democratic Revolution.
None of these commentators seems to be asking themselves the obvious question:
Why would the Empire wait until things have gotten as far as they have -with Morales' re-election and the new-found MAS dominance of the Bolivian Legislature- to suddenly decide/be able to "eliminate him" or thwart the Movement he is a spokesman of?
Surely sometime BEFORE S. America became largely controlled by Movement sympathizers and Empire-haters would have been more appropriate?
Perhaps they are like the Federal Police in that Willie Nelson song, Poncho and Lefty?:
"All the Fede-rales say, they could've had him an-y day,
They on-ly let him go-, out of kind-ness I supp-ose-"
What is going on with these weird, blind to the history of the last decade, comments?
-matti.
Gosh Matti,
Have you forgotten that the US was the only country to recognize the coup against Chavez in 2002, which was only foiled by massive public support for the president? Have you forgotten about the attempt in 2003 to strangle the economy with a bosses strike in the oil industry? Have you forgotten about all the "democracy" money the US is still pouring into opposition groups in Venezuela?
Only the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have prevented the US from finding more resources for Latin American destabilization. Governments in smaller & poorer countries, like Honduras and Haiti, which had the audacity to raise the minimum wage - those can be removed. Only the US and a select few loyal allies recognize the so called election put on by the coup lords in Honduras. And Haiti? Just last week Aristede's "Lavalas" party was banned from taking part in the upcoming elections there. Did you notice a peep of complaint coming from the democracy loving State Department?
The US is no longer all powerful in the world, and fortunately for the world, it is becoming less so every day. But if I were Chavez or Morales, I would be very careful about who is in my local Secret Service.
What is going on with these weird, blind to the history of the last decade (and century), comments?
Matti - no one is saying the CIA or the Coup-habituated USA is going to SUCCEED ...what people are saying is that based on KNOWN history, and certainly former CIA John Perkins has attested to it as a matter of US policy , as almost a century ago General Smedley Butler, US marines has described US policy of upholding rightwing regimes friendly to the USA (with HIMSELF as "chief high-class muscle enforcer of the US Chamber of Commerce, and our supernationalistic Capitalism...I participated in a Dozen COUPS in south america") -- this is
NORMAL for the USA. it's how it operates.
as John Perkins described the steps of US Policy:
1) economic hitmen - go to undermine the country that is uncooperative , disguised in various ways: such as economic institutions pretending to help , or through the STate department
2) "if that fails...we resort to blackmail, covert operations, sanctions..fomenting instabilities against uncooperative governments"
3) "then if that fails, we resort to assassinations..that's what we did in nicaragua and panama and other places.."
4) "we tried that with saddam but his bodyguard was too strong...so "
5) "that's when we send in our army..".
Well said. And some of the most voluble mouthpieces for this corrupt empire can be found at Newsweek.
Evo Morales the man of the YEAR without a doubt some how i don't think Time magazine will agree
I agree. My hero.
I imagine the Honduran resistance is feeling some encouragement about now from the Bolivian elections. They probably have a long hard struggle ahead but there is reason for hope. More power to them.
Look out! The IMF "praised the Morales government for what he called its 'very responsible' macroeconomic policies"
They love it when countries get into debt. Morales needs to avoid the debt trap and go with a pay as you go plan.
We need an Evo Morales in our corruption filled USA in order to clean house.
what a great story- go Evo!
why can't we get leaders like that?
it just could be possible that the u.s. is so very bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan- and now Pakistan too that they can't stop the wonderful events going on down south.at least it is reasonable to hope for such a thing. youse guys talking about a cia action, their mo has always been to nip these things in the bud. the fact that they've allowed it to get this far seems to indicate that they are now helpless to stop it.
anyway let's just celebrate what Evo is doing, and wish him good luck. The people need a win!
Because 99.99999% of the folks in the US would crap themselves daily in public before voting an indigenous person into the presidency, that's why.
US out of the Americas!