Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
More Than 100 Killed in Baghdad Explosions
Iraq today suffered one of its worst days of violence this year as insurgents struck government buildings in Baghdad, killing at least 112 people and injuring up to 197.
The explosions underlined the precarious nature of security in Baghdad ahead of an auction of oilfield contracts at the weekend and with elections due in February. Iraqi and US military officials fear that insurgents will step up their attacks to weaken the authority of Nouri al-Maliki, the prime minister, ahead of elections that are meant to showcase Iraq's return to political stability. (Guardian image) The explosions happened within minutes of each other, with police saying there could have been as many as four or five. Insurgents, who included suicide bombers, detonated powerful explosives near the labour ministry building, a court complex near the Iraqi-protected Green Zone and the new site of the finance ministry after its previous building was destroyed in attacks in August.
An interior ministry official said at least 99 people were killed and 192 injured in those three assaults.
"We had entered a shop seconds before the blast, the ceiling caved in on us, and we lost consciousness. Then I heard screams and sirens all around," Mohammed Abdul Ridha, one of the 197 wounded in the blasts, told Reuters.
About an hour before those blasts, a suicide car bomber struck a police patrol in the mostly Sunni district of Dora in southern Baghdad, killing at least three police officers and one civilian, and injuring five people.
The explosions underlined the precarious nature of security in Baghdad ahead of an auction of oilfield contracts at the weekend and with elections due in February. Iraqi and US military officials fear that insurgents will step up their attacks to weaken the authority of Nouri al-Maliki, the prime minister, ahead of elections that are meant to showcase Iraq's return to political stability.
Although violence has declined sharply recently - the health ministry last month reported the lowest monthly death toll of civilians in six and a half years - insurgents continue to target Iraqi security forces and civilians.
Today's attacks are the deadliest in Baghdad since late October, when at least 155 people died in car bomb attacks outside municipal offices.
That attack, and a similar bombing in August, marked a change of tactics. Rather than frequent small-scale attacks against soft targets, such as markets or mosques, insurgent groups have recently carried out far more spectacular and lethal attacks against heavily defended government buildings.
Iraqi authorities blamed the October attacks on loyalists to Saddam Hussein's banned Ba'athist party, and paraded on national television three suspects who gave what officials termed confessions. But there are questions over whether Iraqi leaders are seeking to divert attention from a possible resurgence of Sunni insurgency led by al-Qaida in Iraq. A rise in violence could undermine the government's claims that it can provide security without the help of US troops.
On Sunday, Iraqi MPs approved plans to hold parliamentary elections early next year, seen as an important step towards political reconciliation and easing the withdrawal of US troops. The vote, during an emergency session, followed marathon talks to break an impasse over balloting provisions that would satisfy the country's rival groups.
In an attack yesterday, at least eight people died in an explosion outside a primary school in a Shia district of Baghdad yesterday. Six children, aged between six and 12, were among the dead.
- Posted in

3 Comments so far
Show AllIraq..Iraq...that name sounds familiar somehow....
Insurgents? What insurgents; the Iraqi Resistance, which is about resistance fighters and not insurgents? If they mean the IR, and I think they do, else they'd said Al Qaida, again, then has the IR claimed responsibility? If not, then why not; because they didn't commit this attack, maybe?
The U.S. and its puppet Iraqi government, and allied Iraqi police forces, could be lying about who really committed this attack; like they've lied about sucide car bombings, f.e., plenty of times during this war there. There've been "Operation Salvador" covert ops in Iraq many times before during this war and this could be another one. Many of the prior so-called suicide car bombings weren't suicide bombings; there weren't any bodies in some of the cars used. They had been parked with planted explosives and blew up with no one in them. And these are only some examples of attacks the U.S lied about; although it was so much a lie in these cases, for it could've only been stupid, ... military judgement. There were other "Op. Salvador" covert ops in Iraq though, and these were not committed by the IR, and, if Al Qaida in Iraq is really independent of the U.S., then it wasn't guilty of these or some of these attacks, either. "Op. Salvador" covert ops are committed by the occupation forces' command and their "soldiers", whether they are from U.S. troops, or others brought in for this dirty work. Two British SAS soldiers were caught in Basra; luckily, before they committed their bombings, etcetera, but no so lucky for a Basra police officer, who was shot and killed, or maybe not killed, by one of these SAS operators. And evidence was found for other examples involving checkpoint guards loading explosives into the cars or vehicles of innocent Iraqis made to stop and get themselves cleared at nearby police stations; during which time, guards planted the explosives.
If the IR was to commit attacks, then it would target occupation forces and command, and their puppet Iraqi government officials, so I suppose the present attack in Baghdad could possibly be by IR members. However, if they don't claim responsibility, then we apparently wouldn't have proof that they're responsible.
Just because constant liars, imperialists, ... say the IR did this act doesn't mean that the liars, ... are telling the truth. Maybe they are, but we apparently don't know that they are; certainly not only based on what some Iraqi puppet government police officer(s) said, and certainly not based on the mere words of constantly lying U.S. military commanders, anyway.
So, "who done it?".