Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Major Cities at Risk from Rising Sea Level Threat
Sea levels will rise by twice as much as previously predicted as a result of global warming, an important international study has concluded.
The predicted rise in sea levels would engulf island nations such as the Maldives in the Indian Ocean and Tuvalu in the Pacific, devastate coastal cities such as Calcutta and Dhaka and force London, New York and Shanghai to spend billions on flood defences (Mischa Keijser/Hollandse Hoogte/eyevine)
The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) calculated that if temperatures continued to increase at the present rate, by 2100 the sea level would rise by up to 1.4 metres - twice that predicted two years ago.
Such a rise in sea levels would engulf island nations such as the Maldives in the Indian Ocean and Tuvalu in the Pacific, devastate coastal cities such as Calcutta and Dhaka and force London, New York and Shanghai to spend billions on flood defences.
Even if the average global temperature increases by only 2C - the target set for next week's Copenhagen summit - sea levels could still rise by 50cm, double previous forecasts, according to the report.
SCAR, a partnership of 35 of the world's leading climate research institutions, made the prediction in the report Antarctic Climate Change and Climate. It far exceeds the 0.59 metre rise by the end of the century quoted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007. This was based on a "business as usual" approach by governments that allowed temperatures to rise by 4 degrees. It will underpin the negotiations in Copenhagen.
SCAR scientists said that the IPCC underestimated grossly how much the melting of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets would contribute to total sea-level rises.
One of the world's leading experts on climate science has called for the world to intensify efforts to control global warming by actively removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
In an interview with The Times, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, said that geo-engineering, where carbon is stripped from the atmosphere using specialist technologies, would be necessary to control runaway damage to the climate. "At some point we will have to cross over and start sucking some of those gases out of the atmosphere."
He added that world leaders meeting in Copenhagen should aim for a tighter target of no more than a 1.5C rise in global temperatures.
The IPCC report predicted that the melting of ice sheets would contribute about 20 per cent of the total rise in sea levels, with the majority coming from the melting of glaciers and the expansion of the water as it warms. It said that it was not able to predict the impact of melting ice sheets, but suggested this could add 10-20cm.
The SCAR report uses detailed climate observations over the past century linking temperature to sea levels to produce a more sophisticated estimate. It puts the likely contribution from ice sheets at more than 50 per cent.
The calculations were carried out by Stefan Rahmstorf, Professor of Physics of the Oceans at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Sceptics seized upon his figures as further evidence of the unreliability of climate change predictions.
"It's 50cm, 60cm, 100cm - 60m if you ask James Hansen from Nasa," said Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation . "The predictions come in thick and fast, but we take them all with a pinch of salt. We look out of the window and it's very cold, it doesn't seem to be warming. We're very concerned that 100-year policies are being made on the basis of these predictions"



20 Comments so far
Show AllWhat is the Global Warming Policy Foundation, and why is it directed by a man who doesn't know the difference between weather and climate?
We tend to assume that people in authority know what they are doing, but just imagine meeting GWB for the first time when you are interviewing people to be an administrator in a business you own.
Really, how likely would you be to trust his competence, initiative, intelligence? How about Clarence Thomas? Sarah Palin? Not bloody likely I would venture to guess.
Peiser is a dishonest (or demented, but I'd bet dishonest) social scientist, and the Foundation is his figleaf.
Global sea level rise is predicted to be 1.4m accoring to Benny's own website -
http://www.thegwpf.org/the-observatory/185-antarctic-may-cause-global-sea-level-rise.html
This is an odd story on a site that seems to mainly about cheering on all attempts at countering climate change.
See:
Profiles in Wanktankery: GWPF
Who is Benny Peiser? Sourcewatch knows. He’s a social anthropologist specialising in sport, and a fan of worrying about near-earth objects. He has published a total of three peer-reviewed papers, none of them on anything remotely relevant.
He also does things like this:
Originally published in the prestigious publication, Science, the Oreskes study looked at 928 research papers on climate change and found that 100% agreed with the scientific consensus.[1] Peiser originally stated in January 2005 that Oreskes was incorrect and that “in light of the data [Peiser] presented… Science should withdraw Oresekes’s study and its results in order to prevent any further damage to the integrity of science. On October 12, 2006, Peiser admitted that only one of the research papers he used in his study refuted the scientific consensus on climate change, and that study was NOT peer-reviewed and was published by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
How in the HELL do people like this get into Times articles?!!??
Building flood defenses against sea level rise is like pissing into the wind.
"by 2100 the sea level would rise by up to 1.4 metres."
Run! Run for the high ground! We only have 91 years to get 1.4m higher!...and it takes longer to get anaywhere when you are 150!
BTW Tuvalu isn't a nation..it is a sandbar with people living on it.
"Tuvalu (en-us-Tuvalu.ogg /tuːˈvɑːluː/ (help·info) or /ˈtuːvəluː/), formerly known as the Ellice Islands, is a Polynesian island nation located in the Pacific Ocean, midway between Hawaii and Australia. Its nearest neighbours are Kiribati, Samoa and Fiji. It comprises four reef islands and five true atolls. Its population of 11,992 makes it the third-least-populated sovereign state in the world.
In 1974, the Ellice Islanders voted for separate British dependency status as Tuvalu, separating from the Gilbert Islands which became Kiribati upon independence. Tuvalu became fully independent within the Commonwealth in 1978." (wikipedia)
You still have a lot to learn just dont expect others to educate you, you ought to do that yourself kid.
Perhaps the knowledge that just a few inches of msl (mean sea level) rise can in some parts of the world translate into ten feet of storm surge with the confluence of high astrological tide and low pressure system (typhoon, hurricane) might instruct us. Not many coastal communities around the world can survive a ten foot storm surge water level. Just ask the millions of homeless in Burma (Myanmar) or the people who lost their homes to Katrina and Wilma. These people are not "living on sandbars" they got flooded many miles inland.
We are now eight inches higher MSL (mean sea level) than we were 100 years ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_sea_level
And the melt rate on Greenland is NOT linear. It is exponential. These conservative estimates of twenty inches rise in 100 years do not even factor in this important fact.
We can use real science in peer-reviewed articles or we can be nimrods and stick our finger out the window. But saying that it seems colder because that's what you wish for, is not science. It's superstition and ignorance, which is very common among people who are glued to the boob tube watching "the Ministry of Truth" on channel 1984.
I'm calling for a ban on TV. It's nothing but corporate misinformation imho.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
The inevitable variations in estimates, that different scientists come up with regarding regarding rising sea levels, are seized upon by corporate polluters to dismiss all demands for ending their profitable but polluting industries.
In 100 years the descendents of these gangster capitalists will invest their pollution profits in a whole new industry, making billions more profit, building the dikes to hold back the rising sea.
Ain't capitalism wonderful!
To end global warming, to end the wars for profit, to end corporate destruction of health care, to end privatization of government and the commonwealth, for the survival of humanity, run-amok, gangster capitalism must end.
For an anti-capitalist, socialist perspective, read daily the World Socialist Web Site: http://www.wsws.org
Well, if the author is correct, there will be enough time to just watch it rise and get out of the way, what would be devastating would be greenland and/or antarctica ice sheets to crash into the ocean, now that would surprise a lot of people but it isn't something that hasn't happened before.
You may be referring to small pieces breaking of around the edges, but the whole ice sheet in Antarctica or Greenland has not slid into the ocean. I doubt that could happen all at once.
it probably won't fall in all at once; however it could fall in/melt over a decade. that would cause a 6.5m (21 ft) rise according to the USGS.
http://www.smith.edu/libraries/research/class/idp108USGS_99.pdf
It probably couldn't slide in at all because the weight of it has so depressed Greenland's landmass that the ice sheet is more or less sitting in a self-made cup. If it melted tomorrow, it's thought that Greenland would look like a caldera (cf. Santorini) until the center decompressed.
Once the earth's crust is depressed by an ice sheet that heavy it takes time for it to recover. The great lakes are sitting in a big bowl created by the last ice age.
I'm sure the young women in Afghanistan having two-headed and one-eyed babies born dead are not terribly concerned with what the ocean will be doing in the year 2100...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...acoustic, agrarian living...everywhere...
Jeevee
We recommend reading the reports of the Worldwatch Insitute,
headed by the eminent ecologist Lester Brown.
Link to Berkley Labs on their attempt to model what will happen:
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2008/09/17/impacts-on-the-threshold-of-abrupt-climate-changes/
And another possibility from the climate change department about the scablands in Washington state:
http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/projects/geoweb/participants/dutch/vtrips/Scablands0.HTM
And what caused the scablands:
http://www.glaciallakemissoula.org/
and one more glacial lake:
https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/NDNotes/Agassiz/Lake%20Agassiz.asp
Of course, to get lakes of these magnitudes we would have to go through a glacial period to set the ice up for the interglacial melts.
And this from no less than msnbc today.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34242705/ns/technology_and_science-science/