Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Russia, US Likely to Miss Deadline on Arms Pact
MINSK/WASHINGTON - The United States and Russia are unlikely to finish a pact to cut Cold War arsenals of nuclear weapons by a December 5 deadline but still aim to close the deal by year-end, Russian and U.S. sources said Friday.
A Russian Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile drives through Red Square during Victory Day parade in Moscow in May 2009. After the cuts -- which have to be made within seven years of a new treaty taking effect -- the United States and Russia will still have enough firepower to destroy the world several times over. (AFP/File/Dmitry Kostyukov) Diplomats from the two biggest nuclear powers have been trying to prepare a new agreement on cutting atomic weapons before the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty expires.
The new accord will be signed "in a European country" in December, a Kremlin source told Reuters in Minsk, where President Dmitry Medvedev was meeting regional leaders.
"We may not be able to do it by December 5," said the Kremlin source, when asked about when the presidents would sign the deal. The source did not give a reason for the delay.
A U.S. official said the December 5 deadline was ambitious and outstanding disagreements between the two sides made it less likely that a deal would be reached on time.
"There are still unresolved issues that will require further ... discussion and both sides need to move to make it happen by the fifth in a very dramatic way," he said.
U.S. Presidents Barack Obama and Medvedev are both due to make visits in Europe in the next few weeks and diplomats say the two sides are trying to agree a time when the leaders can meet to sign a deal if it is finished in the coming weeks.
When asked when the signing would take place, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov refused to give a date, saying the deal "will be signed in accordance with the orders of the presidents based on the timeframes set by them."
The U.S. official said if the deadline passed, a temporary pact could be used as a bridge.
"Both the negotiating teams recognize that first and foremost they need to keep working to try to finalize a deal that is comprehensive, however, should time run out, efforts shall be made to provide for a bridging agreement," he said.
Obama and Medvedev said in a joint statement on April 1 that they intended to find a replacement for the deal by the time START-1 expired, a step the Kremlin and White House say will "reset" relations after the friction of recent years.
A White House spokesman said Obama's national security adviser Jim Jones discussed the treaty with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Prikhodko, in Washington Wednesday.
"As Presidents Obama and Medvedev reaffirmed in Singapore, both are committed to trying to get a post-START agreement concluded by the end of the year," said Mike Hammer, spokesman for the White House National Security Council.
Obama and Medvedev met in Singapore during the U.S. president's trip to Asia this month.
NUCLEAR ARMS DEAL
Roland Timerbayev, a former Soviet ambassador and nuclear arms negotiator, said it was too early to draw any conclusions about the significance of missing the December 5 deadline.
"This treaty is a great move ahead and will improve relations between the United States and Russia," he said.
Hopes of a deal to replace START-1, which was signed just months before the Soviet Union broke up, rose in September when Obama said the United States would roll back a plan to deploy a European missile shield that Moscow had bitterly opposed.
Russia has so far refused to support U.S. calls for the threat of sanctions against Iran, but diplomats say that cooperation between the two former Cold War foes on Iran is good, setting the tone for a START deal.
Negotiators in Geneva have been battling a variety of complex technical questions to thrash out an agreement.
"The delegations of Russia and the United States are working incessantly but not looking at the time," Russia's Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
"The timeframe for signing new agreement is important but does not define the negotiating process; rather, (it is defined) by the striving of the leaders of Russia and the United States to agree a full, properly working bilateral agreement," it said.
Obama and Medvedev agreed in July to cut the number of deployed nuclear weapons by around a third from current levels to 1,500-1,675 each.
After the cuts -- which have to be made within seven years of a new treaty taking effect -- the United States and Russia will still have enough firepower to destroy the world several times over.
(Additional reporting by Conor Sweeney in Moscow; writing by Guy Faulconbridge; editing by Charles Dick and Mohammad Zargham)
- Posted in

4 Comments so far
Show All"the United States and Russia will still have enough firepower to destroy the world several times over."
once isn't enough?
The Freedom Agenda On The Take ePie November 28th, 2009
The freedom agenda
or ‘war is peace’
painted at the warrior temple
on the mount of sleaze
to appease the masters of ease
Truth dressed up to please
infotainment
lonely
truth attains...
{without the change
without the cheese
without the cacophony of digited clicks
performing for the Doomsday tics
and beauty chicks
like suited gentry on the take
for everybody is on the make}
....quid pro quo refrains.
A big apple without a core
A falling angel that don’t soar.
As infotainment lonely truth attains
‘quid pro quo’ refrains
so...
Pray for war
at the warrior temple
for ‘war is peace’
but most of all...
“Oh please”
don’t give up on ease.
Sometimes I get exhausted from reading articles when the parties involved provide their rationales for why this is going to be this way or why that is going to be that way, but what they are so "rationally" discussing are matters of INSANITY ... and that's just about everything discussed now by the world's "leadership," especially in the U.S., Israel, Great Britain, Russia, ...
And by the way between 1980 and 1984, it was estimated that the nuclear capabilities of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. were even more potent than being able to totally obliterate all life on earth 50 times over. I don't imagine it's less than that number now; likely more.
Despite the grown-up look, the grown-up voices, we are still talking 2-year olds stuck in a groove of bad guys and good guys, and I can beat you up better than you can beat me up, and the mentalities of a good portion of the "subjects" of the "civilized" world countries are at that level too, and it's always about getting the other guy's stuff or positioning one's self better to get the other guy's stuff.
I am so tired of the unimaginative, immature stupidity in what passes for thinking.
Hey, Fellas, we've got one earth to live on. When it is destroyed, so will we be destroyed. Get it? Get it, please.
Find a new way of thinking. You can't eat, breathe or drink money and power!!!
World Peace is a great concept. Why not work as hard on that as you do on WAR PLANS, new weapons, and HOW TO GET MORE THAN THE OTHER GUY?
/cm
Hey, the earth will 'end' sooner or later so what's the diff if it is sooner because what the fantastic asshole idiots have done to the life and face of earth is just another deep cut that will hasten the end of the 'good times' the earth has provided but now, whether anyone likes it or not, the end of the current ice age is in process and the next glacial period will begin soon, in geological time, so that in probably 2000 years or so, life will really begin to be a chore to deal with for those left.
But after the 'georgia' incident last year or whenever, I would imagine that russia is keeping a close eye on the u.s. as is china, india, japan and the other developed countries, oh and I dare not leave out south america especially since there is a sensitivity about allowing the u.s. to dictate milton turdmouth friedman economics in those s.a countries.