Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Global Poll: Widespread Dissatisfaction with Free-Market Capitalism
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a new BBC poll has found widespread dissatisfaction with free-market capitalism.
In the global poll for the BBC World Service, only 11% of those questioned across 27 countries said that it was working well.
Most thought regulation and reform of the capitalist system were necessary.
There were also sharp divisions around the world on whether the end of the Soviet Union was a good thing.
Economic regulation
In 1989, as the Berlin Wall fell, it was a victory for ordinary people across Eastern and Central Europe.
It also looked at the time like a crushing victory for free-market capitalism.
Twenty years on, this new global poll suggests confidence in free markets has taken heavy blows from the past 12 months of financial and economic crisis.
More than 29,000 people in 27 countries were questioned. In only two countries, the United States and Pakistan, did more than one in five people feel that capitalism works well as it stands.
Almost a quarter - 23% of those who responded - feel it is fatally flawed. That is the view of 43% in France, 38% in Mexico and 35% in Brazil.
And there is very strong support around the world for governments to distribute wealth more evenly. That is backed by majorities in 22 of the 27 countries.
If there is one issue where a global consensus seems to emerge from the survey it is this: there are majorities almost everywhere wanting government to be more active in regulating business.
It is only in Turkey that a majority want less government regulation.
Opinion about the disintegration of the Soviet Union is sharply divided.
Europeans overwhelmingly say it was a good thing: 79% in Germany, 76% in Britain and 74% in France feel that way.
But outside the developed West it is a different picture. Almost seven in 10 Egyptians say the end of the Soviet Union was a bad thing and views are sharply divided in India, Kenya and Indonesia.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

66 Comments so far
Show Allyou're welcome , Jennifer. I'll keep trying to find relevant news that might help us get better informed.
Capitalism would work fine if it weren't for greed and corruption.
That's where the problem basically starts. When Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations he envisioned an idealized world of private entrepreneurs striking out for freedom from the aristocracy, something Europe had never really known before. In that world self interest wasn't greedy or corrupt. It was liberal in a most charming Enlightenment way. And Smith was among the first to voice those new advantages.
But then Marx came along, and pointed out all of Capitalism's failings. No small matter, considering how much the working man suffered in the industrialized world. This was a mere half century after Smith.
But the struggle between capital and labor is founded upon these ancient issues. In the US capital has won, in more ways than one. It has even co-opted the loyalty of millions of working men. Many believe in laissez faire even if it is to their own disadvantage because they believe in the capitalist myths. Listen to the resonant arguments against universal healthcare today: that it will lead to a loss of individual freedom.
A guarantee of good healthcare, tax supported, is a loss of individual freedom? Only in America.
Well, to make an extremely long story instantly short, government regulation protects consumers, workers, the environment, minorities, many good things. Those who would like to exploit such resources - labor, natural resources, etc. - cry out their freedom is abridged by tyrannical government whenever they are blocked.
It is truly sad that capital has won the propaganda war here in the US. Capitalism has its attractive aspects. But unchecked it is a monster.
THANK YOU, QUINTY , for your very thoughtful , and calm way of explaining .
Free-market capitalism? How can people be dissatisfied with something they have never seen or taken part in? We have not had free-market capitalism in any of our lifetimes. We have corporatism aka fascism as our government/economic system. Mussolini, the father of fascism, said that it should be called corporatism because all fascism is is a merger of government and corporate power. Now with all of our elected officials on the payroll of corporate America, doesn't that sound to you like what we have? Stop ripping free-market capitalism until we've actually tried it.
Can liberals and progressives ever beat conservatives at their own rigged game?
CAPITALISM at the TIPPING POINT
As Jean Jacques Rousseau said in his "Social Contract" in 1762, a social system can become so corrupt that it cannot be changed without a great catastrophe. That is what has happened to American capitalism.
This process can be understood as a series of positive feedback loops leading to a tipping point. Climate change and capitalism evolve in a similar way.
In the case of climate change the feedback loops are fairly well understood.
1) As arctic sea ice melts back, more sunlight is absorbed into the dark ocean rather than reflected into space by white ice, and the warmer ocean causes more ice to melt, absobing still more heat. A positive feedback loop.
2) As arctic tundra melts, underlying organic material releases CO2 and methane (23 times as potent as CO2) causing more tundra to melt. Positive feedback.
3) Rising temperatures encourage beetles which are killing millions of acres of sub-arctic forests, which then rot and release more warming CO2.
When the loops have gone on long enough a tipping point is reached so that NOTHING CAN BE DONE to stop them. Within 10 years, say most climate scientists.
Within capitalism, the elements of the feedback loop are unequal wealth, power and public opinion. As the rich get richer they use their wealth to buy more power, both in government and in the mass media. More power allows them to rewrite the laws and control the executive which gives them more wealth, which in turn allows them to buy more power. A spiral of wealth to power and power to wealth becomes unstoppable, especially as the organized power of the poor simultaneously declines (think unions and independent media).
The positive feedback is systemic. Thus Obama, regardless of what his intentions may have been, cannot "reform" the banking system without enriching and concentrating the banks, and cannot "reform" the health system without a huge windfall to the insurance companies.
Eventually, mass impoverishment leads to greater and greater debt crises and the system begins to unravel. And since human beings have more consciousness than polar bears, more and more of us conclude that capitalism, "is fatally flawed and a different economic system is need," and that it CANNOT be "addressed through regulation and reform."
At the point of breakdown, however, consciousness of a flawed system will not be enough to lead us into a better one. The only way to escape the "man on horseback," of the right or of the so-called "left," is to build up our habits of co-operation and solidarity. The storm is coming. Feedback loops lead to a tipping point. We have to start to prepare, NOW.
VERY WELL-STATED LAURENCEofBERK.
despite the incomparably more advanced Fascism , institutional population control of capitalism, especially in the USA , it is still like with Monarchical France...where the rich , the nobility , kept taxing the people to support the rich lifestyles..and eventually - the people had enough , confronted even the immediate reality of their OWN bloody death , imprisonments, torture, etc...simply used their MASS and overcame the wealthy no matter how much the wealth surrounded themselves with their armies. the cumulative MASS of the people, like in physics simply followed the laws of nature.
if for example - the US ARMY itself was to be coerced - as with other repressive regimes - such as in south america - to do the bidding of the rich and powerful...not just to continue to protect them and "maintain order" - but through the VERY ACT of "maintaining order" against accumulating and rising discontent that pushes the MASS of people to do the "unthinkable" --
revolt and actually do what even Thomas Jefferson actually ENCOURAGED "every now and then - when governance has become untenable - the people shall shed blood of the nobility" or something like that --
exactly what is the US armed forces in all their manifestations...NSA , CIA, FBI, POLICE, NATIONAL GUARD, ARMY, PRIVATE MERCENARIES....
going to do against the MASS of people? they are going to BOMB americans? use tens of thousands of what? snipers? surround 100,000 people EACH in 50 cities and more in 100 - 200- 300 towns, 1,000 villages?
as each attempt to "crowd control" what the government and their corporate backers will TRY to paint as "terrorists"....
become fodder for MORE americans elsewhere seeing they are INDEED the victims of their own leaders and corporatocracy that is then become so desperate to hang on to power it uses brutalities OPENLY ?...
and that this spreads throughout the land ...town after town, city after city,?
exactly how MANY CONSCRIPTS can the corporatocracy and its "government sanctioned" violence monopolists get to "put down the terrorism?"
which would in reality be a REBELLION?
they'd be LUCKY if they survive the wrath of the american people if americans actually did that - beyond a mere week before it's over and these corporatist Fascists can't even PEEP out of the windows of their mansions - with their grand army spread out everywhere trying to tamp down a rebellion everywhere UNABLE to protect all of them...
until the armyt ITSELF is rendered useless...considering that a great number of the FAMILIES of army and "armed forces" institutions WILL likely have become PART of the rebellion.
if one has to describe potentials like that - this is certainly one of them. it is frightening because of the blood that WILL be shed ...which is so unnecessary.
but people - in their masses - are capable of that - if they are pushed so far against the wall and they increasingly see that THEY could be the next victim of their own oppressive leaders..which in the USA - is comprised of the triumvirate of
CORPORATIONS - THE US ARMED FORCES , both "public by name only" and Private mercenaries - and of course the "law making bodies" all the way from the presidency , through the congress , to the judiciary and the local levels...depending on WHICH SIDE they stand on -IF or ONCE the american people have had ENOUGH .
They'll still crash the world just to think they still can increase the profits to minimize the costs, and we still can't get them put in jail because in fair( and I mean legislatures, courts and 'officials' that aren't bribed) capitalism there are regulations, oversight and repercussions that are suppose to stop just exactly what is happening now, greed running rampant.
How can anyone possibly believe there is or ever has been a free market? Corporations exist to maximize profits. Corporations buy legislation to ensure regulation that will benefit themselves at the expense of others in that market. Competition is not conducive to profit hence the monopolization of the market place. That was the reason the antitrust and racketeering laws were established. Free markets and corporations are the exact opposits. Reagan set in place breakers to cease trading when the market collapsed. How can that be called free? The plunge protection team was established at the same time to manipulate the market when collapse was inherent. How can that be called free? When finance collapsed the taxpayers bailed out the capitalist-no strings attached. how can that be free? The fact that markets require regulation to keep from collapsing proves they aren't free. The whole idea of free markets is pure mythology. There has never been one and there will never be one.
And this is the point that illustrates the working mechanism of the vertical and horizontal economic integrations that allows the few 'owners' to keep the few making the bucks and almost makes small business ventures a very nasty joke on reality and all the while maintaining the facade of a free market that is really a non-regulated economics that prevents more people from going far in their attempt at having their own business or the world for that matter where countries are not allowed to develop their on natural resources.
Capitalism needs democracy to keep it in check, but capitalism has corrupted democracy through legalized bribery. Buying Congress is likely the world’s best investment, paying off at 1000 to 1, according to several sources, including Jack Abramoff, in the 3rd paragraph of http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/30/AR2005043000783.html
We should let citizens legislate in parallel with Congress, as the Swiss have since 1848 via NATIONAL ballot initiatives. Sen. Gravel has the best plan for here: http://Vote.org
Ballot initiatives are the origin of most reforms, such as women's suffrage (passed in 13 states before Congress went along), direct election of Senators (4 states), publicly financed elections (passed by initiative in 6 of 7 states with them), medical marijuana ( in 10 of 13 states) and increasing minimum wages (in all 6 states that tried in 2006). See http://Vote.org/initiatives for more examples and references. The media have seized on the problem initiatives. They generally kiss up to politicians.
You can discuss governments all day and night. The problem with the u.s. is in the composite spirit. The Sioux Nation was the best for individual freedom and the purest type of socialism without words on paper, jails, or standing armies. The cream rose in respect through deeds. People were revered for generosity/sacrifice to others, the polar opposite of the perverted hierarchal capitalist americans where it matters not how the wealth is attained and the leaders are scraped from the bottom of the barrel.
Really, if you want to learn about a system based on individual freedom get "The Sioux" by Royal B. Hassrick.
"Free market capitalism" is a contradiction in terms, because the free market relies on unrestricted trade between all countries. If one World currency existed, and there was a universal code of rights for workers everywhere, then a better system may be possible. As it is, the rich nations of the World, simply protect their financial institutions, whilst ignoring the fact that their industrial bases are suffering, or in the case of the UK, have vanished completely. Capitalism allows the rich elite to travel the globe in search of cheap labour, whilst ignoring the plight of the worker at home. Because of the advances in technology, the processes involved in manufacturing, have seen vast cuts in labour resources.
As long as there are humans on this planet, there will always be that most undesirable character trait - greed.
Capitalism by its very nature is fuelled by greed, a desire to beat the competition at all costs, irrespective of the damage caused to economies or people.
Even now, our leader, Gordon Brown, does not want to step in to regulate the financial sector, insisting that a loose grip on the reins is vital for it to function efficiently. We are also being told, that consumers must spend again, and presumably use credit to obtain goods, all this to get the great juggernaut Capitalism on the move again.
Kaboom.
Proponents of free market capitalism do not understand the irrationality of greed. Wall Street talks of recovery while Main Street experiences growing unemployment, loss of homes and Hoovervilles.