Healthcare Bill Faces Tough Path in Senate
WASHINGTON - After a landmark win in the House of Representatives, President Barack Obama's push for healthcare reform faces a difficult path in the Senate amid divisions in his own Democratic Party on how to proceed.
On a 220-215 vote, including the support of one Republican and
opposition from 39 Democrats, the House backed a bill late on Saturday
that would expand coverage to nearly all Americans and bar insurance
practices such as refusing to cover people with pre-existing medical
conditions.
The battle now shifts to the Senate, where work on Obama's top domestic priority has been stalled for weeks as Democratic leader Harry Reid searches for an approach that can win the 60 votes he needs to overcome Republican procedural hurdles.
"Take this baton and bring this effort to the finish line," Obama urged senators on Sunday in an appearance at the White House, saying passage of healthcare reform would represent "their finest moment in public service."
Democrats have no margin for error -- they control exactly 60 seats in the 100-member Senate. Some moderate Democrats have rebelled at Reid's plan to include a new government-run insurance program, known as the "public option," in the bill.
Senator Joe Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, renewed his promise on Sunday to help Republicans block a final vote if the bill contains the government-run insurance option backed by Senate liberals.
"If the public option plan is in there, as a matter of conscience, I will not allow this bill to come to a final vote," Lieberman said on "Fox News Sunday."
Republicans and some moderate Democrats have balked at the House bill's $1 trillion price tag, new taxes on the wealthy and what they call a heavy-handed government intrusion in the private sector.
The overhaul would lead to the biggest changes in the $2.5 trillion healthcare system -- which accounts for one-sixth of the U.S. economy -- since the 1965 creation of the Medicare government health insurance program for the elderly.
DIFFERENT APPROACHES
The House bill includes a different version of the public option than the Senate. Senate Democrats also may not adopt the House bill's requirement that all but the smallest employers offer coverage to their workers and its new tax on the wealthiest Americans to pay for the reforms.
Eventually, the House and Senate would have to reconcile their differences and agree on one bill to be passed again and sent to Obama for his signature.
"The House bill is dead on arrival in the Senate," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on CBS's "Face the Nation," calling it "a bill written by liberals for liberals."
The House bill would set up exchanges where people could choose to purchase private insurance or a government-run option bitterly opposed by the insurance industry. It also would offer subsidies to help low-income Americans buy insurance.
Congressional budget analysts say it would extend coverage to 36 million uninsured people living in the United States, covering about 96 percent of the population, and would reduce the budget deficit by about $100 billion over 10 years.
The House vote was a vital victory for Obama, who staked much of his political capital on the healthcare battle. A loss in the House could have ended the fight, impaired the rest of his legislative agenda and left Democrats vulnerable to big losses in next year's congressional elections.
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican vice presidential candidate in 2008 and a leader of conservative grass-roots opposition to Obama's agenda, promised retribution in those elections against healthcare reform advocates.
"It's on to the Senate now. Our legislators can listen now, or they can hear us in 2010. It's their choice," Palin said on her Facebook page, promising: "We will make our voices heard."
Reid has been awaiting cost estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office before unveiling a Senate bill, and has indicated Obama's goal of signing a bill by Christmas could slip to 2010.
Reid said he hoped to receive those cost estimates in the coming days, and that he planned to bring a final bill to the Senate floor for consideration "as soon as possible.
(Editing by Will Dunham)
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
14 Comments so far
Show AllAnd if they had any common sense, heart and dignity, they wouldn't pass it! That bill is a disgrace and just an open hand clawing into the pockets of the poor of this country. Kill the bill!
"It's on to the Senate now. Our legislators can listen now, or they can hear us in 2010. It's their choice," Palin said on her Facebook page, promising: "We will make our voices heard."
Sarah Palin's FACEBOOK????
WHY IS REUTERS REPORTING ON WHAT IS ON PALIN'S FACEBOOK ACCOUNT LIKE IT IS NEWSWORTHY???
HEY REUTERS..WHAT IS THE LATEST POSITION OF KIM KARDASIAN??
(BESIDES DOGGIE?)
WHAT A SAD EXCUSE FOR A NEW ORGANIZATION.
$700 billion approved in less than 2 weeks for the financiers.
A trillion for health care over 10 years. What's the debate??
"A bill written by liberals for liberals..... dead on arrival in the Senate" declares the smarmy, supposedly moderate GOP Senator from South Carolina Lindsey Graham.
I guess Dennis Kuchinich (who voted against the House health insurance reform bill) does not qualify as a liberal. I guess NOW and Planned Parenthood (who harshly assail the bill's impact upon womens' reproductive rights) no longer represent liberal constituencies.
No use of the government's bargaining leverage when negotiating drug prices with big pharma. No Medicare for All. No government administrated public health insurance option. No hint that this is a transition step towards having a genuine, single payer national health care system.
Instead, we get a government mandate for everybody to pay premiums into the existing employment-linked, private for-profit health insurance monopoly, with some murky form of tax dollar subsidies promised to help the neediest Americans later price shop for coverage on a yet-to-be created market exchange a few years down the road. And the Senate sits poised to water the measure down even more.
Amazing.
In unison, Lindsey Graham, Joe Lieberman, the GOP tea baggers, and the usual Faux News spinmeisters shriek about socialized medicine and label the House health reform package "liberal", all with a completely straight face. Nobody in the mainstream media bats an eye at this issue framing, preferring instead to babble on endlessly instead about how historic the moment is, and how much Barack Obama's reelection chances have riding upon the final outcome.
Absolutely amazing, how the inside-the-DC beltway Democratic Party leadership keeps reaching across the aisle, giving away the store, only to get their knuckles rapped once more in return.
Bill from Saginaw
May the Senate kill this thing.
The bill is worse than useless, and anything 1900 pages long is pre-crafted for abuse.
Start over and return with a single payer bill.
"Start over and return with a single payer bill." That's the best idea.
As the house bill now stands and what the senate is going to do;be mercyful and kill this piece of shit,Tony
"The overhaul would lead to the biggest changes in the $2.5 trillion healthcare system -- which accounts for one-sixth of the U.S. economy -- since the 1965 creation of the Medicare government health insurance program for the elderly."
"since the 1965 creation of the Medicare . . ."?
Is the weasel who wrote this suggesting that the huge part of the economy that healthcare occupies is caused by medicare?
Lindsey Graham says: "a bill written by liberals for liberals."
If only. I mean, we are talking about the same bill that hands insurance companies a bunch of new customers, totally screws women over, and further legitimizes (with tax dollars) faith "healing" yes? Because those sound more like right-wing appeasements, is all...
Coming from the Catholic Bus.shop where they created the twin miscarriages of justice and healthy peace of mind, I wonder how the Obamasses feel now? Better get used to it, as it's the FUTURE!
Off subject...but gotta voice this!!! At approximately 1:15 P.M. CST CD REMOVED an article about Dennis Kucinich backing out of a keynote speech he was supposed to make because Israeli Zionists in Florida were big time complaining....the whole article disappeared WHILE I was trying to write a commentary. Someone (I forget who) had written a derogatory comment about Jews..and off went the article!!! Probably this one will too! We'll see. What gives?! What does this mean as far as honest free speech on this site goes?!!!!! And WHO is monitoring it?!!!!!
That would explain why I was banned...ha, ha! Them Irish boys don't care for honest criticism of their Nazi policies. Oh, well...there plenty more where this came from... (~shrugs shoulders~)
Odd...the article reappeared! WTF?