UN Endorses Gaza War Crimes Report
The United Nations General Assembly has voted in favour of resolution endorsing a UN-sponsored report into war crimes committed during Israel's war on Gaza.
The Goldstone report, which accuses both Israel and Hamas of war
crimes, was endorsed by the assembly on Thursday by a margin of 114 to
18, after two days of debate.
Forty-four member-nations abstained from voting.
The report, which was compiled by a panel led by Richard Goldstone, a South African judge, had already been endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council, which sponsored the fact-finding commission.
The report calls on both Israel and the Palestinians to investigate within three months accusations of human-rights violations during the 22-day conflict in December and January.
Most of the criticism in the Goldstone report was directed towards Israel's conduct during the offensive, in which human rights organisations say about 1,400 Palestinians - many of them women and children - were killed.
Thirteen Israelis, including three civilians, were killed over the course of the war.
The report concluded that Israel used disproportionate force in the war, deliberately targeting Gaza civilians, using them as human shields, and destroying civilian infrastructure.
Offensive conduct
Ali Treki, the General Assembly president, called the vote "an important declaration against impunity. It is a call for justice and accountability".
"Without justice, there can be no progress towards peace. A human being should be treated as a human being, regardless of his or her religion, race or nationality," he said.
Apart from Israel and the US, a number of European countries including Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and the Czech Republic, voted against the resolution.
The Netherlands' representative said, however, he supported elements in the text, which sought to pursue inquiries into violations of human rights and international law.
Britain and France were among EU member nations who abstained. Most developing countries voted in favour of endorsing the report.
Jorge Valero, Venezuela's ambassador to the UN, endorsing the report, said Israel should be brought to justice for crimes against Palestinians, and those responsible for the "operation of terror".
Nassir Abdulaziz al-Nasser, Qatar's ambassador to the UN, said the Goldstone report pointed to crimes committed by the Israel that amounted to war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder, torture and serious physical and psychological harm to civilians.
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian UN observer called it "an important night in the history of the General Assembly and the history of fighting against impunity and seeking accountability".
'Disproportionate and systematic'
Earlier, speaking ahead of the final UN vote, Mansour said the Goldstone report had concluded that the Israeli military onslaught "was planned in all of its phases as a deliberately disproportionate and systematic attack aimed at punishing, humiliating and terrorising the Palestinian civilian population".
But Daniel Carmon, Israel's deputy ambassador to the UN, told the assembly that the resolution "endorses and legitimises a deeply flawed, one-sided and prejudiced report of the discredited Human Rights Council and its politicised work that bends both fact and law".
Alejandro Wolff, the US deputy ambasssador to the UN, also accused the the resolution of being flawed, saying that it failed to name Hamas, the Palestinian group that has de facto control of Gaza.
The non-binding resolution passed on Thursday by the General Assembly asks Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, to pass the report to the UN Security Council.
However, diplomats have said that the five permanent members of the 15-member Security Council have signalled that they are opposed to council involvement - meaning that it is unlikely that the 15-nation body would take action.
The debate at the General Assembly was called for by the Arab UN group, with the backing of the 118-member Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show All(Part II)
As far as I know, at the beginning of the intifada, the attacks were limited to IDF soldiers but the massacre in a Hebron mosque
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/25/newsid_4167000/4167929.stm
was the incentive for Hamas to attack also civilians inside Israel.
Besides, it is clear, that Israel WANTS and NEEDS to provoke violent resistance so that it can portray its own cruelty and violence as "defense" in the context of the "war on terror" ...
It is highly ironic, that the world has been duped into believing that Islam represents a threat to global security while in fact Zionism is the real threat (abuse of religion) and is never even mentioned in this context (at least not here in Germany)
In his book “Overcoming Zionism” Joel Kovel (a Jewish psychiatrist) shows the insanity of Zionism as a political instrument and the staggering hypocrisy and self-deception this has entailed: the eternal “victims” with their (self-attributed) high Jewish morality, created a state on the brutal expropriation and misery of another people.
The victims became racist perpetrators but in order to maintain their collective identity and exculpatory self-image, they had to bend over backwards to put the blame somehow on the victims .... so they keep inventing “reasons” why their criminal and inhumane actions can be justified before their conscience and before their God:
Golda Meir: " I will never forgive the Arabs for forcing us to kill them ..."
( ...Jewish souls are very special, a part of God, so we have learned, they rank higher than human souls, and "Arab" souls, for this school of thought, apparently belong more to the cattle range ..))
Baruch Goldstein, who committed the massacre in Hebron, refused to treat non-Jews, even in the IDF ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Goldstein
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2902/jewish/What-Is-the-Cause-of-Antisemitism.htm
To return to the UN-GA resolution: I am deeply ashamed that with the exception of IRELAND, NO EU member state has voted FOR the resolution.
The majority of the hypocrites abstained, the US-puppets in Eastern Europe voted against (divide and conquer works...), but the biggest assholes are GERMANY, ITALY AND THE NETHERLANDS.
Germany sells heavily subsidized submarines to Israel and the EU awards Israel a “privileged” trade status ...
My God, will they exploit the Holocaust forever ...?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15515
Nahida, I am on your side, but have you actually READ the Goldstone report?
Given the extremely difficult circumstances, I think Judge Goldstone did a good job. Those who accuse him of "bias" should present facts that support their allegations or keep quiet.
His findings simply confirm a long line of previous reports from Human Rights Organisations (including B't Selem) and the revelations by groups like "Breaking the Silence" although there is one unacceptable premise:
I absolutely agree with Norman Finkelstein, that to refer to the massacre in Gaza as a "war" is totally unacceptable and deliberately misleading, given the huge disparity of force between Hamas militants and the IDF.
Therefore, even though the "firing of (relatively ridiculous) rockets" into civilian neighbourhoods may be a violation of humanitarian law in principle, the moral dimensions of Israel's systemic violence (occupation and military assaults under some pretext) and the occasional outbursts of "revenge" through these rockets are totally different.
The hypocrisy here is in the legal groundwork: people under occupation are entitled to "resist", to fight againt the occupier but they ought to restrict their attacks to the military. But in light of the seemingly endless horrors of the occupation, the brutal retaliations against peaceful demonstrations and rather harmless "resistance" like stone-throwing children, let alone the ongoing and intensifying violation of human rights (including land expropriation and evictions, and of course the siege on Gaza) this restraint is practically impossible and would require super-human self-control.
(End of Part I)
Dear tocqueville
Am in total agreement with you, what I was referring to is that if Goldstone is biased, it would NOT be towards the Palestinians, as he was accused of, by zionists
He has a soft spot for israel, and he does not deny that
Naturally, he would be more lenient and gentle with his people, which he has no problem admitting as you have seen in his article:
My mission - and motivation
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1255694838474&pagename=JPArticle/ShowFull
“as a Jew who has supported Israel and its people all my life”
“Israel missed a golden opportunity to actually have a fair hearing from a UN-sponsored inquiry”
“I…have frequently spoken out against the unfair and exceptional treatment of Israel by the UN and especially by the Human Rights Council”.
His daughter said:
"He is a Zionist……My dad loves Israel………………he wanted to help find a long-term solution for the state of Israel."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251804583376&pagename=JPArticle%2FShowFull
Biased propaganda crap. Not a single mention of arab rockets.
What "Arab" rockets? I take it you mean Palestinian rockets. Answer the following questions "How many Palestinian rockets were launched from Gaza during the 6 months leading up to the Israeli attack that killed several Hamas leaders on US election day?" And how many Israelis were killed or injured by them? And how many of those were launched by Hamas?
Since I'm sure you are not going to take the trouble to find out the answers to these questions, I will tell you and the other readers here who might be more interested in the answers than you are. The answers are:
1. There were a handful of rockets launched from Gaza - immeasurably fewer than those that were launched from Gaza prior to the agreed ceasefire. Moreover Israel did not keep its part of the bargain - it did not open the border.
2. No Israelis were killed or injured.
3. None were launched by Hamas - they were all launched by a rival organisation - the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade allied to Fatah. Hamas did a remarkably good job of maintaining the ceasefire given the limited security resources it is allowed to have.
Hamas decided the agreed ceasefire with Israel was at an end when its leaders were killed by Israeli rockets launched from airplanes.
As with pretty well other agreed ceasefire since 1973, it was Israel that broke it and Israel that did almost all of the killing.
Biased propaganda crap? Seems to me that you have been reading too much of that elsewhere.
Here's who Israel and the U.S. lined up against world opinion:
Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Netherlands, Palau, Panama, Poland, Slovakia, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Ukraine.
---------------
Federated States of Micronesia ? What did they bribe *them* with, Yankees tickets ?
Nauru ?
Palau ?
Panama ?
And much of "new", Eastern Europe, eager to get in on the economic scam before China rewrites the global rules.
Yeah, good luck in 2030, Israel. It will be the first time in world history an entire country moves to New York City.
Do you know whay the mission was prevented from visiting Sderot??
find out why, here:
*******************************************************
WATCH:
Hamas's "crimes against humanity" and israel's innocence:
http://palestinian.ning.com/forum/topics/the-other-side-of-the-story
*******************************************************
***********************************************************
"Despite the mission’s charges over Israeli war crimes, South African jurist Richard Goldstone actually bent over backwards to protect Israel as much as possible"
Jeff Halper
http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?menu=6&submenu=2&article=552
***********************************************************
My mission - and motivation
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1255694838474&pagename=JPArticle/ShowFull
By RICHARD GOLDSTONE
“as a Jew who has supported Israel and its people all my life…………..……I sincerely believed that because of my own record and the terms of the mission's mandate we would receive the cooperation of the Israeli government. Its refusal to cooperate was a grave error.
“Israel missed a golden opportunity to actually have a fair hearing from a UN-sponsored inquiry. Of course, I was aware of and have frequently spoken out against the unfair and exceptional treatment of Israel by the UN and especially by the Human Rights Council. I did so again last week. Israel could have seized the opportunity provided by the even-handed mandate of our mission and used it as a precedent for a new direction by the United Nations in the Middle East. Instead, we were shut out
As I stated in response to a recent letter from the mayor of Sderot, I believed strongly that our mission should have been allowed to visit Sderot and other parts of southern Israel…………………We were prevented from doing so by, what I believe, was a misguided decision by the Israeli government."
.
GOLDSTONE is a ZIONIST; hardly an objective report that comes from a ZIONIST and LOVER OF ISRAEL
This report was cleansed by Goldstone to PROTECT Israel and to include an occupied people, Palestinians, as being guilty of “war” crimes and “crimes against humanity” when Goldstone, as a judge, knows that an occupied people have EVERY right to resist the occupiers
=========================================================
'My father is a Zionist, loves Israel'
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251804583376&pagename=JPArticle%2FShowFull
Quote: “Nicole Goldstone, the daughter of Richard Goldstone, whose report on Operation Cast Lead alleged that Israel committed war crimes in Gaza, maintained on Wednesday that her father "is a Zionist and loves Israel."
Speaking from Toronto, where she now lives, Nicole told Army Radio she had many conversations with her father after he was asked to head the UN inquiry…
She said she planned to host her parents in Toronto for Rosh Hashana, and that while speaking with her father following the report's release, he had quipped, "Are you sure we can still come?"
Nicole insisted that the fact the report also accused the Palestinians of crimes against humanity showed that her father tried to be balanced.
"I am not angry with him. I love him and respect him," she said.
"He is a Zionist," she added. "My dad loves Israel and it wasn't easy for him to see and hear what happened. I think he heard and saw things he didn't expect to see and hear, and I am 100 percent sure he [conducted the investigation] in the hope that the Israelis would come to cooperate, and he wanted to help find a long-term solution for the state of Israel."
Nicole, who lived in Israel for six months, said that the country "is the most important thing in my life, my heart is there.... I love Israel more than my family and friends and anything else."
.
Many countries who are poor and weak, give in to US pressure, and are more likely to vote the way US wants them to.
There's nothing new about my comment. It is a universal truth.
Syed Rizvi, San Jose, CA
"Most developing countries voted in favour of endorsing the report."
One has to wonder, in the instance of the Goldstone report, exactly which countries are 'developing' and which are truly 'developed'.
I hope I never "develop" in such a fashion.