US Diplomats Meet Burmese Leaders
Two senior US envoys have held separate talks with Burmese Prime Minister Thein Sein and detained pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
The visit of US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and his deputy is the highest level contact between the two governments for more than a decade.
Mr Campbell met the prime minister in the capital, Naypyitaw, before flying to Rangoon to meet Ms Suu Kyi.
No details of either set of talks have been released.
The visit comes weeks after the US announced it would engage with Burma's military junta in an attempt to promote reform.
But the US envoys are not meeting Burma's top leader, General Than Shwe.
New approach
Aung San Suu Kyi said nothing as she entered the lakeside hotel in Rangoon to meet the US officials.
But the fact that she was seen in public and was allowed to meet such a high-level US delegation is being seen as positive, reports BBC South East Asia correspondent Rachel Harvey.
After the talks, which lasted two hours, Mr Campbell was expected to meet with leaders of Ms Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD), officials said.
The US diplomats earlier met Burmese Prime Minister Thein Sein in Naypyidaw. Details of those discussions have not been made public.
The visit is the latest evidence of Washington's new approach towards Burma, our correspondent says, a policy described as engagement alongside sanctions.
There is a growing belief in diplomatic circles that isolating the military leadership has not had the desired effect. The question now is whether face-to-face dialogue is any more productive, our reporter adds.
Burma's military junta says multi-party elections will take place in early 2010 - the first polls in almost two decades.
Ms Suu Kyi's NLD won the last elections, in 1990, but was never allowed to take power.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
5 Comments so far
Show AllThe USA wants to cultivate another imperial thug-to-thug partnership, this time with the military junta in Burma, as part of its "great games" ambitions, to plant more US military bases around the world, for fossil plundering advantage, and to intimidate/harass competitors.
She is so beautiful and I am so ignorant, but I believe the relevant point is the last line of the article:
"Ms Suu Kyi's NLD won the last elections, in 1990, but was never allowed to take power."
1990. And "never allowed to take power" by whom?
I know men aren't supposed to cry but I've been crying a lot lately.
Meanwhile, why is Burma (Myanmar) important, and why do we keep changing the names of these countries and their cities? Let alone the name of that Chinese guy? What was his name? That Little Red Book guy?
Why isn't Henry Kissinger dead yet? Why is gold so high these days?
-30-
Ms Suu Kyi's NLD won the last elections, in 1990, but was never allowed to take power." And "never allowed to take power" by whom?
************
The military Junta that was ruling Burma at the time and continues to do so--Think Kim Il Sung.
************
Meanwhile, why is Burma (Myanmar) important, and why do we keep changing the names of these countries and their cities?
***************
Burma's name was changed to Myanmar by the military Junta as a kind of style statement in attmept to forge a new identity independent of the British colonial power that had dominated the country (think Belgian Congo to Zaire to Congo or Southern Rhodesia to Zimbabwe)
Burma's importance is chiefly in its petroleum reserves that Chevron (among others) is "helping to develope for" (translate: "steal from") the Burmese people. The resistance which is the last government legally elected in a fair election rejects the name Myanmar and prefers to use Burma as a sign of rejection and resistance to the military junta.
***************
What was his name? That Little Red Book guy?
************
His name was Mao Tse Tung,(or "Mao Ze Dong") who led the Chinese communist revolution that has ruled that country since 1949. The little red book was the collected revolutionary wisdom of Mao and required reading and dsicussion topic for the 1.however many billion Chinese during his reign. (Think the Bible in Puritan Massachusetts).
*******************
Why isn't Henry Kissinger dead yet?
Because only the good die young.
**********
Poet
Obama has suggested that Arroyo, Philippines president would be a good choice to advise the Burmese government on human rights. In effect he is recommending a horrible human rights abuser should advise a government that is only marginally worse. Arroyo calls a priest, "that communist priest" and a week later he is shot to death by a paramilitary or government death squad. Not one member of a military death squad in the Philippines has been prosecuted.
It's time for President Obama to reassess his own policies and values. What new approach? This is business as usual. Put some teeth in our military aid policies and remove funding from countries like the Philippines that are abusing human rights with impunity.
An angel amidst a pack of scoundrels.
Poet