Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Senate Finance Panel Rejects Govt Insurance Option
The 15-8 rejection marked a victory for Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman, who is hoping to push his middle-of-the-road measure through the panel by week's end. It also kept alive the possibility that at least one Republican may yet swing behind the overhaul, a key goal of both Baucus and the White House.
An audience member hold up a small sign with the words 'Public Option' as President Barack Obama spoke at a rally on health care reform, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009, at the Comcast Center at the University of Maryland in College Park, Md. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) "My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" in the full Senate, the Montana Democrat said shortly before he joined a majority on the committee in opposing the provision. "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option," the term used to describe a new government role in health care. It takes 60 votes in the 100-member Senate to overcome delaying actions that Republicans may attempt.
Undeterred, supporters of a new role for government in U.S. health coverage immediately launched a new attempt to prevail.
The maneuvering occurred as the committee plunged into a second week of public debate on legislation that generally adheres to conditions that President Barack Obama has called for. The bill includes numerous new consumer protections, including a ban on companies denying insurance on the basis of pre-existing conditions. At the same time it provides government subsidies to help lower-income Americans afford insurance that is currently beyond their means. It also includes steps that supporters say will begin to slow the growth in health care costs nationwide.
After weeks of delay, both the House and Senate appear on track to vote on different versions of health care legislation in October. Passage in both houses would set the stage for a compromise to be voted on deeper into the fall.
Inside the Senate Finance Committee, the first effort to remake a key portion of the bill came from Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W. Va., who said his proposal was far from the government takeover of health care that critics portray. "It's not. It's optional," he said, adding it was designed to offer competition and a lower-priced, reliable choice for consumers shopping for coverage.
Rockefeller assailed the insurance industry in withering terms. "I hate to use the word 'rapacious,'" he said - but quickly added it was warranted. He said omission of a government option from the measure was a virtual invitation to insurance companies to continue placing profits over people, adding they would raise their premiums substantially once the legislation went into effect.
All 10 Republicans on the committee voted against the proposal to allow the government to compete directly with insurance companies, Sen. Olympia Snowe among them. Democrats are hoping the Maine lawmaker will eventually break ranks with her party and support the legislation.
Also opposed were Baucus and fellow Democrats Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Bill Nelson of Florida and Tom Carper of Delaware.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., backed an alternative approach that he said would introduce more competition into the insurance market nationwide. His version differed from Rockefeller's chiefly in that it would have allowed for the government to negotiate payments with doctors, hospitals and other health care providers for an initial two-year period rather than pay them at the same rates as under Medicare.
Republicans countered that the proposals would lead to the demise of the private insurance industry and result in a system that is completely run by the government.
"Washington is not the answer," declared Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, cited private studies - one by the conservative Heritage Foundation, the other by the Lewin Group, owned by United HealthCare - saying millions would be pushed out of private insurance as the government held fees to doctors at artificially low levels. He said the result would be a violation of Obama's pledge that consumers would be able to keep their current insurance if they wanted once the legislation went into effect.
While Baucus voted against the proposal, he was at pains to counter Rockefeller's charge that the legislation increased subsidies that would go to insurance companies without dictating changes in past practices.
He said the legislation raises taxes on insurers, bans the practice of denying coverage because of pre-existing medical conditions and limits the extra premiums that can be charged on the basis of age.
Associated Press writer Erica Werner in Washington contributed to this story.
- Posted in



72 Comments so far
Show AllGeneral Strike.
The Republicans have the Democrats exactly where they want them.
Now the Republicans will gain cover by not supporting whatever corrupted bill the Democrats concoct, thereby giving them the opportunity to beat Democrats over the head with it during the 2010 and 2012 elections.
The Democrats seem determined to shoot themselves in the foot yet again. Can you say "GOP Majority?"
WASHINGTON –
The 15-8 rejection marked a victory for Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman, who is hoping to push his middle-of-the-road measure through the panel by week's end. It also kept alive the possibility that at least one Republican may yet swing behind the bill, a key goal of both Baucus and the White House.
Someone should tell Baucus that the only thing in "the middle of the road" is roadkill. No Deathpaneler is going to get behind anything that will upset their corporate sponsors.
Kill the bill. Nuke the Filibuster, Then write a bill that actually does something for the taxpayer, and doesnt just line the pockets of Big Health
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
"middle-of-the-road measure"? What would be a rightwing measure, then--a law prescribing extermination of the ill and old? Get sick, go up the chimney?
Is there anyone who still doubts who the MSM work for?
>>The Democrats seem determined to shoot themselves in the foot yet again. Can you say "GOP Majority?"
Yeah but they have a rather generous Health Care plan do they not? Its covered unless the providers can show a pre exisiting condition.
Ah, yes, well, there you have it. No progress to be made in this quadrennial. What will it take?
Baucus works cheap...the Health Insurance Industry got a lot for their millions.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE! TAX STRIKE!
ITS TIME FOR A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE. WE NEED TO DO THIS
IN OUR TOWNS AND LET OUR FRIENDS PASS IT ON TO THEIRS!
THE TIME FOR BEING A COUNTRY OF TOMS IS PAST AND THIS COUL
BE THE FIRST AND REALLY ONLY STEP LEFT TO US TO TURN
AMERIKA BACK TO AMERICA!
So much for 'public' healthcare.
And you have that whole H1N1 flu 'pandemic' coming... should be fun to watch when the 'mandatory' vaccinations come to town.
Have fun.
Walk in peace.
"Moderate Democrats oppose it."
They aren't moderates, nor democrats. They are BARBARIANS.
Not much surprise there as the US is a majority one party state (corporatists) with a few liberals on the other end.
I'd love to have a national strike myself but it really won't do much good
Right now there is so much unemployment that there is an unlimited pool of desperate scab workers. And if for some reason we could get such a strike going either foreign "emergency workers" would be brought in or martial law would be declared and our democracy would be over.
You remember the "three box" rule conservatives like so much
Soap
Ballot
Cartridge
use in that order. The 1st box is clearly no longer working, so we'll go to the second. Its had some impact just not enough. If elections turn out to be bogus or the system is so crooked then well, the future is hazy. Ask again later.
We hol d these truths to be self-evident, that all men are not created equal, that they are endowed by their Insurer with certain revokable privileges, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure OUR rights, Insurers are instituted above Men, deriving their powers from cash to the Congress, That whenever the People becomes destructive of our bottom line, it is the Right of the Insurer to alter or to abolish their coverage, and to institute new Insurance requirements, laying their foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect the Health Care Insustry's Financial Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Insurance Policies long established should always be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is unfortunately their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future HEALTH.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
HIT THE STREETS!!!
It has always amazed me how cheap these corporate "people" can buy off these boys on capital hill!! Seems as though the people could buy them off ourselves, but of course the corps would not like that and have made sure that the people who pay the bills have no say in how the money is spent..
Obomba was bought a long time Ago.. He received over 2 million from the insurance alone..Now in reality that is chicken feed in the realm of the usa budget and you would think that IF we all just sent in fifty cents each that would be about 150 million right there and we could buy ourselves a President... Whats that you say you already pay much more than that!! With what results,,, what a country..
Take that Obomba sticker off the bus its time...
Jefferson warned us: "The influence over government must be shared among all the people. If every individual which composes their mass participates of the ultimate authority, the government will be safe, because the corrupting the whole mass will exceed any private resources of wealth, and public ones cannot be provided but by levies on the people. In this case every man would have to pay his own price." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. ME 2:207
The Democrats will be begging for votes next year prior to the mid-term election. I have no pity for any of them anymore.
The Democratic Party can afford to let a few Democrats be gamebreakers and vote against the public interest because those Democrats have the political strength to hold their seats. Meanwhile the remaining Democrats can vote in the public interest knowing that the bills won't pass anyways.
Progressive, you've made a great decision.
In 2010 and 2012, let us not vote for any elected office candidate---president, vp, senator, congressman---who has not done his/her best to support single-payer health care. No act of redemption exists for such a person.
Come that time, people will start talking about lesser evil again; don't fall in that trap.
FAILURE. THE FINAL BETRAYAL.
GENERAL STRIKE.
Only pass the insurance reform parts of this bill (no pre-existing condition denials, etc).
Do NOT pass the part that is a giveaway to the insurance companies. (Maybe they'd like the trade off: "yes, you can regulate us a bit, but give us windfall in new customers at our prices with Uncle Sam paying the bill.")
No way. No money to subsidize for-profit insurance coverage.
So is this the best Demomcrats can do once they are the majority?
Very sad.
I just sent my senator this message:
"Senator Cantwell,
Please do not consider running for re-election."
(I also just finished moving the last of my IRA assets offshore.)
What was that tag line in Orwell's 1984 about Betrayal?
Humbaba; wait a second!! Why are you down on M. Cantwell?!!! She made some really well-reasoned, cogent, and intelligent speeches for why we need a public option (although would prefer single payer). She also voted FOR the Rockefeller & Schumer amendments for this worm-ridden committee to include a PUBLIC OPTION!!! She is a national treasure! If there were just five more of HER, in place of the BIG FIVE TRAITORS in the Democratic camp, we would all be happy and healthy...Please do not vote against a REAL progressive, just because the BIG FIVE TRAITORS burned her ideas at the stake.
Donate here to run ads in Max Baucus' state:
http://www.actblue.com/page/baucuspublicoption
My honest and most sincere condolences to you all. From this angle it appears as though nothing of any worth will come from this. Everyone deserves appropriate, free health care but that is not going to happen. Your federal administration betrayed you and the effects will be felt in many other areas and most certainly in the apathy and cynicism that will be in evidence during your next presidential election. It wasn't just the insurance companies who won; all those who profit from an impoverished, sick and frightened populace have.
Thanks. You're so right--we're screwed.
I find the entire for profit insurance industry criminal and murderous. It is well known that 45,000 Americans die every year, one every 7 minutes or so because they do not have access to health care.
Baucus is well aware of this fact. He is, by his action to save the for profit insurance corporations, complicit in these deaths.
Many have faced a firing squad for less grievous crimes.
All the talk about 60 votes is complete B.S. This bill is not going to pass without a reconciliation process after something passes both houses of Congress. Reconciliation bills only require 50 votes plus the Vice President and 50 Democratic Senators have already pledged to vote for a bill with a public option. To hell with the Republicans and I really think Baucus, that dimwitted idiot, should face a firing squad for his corruption and his crimes.
There are still three acts to be played out in this drama, and this was to be expected from the most conservative of the five committees considering bills.
Nevertheless, it is time to start planning a general strike and some TRULY SERIOUS civil disobedience, particularly if the final product contains individual mandates (which it certainly will) without effective provisions to supply a uniform standard of affordable care for all citizens with strict regulation of insurance company practices. That is the bare minimum that is required for the insurance product to be anything other than defective.
For me, that disobedience will consist of:
1. Refusal to purchase insurance.
2. Refusal to cooperate with any government agency, including the IRS, that tries to levy a fine or penalty against me.
3. Pleading no contest to any criminal charges that might ensue, and accepting jail time while refusing to pay any fines.
4. Refusal to participate in the health care system in any way. That is to say that I will not give consent for, or accept financial responsibility for, any conveyance or treatment by any medical or paramedical organization. I do not expect, nor do I wish, to be treated under some charity regime or sub-prime clinical arrangement. I will accept the consequences of non-treatment, including possible death.
And I will leave it to the Congress to figure out how to dispose of me.
Why is anyone surprised? It's an open secret that Baucus and friends are owned by the insurance industry. It's an open secret that none of these people have any clue about what it's like to work for a living and pay bills. None of them have a clue about what it's like to deal with the foul and rapacious businesses that they take money from. Nor do any of them really care. They are concerned only with staying in power, with keeping their perks and privilege and entree to the big money. And they get the big money by enabling the corporations to steal the money from your pocket, from your paycheck. You are being crushed and it will only get worse. If this stands and if the financial sector isn't brought to heel, there will be blood. That is inevitable.
Monday, Raul Grijalva, co-chair of the CPC, wrote this:
http://thehill.com/special-reports/healthcare-september-23-2009/59861-public-option--accept-nothing-less
I expect they have over 38 members to vote down anything with a weak or no public option. So if they do, no bill passes, and President Obama will have some thinking to do about his approach.
And WE will have to decide what to do to fix this corrupt corporate, totalitarian regime.
Congratulations to president Obama!
This is exactly what he set out to achieve - get more money for the corporations who own him.
Baucus really needs some investigating to see how much money he has and is making by dragging this out to make sure the insurance companies get a huge slice of the mandatory public health program pie being forced down our throats, with lots of thanks from the jerks who elected these bastards to surpress the people even more and the criminals that bribe these traitors to get what corporate america wants and the american people get absolutely nothing in return except maybe incarceration in one of those private contrator 'hotels'.
And after this, Obama will appear on TV, giving another speech.
Watch Obama talk.
Talk talk talk.
That's all he does. Talk.
See the people watch Obama talk.
Watch watch watch.
What does Obama actually Do?
Talk talk talk.
Watch him talk about how it will soon be necessary to implement stringent controls on daily life because so many people are mad at him.
See the corporations pat him on the head for being a good boy. Good, good boy.
That is, until they decide he is a liability, and must be put down.
Bye-bye, Obama, Bye-bye.
Let's see you talk your way out of this one.
Walk in peace.
What does Obama actually Do?
First, he collects his payoffs . . . then he talks, talks talks.
What is to be done about the total and hopeless corruption of the United States government, besides leaving the country or revolution?
"Republicans countered that the proposals would lead to the demise of the private insurance industry and result in a system that is completely run by the government."
That is exactly the idea.
Obama endorsed this position when he said that starting from scratch single payer would be the best system.
Lets start from scratch!
It's time to get angry.
"In Guinea, 157 protesters killed, rape reported"
Is this anything different than what our senate just did to the American people?
Progressives have been sold out. No votes for Democrats (at least Republicans can throw a bone to their base). No longer a Democrat. But always a Progressive.
So now tax money will subsidize a bloated insurance industry with little to no regulation. I will wear my Jefferson t-shirt tomorrow.
Give me Single-Payer or give me death. Because without Single-Payer we're all dead anyway without health coverage.
General Strike: The militarized police and the War Department (Pentagon) are useless against peaceful resistance.
"Nazis were actually relieved when the resistance turned to violence because it gave them an excuse to use more drastic and suppressive measures.
According to military historian Basil Lidell Hart, who had the unique opportunity to interview German generals imprisoned in Britain after the war, "other forms of resistance baffled them" because "they were experts in violence, and had been trained to deal with opponents who used that method."
Published on Saturday, September 19, 2009
Enough Already with WWII Film Violence
by Bryan Farrell
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/19-0
Just calm down ,
its round one,
it aint over till the fat lady with clogged arteries and a bad heart falls over and drops dead.
Wrong it is over I am afraid..in fact it has been over sense the insurance corps wrote the checks..
pity the children
It was over before it began...
"victory for Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman, who is hoping to push his middle-of-the-road measure"
Middle of what road?
"Republicans countered that the proposals would lead to the demise of the private insurance industry and result in a system that is completely run by the government."
Private profits are more important than lives.
Baucus sez: "My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" in the full Senate ...
-- I don't remember hearing that job requirement come up in your oath of office, dude.
Baucus also sez: "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option."
-- Misquote. He actually said "No one PAYS me to get to 60 votes with a public option."
A disgraceful outcome. So called "moderate" Democrats and their Republican friends are bought. They choose their corporate benefactors over the health of the American people. Shame!
The US mainstream media sure knows how to call the middle of a far right primrose path piece of rat do do "moderate." Can anyone seriously now fail to see why the USA is going to hell in hand basket? As a small businessman and also a victim of US health insurance industry dominate US health care, I say along I'm sure with tens of millions of others, vote this piece rat excrement down and stand up for the people of the USA.
AD
If supporting universal single payer health insurance for all Americans, was about getting votes from we the people, they all would be voting for this public option. But obviously it is about corporate campaign contribution, and the other perks that they receive.
So why do we continue, year after year, donating money to any of them? Why do we volunteer our time campaigning for them? Does the word sucker come to mind.
Have a good day everyone.
Marian Cole
These people do not represent anyone but the people who are lining their pockets to maintain the current theft of our Health Care. What a 4+ disgrace!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are their constituents listening? I wonder if they know they can be replaced?
I think that if the progressives would begin boycotting any corporate business; grocery, pharmacy, retail,fast food, coffee shops, etc., and began patronizing ONLY small mom and pop local businesses with no corporate affiliation, even though it will cost a little more, soon the corporate profits would fall. All corporations are bad for children and other human beings! There is not one that puts humanity before profit! Health insurance and big pharmacy are just an example. It's time to fight them at every point. Boycotting is just an easy way to start until we ramp up to physical confrontation!
You are absolutely correct. So, my question is...Where do we go? In my city, there ARE NO ALTERNATIVES to corporate, because our "leaders," have ALREADY SOLD THE FARM to these entities. The option for me is buy, or eat worms. I have no problem with worms and grubs, but I think we should be able to do better; however, with the stranglehold our city has over growing your own livestock & food, it is impossible. We have been um...neutered in our own homes.
Eat grass or grow your own food. It is now obvious now that Health Care in America is something that is only for Filthy Rich White Men. The rest of us working slaves need only suffer and die in poverty. I personally shall refuse to buy goods and services from any company that bought these so called senators.
Small point: Where do the mom and pops get the supplies and goods to run their shops?
Oops. Didn't think about that didja?
And with Walmart out to be the only retailer left in the world (their stated corporate goal), how many of these mom and pops are actually left? What do you think led to the demise of the local business core and the death of main street?
Walk in peace.