Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Novel Approach: Ralph Nader Turns to Fiction
Ralph Nader, the consumer activist and corporate scourge, is saying nice things about the kind of folks you'd expect him to despise.
"Never in America have there been more super-rich people with relatively enlightened views," says Nader, lean and hopeful at age 75, dark eyes aglow as he speaks at the offices of Public Citizen, the progressive research and advocacy group he founded nearly 40 years ago.
"Not all the super-rich are craven greedhounds, dominators and bullies. Some of them take on their counterpart greedhounds, dominators and bullies."
It's as if Glenn Beck had found the bright side of socialism.
Nader hasn't turned conservative and he isn't making this stuff up, although he is, in a way. After decades of speeches, articles, policy papers and policy books attacking corporations and politicians, Nader has turned to fiction.
"Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!" is more than 700 pages, worthy of a billionaire's portfolio, and its heroes are a gang of 70-something plutocrats, from Warren Buffett and Ted Turner to Bill Cosby and Yoko Ono, who conspire to set off a progressive revolution.
The story begins in 2005, not long after Hurricane Katrina. A secret gathering is convened by Buffett at a Maui mountain retreat, where 17 very wealthy people agree to take back the country they think has been betrayed.
They give speeches, write books, organize community action groups. They infiltrate corporate boards of directors, stage demonstrations for the environment and better wages. They start a People's Chamber of Commerce, advocate changing the national anthem to "America the Beautiful" and dream up a politicized parrot, "Patriotic Polly," that becomes a media folk hero.
"Fiction is a way to liberate the imagination," Nader says, "to see what could happen if 17 billionaires and super-rich people really put their minds to it, along with a parrot, and took on the existing business power bloc and the politicians in Washington who serve (it)."
The super-rich name themselves "Meliorists," believers that people can make the world better. They persuade the elusive Warren Beatty to run against Arnold Schwarzenegger for California governor. They conspire to force Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to allow its workers to unionize. They push for universal health care. They start a new political party, dedicated to publicly financed elections. They are so quick, and clever, their foes can't catch up.
The masses respond. Conservative smear campaigns fail. The corporations and the politicians retreat, powerless against the joy and fire of an engaged public.
It all works.
"In the real world?" asked Victor Navasky, publisher emeritus of The Nation, the liberal weekly where some of Nader's early writings appeared. "In the real world of satire I can imagine it, but not in the other world, the one we inhabit. But Ralph is a prophet; he has been right about so many things the rest of us couldn't imagine."
"The cast seems a bit like People magazine, doesn't it?" said author-journalist Alexander Cockburn, who supported Nader's 2000 and 2004 third-party presidential campaigns and has frequently published his essays in Counterpunch, a left-wing newsletter Cockburn co-edits.
"Good luck to Ralph. God knows how he found the time to write a 700-page novel. ... But the use of billionaire's money for anything other than malign purposes is extremely rare, as Ralph well knows."
Nader teases, but doesn't kid. He believes the top can motivate the masses and wants very much for the people mentioned in his novel to read it. He already has some success: Early blurbs came from Beatty ("With this utopian fantasy, he shows us how good he thinks things could be") and from Patti Smith, whose "People Have the Power" becomes a progressive theme song in the book.
Messages left with Buffett and fellow Meliorist Barry Diller were not immediately returned. Spokesmen for Ono and Turner each said their client had yet to read the book and would have no comment.
Since the days of Karl Marx, revolutionaries have debated how much, if any, help from the top was needed to overthrow the ruling class. Nader thinks that the aging rich make for ideal instigators - wise and wealthy, beyond accusations of personal ambition, people of the highest achievement, yet also frustrated.
"They're very demoralized as to the state of the country," Nader says. "They play golf and they grumble and they've persuaded themselves that they're powerless, which is absurd."
His book includes pages of detailed policy proposals, Nader's common literary format, and draws upon public and personal observations. He believes each of the super-rich included is capable of the actions taken in his novel, citing as an example Turner's well-documented interest in the environment.
Nader says his decision to write a novel was in part a response to the nonfiction books he had read in recent years. The corruption of politicians and financial institutions is diligently investigated and revealed. But only the problems are addressed; solutions either are not provided or are too dull to inspire.
"You can see it on TV," he says, "when (liberal author-journalist) Bill Greider gets on Bill Moyers, for example, and he talks about the failure of the Federal Reserve and the Wall Street collapse and that's all very interesting.
"And then he gets to, `Here's one thing you can do about it. You can re-enact the usury laws and control the skyrocketing, gouging interest rates that fed all this speculation.' People look the other way."
Greider, whose books include "Come Home, America" and "The Soul of Capitalism," countered that he had received strong, positive reaction for his advocacy of usury laws, which set maximum interest rates for loans.
"But I agree, in general, about what happens with exposes," he says. "It's a basic complaint, that there's not a follow-through of outrage and action to books like mine, and to his, I might add."
Parts of the novel are now physically impossible. The super-rich crusaders include Paul Newman, who last year died of cancer (Nader says he was already well into the book, and that Newman's role was too important to remove him from the story).
Another Meliorist is Leonard Riggio, the chairman of Barnes & Noble Inc., whom Nader places in charge of organizing street rallies. The reason: Riggio once told Nader that he had a lifelong dislike of bullies, strange comfort for the many independent booksellers - retailers long championed by Nader - who blame Barnes & Noble for helping to drive them out of business.
"I'm pretty sure that's accurate, what he feels about bullies, but it's still ironic," says Oren Teicher, CEO of the American Booksellers Association, which represents the country's independent stores.
"There are ironies," Nader acknowledges. "These people are not angels. And that's one reason they're so effective, because they're not angels."
The son of Lebanese immigrants, Nader was born in Winsted, Conn., in 1934, and remembers that as a teenager he finished "dozens" of socially conscious works such as Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" and the muckraking of Ida Tarbell. He would read and listen to the radio, to baseball games featuring, irony again, those ultimate underdogs, the New York Yankees.
"That's my only Yankee imperialism," he says. "But that was before (team owner George) Steinbrenner. I was coming off the image and history of Babe Ruth and my hero, Lou Gehrig ... because he showed me stamina."
His education was pinstriped: Princeton University as an undergraduate, then Harvard Law School. In his 20s, he taught and worked as a lawyer in Hartford, Conn., and freelanced articles, notably a 1959 piece for The Nation in which he charged the leading automakers with caring more about design than about safety.
Six years later, he published "Unsafe at Any Speed," a slow seller at first that helped launch the modern consumer movement, thanks in part to those he attacked. General Motors, builder of the Corvair, the "sporty" little deathtrap that was the main target of Nader's book, assigned private investigators to dig up dirt. The resulting publicity propelled the book onto the best-seller lists, got Nader a personal apology from the president of GM, and pushed Congress to pass new auto-safety laws and regulations.
"Ralph Nader became famous 40-plus years ago operating on a fairly straightforward logic, that if you expose wrongdoing and get attention, it will produce a political reaction," Greider says. "And that's what his campaign was about, and it was successful, and helped lead to laws for clean water, clean air and a rather long list of legislation."
Nader said it took just months to finish the novel, "the words flying out" of his Underwood typewriter, a process so flush that when an occasional thunderstorm knocked out the electricity he would continue to work, by candlelight.
He cites a couple of reasons for waiting until now to try fiction: "insufficient" imagination and a stubborn belief, now worn down, that the truth was enough, that "around the corner we'd have a breakthrough in health care, we'd have a breakthrough in corporate accountability." His mind was not changed by the election of Barack Obama.
Even Utopia isn't perfect. Of all the hurdles cleared and miracles realized in his novel, one great leap is never considered:
Ralph Nader becoming president.
"Fiction has some boundaries," he says with a laugh.

45 Comments so far
Show AllAs another perennial optimist, I say, "It, or something like this, could happen." Nader knows one must do more than complain - we must come up with solutions and put them into practice, no matter how long it takes.
Hooray for Ralph Nader, my personal hero!!!
And you can buy it right now at Amazon - here's the URL
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1583229035/ref=nosim/?tag=commondreams-20
An amazing man. His integrity will not allow him to stop.
Here we have VISION in the service of justice.
Meanwhile, what vastly dominates the Washingtonwallstreetified is a mix of avaricious debasement, vicious intolerance, or disingenuous pandering which enables the intolerance and debasement.
The super rich save the planet--is that before of after they destroy it?? One can understand Nader's appeal to them, or their conscience--if they even have one. However, it is up to the worker ants to learn how to quit feeding the monster 'queens' (i.e., making the super rich super rich in the first place, or a variation of feeding the beast(s)).
In the dictionary under the word DETERMINATION should be a picture of Ralph Nader. Next to my SHERO Emma Goldman I would have to put Mr. Nader as my HERO. No two finer humanitarians were ever born!!! And you cannot say that about Warren Buffet, Bill Gates or even Yoko Ono.
Nader for President....WORLD PRESIDENT : )
Peace!!
It's really wonderful that Mr. Nader is still willing to try to save us from ourselves. If only every student and every citizen were given a paperback copy of his book to really read, we might really save this country from the disaster that awaits us.
Common Dreamers, ever let others think for you? Rare? Me too. But I thought BO was gonna help, yikes! And that RN was off-base, as I his declaration that billionaires are "very demoralized," sure strikes me. BUT, on this topic CD, I'm deferring; I'll vote for him for President if I get a chance-after '08 I trust CD's collective opinion on this topic more than my own.
Thanks Ya'All. GO RN.
Mr. Nader is still going strong at 75. I think Diogenes would be proud of Mr. Nader, if he were still alive.
Nader: Gets returns on Cisco stock.
And for us: re-runs of our brain on crisco- fried by corporate greed and shlock.
Power and the solutions come from below.
Soak the rich, marginalize them and give them the heave-ho.
Ralphie,please.
Don't ruin your wonderful life with such nonsensical dribble !
And this is not just some, nihilistic poor person's quibble.
Cisco stock....and you have proof of where RN's money is invested??? I am always baffled by how people who despise Nader (maybe for being as honest as a person can get without selling his soul and sharing his wealth with others to improve this godforesaken country) try and make him look bad. Like the rumor that Nader had investments in Occidental Petroleum when it was Al Gore who did and tried to pass himself off as some envrionmentalist (what a joke).
Ralph Nader knows there's no good alternative to continuing to fight the good fight and has, over his lifetime, set the bar very high for what it means to persevere -- how many decades now?
Thank you, Mr. Nader.
YET AGAIN, WE ARE BEING FOOLED!
Seems Ralph Nader is trying to lead the public up the garden path.
>Nader teases, but doesn't kid. He believes the top can
>motivate the masses and wants very much for the people
>mentioned in his novel to read it.
Nader will have read the Wall Street Journal article about Warren Buffet. So he knows that Buffet threatened to disown his adopted granddaughter after she spoke out about how the rich have loaded the economic dice in their favor - how they effectively conspire to keep the masses in their place:
"The Rich Man's Michael Moore - why an Heir Continues to Document - and Anger - the Wealthy"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120371859381786725.html
So what possessed Nader to make Buffet one of his "fictional" heroes?
The super rich and CEOs have control, and Nader is trying to fool people that a few of these powerful individuals harbor a (latent) desire to change things - "Hey, these guys aren't so bad, after all!" Who is the guy kidding? More than a few individuals who post to Common Dreams!
Maybe Nader got tired of writing the same old FACTS/TRUTH to warn the American people who continue to sit behind their computer screen and do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING while their own community, state, country goes down in flames. You blame rich folks for taking actions to make themselves rich (as you spend your money in Wal-Mart buying your plastic crap from China..instead of helping your local mom & pop shop..., buying gas at Exxon/Mobile...instead of bicycling around town to get your errands done and buying gas from maybe Citgo where the oil comes from Venezuela which helps leaders like Chavez who is actually doing more good for his people than our own President is for us....and use AT&T for your telephone service instead of CREDO or Working Assets that at least does not support or engage in spying on US citizens) while you help them get rich by being unconscious about how you spend your money or the fact that maybe you are working for one of these companies that is destroying our country or harming other countries (if you are working for say Lockheed Martin then you are helping to bomb other countries to get your paycheck).
I am tired of people chastizing others for doing something to awaken the masses while they sit back and look to blame others for the lousy state of affairs. Even I know that my purchases and where I work is of importance to the environment and other people and beings in this world. I think Nader knows that even guys like Buffet will have a moment where they might realize what they have been doing is WRONG. Just like Daniel Ellsberg who after working for the Rand Corp. in the 60's and realizing what his work and his govt. was really doing (killing the innocent citizens in Vietnam) was wrong and then turned his effort into exposing the injustice....thankfully Ellsberg woke up and changed his mind....that may be the best we can hope for from Buffet and the other rich folks who are destroying the very country that got them where they are. If the millions of poor and working class people DON'T SHUT OFF THEIR COMPUTER AND GET OUT INTO THE STREETS SOON....we will have NOTHING LEFT TO BITCH ABOUT...because we will all be behind some concentration camp walls waiting to work our shift for the good of the rich in this soon to be completely fascist-run nation.
Ugh....get a f'ing life!!!
freethinker68, thanks for your appalling response. It is people like you who are partly responsible for the apathy. When Nader is dead, who are you going to hero-worship then? Which person will you treat like Jesus Christ to save you from damnation?
Ralph Nader is misleading the public. Until people think for themselves, take action for themselves, stop being selfish, and stop acting like sheep, wanting to be led - by Nader, Chomsky, and others - nothing will change, things will just get worse!
Thank you, freethinker. I once cared about these issues, I now don't. I am now looking after myself, caring about number one, because I realize "progressives" are as nasty and selfish as those they condemn.
Nader gets paid very handsomely for writing articles - the guy is rich! - what do you people get out of all this? NOTHING!
Warren Buffet doesn't care, and many Americans don't care either. Time to grow up, freethinker - it's a painful process!
There is no thinking for oneself (or, if any, least extremely limited, since you always learn from your environment), it is always the building and culmination of many. That's what progressive ideals are about. I'm not going to figure this world out all out on my own. What I will do is try to understand who/what can give the most accurate information about the things I care about. And I will follow them. That doesn't mean suspend skepticism. Every perspective is an attempt to understand (or distort) the truth, they are never the truth though, just a reflection. I don't know the truth, and neither does Ralph Nader. But when it comes to the political world, he knows more than I. He cares more and is a harder worker than I. Talk about selfishness, not admitting that others can lead, that others are stronger? If you disagree with Nader, that is fine, but saying it is stupid for anyone to follow him because it is "hero-worship" is just absurd. Are you really arguing that Nader takes away the motivation people have to act?
You railing on Free Thinker as if you know the workings of the world while he or she is so blind. But what Free Thinker essentially already pointed out, you put nothing productive forward. No idea at all. You are completely negative and that leads to nothing (basically anti-progressive). I have no idea what made you think you can be a voice on progressive matters with such babble (Though that WSJ link was nice).
The less powerful must come together to overcome those who have the power. Leadership is needed. Not anarchy-socialism. I hope you finish growing up soon and the pain and hate go away. I'm sure it won't be soon enough to prevent a nasty reply.
freethinker68, thanks for your appalling response. It is people like you who are partly responsible for the apathy. When Nader is dead, who are you going to hero-worship then? Which person will you treat like Jesus Christ to save you from damnation?
Ralph Nader is misleading the public. Until people think for themselves, take action for themselves, stop being selfish, and stop acting like sheep, wanting to be led - by Nader, Chomsky, and others - nothing will change, things will just get worse!
Thank you, freethinker. I once cared about these issues, I now don't. I am now looking after myself, caring about number one, because I realize "progressives" are as nasty and selfish as those they condemn.
Nader gets paid very handsomely for writing articles - the guy is rich! - what do you people get out of all this? NOTHING!
Warren Buffet doesn't care, and many Americans don't care either. Time to grow up, freethinker - it's a painful process!
This is a hoot ...Nader tells all!
the revolutionary Billionaires club took all the yippy ideas.
instead of runnin a pig for prez they ran a parrot.
Like there wasn't a pig that deserved a second chance!
Now we are Saved! I knew Ralph could do it.
but it is a bold dream to want the super rich to use their power to put investment into a susatainable world econmy rather than this Debt ridden war economy of Death.
Considering the impact fiction has had in spreading an ideology (i.e., Ayn Rand), why not Ralph Nader do likewise. Especially when one considers his prior communications methods are not reaching the audiences it needs to.
Yes and I am still wondering why I am supposed to hate Ann Rand.... She never said a bad thing about me.
Jim, Rand is hated for promulgating the existentialist super-hero archetype as ManGod. ie the Truly Talented, Driven Geniuses, the Atlas's of mankind, are the shoulders upon which society rests. NOT the collective efforts of humble women and men over time; they are the chaff to Rand. Whose Godless Ego found this mentaltripe a nice fit.
Ayn Rand, not Ann Rand.
Just think about what it did for the "left behind" idea. Maybe it's the way to go.
Love Ralph Nader ---
Logically, he counted on our elected officials to not behave in a suicidal manner. Amd even capitalists to not behave in a suicidal manner. Any of us who thought that were wrong.
Mr. Nader made corporatism clear to us, co-option of the democratic party clear to us, the buying of government and our elected officials clear to us. However, even any myth of a free press in America was gone by then.
Mr. Nader has given us the great truths which should have finished off capitalism -- especially unregulated capitalism which is merely organized crime. But criminals seem to work much faster at destruction than Mr. Nader and any of us can work at getting truth out and making positive change.
Truth, openness, legal protections are what run Ralph Nader.
Lies, secrecy, violence are what run patriarchy's capitalism.
"The myth of a free press died with the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy" --
.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
"According to all myth, the female-not the male-gives life".
So it's a myth that females give life? Or in mythology the female gives life? All mythology?
If it's mythology, are you saying therefore it's true that the male gives life? Or are you suggesting that males don't give life? The sperm does what then?
I'm confused. What the hell are you saying?
ralph has resorted to the oldest way in humanity. kill them
with kindness if beating them about the head doesn't
work.and maybe since none obumma's will give him any
dinero's he'll work work the hand that feeds him instead
of biting it for a change. it will take some real coin to
make a run in 2012 and ralph doesn't have the green to do
that.
I have great respect for Nader, and gratitude for his lifelong efforts. I have always voted for him.
Here, though, I think he presents a very dubious idea, even if in fictional form.
Summoning the rich and celebrated among us to do what democracy requires the citizenry to do -- keep the system fair and humane and fix it when it gets broken -- is not a sustainable operating plan for a government of, by, and for the people.
It displaces the civic responsibilities properly assigned to an engaged electorate and places those responsibilities in the hands of, essentially, a benign oligarchy.
Via any meaningful democratic theory, this is akin to the absurdity of hiring someone else to eat a good diet and do your daily aerobic exercise for you, as you continue to consume junk food and sit on the couch.
If Nader has concluded that the broad US citizenry can't govern itself as intended by the constitution, and that Americans, such as they've become, have no realistic prospect organizing themselves to do so in any foreseeable future, he may be correct. But he should come out and say that that is what he means.
At least then there is no pretense about what is being advocated as an alternative, and we can then, at that point honestly discuss the pros and cons of benign oligarchy.
If, on the other hand, Nader actually believes, more discretely, that a temporary, system-correcting intervention by benign billionaires and celebrities would set American's fallen democratic system aright, he is still obliged to think-through even that premise more thoroughly.
How could such a heightened 'you-do-it-for-me' approach to democracy, transform a nation of civic couch potatoes into responsible self governing citizens when this 'you-do-it-for-me' decadence is exactly what causes and feeds couch potato-ness to begin with?
Perhaps Nader believes it would re-kindle the prerequisite to action (Hope), where there is now mass hopelessness; like a surgeon removing a deadly tumor to allow the rest of the body to recover.
I suppose that's a possible outcome, though it doesn't seem likely to me.
Hey CD critics, lighten up a little. If Ralph Nader is inspired to take a few months to write a novel (in lightning speed no less), more power to him. Maybe he needed to cheer himself up and found a more creative way than ranting, raving and weeping (like me).
And Mark Dalessio, I appreciate what you say but
"How could such a heightened 'you-do-it-for-me' approach to democracy, transform a nation of civic couch potatoes into responsible self governing citizens when this 'you-do-it-for-me' decadence is exactly what causes and feeds couch potato-ness to begin with?"
is a bit of an oversimplification, isn't it? There is a whole complex of reasons for such diverse qualities of American couch potatoes as apathy, indifference, ignorance, stupidity, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, egotism, a sense of powerlessness, exhaustion, depression, just to name a few. An educational system in decline (with higher education obscenely priced), a manipulative propagandistic infotainment system of media and an environment filled with numerous toxins make for a synergy of obstacles to critical thinking and social activism which are pretty damn formidable to the average individual. And what "democracy" are you talking about? Just a nine-letter word. We've got a corporate oligarchy pure and simple.
A couple of thoughts occur here.
No one could have imagined the overseers of Soviet collectivism voluntarily overturning their own system and reinstating capitalism--so I guess a ruling class really can in some sense sabotage itelf--although in the case of the Soviet bureaucrats, many benefited from the capitalist restoration.
There is also the case of the New Deal--many of the presiding minds and activists in that progressive crusade were patrician types--including the chief himself, FDR. Now maybe they were trying to save the capitalist system, but many were also sincere idealists. And if you believe those who claim that JFK was determined to remake the USA as a force for peace and justice, the same thing happened 30 years later.
Then the right-wing yahoos got REALLY serious and started murdering any person of talent and vision who threatened their country-club hegemony: JFK, RFK, King, Malcolm, Wellstone, etc. That series of political murders has kept the country politically terrorized and lobotomized.
ON THE OTHER HAND--Nader seems to have lost confidence in the possibilities of a mass uprising from below because he can't seem to get a mass audience anymore. But no one to the left of Wolf Blitzer can!
Ralph is chapped and personally aggrieved and so gives up on popular revolution. Maybe here we see a glimpse of the narcissism of which so many have accused him in the past--wrongly, I always thought, perhaps until now.
In my long life I've discovered that people will believe what they read in fiction far more easily than something that's put forth as truth. Could be Nader realizes that and is going for the gold.
Ralph Nader is a noble man, a man of real creativity and great energy, a real servant of mankind. He has a fine sense of humor, too, and can even laugh at himself.
This man deserves the Medal of Freedom (or whatever it is that the prez bestows) more than anyone else who's received it.
He's not superhuman, but mighty close.
What's the point of your post--to imply that because of his admirable resume, Ralph Nader should be immune from even a hint of criticism from anyone?
Political rather than general couch potato-ness was my focus in the post above, though I admit it can quickly become useless to try to separate the two.
Anyway, I don't disagree with Desmoulins' point (if I can rephrase it?) that the general decline of flesh and blood personhood in the US is a more complexly caused phenomenon out of which political apathy {therefore} becomes more an effect than a cause.
To me, though, it's still importantly telling that one of the most credible and most visible progressive analysts in the country, Ralph Nader, appears to have personally given up hope for any kind of grass roots reform of the System.
And that, here, on Common Dreams, a gathering place of many of the best, however less-visible, similar thinkers, Nader's giving up is being met with, so far at least, not much more than mild bemusement.
I personally feel Ralph has NOT given up on grassroots movements...he's been patiently waiting for a revival for almost 10 years now.... it is US that have given up on grassroots mass movements....he is still doing his thing....TRYING TO WAKE US ALL UP....poor, middle-class and NOW THE RICH!!!
Ask more of yourself than just online bantering and get out in the community where you live and get your fellow members to get out of their comfort (or discomfort) zone and GET AS ANGRY AS THOSE DAMN TEA-BAGGERS AND MAKE NOISE!!! SHAKE THE ESTABLISHMENT.... WE ON THE LEFT MUST GET OUT AND GET GOING!!!
Poor Ralph can't get a f'ing break from the progressives in this country!!
One can support Nader and vote for him--as I have--while reserving the right to call him out when he does or says something stupid, as he as on occasion--courting the financial and organizational support of the Newman/Fulani cult in 2004 was the most glaring stupidity, but there have been others, such as his repeated racial references to Obama during the campaign, culminating in his dopey "Uncle Tom" statement after the election.
Ralph is a great American--but he is no more infallible than the pope.
It's bizarre that presumably critical-minded progressives treat certain personages like demigods.
Ralph Nader is a fine progressive analyst. As for him being an effective political leader cum candidate, I don't know.
Seems to me that any political leader who runs for office, especially a grass roots hullabalooing progressive, needs to proactively organize a halfway serious street smart campaign, and not expect that just by giving enlightened lectures in selected, generally well-appointed venues, masses of voters will therefore flock to and work for him/her by mere dint of his/her analytic brilliance.
It's indisputable that "...THE LEFT MUST GET OUT AND GET GOING...."
But that almost never happens spontaneously among disorganized masses unless a campaign-competent candidate first, organizationally, gets the going going.
No criticism of Ralph intended. Not as a progressive analyst, anyway.
Dem. Party voters are partisan, many acknowledge voting for what they claim, falsely, are "lesser evil" candidates, and others are irresponsible because they make no effort to intelligently give due consideration to alternative, say, candidates, regardless of which political parties they're from. Maybe Nader's new fictional approach might work, if some or enough of the rich people he refers to in his 700-page book do as he describes therein. After all, they're not "angels", as Nader says, and "lesser evil" is definitely not of angelic. Of course he's not likely to win over more than very, very few of these rich people in the book, he'd be lucky to gain one ally among them. But if these people "convert" enough, then maybe Dem. "lesser evil"-liking voters will be amenable to a little change of their puny minds and inflated egos. I doubt that he seriously thinks these rich people will "convert", and believe he knows very few voters will ever read the book. Maybe it's for some publicity, getting his name out in public in another way than how he usually does it.
How about Tim Robbins making a movie based on this book of fiction by Nader? This'd surely help for publicity.
I haven't read his book yet, but one thing we can count on, Ralph will hit the nail on the head as usual, even if the outcome is highly doubtful.
Maybe only oligarchs can beat the oligarchy, a contradiction it seems. Systemic changes in the capitalist system that produces oligarchs would inevitably cause these to lose their money-power to a democratized economy. This is something I just can't see happening unless things deteriorate to the point that oligarch lives are at risk, and even then some "would rather die than to give up any advantage".
Banking families like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and JP Morgans are ultimately the Central Banks and Fed's owners and true masters of the universe to which all corporations must bow before if they are to get loans conditioned on realizing ever higher profits at any cost. Trump, Yoko, Buffet, Cosby and others Ralph mentions are hardly a match for them.
Good Luck, Ralph and thanks for all you have done and for all you keep trying to do for America.
I didn't mean to say Ralph Nader is above criticism! I don't know either how credible is the idea of appealing to a few members of the corporate oligarchy who might happen to have a conscience... We are talking about fiction here... but what the hell. And Mark, thanks for your further posts. Here's a link to an interesting article I just read on znet by a guy who, from his website, seems to have spent his life walking the walk: http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/22498. It's called "Revolution in the Time of Hamsters."
I happen to think it's pretty obnoxious to place one's responses at the top of the thread rather than appending them to the comment to which you are responding. First of all, it's dysfunctional--no one knows which comment you're responding to. Second, it's kind of exhibitionistic--like you're so afraid someone won't read your comment if its a few inches down the screen.
Say it ain't so, Ralph. The tyranny of America is that it's a worldly hell where you can get absolutely ANYTHING you DON'T want, but NOTHING you really do. We don't need more of this; instead, a champion for single-payer or single term!
The book sounds like Ralph Naders equivalent to Ed Abbeys 'The Monkey Wrench Gang'.
Ralph Nader was the only Presidential candidate that actually has done legitimate work (many by the way) for the country. He always defines what America is to me more so the than the so called Patriots that our stuffed down our throats.
Nice to see that "progressives" are as much sheep as the public they condemn. Nader is your shepherd, and when he dies, who will you all hero-worship and make rich then? Nader gets paid to write articles - he doesn't do it because he's a dissident! Until you people start supporting honest individuals - instead of celebrities! - no one will ever listen to you.
Nader is wrong. The CEOs and super wealthy DON'T GIVE A DAMN, neither do many Americans. Time to grow up!
The reality is Nader just wants his ego stroked by having the likes of Warren Buffet read his "book".
I was banned last year by commondreams for attacking Obama. I can see most on common dreams are FANATICS in the true sense of the word. Nader originally told you all to condemn CEOs and corporations, so you did. Now Nader tells you to support them, and so you do. Sheep!
I once cared about these issues. Now, I don't give a damn! You lot are just FANATICS, who abuse and insult everyone who doesn't worship your latest GOD. Once it was Chomsky, now it's Nader.
You lot are changing nothing, you're just turning people away with your teenage behavior. I won't be coming back to common dreams, or donating. It's a joke!