Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Study Finds Lack of Insurance Can Be Lethal
As medical care has improved for people with health insurance, the consequences of being uninsured have worsened, according to a new study that says the lack of coverage translates into nearly 45,000 deaths each year among working-age Americans.
A protester holds a sign outside a building where a dialogue on the proposed healthcare reform for ticketed guests is being held in Dallas, Texas August 17, 2009.
(REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi) Researchers from Cambridge Health Alliance reported yesterday in the American Journal of Public Health on a study that followed 9,005 adults under 65 years old who took part in a national survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 1986 through 1994. After 12 years, 351 people had died. Sixty of them were uninsured, and 291 were insured.
After accounting for differences in age, education, income, and other factors, the researchers found that people without private insurance had a 40 percent higher risk of dying than people with private insurance.
An earlier study by the Institute of Medicine based on 16 years of data through 1993 found that uninsured people had a 25 percent higher risk of dying than insured people, which translated into 18,000 additional deaths.
"Being uninsured is more lethal relative to being insured than it was 20 years ago,'' coauthor Dr. Steffie Woolhandler said in an interview.
According to US Census figures released earlier this month, the number of uninsured people rose from 45.7 million in 2007 to 46.3 million in 2008.
Woolhandler, who advocates a single-payer form of universal health coverage, blamed three factors for the widening gap between those with and without insurance. More people are uninsured and the safety net for those people has eroded, she said. But the gap has also grown because the care that insured people are more likely to get has gotten better.
Treatments for chronic illnesses have improved, including blood pressure medications to control hypertension and statins to lower cholesterol, the authors write.
"We're much more vigilant about care of high cholesterol, diabetes, and hypertension, which has lowered the death rate of people with insurance, which is great, but the uninsured have not shared in those benefits,'' Woolhandler said.
"Uninsured people who have a chronic condition are less likely to know they have it, and even when they know they have it, they are less likely to be able to control it because control of chronic conditions involves regular visits to a primary care doctor.''
Dr. John Z. Ayanian, a professor of medicine and health policy at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, served on the committee that issued the 2002 Institute of Medicine report. He said the newer work confirms the results of several prior studies.
It also fits with his own research analyzing what happens when uninsured people turn 65 and qualify for Medicare. In that study, published in 2007, people with diabetes or cardiovascular disease were especially likely to see dramatic improvements in their health after gaining insurance coverage through the national plan for the elderly.
"This study underscores the serious health consequences that people face when they are uninsured, as well as the potential benefit of extending coverage to all Americans so that they have access to good primary and specialty care when they need it,'' Ayanian said.
- Posted in

35 Comments so far
Show AllThat's 15 World Trade Centers a year, every year.
Joe
You took the words right out of my mouth.
But at least they are not being killed by Arab terrorists, THAT would be UNACCEPTABLE.
(Sarcasm implied...)
The biggest opposer to the healthcare reform are the corporations and the rich. Why? Because they use their healthcare plan as an incentive to work for them. In essence, the corporations have you enslaved. Because without a job, most cannot afford the health plans out there.
If there is a national health plan, there is no real incentives for most to be working for someone else. They could work for themselves and be much happier.
So true. I really feel that so many laws are written in an attempt to keep people enslaved to the corporate overlords. It really is disgusting.
Of course. It's called gaming the system. That's what these sophistic bastards do while simultaneously putting pretty titles on the laws that disempower, enslave and criminalize humanity. To them, a level playing field is an alpine slope; they're at the top complaining that you are so weak down there trying to climb the steep slope that is "all in your mind" because all they see is a level playing field.
Mens Rea from the word go.
In Calculus the derivative in regard to the position of a point on a line is the slope. The derivative of the slope in regard to time is the velocity. The derivative of the velocity in regard to time is acceleration. Corporate crooks have turned humanity into a commodity by taking our common needs and "deriving" the derivative of the derivative until the only thing that matters is profit. So they turn the equation on it's head and end up seeking to kill people they were entrusted to care for simply because they aren't profitable. The lawyers and accountants in these corporations are spiritually dead. They are as evil as the worst Nazi concentration camp manager ever was. Prison is too good for this filth.
"The lawyers and accountants in these corporations are spiritually dead. They are as evil as the worst Nazi concentration camp manager ever was. Prison is too good for this filth."
Agreed. I'd add CEOs to that list also.
jbentham
"After 12 years, 351 people had died. Sixty of them were uninsured, and 291 were insured."
If those were the statistics, then insurance would seem to be the more lethal option. A misprint?
No, because a large majority of the study cohort had insurance, with the uninsured over-represented among the deaths. Other adjustments were made as well to remove other possible factors.
I am happy to see that someone pays attention to statistics! But pjd412 is correct. It depends on how many you started with in each category, insured and uninsured.
Reporting of statistics in the press could use a lot of improvement. Sometimes the understanding is not there (for instance equating a correlation with a cause or citing an average in a skewed distribution) and sometimes there is not clear and sufficient context or detail. It is an art to present statistics in an educational manner. Reporters should have to take a course in it!
Joe
They can't pull the plug on grandma if she was never plugged in.......
I'm Canadian.
I choose whatever doctor I want to see.
When I do see a doctor, I pay NO deductible, NO co-pays, no fees at all.
Also, my insurance premiums are $0. That's right NO insurance premiums.
I pay no money to see a doctor whether I'm working or unemployed.
I do pay for prescription drugs and dentists but I have insurance for those.
So what.
Our CEOs make more money than your CEOs, and our military wastes more money than yours does, and, and our lobbyists spend more on our politicians than you all do, and we have really cool prescription drug ads on our TVs that we pay for with our insurance premiums.
So there, take that Canada!!!!!!
Canadians may be connected to history. Canadians may be connected to nature. Canadians may be connected to reality. But USans are connected to gold, godz and gunz!!! Take that!
Phasor: You sure know how to hurt a guy!
The US is all about warfare not healthcare and Canada is the oppositve. Damn those Canadians, eh?
Yeah, and another thing, Canada, we got bombs -- we can blow shit up.
Top that!!!
Phasor, I had the same system as you for 21 years somewhere else. After 30 years of this American marvel of capitalism, I'd go back at the drop of a hat. If nothing else, I didn't spend all those 21 years worring about losing everything I had worked for all my life if I got sick or into an accident. This shit system takes 10 years off the life span of every working class USan
Well said.
Bring America Back !!!!
**Lets translate this into common sense:
====Under current reforms proposed this says, if the 45,000 dead were forced--required to buy insurance (whether they could afford it or not--you know the 47 million of us) then at least some, most, or all would still be alive today ! Still alive, but maybe in prison for not paying Govt for its required pound of flesh !!!!
====Simply then, if the 45,000 dead did have Free Medical Healthcare as a right for being a human in America, would not this research prove indeed , ALL of them, every last curable one would still be surviving ???? Did not Senator Kennedy state his plan that US Healthcare is a Right and not an affordable Priviledge ???
****The choice is clear===to save these lives who were uninsured, we must all be given free medical care under a single payer system funded by the US Govt !
ALAS, Prez Obama and our lobby infected Congress tell us the Single Payer System is 'off the table' and we will NOT get it !
Barak Obama has caved-in to Big Med, Big Pharma, Big AMA,
Big HMOs, just as he has failed on all of his major campaign promises for Change ! He promised to end the influence of the Culture of Corruption in DC, but instead He has become part and parcel of it !!
BO did not become part of the corruption in D.C., he always was part of the corruption in D.C.! All you have to do is check out his previous voting record in congress. BO is the consummate con man and he still has much of his constituency still conned.
Having the best insurance available may not be such a bargain either. Consider that on the order of 100,000 USans, more than double the number cited in the article, die each year from hospital-acquired infections, medication errors, and other high-tech bungling.
The better your insurance, the more likely you are to be "procedured" to death---an unintended consequence of health care rationing based on the ability to pay.
Thanks for pointing this out. I was trying to figure out how to say it. Historically, when doctors have gone on strike, the death rate falls.
"Treatments for chronic illnesses have improved, including blood pressure medications to control hypertension and statins to lower cholesterol"
I don't call those healthcare improvements. Maybe they are improvements for the portfolios of big pharma investors but that's something different. But here in the land of radical liberalism, war is peace and down is up and everyone is "entitled to his own opinion", that is, until the fossil supply ceases to fuel it.
45 million in the U.S. with no health coverage, and 45 thousand annual deaths among these uninsured due to their lack of coverage -- this should be so far beyond unacceptable to ALL of us. Those of us who are insured should simply refuse to any longer do business with these vampires -- just cancel the policy. That's right, just like that -- one phone call.
Unrealistic? Simplistic? Maybe so, but if enough of us who are insured would do it we could, with no help from Congress, bring Big Insurance to their knees overnight.
The power we hold collectively if we would only organize is a power the PTB could never hope to match.
That's exactly what I've been saying for years now. If we all drop the bastards and line the emergency rooms from coast to coast, it will be a month before we have a healthcare policy that we can all live with and by.
You are right.
I haven't paid an insurance premium in over 10 years. But you better be prepared to take care of yourself through food, activity and natural medicine. And set aside at least some of the premium money for medical costs.
I could have paid the premiums but they would have had to come out of savings that were too scarce to spend on something that wouldn't pay for the treatments I would choose if I really did get sick. I've just been annoyed that I am not allowed a medical savings account to be able to use pre-tax dollars for health care expenses. You can't get a tax break unless you pay your dues to their agents (masters?), the insurance companies. Imagine that, in the Land of the Free...
No, shit! They actually had to do a study for this?
Surely there a way this can be pinned on "Arab terrorists" ?
Study Finds Lack of Insurance Can Be Lethal
___________________________________________
Who knew? I haven't been this blindsided since I read "Study Finds Water Wet"!
· Yr Obd't Servant
What kind of values do the conservatives, who had a" values conference" today , actually practice when they are against health care for everyone. Denying sick people medical care, because they are in the country illegally or they have pregnancy complications or they do not have enough income to afford private premiums, rent, food, clothes and transportation, is this an American value? These Republican extreme right wingers opened the conference with the song "God do not bless America" because they believe that we Americans who want to heal the sick are evil people and we are in control of the government therefore America should not be blessed? But asking for God's blessing means asking God to make holy or sanctify. Who would ask God not to preserve America from evil, the Anti- Christ? Are these the Hypocrites who called Obama the Anti-Christ? allowing nearly 45,000 deaths each year among working-age Americans is not pro-life.
They want to protect the unborn, but not with medical care.
Joe
It's difficult to walk without legs.
It's hard to see when you are blind.
Water is wet.
Mean people run health insurance corporations.
Duh...
It's difficult to walk without legs.
It's hard to see when you are blind.
Water is wet.
Mean people run health insurance corporations.
Duh...