Canada's Becoming a 'Global Carbon Bully': Greenpeace
Canada's greenhouse-gas emissions are up 26 per cent since 1990
MONTREAL - A new report from Greenpeace says oil production in Alberta's tar sands has made Canada into a "global carbon bully."
Little has been done to tackle climate change in Canada, and the federal government has actively tried to block international agreements and laws targeting climate change, says the report, called Dirty Oil: How The Tar Sands Are Fuelling the Global Climate Crisis.
Meanwhile, oilsands projects in northern Alberta are creating more greenhouse-gas emissions (GHGs) per year than several small European countries, and by 2020, will be more than what's produced by Austria or Ireland, the report says.
Continued growth in the oilsands will mean that by 2020, more carbon dioxide will be produced there than by all the volcanoes in the world put together, the report says.
"Canada is now one of the world's leading emitters of GHGs, and a global defender of dirty fuels," writes author Andrew Nikiforuk, an award-winning Calgary-based science writer who last year published Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of the Continent.
Canada's emissions from greenhouse gases, which are linked to climate change, have increased by more than 26 per cent since 1990. Canada's goal is to reduce emissions by 20 per cent from 2006 levels by 2020, a target that environmental groups say falls far short of what Canada must do to combat climate change.
"This report shows how Canada is not doing its part in the fight against climate change - in fact, it is allowing foreign oil companies to massively invest in the tar sands," said Virginie Lambert-Ferry of Greenpeace Québec.
Canadian environmental groups are trying to garner attention about the environmental impact of the oilsands ahead of a meeting in Washington Wednesday between between US. President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
Among the topics up for discussion are climate change, and upcoming international climate talks in Copenhagen in December, where countries are going to try to come up with post-Kyoto Protocol targets for greenhouse-gas reductions.
Prentice will also be taking part in Wednesday's talks. On Tuesday, his office said in a statement that reaching Canada's greenhouse-gas emission targets by 2020 will require "major efforts."
"Our actions will involve participation by all the key sectors and sources of emissions, including the oilsands," the statement said.
Extracting oil from the tar sands requires "extreme" amounts of hydrogen, electricity, steam, hot water, diesel fuel and natural gas, Nikiforuk writes.
To meet future energy needs in the tar sands, several companies have already said they are interested in building nuclear reactors in northern Alberta to provide the energy needed to extract oil.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show AllI think the whole silly debate is supported by an elitist education system in Canada. Only the academics get reported in the media, and the ordinary people, who are more intelligent and have the added advantage of common sense, are left wondering why CO2, or plant food as it is better known, is being regarded as a toxin. After all, as everyone surely knows, there was five times more CO2 during the Jurassic and at least fifteen times more plant life and three times more animal life.
Ordinary folks are wondering, should we not have more CO2 in the atmosphere?
But in most countries this is pure entertainment... TV showing the sea rising on islands (that are actually sinking, or that are conning gullible UN funders for free money as compensation).
AGW indeed!
The solution is simple. Vote Harper out of office and never again vote for the Conservatives! Better still... Canada should trade Harper, his minions and all his supporters to the US, for Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich and their supporters. Then we close the border!
Don't mean to interfere in internal afairs of sovereign nations but my understanding is the liberals signed the Kyoto accord but did not honor it. I also hear they hit you with the largest tax grab in ON (heatlth tax). Whereas Steve lowered your hated GST by 1%, or was it 2%?
I guess we'll see how your fall elections are gonna pan out. How many was that? 3 in the last 5 years?
Oh, i thought Canada signed and ratified to Kyoto agreement, while the big bad US didn't.
", it is allowing foreign oil companies to massively invest in the tar sands"
On the other hand, money has to come in from somewhere to pay for all that "free" healthcare.
"Oh, i thought Canada signed and ratified to Kyoto agreement, while the big bad US didn't."
Indeed we did, but did not live up to the demands of that international agreement. If only sovereign nations would honour the international laws and agreements to which they are signatories.
Canada's health care system has nothing whatever to do with this. Sure, try to change the news to your own agenda. You're a low life shill for some filthy repugnican pig so can that BS.
This is driven like most everything now, GREED! If I had several billion dollars to spread around I have no doubts I could buy a legislator or several in ANY nation and Canada is not immune to greed.
Thank you for the compliment (low life shill). Next time pls refrain from using the people's bandwith for personal attacks.
Anyway, the "free" Canadian healthcare is paid for by taxes. So the more business there is, the more money comes in. And yes that was a cheap shot on my part. I lived for quite a while in Canada and the healthare system works ok more or less. I personally was happy with it.
As long as oilmen from Alberta run the federal government, nothing will change. Provinces like Quebec can do all they want to live green, but Albertan money will contaminate the entire globe. To build malls and McMansions in Calgary.
I guess I won't move to Canada after all...
::::sigh:::: It's always something