EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- The Sick Madness of Tom Friedman's Culture
Popular content
Today's Top News
NATO Chief Orders Investigation Into Airstrike Deaths of Afghan Villagers
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen yesterday pledged a full inquiry into an airstrike that killed as many as 90 people in Afghanistan, when the alliance's war planes destroyed two of their own petrol tankers hijacked by the Taliban.
Shafiullah, 10, an Afghan boy, who was injured by Friday's NATO airstrike, looks at a camera as he lies on a bed at a hospital in Kunduz, Kunduz province, north of Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009. (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq) The strike in the northern province of Kunduz triggered fears of a large civilian death count, something NATO has been struggling to prevent. It is concerned that it would further undermine its already struggling counter-insurgency strategy.
Hamid Karzai, the Afghan President, announced that he was creating his own panel to look into the attack, saying: "Targeting civilians is unacceptable for us."
David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, also called for an urgent investigation. "It's important that we are very open and clear about what happened and make sure that it doesn't happen again," he said.
A German army spokesman said that at least 56 of the dead were Taliban fighters. The governor of Kunduz province, on the border with Tajikistan, said that about 90 people died, and a NATO spokesman admitted that a large number of wounded civilians were arriving at nearby hospitals.
"Based on the information we are receiving from Kunduz, it would appear that many civilian casualties are being evacuated and treated in the local hospitals. There is perhaps a direct link with the incident that has occurred around the two fuel trucks," said Brigadier General Eric Tremblay.
The civilians had apparently come out to take free petrol that the insurgents were offering from the hijacked trucks, one of which had apparently got stuck in mud on a river bank, when the NATO planes struck. A spokesman for the health ministry in Kabul said that as many as 250 villages had come out of their homes to take advantage of the handout.
NATO's US commander has tried to shift the emphasis away from attacks that cause massive civilian casualties and alienate public opinion, and more towards protecting the population from the Taliban. Airstrikes are not supposed to be launched unless it is clear that the target is purely military.
The deadly strike coincided with Gordon Brown's policy speech on the war, in which he said Britain is determined to keep its forces in Afghanistan despite fading public support for the eight-year conflict.
The Prime Minister's speech was also overshadowed by the resignation the night before of a defence aide, Eric Joyce, a former Army major, over the Government's handling of the conflict.
Taliban fighters hijacked the two tankers, contracted to ship fuel to German forces, late on Thursday night at a river crossing near the village of Omar Khmel, Afghan police said.
Locals said that civilians had been horribly injured in the explosion. "Nobody was in one piece. Hands, legs and body parts were scattered everywhere. Those who were away from the fuel tanker were badly burnt," said one villager, Mohammad Daud.
"My brother was burnt when the aircraft bombed the fuel tankers. I don't know whether he is dead or alive," said Ghulam Yahya, a distraught relative who along with dozens of others had gathered outside Kunduz Central Hospital in the provincial capital.
Convoys are one of the vulnerable aspects of the NATO operation. On Thursday, a French soldier was killed and nine wounded by a roadside bomb while scouting a route for a logistics convoy. Three Afghan security guards were also killed when a suicide car bomber rammed the convoy they were escorting in the normally quiet west of the country.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllYes it is worth it, to the wealthy protected corporatistas.
That's the way to win hearts and minds! By separating them into their individual parts. This sort of thing isn't going to drive more people to support the taliban, no, of course not. We're ever so much more efficient at occupation than the Germans or the Empire of Japan, we'll drop bombs on territory that we occupy.
Peace will come, in pieces...
Investigation? What's to investigate? NATO firebombed a small Afghan village.
Remember the little Vietnamese girl running naked?
"The civilians had apparently come out to take free petrol that the insurgents were offering from the hijacked trucks..."
Mmmmm, take from the rich, give to the poor. Who ya going to side with? Robin Hood or King John?
If a spokesman stated 56 of the Killed were Taliban fighters then , using ample precedent of Western spokesmen inflating such numbers, we can estimate that amongst the dead were some 5 or 6 Taliban.
In any case that begs the question.
Assuming people were starving and the Taliban gathered to pass out free food to starving women and Children.
Would that grouping of Taliban mean it "target rich" and thus warranting an air strike?
This is mass murder. Is the intent to "Terrorize" the population so they will not even go out for "free fuel" because they fear a Nato attack?
How is this different then Killing Afghanis who went to vote?
The photo shows people around the charred remains.
Don't get too many people in one place or the allies will drop another bomb, that's a common practice over there.
*********
Next time they won't bother hijacking it, they will just use a grenade launcher.
This is obviously some sort of terrible mistake or accident!
Nothing like this has EVER happened before!*
* This comment made possible by Obamatech Moving-Forward Goggles™-- the goggles that transform even the Amerikan imperialist horrorshow into a rosy blur!
· Yr Obd't Servant
If 2 F-16s had crashed, with aircrews killed or badly injured, they would have been grounded until the problem was fixed. McChrystal will continue the bombings; after all, nobody important was hurt.
Greatest military in the world? When your targets are 2 trucks driving in an area of the world that is so sparsely populated, are you telling us that you can't shoot at these objects when there are no civilians around? Give me and the Afghans a break.
Military: get out of the Middle East. You can't 'win' and you WON'T win.
It seems like this is being blamed on the US troops but if you read the facts you would realize that this bombing was called in by a the Germain troops in Afghanistan.
Who was flying the planes and who was the ultimate commander?
It was a US plane responding to a call by the Germain command. It's an Allied Coalition force. The US is in charge however lower ranking commanders have the full authority to order stikes.
I just find it funny how everytime something goes wrong in the world the US must be held responsible.
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around is the US responsible.
~it's a rhetorical question.
Looks like these Taliban were emulating Robin Hood.
Another Official Investigation ! ! !
Kill as many Muslims as possible because it will help promote the G.W.Bush/Obama´s war on Islam.
Afghanistan -- Iraq -- Lebanon -- Gaza -- Pakistan -- WHERE EVER.
Onward Christian Soldiers Jesus loves you.