Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A National Movement of Foodies, Farmers, Parents and Educators Is Pushing for Better School Food
There's unusual lunchtime chatter at ACE Charter School in East San Jose: Students are actually raving about lunch. School lunch. And so are some teachers.
Fresh chopped vegetables are placed in a tray in the kitchen of Revolution Foods in Los Angeles August 19, 2009. Privately held Revolution Foods, which delivers health-focused, made-from-scratch lunches, breakfast and snacks to schools around California, got $6.5 million to expand into Colorado and Washington, D.C., bringing its total venture funding thus far to $17 million. (REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni) Just ask Arallana Sanchez, 11, in between her munches on a chicken barbecue sandwich and sips of organic, hormone-free milk. "At my old school everyone always drank chocolate milk because the regular milk tasted like it had expired."
Serving healthful meals at school is tougher than ever - most campuses don't even have kitchens anymore. And the federal government's low reimbursement rate - $2.68 for each poor child who qualifies for free lunch - makes it tough to buy high-quality produce. As school budgets get squeezed, many districts are going with the vendors offering the best bargain, not the best food.
But now a national push is under way to improve students' midday meal.
Schools like ACE Charter are contracting with companies that provide organic lunches. "Farm to School" programs that connect schools with local farms - like the relationship between Full Circle Farm in Sunnyvale and Santa Clara Unified School District - are popping up nationwide. And Slow Food USA is organizing "Time for Lunch," a campaign designed to "get real food in schools." The effort kicks off on Labor Day with more than 300 "Eat-ins," or community pot lucks, planned across the nation.
Advocates hope the momentum will lead to an overhaul of the Child Nutrition Act, the bill that governs the National School Lunch Program and is up for reauthorization in Congress this fall.
"It's the right time for this campaign," said Gordon Jenkins of Slow Food USA. "People are more food conscious overall. We have Michelle Obama planting a garden in the White House lawn. Now the burden is on us to show that there's a political will for this."
Most local school districts contract with large food service companies that prepare food off-site, often in other states, then freeze it and ship it to school districts. The food is then heated in microwaves or warmers. Corn dogs, pizza, and nachos - meals that are high in fats and cholesterol - are standard fare.
"Schools don't have kitchens anymore," Jenkins said. "If we really want healthy food, the food needs to be prepared at the schools."
But cost is an enormous barrier. Advocates such as Slow Food, which was founded in opposition to fast food and emphasizes eating locally grown food, are urging Congress to raise the reimbursement rate so schools can buy fresher ingredients.
On Monday, Eat-Ins are scheduled in Hollister, Mountain View, San Jose, Sunnyvale, Santa Cruz and several other locations statewide. But it's not just California: organizers are thrilled that Eat-Ins have sprouted up in Iowa, Georgia and Wisconsin.
The Sunnyvale Eat-In takes place at Full Circle Farm. At the potluck lunch, open to the public, people will discuss the farm's efforts to promote healthful eating at local schools. Kids and parents will be encouraged to write letters to President Barack Obama asking for better school lunches and sign a "Time for Lunch" petition to Congress.
"If kids can see a green bean on the vine, and meet the farmer who grows it, versus watching it defrost or slosh out of a can, they are more apt to try it and make it a part of their diet," said Emma Mae Hoag of the Community Alliance with Family Farmers.
But as the school year gets under way, some students are already eating better.
Revolution Foods, which operates out of a vast kitchen near the Oakland airport, is rapidly expanding. It has contracts with ACE and other charter schools, the Santa Cruz City Schools and is expanding to other cities. The meals are not exotic: spaghetti and meatballs with steamed zucchini; burritos with brown rice; honey-glazed chicken with roasted potatoes and garlic braised collard greens. The food is never frozen, and it is shipped within 24 hours of preparation; there is no high fructose corn syrup or trans fats.
Vanessa Sifuentes principal of ACE Charter School in the Mayfair neighborhood of East San Jose, said "Rev Foods" makes an enormous difference in the lives of her 217 middle school students.
"Food absolutely affects their learning," said Sifuentes, who took the additional step of banning soda, candy, chips and fast food from the campus. "Usually kids eat lunch and get a sugar high; they're bouncy and can't concentrate. Then they crash from the sugar and have headaches. Now they're eating balanced meals, and they can focus. Some of our students are actually losing weight."
Revolution Foods sells high-end snack items through a partnership with Whole Foods. A percentage from the snack sales allows the company to charge school districts a sliding scale. Prices are less than $3 a meal for low-income schools - close to the federal reimbursement rate.
Kirsten Tobey, one of the company's co-founders, says there are a lot of misconceptions around what kids will and won't eat.
"Kids love fruit," said Tobey, who has a 2-year-old daughter. "But they want high quality fruit, not old fruit that's been bashed and bruised. They love food that is well prepared, and fresh. They respond to quality."
So far, the meals appear to be a hit. Though most teachers bring lunch from home, several ACE teachers say they regularly buy Revolution Food lunches, which cost $4.50 at full fare.
Dan Martinez, 11, was first in line for lunch earlier this week, and he knows the company's menu by heart.
"Yesterday we had my favorite: spaghetti," Martinez said. "Now if I eat too much junk food, I feel like I want to burst."
- Posted in



21 Comments so far
Show AllThanks for an uplifting story at a time in our country when so much is going in the wrong direction...
Sorry for the bad news. HR 2749 has to be stopped if we want farmers at all here and we want vitamins and minerals and natural supplements.
How about a story on a program like this in a non-charter, regular public school, please?
The Davis, California school district has such a program. Their website is http://www.davisfarmtoschool.org/. It's actually about much more than just food:
"The Davis Farm to School Connection embodies a systems approach to education by supporting programs within the Davis Joint Unified School District that connect classroom studies with hands-on experiences. These experiences include garden based learning, classroom cooking, cafeteria taste-testing, local farm visits for second graders and waste management programs such as composting and recycling. School lunch based on values that support a sustainable food system is envisioned as part of the educational culture." They are aiming to have 60% of the food in the schools sourced from local producers by next year. Local residents passed a city parcel tax measure last year which is helping to fund the program.
That's incredibly awesome, thanks!
That's terrific. What are you doing there to stop HR 2749 which is set to destroy small farmers before they can provide a thing? One senses that the government, in bed with Monsanto who wrote the bill, just loves having people focused on this sort of school choice issue so they miss the large take over of agriculture itself that is occurring here and worldwide. Just as bankers and healthcare corporations are making gargantuan grabs for more billions and more invasive control over our lives, the same is happening in farming where the multinationals are actually attempting to end normal farming here altogether. The regulations, fees, monitoring, surveillance, warrantless entry are nothing compared to Obama having appointed Monsanto VP and lawyer Michael Taylor (same guy who gave us rBGH and genetically engineered food and undid laws for stopping it) to oversee food safety at the FDA, Likely he will be the "Administrator" who punishes small farmers and producers with bankrupting penalties and eve prison for bureaucratic errors that harm no one, while companies like Cargill and ConAgra who kill people with their contaminated food will continue to be uninspected.
Basically, HR 2749 is set to turn the country side into a heavily regulated and controlled industry controlled by corporations in which farmers MUST buy pesticides and GMO seeds to meet the "modern scientific standards" for Good Agricultural Practices set by the World Trade Organization - which is Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ConAgra and the biotech corporations.
The farmers in this country need help even more than single payer does because they give us true health and with that, we might survive without the health care we deserve. By the way, the pharmaceutical industry screwing everyone with health care, is behind this bill which would destroy natural supplement companies, make it a crime to pass truthful nutritional information, mandate pesticides, GMOs, irradiation of food, etc. That is all part of Codex Alimentarius (learn all you can about it - http://www.ceri.com/ed-rath.htm) which was designed by the Nazi pharmaceutical companies Two of the same companies are providing the swine flu vaccine, despite a war crime history of killing with vaccines.
Obama doesn't care about farmers, or he'd stop using the government to destroy them for his Big Ag and Big Pharma connections. Instead, he gives us the charade of Michelle's organic garden and the USDA pretending it cares about school lunch programs while it is doing all it can to wipe out the farmers who would provide for it.
HR 2749 must be stopped. If you like farmers markets, if you like having farms in this country and not concentration camps for torture animals, do what you can to let others know how serious this is and stop it.
Writing as a former employee of LAUSD during the 80's (which had some of the more dire food offerings I had the misfortune to eat), I am glad that an undertaking such as the one explicated is being attempted (Jamie Oliver did much the same thing in the U.K.). Having seen first hand how regular food positively affects student performance, a small step towards better school lunches is something I heartily support.
Whine, whine, the government isn't feeding my spoiled child healthy food. Whatever happened to packig a sandwich and an apple? Afraid the bullies are gonna take it away?
Whine, whine, oh noes, people are actually trying get poor children good food. This is Evil Socialism Fascism. Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. Mao. Poor children deserve to starve. That is evolution, survival of the fittest, while rich bankers must be given huge amounts of money. Because they earned it.
I remember something about "Beggars can't be choosers". But that might have been too long ago to remember. Maybe cancelling that cell phone would help free some cash for food.
The lunch cost $2.25 (or 2.75 maybe). I finished school a long time ago but I still make my own lunch most of the time. Bun, mustard, cheese and some kind of cold cut. If I add it up it's less than $2.25. No school kitchen, cafeteria and government intervention needed. Just some good parenting.
BTW, bankers should not get money either.
Yeah, poor kids should eat crap food. That is what you are saying. Otherwise, it is Evil Socialism Fascism.
And yes, a lunch of a bun, mustard, some kind of cheap crappy cold cut filled with chemicals and synthesised from a bunch of artificial ingredients is crappy food. Just some BAD LAZY parenting.
If you're one of them rich liberal progressives and can afford oragnic beef everyday for lunch more power to you. Us poor slobs have to be happy with a cold cut sandwich, which is better than the crap at scool cafeteria. At least my kids (don't have any) wouldn't depend on the government to feed them crappy lunch.
Sorry, but a cold cut sandwich isn't better than the crap at a school cafeteria. Nutritionally, it is precisely the kind of unhealthy crap that a school cafeteria serves. Tossing a crappy cold cut in a sandwich is the epitome of lazy parenting. Just give the kid the money and tell him / her to eat at some fast food place while you're at it. Despite your claim, the choice is not between organic beef, and some cheap crap cold cut.
Not to mention that that is PRECISELY the point of this article. People want school cafeterias to serve better lunches. So, you agree then that school cafeterias should serve better food? You agree that poor kids should not have to eat crap food?
But then that is Evil Socialism Fascism, no? If poor kids are so badly fed and so hungry that they cannot focus on studies, it is their own damn fault. Survival of the fittest. That would mean making kids listen to speeches by Chairman Obamao.
I make $8.50 an hour and I buy organic fruits and veggies, a little grass-fed meat, organic cage-free eggs, organic milk, whole grain bread, pasta, cereal, etc, organic peanut butter for lunches, on and on, more and more these days from the various farmer's markets around here.
I sure as hell am not rich. But I also choose to not eat beef every day for lunch.
My, my, my, my, my.....you ARE a stellar human being aren't you? And maybe THE ONLY ONE on the planet. I loved being reminded of the "beggers can't be choosers" statement! I remember it well. I wonder who coined that one?..I bet it might have been one of those "compassionate conversatives"...the emphasis being on the word "compassionate" here. But since you have the all KNOWING eye and are living in THE BIG AIRPLANE looking down at the rest of humanity....I guess you know what is best for the rest of us. Thank you for sharing a piece of your wisdom with us.
"I guess you know what is best for the rest of us"
I think you are mistaking me for a rich liberal or the government. Those are the ones trying to tell everyone how to live their lives. I'm mostly a live and live kinda guy.
Yes. Conservatives, right wingers, right wing libertarians who care about their own civil liberties, but are perfectly willing to trample all over everyone else's civil liberties, do not try to tell people how to live their lives.
Tell me again what DOMA is, to pick one example, if it isn't an attempt to tell everyone how to live their lives?
I never said i was conservative. Frankly i don't care much for either "conservatives" or "progressives". Both of them are trying to impose their will on me.
I assume you mean the defense of marriage act? Personally, gays wanna get hitched, go ahead. As long as it won't interfere with my activities go ahead and live your life like you want. But, unfortunately, common sense has disappeared from our society and every self righteous (insert whatever term you want here) tries to impose his/her lifestyle and beliefs on others. That has to stop.
The government will either fund CAFOs or support farmers and what children will get will either make a shift toward health for them and income for farmers or continue to let corporations wreck health, the land and take jobs away from regular people.
But it is true that we shouldn't be depending on government for this but so long as your tax dollars go toward the corporations for this while you are additionally having to make that sandwich at home, it matters to have the system work for us and not them.
To get up to speed on the HR 2749 issues and to take appropriate action, I highly recommend visiting Community Alliance With Family Farms' website (www.caff.org). The page specifically about HR 2749 is
http://www.caff.org/policy/foodsafetyfederal.shtml
Thanks.