Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Following the Money from Defense Lobby
WASHINGTON - Defense lobbyists spent nearly $750,000 to help honor Obama administration officials during the first six months of the year, accounting for nearly half of the payments made then, a USA TODAY analysis of federal data shows.
Lockheed Martin, followed by three other defense contractors -BAE Systems, TriWest Healthcare Alliance and General Dynamics- reported spending the most. In many cases, the companies underwrote charity events in which the military's top brass or other key federal officials were honored or in attendance.
Overall, all lobbyists reported spending more than $1.6 million in the category of honorary expenses connected to executive branch officials between Jan. 1 and June 30. By comparison, lobbyists reported spending $2.3 million during the first six months of 2008, when President George W. Bush was in the White House. Defense contractors also topped the giving then, spending $1.8 million.
The spending, which is legal, represents another way for contractors to build relationships with the officials who have sway over their industry, said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "Most of their business is with the government," Sloan said. "Spending $50,000 is nothing if it warms up people to give them the next $100 million contract."
The analysis examined reports that lobbyists are required to file with Congress detailing donations to non-profit groups associated with public officials or payments made for events held in their honor. It did not include an additional $700,000 related to inaugural celebrations that lobbyists disclosed in separate reports.
Lockheed spent nearly $190,000 - including a $50,000 payment to the National Defense University that lists Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, as the honoree and another $50,000 to the Coast Guard Foundation for a dinner attended by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Lockheed is the top recipient of Defense Department contracts. Last month, the company was awarded an $821 million contract to service Homeland Security surveillance planes.Lockheed spokesman Jeff Adams said the payments reflect the company's long support for worthy causes. "We secure our contracts through the federal acquisition processes," he added, "not through the intervention of government officials."
Petraeus spokesman Erik Gunhus said the general has received awards at dinners recently but knew nothing of lobbyists' contributions to groups hosting the events and accepts no speaking fees.
Napolitano spokesman Matt Chandler said the secretary did nothing more than attend a dinner hosted by a Coast Guard-related non-profit and was "unaware of the contribution."
Overall, lobbyists and their employers reported more than $430,000 in expenses that list President Obama as an honoree. White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said the administration "has not authorized any corporations to make a contribution in the name of an administration official." In many cases, he added, the officials listed on lobbyists' reports either attended an event or spoke before a non-profit group and had "no contact with the event's corporate sponsors."
In some cases, top officials were at the center of the celebrations. Tyson Foods, for instance, reported a $10,000 payment in June to the Iowa Democratic Party for an event at which Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, a former Iowa governor, was inducted into the party's hall of fame.
Tyson spokesman Gary Mickelson said the company was one of multiple sponsors underwriting the June event. Some company officials "spent a matter of seconds greeting" Vilsack, Mickelson added, but "none had an extended conversation with him." Chris Mather, Vilsack's spokeswoman, said the secretary "had no idea who would be there or who the sponsors would be." Vilsack's decisions, she said, "are not based on contributions."
Contributing: Paul Overberg, Brad Heath and Seung Min Kim

9 Comments so far
Show All"Lockheed spokesman Jeff Adams said the payments reflect the company's long support for worthy causes."
One of the main causes is killing babies.
The use of the word "honor" in this context is beyond laughable, it is disgusting. There is no honor in stealing from the people to enrich a few wealthy elite neoliberal fascist weapons death eating politicos. The corruption is so blatant...they don't even bother to hide it.
As far as I am concerned anyone who was so "honored" should be in prison.
So why are we still at war?
Good advice, but not broad enough.... FOLLOW THE MONEY:
the defense lobby,
the pharmaceutical lobby,
the banking lobby,
the insurance lobby,
the transportation lobby,
the agricultural lobby,
etc., etc., etc.
Our "honorable" representatives in Washington are gettin rich and we the people are getting the stinky end of the stick.... (in my opinion)
It's not the Defense Lobby. It's the Weapons Lobby. The only things they defend are their political influence and their bottom line.
It's not the Defense Department. It's the Department of War. And the only things they defend are the rights of US corporations around the world.
Joe
These are bribes. We shall have corrupt governments as long as corporations have personhood.
Let us look at the truth and see who is making the money here. Do you have a 401K, mutual funds, enrolled in a state pension plan (oil companies, pharmaceutical, insurance)? You are the ones who are making the money from the big corporations. Yes you, the liberal elite. If you have investments, you are a part of your own greedy problem.
Newton, 10% of American families own over 80% of finacial assets in the U.S. The bottom 50% of families have next to nothing in terms of financial wealth. In otherwords, the vast majority of U.S. households are not part of the "greedy problem".
Larry Flynt wants a mass demonstration to get money out of politics:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-flynt/common-sense-2009_b_264706.html