Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
'15 Days to Copenhagen'
BERLIN - The disappointing results of negotiations in Bonn last week are indication that industrialised countries are unwilling to make substantial contributions to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.
They failed once again to meet the expectations formulated in 2007 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In a report in February 2007, the IPCC called for reductions of up to 40 percent up to 2020. Without substantial reductions, it warned, the average earth temperature would rise by more than two degrees Celsius by 2050.
A small house can be seen in front of a coal-burning power station located on the outskirts of Beijing August 17, 2009. China should set firm targets to limit greenhouse gas emissions so they peak around 2030, a study by some of the nation's top climate change policy advisers has proposed ahead of contentious talks on a new global warming pact. REUTERS/David Gray (CHINA BUSINESS SOCIETY ENVIRONMENT) Two degrees is considered the most that earth can tolerate if it is to maintain its ecological equilibrium. A temperature rise beyond this point, the IPCC said, would lead to environmental catastrophes from severe droughts to further melting of glaciers and rise in sea level, and stronger and more frequent cyclones and hurricanes.
The industrialised nations - other than the U.S. - responsible for most greenhouse gas emissions causing climate change, proposed reduction by 16 to 24 percent by 2020 relative to 1990 levels.
The U.S., the largest polluting country per capita by far, did not commit itself even to this. The total reductions offered by industrialised nations add up to far less if U.S. emissions are taken into account.
"If we count the U.S. emissions, then the reductions proposed in Bonn by industrialised nations fall to 10 to 15 percent," Martin Kaiser, climate change expert with the environmental organisation Greenpeace told IPS.
"If we continue at this rate we're not going to make it," Yvo de Boer, head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which hosted the meeting in Bonn, told a news conference after the closing of the negotiations. Some 2,000 delegates from 192 nations took part in the Bonn talks.
The conference in Copenhagen is expected to produce a binding global agreement on reducing emissions, to take over from the Kyoto protocol on climate change which expires in 2012.
De Boer said there are now only 15 days of negotiations left until the Copenhagen meeting. "A climate deal in Copenhagen this year is an unequivocal requirement to stop climate change from slipping out of control," he said.
The talks are scheduled to continue in Bangkok in late September and in Barcelona in November.
Eighty least developed countries, including several small island states, collectively called for reductions of at least 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, in order to keep the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees.
There is little sign of any such pledge. "Industrialised countries are playing poker with climate change," Stephen Byers, chair of the Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE), told IPS.
Byers said industrialised countries are waiting until the very end of the negotiations for reduction commitments by emerging economies, and only then reveal their hand. "This is a gambler's behaviour, and it's as wrong."
Byers urged the industrialised countries to "take a strategic approach to the climate change negotiations and commit to medium-term emissions reductions in line with the IPCC's analysis and an overall goal of limiting global temperature rise to two degrees Celsius."
Byers also demanded that the industrialised countries "recognise the scale of the required financial support from developed to developing economies to ensure effective implementation of the diverse outcomes of the Copenhagen conference."
GLOBE estimates that some 90 to 140 billion dollars a year might be needed to pay for climate change mitigation technologies and adaptation. GLOBE says predictable and sustained finance must be raised "according to the principle of common but differentiated responsibility, for example a levy on bunker fuels or aviation."
Delegates from the emerging new economies such as India and China accused industrialised countries of trying to shift the burden of reductions on to poorer countries.
"We still have the same problems that have been holding back an agreement," China's climate ambassador Yu Qingtai said at a press conference in Bonn.
Yvo de Boer had said at the last round of talks in June in Bonn that there remained "tough nuts to crack." Those nuts still remain, and remain just as hard.



5 Comments so far
Show AllGWa--holeBush said at the beginning of his illegal war "bring it on" and they did.
"The U.S., the largest polluting country per capita by far, did not commit itself even to this." The result of this policy will be the massive death of humans mostly in other countries. As you foreigners starve and die of thirst or watch your countrymen suffer through major storms. Think of our president who smugly states "make me do it".
The American people are in favor of reduction of co2 as well as other environment policies but we are coming to understand that with this president we have surely lost our voice and have lost our democracy.We seem to be quite powerless.
So people of the world make Obama do it.
"...environmental catastrophes from severe droughts to further melting of glaciers and rise in sea level, and stronger and more frequent cyclones and hurricanes."
Mother Nature's pissed and She's fixin' to clean house.
Here in So. Florida, it looks like Hurricane Bill is going to miss us but Hurricane Anna will hit us on Wednesday and Thursday.
Governments are not now or ever going to solve the climate crisis...they are insulated and mainly concerned with economic growth. We can point fingers all we want, but the only thing that will change anything is us. WE have to start sacrificing comfort and convenience and let go of expectations that the luxury lifestyle to which we are accustomed will continue. The truth is, a much lower energy lifestyle doesn't have to be painful! Getting caught with our collective pants down, however, would not be fun.
Please go to http://transitionus.org/why-transition. And get going in your own community.
What's this with the temp could rise by 2degrees celsius by 2050? I've read plenty of articles where some scientists are saying that we are past that already. THis article seems watered down a bit...