Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- When You're Cutting Social Security, 'Wealthy' Begins at $25K
- With Little More Than a Note, Obama Deploys US Troops To Niger
- Stripped of 'Country of Origin' Label, US Agrees to Sell Tear Gas to Egypt
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- Decolonize the Consumerist Wasteland: Re-imagining a World Beyond Capitalism and Communism
- Scale Implosion: After Ruining America, the Era of Giant Chain Stores Is Over
- 5 Reasons Why the Keystone XL Pipeline is Bad for the Economy
- Lose Your Lawn
Popular content
Today's Top News
Warning: Oil Supplies Are Running Out Fast
Catastrophic shortfalls threaten economic recovery, says world's top energy economist
The world is heading for a catastrophic energy crunch that could cripple a global economic recovery because most of the major oil fields in the world have passed their peak production, a leading energy economist has warned.
Higher oil prices brought on by a rapid increase in demand and a stagnation, or even decline, in supply could blow any recovery off course, said Dr Fatih Birol, the chief economist at the respected International Energy Agency (IEA) in Paris, which is charged with the task of assessing future energy supplies by OECD countries.
In an interview with The Independent, Dr Birol said that the public and many governments appeared to be oblivious to the fact that the oil on which modern civilisation depends is running out far faster than previously predicted and that global production is likely to peak in about 10 years - at least a decade earlier than most governments had estimated.
But the first detailed assessment of more than 800 oil fields in the world, covering three quarters of global reserves, has found that most of the biggest fields have already peaked and that the rate of decline in oil production is now running at nearly twice the pace as calculated just two years ago. On top of this, there is a problem of chronic under-investment by oil-producing countries, a feature that is set to result in an "oil crunch" within the next five years which will jeopardise any hope of a recovery from the present global economic recession, he said.
In a stark warning to Britain and the other Western powers, Dr Birol said that the market power of the very few oil-producing countries that hold substantial reserves of oil - mostly in the Middle East - would increase rapidly as the oil crisis begins to grip after 2010.
"One day we will run out of oil, it is not today or tomorrow, but one day we will run out of oil and we have to leave oil before oil leaves us, and we have to prepare ourselves for that day," Dr Birol said. "The earlier we start, the better, because all of our economic and social system is based on oil, so to change from that will take a lot of time and a lot of money and we should take this issue very seriously," he said.
"The market power of the very few oil-producing countries, mainly in the Middle East, will increase very quickly. They already have about 40 per cent share of the oil market and this will increase much more strongly in the future," he said.
There is now a real risk of a crunch in the oil supply after next year when demand picks up because not enough is being done to build up new supplies of oil to compensate for the rapid decline in existing fields.
The IEA estimates that the decline in oil production in existing fields is now running at 6.7 per cent a year compared to the 3.7 per cent decline it had estimated in 2007, which it now acknowledges to be wrong.
"If we see a tightness of the markets, people in the street will see it in terms of higher prices, much higher than we see now. It will have an impact on the economy, definitely, especially if we see this tightness in the markets in the next few years," Dr Birol said.
"It will be especially important because the global economy will still be very fragile, very vulnerable. Many people think there will be a recovery in a few years' time but it will be a slow recovery and a fragile recovery and we will have the risk that the recovery will be strangled with higher oil prices," he told The Independent.
In its first-ever assessment of the world's major oil fields, the IEA concluded that the global energy system was at a crossroads and that consumption of oil was "patently unsustainable", with expected demand far outstripping supply.
Oil production has already peaked in non-Opec countries and the era of cheap oil has come to an end, it warned.
In most fields, oil production has now peaked, which means that other sources of supply have to be found to meet existing demand.
Even if demand remained steady, the world would have to find the equivalent of four Saudi Arabias to maintain production, and six Saudi Arabias if it is to keep up with the expected increase in demand between now and 2030, Dr Birol said.
"It's a big challenge in terms of the geology, in terms of the investment and in terms of the geopolitics. So this is a big risk and it's mainly because of the rates of the declining oil fields," he said.
"Many governments now are more and more aware that at least the day of cheap and easy oil is over... [however] I'm not very optimistic about governments being aware of the difficulties we may face in the oil supply," he said.
Environmentalists fear that as supplies of conventional oil run out, governments will be forced to exploit even dirtier alternatives, such as the massive reserves of tar sands in Alberta, Canada, which would be immensely damaging to the environment because of the amount of energy needed to recover a barrel of tar-sand oil compared to the energy needed to collect the same amount of crude oil.
"Just because oil is running out faster than we have collectively assumed, does not mean the pressure is off on climate change," said Jeremy Leggett, a former oil-industry consultant and now a green entrepreneur with Solar Century.
"Shell and others want to turn to tar, and extract oil from coal. But these are very carbon-intensive processes, and will deepen the climate problem," Dr Leggett said.
"What we need to do is accelerate the mobilisation of renewables, energy efficiency and alternative transport.
"We have to do this for global warming reasons anyway, but the imminent energy crisis redoubles the imperative," he said.
Oil: An unclear future
*Why is oil so important as an energy source?
Crude oil has been critical for economic development and the smooth functioning of almost every aspect of society. Agriculture and food production is heavily dependent on oil for fuel and fertilisers. In the US, for instance, it takes the direct and indirect use of about six barrels of oil to raise one beef steer. It is the basis of most transport systems. Oil is also crucial to the drugs and chemicals industries and is a strategic asset for the military.
*How are oil reserves estimated?
The amount of oil recoverable is always going to be an assessment subject to the vagaries of economics - which determines the price of the oil and whether it is worth the costs of pumping it out -and technology, which determines how easy it is to discover and recover. Probable reserves have a better than 50 per cent chance of getting oil out. Possible reserves have less than 50 per cent chance.
*Why is there such disagreement over oil reserves?
All numbers tend to be informed estimates. Different experts make different assumptions so it is under- standable that they can come to different conclusions. Some countries see the size of their oilfields as a national security issue and do not want to provide accurate information. Another problem concerns how fast oil production is declining in fields that are past their peak production. The rate of decline can vary from field to field and this affects calculations on the size of the reserves. A further factor is the expected size of future demand for oil.
*What is "peak oil" and when will it be reached?
This is the point when the maximum rate at which oil is extracted reaches a peak because of technical and geological constraints, with global production going into decline from then on. The UK Government, along with many other governments, has believed that peak oil will not occur until well into the 21st Century, at least not until after 2030. The International Energy Agency believes peak oil will come perhaps by 2020. But it also believes that we are heading for an even earlier "oil crunch" because demand after 2010 is likely to exceed dwindling supplies.
*With global warming, why should we be worried about peak oil?
There are large reserves of non-conventional oil, such as the tar sands of Canada. But this oil is dirty and will produce vast amounts of carbon dioxide which will make a nonsense of any climate change agreement. Another problem concerns how fast oil production is declining in fields that are past their peak production. The rate of decline can vary from field to field and this affects calculations on the size of the reserves. If we are not adequately prepared for peak oil, global warming could become far worse than expected.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


58 Comments so far
Show AllCouple of things not mentioned in the article;
One is the amount of energy needed to extract the remaining oil is increasing exponentially. Most of he industrialized world was built using an energy surplus of 1 barrel of oil to get 100 barrels. We are now somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 to 10. It is estimated that civilization needs somewhere around 1 to 6 just to survive.
And no, this is not something that we can address with efficiency and cutting back a bit.
Second it the fact that all of the oil producing countries are using more and more of their own oil (bastards) which is decreasing the amount they are exporting speeding up the decline in available oil. Several countries have stopped exporting all together and many are starting to IMPORT oil making even less oil available and driving up prices.
Bottom line is unless we can go into more of these oil producing countries and encourage them to stop using their own oil (its easy, just call them terrorist and war on their colored a$$es) we will be using half of what we need to run this Country in just a few years.
Oh, yes there is also the issue of whether or not the world will continue to take our monopoly money in exchange for their resources but that's a whole nuther ball O wax.
Cheers!
"One is the amount of energy needed to extract the remaining oil is increasing exponentially"
Thank you for posting this critical fact. I'm not sure if civilization collapses with an output/input ratio under, 6 but it does stress that the remaining old economy energy needs to be used to produce the products necessary to power the renewable energy economy.
I don't think the "exponential" trend postulated above has been shown to be true. If it exists, the exponential growth rate in energy needed to extract oil must be very very low.
The thing I find amusing about the drive to use up every last drop of oil is our hubris of ignorance. Today petroleum gives us fuel, food, fertilizer, and plastic. Tomorrow this chemical compound may be manipulated to provide humanity with another incredible asset. It is foolish to think that the pinnacle purpose of petroleum is gasoline for an automobile. The oil that lies in the tar sands and in fragile ecosystems should be reserved for the future discoveries of mankind.
"Today petroleum gives us fuel, food, fertilizer, and plastic. Tomorrow this chemical compound may be manipulated to provide humanity with another incredible asset. "
NO THANKS. I can live without all those things. Those things are destructive. Those things are killing us. Whether you're talking about 137 degree daylight temperatures (already in Iraq) or mountains of plastic filth making a rotating island the size of the USA in the Pacific and destroying the food chain (which I have to eat...) Or even if your talking about pesticide-leaching, gut-busting GMO food on a huge unsustainable Agrifarm.
I don't want any more help from the government or industry trying to Kahn me into another consumer product that will enslave me to another monopoly on wall street.
Your predatory Capitalists/Monopolists are a cancer. Renewable energy (rooftop-owned residential solar) is the cure.
We need to surrender the private automobile cold turkey, and break the influence of big oil into thousands of small regional companies. Or we can do it your way and die a slow painful death worldwide.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
I think you miss the point. The notion is that our use of this limited resource is quite crude and that we are squandering it without realizing its ultimate potential. Similar to using radionuclides to boil water to drive turbines when we will undoubtedly discover that there are many more sophisticated uses for the energy of alpha particles.
so tell me tj, how's that petroleum free computer working out for ya?
"All idiocy needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain hypocrits."
Yeah,
Speaking of idiocy,
It seems you're completely unaware that the first personal computer by Apple was made of WOOD. No petroleum products were used at all except a small amount of wire insulation. The motherboard board was made of silicone. The only reason we have to form everything out of your beloved plastic and oil is because we can't kill the Exxon/Mobile Monopoly that you work for. And the Army of toxic lobbyists who have prostituted the government into a oil legislator of everything including food.
Since your such a fan of sludge and benzene residue, why don't you just drink oil? Whoops, I forgot, you already are every time you drink water out of a polycarbonate bottle. Bottoms up bright boy! Big Pharma just loves guys like you.
I was completely unaware that the first personal computer was made out of wood tj.
Does that make everyone who is unaware of that tidbit an idiot? Or are they merely beneath you and your superior being.
Your moral stance has shades of McCarthy and frackin' fundamentalists.
You don't like the message so you shoot the messenger.
Your aim is off mate. I am currently a gardener. The other work I've done has been primarily for non-profit community organizations. I've never owned a car or owned stock in the Exxon/Mobil Monopoly. I know the taste of tear gas.
Now that you know a bit more about me, howz about sharing a bit of yourself tj?
Do you use a wood computer tj?
Do you ever eat or drink something that wasn't produced within walking distance of your home?
Have you ever bought a CD or a toothbrush?
Have you ever lived 100% off the grid?
Is your life more comfortable than 95% of the world?
Have you given up all the conveniences one can enjoy living in America?
Fascism just loves guys like you.
Shades of Jimmy Carter. We were told exactly the same thing then in almost exactly the same way. Hogwash then, hogwash now.
"Shades of Jimmy Carter. We were told exactly the same thing then in almost exactly the same way. Hogwash then, hogwash now."
What an ignorant comment.
By your logic... "I have not died yet therefore I will never die".
Carter was correct then and he is even more correct now. Problem is if we might have had a chance to shift to a new and better society back when he first spoke. Now there is no way to avoid HUGE hurt.
Correctomundo Mr. souperman2. Carter was way ahead of is time. If we had started addressing our almost reckless use of oil back then we may have been in a better situation in dealing with peak oil now. My only question is when is the oily poop is going to hit the fan, in 5 years, 10 years, or more?
All I know is when it does hit, it aint going to be pretty.
Carter was President from 1977-1981. The Arab Oil Embargo was from October 1973 through 1974.
Carter simply realized the reality of dependence upon foreign oil with regard to National Security and as a moral man never considered that the US could simply start a war to steal the oil.
This article is good by MSM standards but it doesn't come close to telling us what we need to know. If the media were doing its job it would insert into articles like this one a paragraph or two summarizing the concensus of geologists regarding the probability of remaining fossil reserves. There are vast continental shelves that probably at one time hosted terrestrial life for millions of years. We don't know the probabilities because elites censor the truly useful information. We need to push for the open flow of information, obviously. We can use the information to set appropriate policy for the people to ultimately gain control over the economy and the society, ostracizing the elites.
That Henry 8...he's kind of a pill, hey?
"I'm yer eighth old man, I'm 'Enery, 'Enery the Eighth I am, I am." Sorry I can't supply the music.
"What an ignorant comment."
Henry8 specializes in them. Be forewarned.
Carter was, in my opinion, the best president of my lifetime. He was right on energy. He was right on human rights. He is right about Israel. He has a world view and that is about survival of the species, peace, and justice. He can see beyond the end of his own nose. For him to be ridiculed by the same people who voted for Bush/Cheney speaks volumes about the dichotomy in American outlooks and perceptions.
Henry8: I suggest you check the IEA website (http://www.iea.org/) and then tell us why you are a more reliable source of information about world oil supplies.
"She's been married seven times before, and every one was an Henery!"
Carter made the call a tad early. Seems to me it's sensible to say peak oil will be reached soon. I'm in the oil business, and we're having trouble finding new reserves the way we used to.
America to world's top energy economist:
Whatever. Pass the big mac and the remote, will ya?
The less oil, the less Sequoias, the less fish in the ocean, the more money somebody is going to make selling the last of it.
When the petroleum companies lock up all currently feasible alternative means of energy, when they run even the smallest competitors out of business, when the Democrats and Republicans have taken their cut, that's when those alternative energies will become available on a massive scale.
Petroleum companies don't have unique abilities to develop alternative energy supplies. You're free to find some yourself if you want to try it. What they have is a lot of cash they can't invest in classical oil plays, so of course they're starting to shift to wind power, biofuels, etc.
Fdoleza,
What about Brown's Gas, is there any research you know of them conducting on that?. I've just learned of it myself, accidentally and don't have links but then there's Google.
I never heard of Brown's gas, but I visited their website after finding it using google. It's bs.
Don't worry. First we finish carving up Alberta for the tar sands, then Colorado for the oil shale, destroy groundwater quality using hydraulic fracturing to exploit the remaining natural gas, then go after the methane hydrates on the ocean floors. Then coal liquifaction. Peak coal is coming too!
Then we reach 600 ppm CO2 and we all die from the coming climate change catastrophes.
Let there be peak oil!
Finally, get rid of the holy economy and of the plague of industrialism.
"Let there be peak oil!
Finally, get rid of the holy economy and of the plague of industrialism."
He types earnestly on his plastic (oil) keyboard without a hint of irony.
I'm sure he doesn't realize what primitive life is like.
He types on an oil keyboard, because there's no alternative due to BIG OIL coercion. He'd buy a wood or fiber one, but BIG OIL would have the government run that company out of business if they dared to make such a product.
Primitive Life: The current state of existence in 90 percent of American cities today. No health care, no jobs, no bank control, no safe food, no representation, no small businesses, no clean air, no independent media, no safety, no democracy, no future...
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
We basically agree.
Some people are so stuck in this dreadful world of ours, this destructive pattern called industrial society, so brainwashed to believe that this "culture" of ours is the height of civilization and frightened by real change, that they are incapable of imagining anything other than their present circumstances.
As soon as someone fancies something really other than our miserable society, they resort to hackneyned expressions such as 'ludite', 'anarchy', 'primitive life', 'caveman'. Those are the only alternatives they can think of, the ones, that is, that were etched into their brains by the insidious ideology that rules this society and according to which we represent the zenith of human evolution, the crown of creation.
Compelling remark!
There is nothing between this sickening excuse for a civilization and primitive life (assuming the latter expression has any meaning at all)?
Fine powers of observation!
Pointing out a benign performative contradiction, is that all you can come up with in defence of industrial society? The misery of industrial imagination.
And as civilization collapses in a fit of ludite anarchy, I'm sure you'll be building hand axes to prepare for your life as a caveman.
Who is afraid of caves and manual work?
I am. But I am old, so I do hope things will remain more or less the same until I die. As for the rest of you, stop having children if you want to go back to the caves. Or learn to eat each other.
I’m going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that the problem lies in perception, attitude and choices. Each of which underlie our current dilemma. The perception of
scarcity is a factor of cultural conditioning. To a point, of course. Starvation and hypothermia are conditions which have their roots in real-world conditions. But what I am referring to is the excess of consumerism as symbolized by the modern supermarkets and shopping malls and big box stores which dominate the landscape
of our unbridled desires. Therefore, if such consumption, which is petroleum-based
In every aspect, is the basis of our economy, we need to re-think our attitudes and choices insofar as they affect our ACTUAL suffering. Clearly, continuing down the path we are on will result in disaster of biblical proportions, for humanity and the natural world. Yet so far, attempts at mitigation seem half-hearted and aim at a propping up of the status quo, in the hopes that we can go merrily commuting on
and on, only in an alternatively-fueled fashion. Well, the party is almost over. It is probably a case of too little too late for individual actions to make any significant
impact. But in the face of overwhelming ignorance, denial, greed, and cultural inertia, one can still chose to pursue a path that is less destructive, even if only on a personal level. What I am talking about is not only alternative energy sources, but alternative lifestyles which are in harmony with the natural cycles of this earth,
of which we are an inseparable part. De-centralized, self-sufficient and sustainable
activities can be even more rewarding than spoon-fed cultural “entertainments”.
One can re-claim one’s humanity and feel empowered as well, simply by starting and tending an organic vegetable garden. The earth will thank you. Your body will thank you. You will feel like you are, in some small way, a part of the solution….
Beautiful post cpaddock,
and so true.....
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
oil:
further, deeper, dirtier, and still more of it demanded burning away our last chances to control global climate change.
after the oil is half gone, we'll still need the remaining droplets to wage wars, and make pesticides, right?
we aren't gonna give up war are we?
C'mon.
and then comes plastic. everyone loves plastic--what's not to like. those ubiquitous plastic bags? heck i bet you all got one over your head right now.
well, at least by the time oil is gone the trees will have grown back so we can burn them to get through those cold winter nites when Li'l Susie don't come home.
And we will keep warm cutting enough hay for the horses--if we got room for 'em in our 24 bedromm mansion we squatted from the Rockefellers.
we might look back on this prez heah, and think how this was our last chance to make the steel and aluminum enough for those turbines to generate wind power electricity. i mean thousands of them out in the ocean with those giant sailboats we cudda used, but ran out of energy to make, fiberglass, glass, metals, all requiring some part of oil or gas to make....oh well, then will come the famines and the economic collapse, unless that's what you wanna call this.
i mean, it may have started already, since everything in econ 101 said the future's all always already discounted in the present.
Propaganda regarding shortages tends to precede a big jump in of oil.
Environmentalists screaming about oil shoratges are doing Exxon's work for them. Preparing the way for public acceptance of $5.00 a gallon gas.
If Dr Birol had also called for nationalization of the oil giants and oil rationing, then I might take him seriously.
Conversion to a new energy economy requires removing Big Oil from the picture.
As the system stands now, "green" babble about conversion to a post oil economy is just nonsense while the financeers and multi-nationals control the show.
Environmentalists gleefully and sanctimoniously prophesizing the collapse of the American standard of living are elitist in there outlook, whether they realize it or not.
Five dollar a gallon gas is still cheap by most world wide standards, and
people tend to drive less when it nears that price. Most would agree that is not such a bad thing.
Removing “Big Oil” from the picture is about as likely as the U.S. converting her
swords into plowshares. Which leaves us facing a rather stark and grim future.
Nothing I feel “gleeful” about. I have children and grandchildren who deserve a
chance at a decent life.
To the extent that the environmentalists crying out for humanity to awaken from
their oil-addicted fantasy world are in the vast minority, then I guess that makes
them “elites”. But warning those standing on the tracks of a fast-approaching
freight train is hardly what I would call “propaganda
Are you talking about elitist environmentalists who can spell?
Horrors, did you find mispellings!!! Why that completely negates the thrust of my argument.
Sorry Miss SchoolTeacher.
Mike Ruppert has a blog and website, Fromthewilderness.com, and has written extensively about PEAK OIL and the big,big,big picture involving the fact of PeakOil and how it is being used (along with anything mass used to meet human needs) to generate yet more Disaster Capitalism.
what's disaster capitalism? Is there a counterpart, disaster socialism?
netminnow August 3rd, 2009 10:07 pm...MR went through hell after publishing "Crossing the Rubicon" and starting "From the Wilderness". He was driven out of the country to Venezuela, up to Canada and eventually to NYC, where he had to give up the fight before he was tortured any further. FTW is still there, but I doubt he is any longer involved. In my mind, "Crossing the Rubicon" remains the "bible" on 9/11 and peak oil.
TPTB almost drove the man insane. He did his best and as I said, I believe he has "retired" from the fight for his own well being.
I welcome $5 gasoline. Then I don't have some asshole in a Suburban towing a boat blowing my doors off when I'm doing the speed limit in the right lane. $5 gas makes people think about their need to drive to carry out the most unnecessary errands, it encourages people to carpool, it encourages people to slow down, it encourages people to live near to where they work. Paying something closer to the real cost of energy (extraction, refining, delivery AND environmental) is the impetus most of us need to embrace alternatives and get serious about conservation.
Happiness is ten, fifteen dollars a gallon.