Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Walter Cronkite, Iconic Anchorman, Dies
Walter Cronkite, an iconic CBS News journalist who defined the role of anchorman for a generation of television viewers, died Friday at the age of 92, his family said.
Walter Cronkite at the anchor desk. "My father Walter Cronkite died," his son Chip said just before 8
p.m. Eastern. CBS interrupted prime time programming to show an
obituary for the man who defined the network's news division.
Mr. Cronkite anchored the "CBS Evening News" from 1962 to 1981, at a time when television became the dominant medium of the United States. He figuratively held the hand of the American public during the civil rights movement, the space race, the Vietnam war, and the impeachment of Richard Nixon. During his tenure, network newscasts were expanded to 30 minutes from 15.
"It is impossible to imagine CBS News, journalism or indeed America without Walter Cronkite," Sean McManus, the president of CBS News, said in a statement. "More than just the best and most trusted anchor in history, he guided America through our crises, tragedies and also our victories and greatest moments."
Mr. McManus added: "No matter what the news event was, Walter was always the consummate professional with an un-paralleled sense of compassion, integrity, humanity, warmth, and occasionally even humor. There will never be another figure in American history who will hold the position Walter held in our minds, our hearts and on the television. We were blessed to have this man in our lives and words cannot describe how much he will be missed by those of us at CBS News and by all of America."
Mike Wallace, the "60 Minutes" correspondent emeritus, said simply in a statement, "We were proud to work with him - for him - we loved him."
Reassurance was Mr. Cronkite's stock in trade, the ability to convince viewers that when he was on the air all would turn out well.
In a review of Mr. Cronkite's autobiography in 1997, the former New York Times columnist Tom Wicker wrote:
When John F. Kennedy was murdered in Dallas in 1963, Walter Cronkite stayed on the air for the Columbia Broadcasting System for countless hours. His performance that weekend helped pull together a nation stricken with grief and was a signal event in television's evolution into the national nervous system.
When Mr. Cronkite came back from Vietnam after the Tet offensive of 1968, he concluded on national television that the war had become no better than a stalemate. Hearing that, President Lyndon Johnson told associates, "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost Middle America." And he had. When Mr. Cronkite asked Robert Kennedy, then a senator from New York, whether he would run for President in 1968, Kennedy turned the tables: he proposed that Mr. Cronkite should run for the Senate. Mr. Cronkite refused, but the idea reflected polls showing that a journalist - a television journalist at that - had become the most trusted man in America.
For his exhaustive and enthusiastic coverage of NASA, Mr. Cronkite was sometimes called "the eighth astronaut." During the first moon landing in 1969, Mr. Cronkite "was on the air for 27 of the 30 hours that Apollo 11 took to complete its mission," The Museum of Broadcast Communications notes.
Jennifer Mascia and Douglas Martin contributed reporting.
45 Comments so far
Show AllAnd thats the way it is, travel well my friend.
He was an Icon in my young world.
And if not a Saint, I sure miss him. His decency.
Now these shrill Fox monstrosities spewing tripe.
The contrast is indescribable, and points to why this country is in ruins. TV, mind control, propoganda now refined for decades.
Goodbye, Old Soul, Sweet Dreams....hope to be with you very soon.
Bye bye Uncle Walter! Whether it was the civil rights unrest, the Kennedy assassination (where he almost broke down when reading the official announcement of death on the air), the Vietnam War, the space program, or NIxon--you helped us make sense of what was happening and were anything but "coldly objective". Thanks for being there for all of us.
May the blogoshere be for a future generation of similarly connected journalists what the wire services and newspapers were for you--a good training ground for becoming an eyewitness to more than just the official politically-correct version of history that unfolds every day and the means of reporting it to all the people.
Poet
the last drop of the good stuff is gone.
bring on the cheap swill, bill.
He was a more than a damn sight better that the current crew of tv legacies who mostly won't even come close to the class of this man, Walter Cronkite.
But there are a new batch of motivated and real investigative journalist out there, mostly not connected to the msm(thankfully), digging around in the garage dump of this world to bring the filthy truth out for those want to know and for those that should want to know, it just boils down to just 'do you want to know?'.
The current crop of news models are not fit enough to clean his toilets.
I am NOT talking about the 'new' tv crews, you dummy, obviously you haven't read the likes of Chalmers Johnson, Naomi Klein, Greg Palast, Andrew Bacevich, Jane Mayer, these and others are the new batch of investigative reporters(and not that Walter Cronkike actually was but the news he supplied us folks was more credible) because you will NOT find real news on our conservative controled MSM which means to be better informed, one has to read books.
Just one correction, the MSM isn't controlled by conservative interests, it is controlled by neoliberal capitalist interests - a now-obvious result of the rise of private, for-profit advertiser-dependent, "professional" journalism.
It is quite accepting of liberal social trends - allowing conservatives to keep calling it "the liberal media". But, any criticism of capitalist economics, and the US military and foreign policy that supports it, is strictly forbidden.
In the case of the media, conservative and neoliberal capitalist interests are one and the same. The media is heavily conservative...they attack Obama's policies as socialist and the worst example of leftism out there. And of course, they totally ignore genuine leftist and progressive policies and people. The only way to claim the media is liberal is to compare the major news networks and newspapers to the rhetoric of Fox (not) News. If you genuinely believe Fox (not) News is really fair and balanced, and sadly, millions do, then in your eyes the rest of the media is "liberal", no matter how full of racists, sexists, and praisers of Reganomics and deregulation they are.
You're right but that is refining the label which still leaves it a conservatively owned and controlled choke hold business that does NOT promote, actually pushes, democracy out of the way.
But, here is a link to a 105 minute video made in 2004, I believe, that does as good of job as any in delving into what has been treasonously subverted from our democracy.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1925114769515892401
It is 'Orwell Rolls in His Grave' just in case you have seen it and don't feel like watching is again, but it is timeless reality of what needs to be cleared up immediately.
He outlived journalism by quite a bit at least.
Back in the day when the government feared the people...
Adios News Integrity,
What a sweet and assuring thing it was indeed, to have Walter waiting for you at six o'clock. Here's a fitting cartoon with Walter in it:
http://sendables.jibjab.com/originals/what_we_call_the_news
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Great little video-song satire there! Tnx for the link.
'"It is impossible to imagine CBS News, journalism or indeed America without Walter Cronkite," Sean McManus, the president of CBS News, said in a statement.'
CBS News, journalism, and America are but mere shadows of what they once were.
Mr. McManus, you are the president of CBS News. Can you not dignify Walter Cronkite's memory by cleaning house of the bubble-headed shills and preening primadonnas? Can you honestly do no better than what you have done? Cronkite is watching you.
Walter Cronkite, we miss you already.
Mister Cronkite: We Americans abandoned integrity, fact and quality in reporting for flash, scandal, swill and controversy and I for one am truly sorry.
Good Night.
A lot of todays teleprompter readers will chokingly tell us how WC inspired them to become journalists. Yet what they became is stenographers to government propaganda spin.
Cronkite was better than most of course, but he wasn't 100% telling the truth either.
One has to wonder how news has become so corporatized, with fluff winning the day to distract, and a conservative slant acting as an agent of misinformation. What would Cronkite have had to say about Fox News, CNN, and the mainstream media? May Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow carry his torch high. Truth is the anti-venom, and Walter bled it. R.I.P.
Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow? Two spokespersons on the payroll of General Electric? As corrupt as they come. They both vastly kissed the behind of the current usurper in chief, the Beije Bush, knowing fully well during the campaign that he was a corporate fraud. Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow care about their paychecks, not journalistic integrity.
Rachel and Keith as corrupt as they come?
You cannot be serious.
I'm always very serious and yes, they're corrupt. General Electric would never give prominent spots to journalists speaking the truth.
KO and RM are Democratic Party hacks, the ultimate media whores trying desperately to sell the lie that there's a dime worth of difference between the two parties.
"Not a dime's worth of difference."
How well I remember that mantra from George Wallace's run for president in 1968.
there's not a penny's worth of difference now -and that's allowing for inflation.
they just bicker to con the voters into believing they have a choice.
and what's the option?
the most successful 3rd party run ('68) was headed by a racist.
There's no dispute that they're corporate media, for sure, but I just watched a Maddow segment in which she highlighted and criticized Obama's "preventive detention" policy. Olbermann has been highly critical of the Democrats' ongoing betrayal of queer people. That's only a couple of examples. Certainly, they're Democrats, but let's not distill their careers down to that alone.
He kept up with current events during the Bush years and wrote vociferously about the power grab. I think he died of a broken heart over what we have become.
I indeed had heard that he wrote quite a lot of criticism on the media and politics late in life, but his actual writings are hard to find. Memory-holed I guess.
But he presented a speech 10 years ago in support of Danny Schechter's then-new website Mediachannel.org, which can be read here:
www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/03/12/walter-cronkite-on-the-media%E2%80%94and-the-mediachannel/
As a rather nerdy science-kid (something you could be and not be ostracized too much back then) I'll always remember his NASA coverage, and his weekly program (on Sundays, it think) called "The Twenty-first Century". It presented all the wonderful ongoing scientific and technological advances and how they would shape society, eliminate poverty, and allow all to enjoy comfort and leisure in the 21st century. I was shooed away once by my catholic parents when the program featured developments in birth control pills.
Like all futurism, it was wildly inaccurate. But it was optimistic in that way the 1960s were - a sense that any present troubles were temporary and anyone suggesting that that the future wasn't going to be much better than the present would be regarded as a kook.
"It presented all the wonderful ongoing scientific and technological advances and how they would shape society, eliminate poverty, and allow all to enjoy comfort and leisure in the 21st century."
I remember a Disney program in the 50's where the other Unca Walt promised the same.
I'm not holding my breath.
It was largely because of a tiny handful of people including Mr. Cronkite that I still believed for a while that the USA might be salvageable. Now I'm not at all so sure. One thing is for certain: an era has ended.
Cronkite, a good guy, out of well-meaning became co-responsible for the fake facade of US society, which has since escalated. Mr. Middle America Cronkite, like the society he served and influenced, was hardly radical enough on crucial issued - pollution, commercialization, war on marijuana or Vietnam - to be realistic.
R.I.P.
How are we to evaluate well-meaning people who co-cause distress and destruction?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
A nonsensical scattered polemic with zero dialectic. You prove neither that Cronkite "co-caused" any distress or destruction, nor that he ever had any intention whatsoever to cause or "co-cause" such things. Reserve your vague ruminations for better far more deserving targets. It isn't as if 2009 Amurka isn't a target rich environment for people who truly do cause and "co-cause" distress and destruction.
Ullern: "We all have power in us. Freedom is knowing what kind of power to participate in to make love to flow."
Cronkite represented the true decencies which function(ed) to let others carry out and get away with USA's greater indecencies.
(Don't worry, I'm not trying to prove anything to you, Mr. metal: metal is too dense.)
Think for yourself.
Love,
Sing &
Dance
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Ok, let's have at least on specific example from you of how Cronkite allegedly "represented the true decencies which function(ed) to let others carry out and get away with USA's greater indencies"--one that stands up to historical or journalistic scrutiny. I don't think you know shit from shinola.
"I don't think you know shit from shinola."
both go on your shoes - right?
Ha-ha, you're right, 'metal' - I hadn't got a clue what Shinola was except part of that obsolete expression:
"Shinola is a brand of wax shoe polish that was available in the early- to mid-20th century."
I admit to not having existed at "mid-20th century". My mistake, I gather.
Yet I find it strange how you, 'metal', won't understand how decency can be exploited to front indecencies - as surely happened with Cronkite, e.g. Vietnam for years - with your other informative and fairly perceptive post at 8:52. Head for the light, maaan.
What is it about us that when someone famous dies (Cronkite, Jacko), we tend to elevate him/her to sainthood? Yes, we can say good things about him/her, but please lets not lose our sense of balance.
Media stars are paid millions, but frankly I don't know any reporter who is worth that kind of money... marketing is what elevates their worth.
Depending on your yardstick, Cronkite was a decent newsman, but not in the league of a John Pilger or a Robert Fisk. During the heyday of Cronkite, I preferred Severeid.
My fellow reporters and I used to refer to Severeid as "Eric Clarifier." He had the demeanor, in spades, but his commentaries were always gravely delivered conventional wisdom, shallow and predictable.
Cronkite was the real deal. A newsman's newsman, with few frills or pretensions.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Compared to Cronkite's heyday, Pilger and Fisk were (and in Fisk's case still are) an entirely different kind of journalist than Cronkite and they only reached a tiny fraction of Cronkite's typical audience numbers. Unless you lived through it it's hard to understand how one journalist like Walter Cronkite could influence the entire country literally overnight. The ONLY other American with that kind of influence over collective public opinion was the president of the United States. Cronkite was one of the very first network news anchormen back when there were only three (3) networks. His audiences at peak were made up of tens of millions of Americans all watching him at once. We were very lucky that he was basically a decent, honest guy who deeply cared about this country, believed in its potential, loved its people and it showed. He wasn't the shrewdest or cleverest of reporters, but when Cronkite said it you knew you could trust it.
I wonder sometimes if he wanted to become as editorial as he gradually did or if he felt the turmoil and upheavals of the '60s left him no choice. Either way, at least he wore out enough shoe leather as an on the ground reporter for decades before the advent of TV news so that he earned the right the hard way to air an informed opinion or two. Today we are drowned in opinions from people who never walked a real reporter's beat in their lives, never had to source any facts, never had to compete to scoop the opposition, and have always been paid shills for this or that corporate interest or set of interests.
I'll bet you fingers to fish sticks that even though a hell of a lot of his fans love listening to Rush Limbaugh because they know he'll always tell them what they want to hear, that deep in their guts they don't really trust him.
Walter Cronkite had been out of the news business for years and years now.
The news business has transformed since his departure into infotainment and public relations for presidential administrations and the establishment. Just remember the lack of journalistic ethics from both print and TV Media during the leadup to the Iraq War when so-called journalists acted as lapdogs rather than watchdogs of the criminals in the Bush administration and the fanciful lies told by Colin Powell to the United Nations regarding "WMD." Yeah, those cartoon-like figures and illustrations had been "real proof" alright. More like real lies! By the time the Bush administration illegally invaded Iraq, the Media/Press Establishment in the USA had completely failed and has yet to regain any of its ethical standards back as it continues to distort the truth and afraid to actually confront the power structure, because of the fear....blah...blah...blah....blah of retaining access to those with high postitions of power. Media consolidation of radio, TV, and newspapers have also totally corrupted the "journalism" profession as well. In short, the news business is awful today and really seems to be more about propaganda shilling for the monied and propertied classes than about the "truth."
Mr. Cronkite was part of that elite establishment as well. In spite of being connected to power, Cronkite admirambly questioned the unjust war in Vietnam. Yet, it should also be noted that Cronkite was not always opposed to that war, either.
I do not think people are "elevating" Cronkite to any sort of "sainthood status" as some poster erroneously suggested either. What has occurred is proper reflection on his way of presenting the news, in contrast to the obscene and vulgar ways that the political discourse has taken in America with the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Mike Savage, Bill O'Reilly, Lou Dobbs, Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan, as well as FOX "News" and its corrupt/criminal owner Rupert Murdoch.
And that's the way it is today, not yesterday, but now!
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
His memoir, while not as complex or interesting as Howard K. Smith's, is worth reading. Especially towards the end where Mr. Cronkite details his outrageous treatment by CBS when they forced him far too early out to pasture. He was one of the first casualties of the buyouts of the once smaller, often family dominated networks by increasingly massive, corporatist/fascist parent companies with hundreds if not thousands of corporate bottom lines to protect. For them Cronkite was too honest, too direct and too likely to use moral reasoning. His stance against the Vietnam War had already made him enemies in the military-industrial complex.
In Cronkite's day the Big Three TV networks kept the news and entertainment divisions separate. TV news in the early to mid Cold War was considered too societally important to be measured in terms of advertising ratings profitability. About the time Cronkite was put out to pasture in the early 1980s, the nightly TV news began to be measured for ratings profitability and the news divisions were invaded by "image consultants". The networks started hiring and promoting TV anchors not based on their journalistic acumen but on their demographic ratings appeal to large subsets of the viewing audience. Thus we went from seasoned, veteran authentic journalists like Howard K. Smith and Walter Cronkite--who paid hard-earned dues as local wire service, newspaper, radio and war correspondents for decades before TV came along--to pretty boy weathermen-turned anchor dolls like Peter Jennings who was a Canadian weatherman who didn't have a degree in journalism, had never been a hard news correspondent or covered a war, but appealed to white women ages 18-to-35 who found him suave and and his delivery very "sophisticated." Rush Limbaugh similarly lacks any journalistic credentials but broadly appealed to white males ages 18-to-35 who found him "truthful" and "authoritative."
Because of his being forced out too early, Cronkite was one of the most wasted journalistic and, in a broader sense, cultural talents in the last 30 years. He did many of the things he wanted to but he might have done so much more had he been allowed the proper media platform. He was a great narrator in any case. I still have audio of him hosting a children's program about dinosaurs and the scientists who study their remains that is wonderful listening.
He was one of the tiny handful of Americans allowed inside the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and saw, on one of his excursions, German POW survivors of battles like Stalingrad doing menial work still in their tattered old WWII uniforms. I think out of well over 200,000 Germans who fought at Stalingrad only 5,000 or so made it out alive to be repatriated to East Germany under Kruschev.
With Cronkite narrating the moon landings and Star Trek and Lost In Space on the tube, many in my generation including myself grew up expecting that man would have colonized Mars by now--and we could have had we gotten our priorities straight. Instead we got moon landings that led nowhere. No further better vision. Now the entire nation and the planet are on the path that leads nowhere.
If souls can be re-born, I hope his finds an alternate parallel U.S. where RFK became president in 1968; we got out of Vietnam by 1970; we got universal single payer health care by 1972; we improved and maintained public education and laid the groundwork for an environmentally sustainable future; we included money to develop space habitats and space colonies, and we early and fully funded NASA's Mission To Planet Earth to preclude Newt Gingrich from deliberately slashing funding to that mission to prevent the early, timely and comprehensive acquisition of multiple data sets confirming global warming.
Walter Cronkite was a 20th century American in the best sense of the word and he stood for hope and against militarism. He had been a war correspondent unlike many present day "TV journalists." He saw firsthand what war does to combatants and civilians alike. He represented hope for the future based on the best aspects of what it meant to be an American. He stood against apathy and emotional defeatism.
There will never be another one like him because there will never be another 1960s. At least not in this verse of the polyverse.
Worthy commentary. Thanks, Metal.
"He was one of the tiny handful of Americans allowed inside the Soviet Union"
was that dependent upon permission from Moscow or Washington?
I can remember actually looking forward to the evening news.
We won't be seeing his like again.
What metal said at 8:52 AM. Excellent post.