China Says 140 Dead in Xinjiang Riot, Blames Separatists
URUMQI, China - At least 140 people have been killed in rioting in China's northwestern region of Xinjiang, with the government blaming exiled separatists for the Muslim area's worst case of unrest in years.
Hundreds of rioters have been arrested, the official Xinhua news agency reported, after rock-throwing Uighur people took to the streets of the regional capital on Sunday, some burning and smashing vehicles and confronting ranks of anti-riot police.
The unrest underscores the volatile ethnic tensions that have accompanied China's growing economic and political stake in its western frontiers.
Along with Tibet, Xinjiang is one of the most politically sensitive regions in China, and in both cases the government has sought to maintain its grip by controlling religious and cultural life while also vowing economic growth and prosperity.
But analysts said the fresh trouble in the remote resource-rich region was unlikely to have a major impact on China's economy.
"In terms of China's domestic economy, it is in a remote place and it does not have a big impact on things generally unless there is some evidence, of which there is none, that the government is in some meaningful way losing control," said Arthur Kroeber, Managing Director of Dragonomics, a research and advisory firm in Beijing.
Beijing's image as a global power, though, may take a hit as it cracks down on the rioters, say analysts.
"Unfortunately ... this will bring a negative impact on China's image as a responsible power. Coercion alone will not solve the problem. If you use coercion alone it will worsen the problem," said Zheng Yongnian, director of the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore.
Signaling a security crackdown in the strategic region near Pakistan and central Asia, a senior Chinese government official said the unrest was the work of extremist forces abroad.
"This was a crime of violence that was pre-meditated and organized," Xinhua quoted the unnamed official as saying.
He blamed the violence on the World Uyghur Congress led by Rebiya Kadeer, a Uighur businesswoman now in exile in the United States after years in jail, and accused of separatist activities. She did not answer calls for comment.
But exiled Uighur groups adamantly rejected the Chinese government claim of a plot. They said the riot was an outpouring of pent-up anger over government policies and Han Chinese dominance of economic opportunities.
China's markets largely brushed off the riots, with the benchmark Shanghai Composite index ending up 1.2 percent at a 13-month closing high, bucking a generally weaker trend in the rest of Asia.
"This is regional unrest only," said Zheshang Securities analyst Zhang Yanbing.
HAN CHINESE TARGETED
Li Zhi, the Communist Party boss of regional capital Urumqi told a news conference that the death toll from the rioting had risen to 140, the semi-official China News Agency said. Xinhua said 816 people were hurt and admitted to hospital.
Xinhua did not give the ethnic identity of the dead, or say if they were civilians or police, but admissions at the People's Hospitals, one of the biggest in Urumqi, suggested Han Chinese were targeted.
Xinhua said the hospital received 291 people of whom 17 died later. Among them 233 were Han Chinese, 39 were Uighurs, while the rest were from other ethnic minorities.
The riot in Urumqi, 3,270 km (2,050 miles) west of Beijing, followed a protest against the government's handling of a June clash between Han Chinese and Uighur factory workers in southern China, where two Uighurs died in Shaoguan.
"In Xinjiang one of the major sources of discontent is that there is still a major gap economically between Han and Uighurs," said Barry Sautman, a specialist on China's ethnic politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Almost half of Xinjiang's 20 million people are Uighurs. The population of Urumqi is mostly Han Chinese, and the Uighurs complain they dominate economic opportunities.
Chinese state television showed rioters throwing rocks at police and overturning a police car, and smoke billowing from burning vehicles.
"I personally saw several Han people being stabbed. Many people on buses were scared witless," Zhang Wanxin, a Urumqi resident, said by telephone.
Police rounded up "several hundred" who participated in the violence, including more than 10 key players who fanned unrest, Xinhua said, and are searching for 90 others.
Residents in Urumqi were unable to access the Internet on Monday, several said. "The city is basically under martial law," Yang Jin, a dried fruit merchant, said by telephone.
(Additional reporting by Chris Buckley, Emma Graham-Harrison, Yu Le and Benjamin Kang Lim in Beijing and Ben Blanchard in Shanghai; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani and Jeremy Laurence)
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
18 Comments so far
Show AllI heard that the Han started the riots by planting a false rumor about Uighur raping.
China seems hell-bent to ethnicly cleanse Xinjiang like they have been doing to Tibet.
Acctually, I'm shock about you western people. You acctually know everything? Or, just the media make you think that way about China? Don't believe that. My brother used to ride a bike from east China to Tibet, and my friend had a great travel to Uyghur... People there are good to them. My brother even live in a Tibetan's house for 3 days. So, why some of them became riots? Are they really "not happy", or being "cleaned"? What I know is those ethnic people could have 20 additional score in "national university entrance exam"! United States always WANT a war abroad, but we Chinese DON'T WANT a war in our own country! I believe it's US government who fund those seperators, there objective is to seperate China, and defeat it!
Don't help your government to settle another war, please, there're too many war started by US. And someday they will fight back!
This is just the beginning. As more and more Chinese begin to react to the disproportionate distribution of wealth and resources, Chinese society will inevitably resort to violent means to restore a sense of balance.
URUMQI, China – Hundreds of Han Chinese armed with clubs marched through the Xinjiang capital of Urumqi, knocking over food stalls run by Muslims.
How come no one in the media uses the word 'fascist' when it comes to how China deals with the minorities within China?
"Conservative" fits fascist and hegemonist equally well.
Fascist does not apply in China, as it is not a Chinese notion, but rather a European one. In fact, the Chinese Communist Party are for all intents and purposes, another dynasty along the lines of the Han and Ming, amongst others. All that is different is the name of the figure head (President instead of Emperor) and the method of choosing him (Politburo election instead of heredity). In almost every other governmental respect, China is still a Confucian state.
Because fascism is associated with the right side of the political spectrum...China isn't on the right.
And China is not on the left either. Just because the ruling entity calls itself communist doesn't make it so.
Anyway, Merriam-Webster dictionary defines fascism as so:
(1) a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
(2)a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
Other dictionaries also refer fascism to be associated with rightist ideologies. The definition you're using is also the same used by Beck and his merry band of followers to label the Democratic Party's government as fascist, and claim Obama is a fascist because of his 'leftist' policies while at the same time claiming he's a socialist and a Marxist.
The Chinese system can only be described as State Capitalist.
Yeah, I called it 'nationalist capitalism' on another thread around here, somewhere.
Sanctions on China anyone...NO? Are sanctions reserved for the Iraq.s, Irans and North Koreas of the world? If so why?
Is it merely because "we" can hurt them more then "They" can hurt us?
Is it because the cause of Human rights is merely a "Flavor of the day" and no amount of dead Uighurs are going to get in the way of the RIGHT to make money?
Answer: Both. Especially 'A'.
As I have written quite a few time before in a myriad of posts: the USA does not have an exclusive on evil. Han chauvinism (be exactly us or else...and you're still second class citizens anyway) is government policy in China. The Uighurs are suffering from discriminatory policies while being made minority in their own land by government migration schemes.
A telling parallel could be partially drawn with the Palestinians, but this topic will probably not get the attention nor vitriol that the Israel related ones will.
And cue the media (or the right-wing radio crazies) again calling all Uighurs terrorists...
Please do not criticize the USA's most important trading partner.
Every time China's oppressive minority policies result in riots, they blame some outside scapegoat: the Dalai Lama in the case of Tibetan riots and now Rabiya Kadeer in the case of riots in Uighur country.
Nauseatingly predictable on their part...