US Toughens Airstrike Policy in Afghanistan
KABUL, Afghanistan - The new American commander in Afghanistan said he would sharply restrict the use of airstrikes here, in an effort to reduce the civilian deaths that he said were undermining the American-led mission.
In interviews over the past few days, the commander, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, said the use of airstrikes during firefights would in most cases be allowed only to prevent American and other coalition troops from being overrun.
Even in the cases of active firefights with Taliban forces, he said, airstrikes will be limited if the combat is taking place in populated areas - the very circumstances in which most Afghan civilian deaths have occurred. The restrictions will be especially tight in attacking houses and compounds where insurgents are believed to have taken cover.
"Air power contains the seeds of our own destruction if we do not use it responsibly," General McChrystal told a group of his senior officers during a video conference last week. "We can lose this fight."
"When we shoot into a compound, that should only be for the protection of our forces," he said. "I want everyone to understand that."
The statements by General McChrystal signaled the latest tightening of the rules for using airstrikes, which, while considered indispensable for protecting troops, have killed hundreds of civilians.
They have also angered the Afghan government, which has repeatedly criticized American and NATO forces for not taking enough care with civilian lives.
In December, the American commander at the time, Gen. David D. McKiernan, issued guidelines ordering his soldiers to use force that was proportional to the provocation and that minimized the risk of civilian casualties.
General McChrystal's new guidelines follow a deadly episode last month in the Afghan village of Granai, where American airstrikes killed dozens of civilians.
The episode highlighted the difficulties facing American officers under fire, as they are forced to balance using lethal force to protect their troops with rules restricting the use of firepower to prevent civilian deaths.
The episode, on May 4, began when a large group of Taliban fighters attacked a group of about 200 Afghan soldiers and police officers and American advisers. During the firefight, which began just after noon and carried on into the night, the Americans on the ground called for air support.
American fighter jets, and then bombers, came to the scene, dropping a number of 500- and 2,000-pound bombs. The bombs succeeded in ending the attack, but they did much more damage as well.
A Pentagon report estimated that at least 26 civilians had been killed in the airstrikes. It concluded that American personnel had made significant errors, including violating procedures, that led to those deaths. Among those errors, the report said, was a failure by the American personnel to discern whether Afghan civilians were in the compound before they attacked.
Other credible estimates of civilian deaths in Granai ranged much higher. An investigation by a Kabul-based group, the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, said that at least 86 women and children had been killed, and as many as 97 civilians altogether. The Afghan government said 140 civilians had been killed.
The Pentagon report did not dispute the conclusions reached by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, and referred to its "balanced, thorough investigation."
The deaths in Granai make up part of the huge rise in civilian casualties that are characterizing the war in Afghanistan.
A United Nations report found that the number of Afghan civilians killed in 2008 was 40 percent higher than in 2007. The Taliban and other insurgents caused the majority of the civilian deaths, primarily through suicide bombers and roadside bombs.
The changes highlighted by General McChrystal go to the heart of what went wrong in Granai. In that case, there were at least four airstrikes: the first by F-18 fighters and the other three by a B-1B bomber. The report found that it was the last two airstrikes that probably caused the civilian deaths.
In those cases, the report found, the bomber's crew tracked suspected Taliban fighters as they entered a building, and then attacked without determining whether civilians were inside. The report said there were probably civilians inside those buildings when they were destroyed.
Under the rules that General McChrystal outlined, those strikes would almost certainly be prohibited. They would be prohibited, the general said, even if it meant letting some Taliban get away.
Referring to airstrikes, General McChrystal said, "If it is just to defeat the enemy, then we are not going to do it, even if it means we are going to step away from that firefight and fight another time."
According to the Pentagon report, the B-1B dropped five 500-pound bombs and two 2,000-pound bombs. The initial airstrikes, carried out by four F-18 fighters-bombers, the report said, killed insurgents but no civilians.
Ahmad Nader Nadery, the director of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, said Sunday that the American response in Granai was "disproportionate." And he said he was pleased by the changes outlined by General McChrystal.
"We are looking forward to seeing the new guidelines, and actually seeing how they would be translated into practice," he said.
Last September, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates ordered new rules specifically to defuse tensions over Afghan civilian deaths.
During a recent visit to Kabul, Mr. Gates said the American military would quickly apologize and offer compensation to survivors in cases of civilian deaths, even in advance of formal investigations to determine exactly what had happened.
"I think the key for us is, on those rare occasions when we do make a mistake, when there is an error, to apologize quickly, to compensate the victims quickly, and then carry out the investigation," Mr. Gates said after a meeting with President Hamid Karzai.
Thom Shanker contributed reporting from Washington.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
25 Comments so far
Show AllAmerica must achieve a decisive victory over the Taliban. I see those young girls, disheveled and with vacant stares, it bothers me. Let's give the Afghan people a progressive kick in the butt. Of course they will remain islamic but what they have now is unacceptable for the 21st century.
SO they toughen their failed policy. What about criminal prosecutions for murder?
Of course, the best way to fuck up a country is to get the people in that country to start killing each other off which has been proved to be a method of not just the gool old usa but also of england when they had military personnel dress as arabs/iraqis and drove through baghdad or some other iraqi town shooting the citizens, you know the 'clean' way to fight another country, until they got caught.
Whatever happens to this country, it will have deserved what it gets and then the people here will really be confused until someone defines 'blowback' to them.
An unfortunate fellow named Chase
Had an ass that was not quite in place,
And he showed indignation
When an investigation
Showed that some people shit through their face.
What do you mean when you say America will get what it deserves? What kind of "blowback" did you have in mind? Please explain.
I'll explain: you are the classic example of what 'blowback' will do, because you won't know why and/or won't believe why.
For further instructions, read Chalmers Johnson's book 'Blowback'.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
If you can't see what's in front of you, we can't learn it for you.
Airstrikes are not only one of the biggest cause of collateral damage, they are also prompted to make errors (like the 4 Canadian soldiers that were killed by a U.S. missile launched due to miscommunication). This is why the air pilot should be 100% sure of the target he or she is shooting at before attacking.
Erin Morino, baby travel system specialist
The picture of this thin little man, General McChrystal...is almost unbelievable in what it exposes. There is NO LIFE in his face at all. He is a dead man inside. Although he breathes in and out, wears his shiney metals, projects a tuff-guy persona...it is obvious he is a dead man in his inner-most-being. Take a good hard look at this man's face. There appears so little left, if anything, that's human.....the joy of the boy that once was died long ago.
If you had to stand for hours at a boring ceremony you would look and feel like a dead man too.
Charles...the kind of deadness in this man is much deeper than "standing for hours at boring ceremonies" ......it is the result of what happens when you relinquish all that it means to be human.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
"They made a desert and called it peace."
These words of Tacitus came from the mouth of Calgacus, the Caledonian tribal leader, just before he and his minions were vanquished by the Agricola-led Roman armies in Mons Grapius (83 A.D./C.E.). Nearly two millennia later, they remain perhaps the best summation of the essence of war and its outcomes.
If past conflagrations teach us nothing else, it should be this: However noble some believe its ostensible purpose to be, war can end only with destruction on one side, or both – and perhaps even among people and lands that were supposed to be neutral. Furthermore, the repercussions of the money, materiel and lives expended in the cause of destroying a putative enemy deplete not only a nation's might and wealth, but also the spirits of people on both sides.
Please read the whole article at: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/nicholas4.html
Let's just see how tough the USA is in fifty years.
We'll see how many big mouthed Buchanans and Reagans and Limbaughs are worth being compared to Julius Caesar.
"And all their mouths are stopped with dust."---Omar Khayyam
STEP ONE IN PR REBRANDING:
Announce that you are going to "get strict" about "policy". This separates you from the past "bad guys" even though you are doing the same shit or worse, It's about perception, you see.
Then you REALLY start killin' em left and right because people relax thinking some "reforms" are in place so things must be improving.
When the shit hits the fan later on, deny, deny deny.
The PR boys and girls are earning their blood money. I pity them if they ever develop a conscience.
If you truly want to fight "terrorism" you don't fight it with guns and bombs. You fight it with public relations, peace, and love. Build schools, bolster economies, spread enlightenment. Terrorism spreads because of fear and hate, and it uses the dark, destructive side of religion to breed fanatics.
If you want to fight "terrorists" then you don't do so by occupying sovereign nations. If you absolutely think you need to use force then you use covert tactics, special ops, and infiltration - you don't use an occupational military.
This farce of a war is just like any other war: the real reasons for it are domination, greed, and exploitation.
"Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the shadow"
ddg716,
that is the double truth!
If you are not there, you cannot make mistakes. Go home!
But in the same breath, the US "government" is strengthening its air superiority over our own cities. Department of Homeland Security is now “testing” unmanned, and so far unarmed, predator drones in New York to assist the NYPD “on the lookout for suspicious activities”. A week earlier, the Department of Defense has determined that domestic lawful protest held in this country is now considered a “low-lever terrorist activity”. This directive makes the First Amendment mute. Free assembly is now a terrorist activity. Imagine, if you will, a time when we “terrorist” decide to pull off another “colored revolution” here in our own country and Homeland Security decides to arm this predator drone in the name of “national security” to quell this demonstration for “national interests”. Scary thought, but we've seen and read what these predator drones are capable of doing and I don't want one flying over me or you anytime or anywhere.
NYC drones:
http://www.newswatch50.com/news/local/story/Homeland-Security-drone-patrolling-NNY/8ujqf9M2YkCXVlOmBVx...
Lawful protest as low level terrorism:
http://www.aclu.org/images/general/asset_upload_file89_39820.pdf
Generals Mayhem and Stanley A. McChrystal are going to use point blank ground fire instead. The women and children are unarmored soft targets who never shoot back. They are easy to spot as they are the ones with their hands in the air holding white flags. Who could miss such an easy target? The only capital crime these civilians committed was to be born atop Unocal's desired pipeline.
"'Air power contains the seeds of our own destruction if we do not use it responsibly," General McChrystal told a group of his senior officers during a video conference last week. "We can lose this fight.'"
Let's see ... and what is it we are planning to win? Oh, yes, the usual: maintaining control of a whole region [& this Afghanistan place is or adjoins part of it] rich in oil and natural gas, and maintaining control of particular waterways and keeping Russia confined to their own riches of oil and gas in particular areas of that huge country and its allied countries.
... and using Air Power "responsibly"? Hmmm ... killing six children and their mothers tops?..., instead of ten children and their mothers and fathers? Obliterating funeral corteges instead of bridal parties as a less depressing choice?
Hmmm ... what would happen if all the money ... $1.4 TRILLION for the Pentagon ... were rechanneled for massive invention and implementation of all kinds of GREEN ENERGY in the United States of America?
Well, the Rockefellers and the Bushes and a whole bunch of other Old Monies in Canada and Western Europe invested in oil and gas would lose their respective shirts ... at least in part ... when oil wasn't needed anymore. And that very unpopular Saudi regime would go down too, and the people would be free of its cruelty and oppression. Can't have that!
"Perpetual War" is the Bilderberg and the U.S./old Colonial powers' buzz-term. Very lucrative paybacks and payoffs from wars, except if you happen to be the victims. With the auto corporations going Snafu, the military industries are one of the few remaining big-ticket employers.
What will it take for The People in the U.S. of A. to really wake up??? ... instead of continuing to believe as they proudly, but worriedly, send their sons and daughters off to war or their sons and daughters enlist, bedazzled by the recruiters' giving them the list of benefits they are going to get for being patriotic and liberating all those poor souls across the globe from the bad guys and giving them freedom and getting them ready for DEMOCRACY!!!!??? HURRAH! HURRAH! What will it take as a wake-up call for the LIES to be recognized for what they are: LIES!!!! ????
World War III? ... absolute nuclear holocaust; nuclear winter with just little bits of life remaining? A few of us huddling in caves and keeping our various sores bandaged and having roaches on the half shell for dinner?
An unending Depression that sees the U.S. supplying cheap labor to China and India, both of them THE rising economic powers of the world?
Oh, I know, ... people will really start practicing their own religions to the letter: they will really try to LOVE ONE ANOTHER, even their enemies or at least they will try to understand and talk with them as fellow human beings. They will be kind, compassionate, generous to a fault, loving God, their neighbor and themselves, thus fulfilling that greatest commandment of all. Now that's a fantasy ... even in good times.
What'll it be, I wonder? Excruciatingly painful outcomes and times that will be wake-up calls like no other or lots of introspection and soul-searching and truth-finding and stretching of the mind and heart ... and voila ... ???!!! a recognition that so much of what passes for truth from the highest authorities is pure-d bull durum ... and maybe the Highest Authority with Its many messengers through the ages saying the same thing over and over and over and over is the Way to Go. More Fantasy? Maybe somewhere in the middle?
Ya' never know. I certainly don't.
Well, nobody is going to get out of this alive, but it would be nicer to make it later rather than sooner.
One thing is clear, however. We are running out of time just to keep foolin' around like this with each other's lives and the life of a very wonderful planet.
Time to get serious.
/cm
The Good General has all but admitted that the United States of America has been committing War Crimes for the past 6+ years.
If these actions will limit Civilian casualties today and are only necessary to prevent a position being overrun, then these same actions could have been implemented 5 years ago.
In other words, contrary to the Geneva Conventions, the USA was NOT doing all it good to prevent the death of civilians.
Now given the logic being used.
There are no American positions at risk of being overrun in Pakistan. Will the drone strikes be called off?
Contrary to what the Good General might believe , the protection of Civilians from bombing campaigns was NOT implemented so that the side dropping the bombs would better able to "win" the war.
Dresden
Japan
Cambodia
Afganistan
Moral blindness has a long history in this country.
The problem is that it is self-afflicted. We cover
our own eyes as not to see the death we are responsible
for so that we may go living in our "I don't want to know"
snow dome of denial, greed and exceptionalism.
NMBill
right. Put there money where their Guns are. But They donot want to give money away, they would rather help the military contractors make money. What ever would the MIC do if they became unnecessary?
"I think the key for us is, on those rare occasions when we do make a mistake..." More military PR / Twist the truth!
The whole occupation is a mistake!
If we are trying to win hearts and minds, we can do it by using all that money to create a stable democratic government instead of a puppet regime friendly to corporate robbers.
We can also get out of the opium business!
Oh, good. Now EVERYTHING will be different.
I've got an idea. Why don't we leave? Then we won't have to worry about "the policy".
Power means the release of energy in a short period of time. A bomb is just this sort of device that achieves this. To expect a bomb not to cause uncontrolled destruction is wishful thinking or maybe even a kind of moral blindness.