Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Palestinian Lawsuit Condemns Canadian Condo Project as War Crime
They're building condos on our land, villagers say
Members of a tiny Palestinian farming community will be in Quebec Superior Court tomorrow claiming two Canadian construction companies are committing war crimes by building condominiums and roads on the village's land in the West Bank.
It will be the first time that Canada's War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Act, passed in 2000, will be used in a civil case.
University of Toronto law professor Ed Morgan, who is also past president of the Canadian Jewish Council, said that while the move is "imaginative," the group may have some difficulty in convincing the Quebec court that it has jurisdiction over the case.
"The Quebec court is going to have to find that there's a real and substantial connection to Quebec, which seems a stretch to me," he said, pointing out that any alleged wrongdoing took place outside of Canada.
The village of Bil'in, with a population of just 1,700, claims Green Park International and Green Mount International, two companies registered in Quebec, are "aiding, abetting, assisting and conspiring with Israel" to illegally construct residential and other buildings on the village's lands.
According to the lawsuit, the lands of Bil'in are subject to the rules and obligations of international law because the West Bank has been under Israeli military occupation since 1967. Canada's war crimes law and other international laws prohibit an occupying power from transferring parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Ronald Levy, the lawyer representing the two companies, declined to comment on the case while it is before the courts.
But he recently told the Canadian Jewish News he thought the suit was "a media exercise intended to besmirch Israel - they don't care if they win or not, they just want attention. We consider this an abusive action."
Levy has filed three motions arguing that a Quebec court shouldn't hear the case.
Mohammed Khatib, of the Popular Committee Against the Wall, Bil'in, has been travelling around Canada with other residents of the 408-hectare agricultural village, trying to raise awareness and support. He said they're optimistic.
"We believe we'll succeed and that's why we're here," he said.
"Maybe not today or tomorrow or the coming months, but we will succeed because we are right."
The 35-year-old said the companies are destroying olive trees to make way for buildings that are reserved exclusively for Israeli citizens. So far, about 45,000 people have moved into the settlement.
Morgan said the Quebec court may also have an issue with the fact Bil'in already went to an Israeli court, where it argued the settlement violated building and planning laws.
It also argued against the location of an Israeli security wall that separates the village from 60 per cent of its land. The court agreed that the wall had to be partially moved.
"It's a creative legal manoeuvre to try to use the home jurisdiction of the company that you're suing, but Canadian courts, Quebec included, don't like to think of themselves as courts of appeal for a foreign court that you lose in," he said.
"Having already sued for something very similar in the Israeli courts ... they're going to have to convince the Quebec Court why it should be reheard here."
But Emily Schaeffer, an Israeli lawyer helping the villagers, said no civil suit has ever been filed in Israel because the Supreme Court there has never ruled on the legality of settlements in the Occupied Territories, saying instead they are a political issue.
The case is scheduled to be heard tomorrow, Tuesday and Thursday.
- Posted in

6 Comments so far
Show AllI see that the Israelis are going to use a quarter of a billion of our tax dollars to build yet more illegal (un)settlements on Occupied Palestinean land. This too is another U.S. Congressional War Crime.
Israel is a cancerous immoral and illegal invasion, and I applaud those resisting the genocidal occupation.
i love how the lawyer has "no comment" except for the comment.
the congressional corporate representatives of america want to know where their bribe
er i mean campaign contribution is before thinking about doing nothing about this
abomination. btw is that what we are now a obamanation? sad isn't it?
they say abused people will do unto others as they had done to them. does that explain
nazi germany and israel? the abused turns into the abuser.f--k israel! if there is a more
psychotic country on this planet then us its israel!
Canada's been criminally involved with Israel and the U.S. against Palestinians since around 1948 people can learn from a new book by Yves Engler, "The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy".
http://blackbook.foreignpolicy.ca
That page for the book has links to several reviews, evidently most quite short, but at least one or two of better length, and they all seem to quote some parts of the book and words from the author; or maybe the latter is not in a review article, but interview. He has writings at a number of websites, including www.globalresearch.ca and www.dominionpaper.ca, and I think he has a Z Space at www.ZMag.org.
One of the longer and, therefore, more thorough reviews of the book is the following.
"Canadian Foreign Policy
A review of Yves Engler's 'Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy'",
by Joe Emersberger, May 3, 2009
http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/21362
I'll quote the part on "Israel-Palestine" from this above review.
EXCERPT:
Israel-Palestine
In 1947, Supreme Court Justice Ivan C.Rand was Canada's representative on a special UN Committee (UNSCOP) that proposed the partition of Palestine - contrary to the wishes of the vast majority of its inhabitants. Both Ivan Rand and Lester Pearson were widely praised by Zionists for moving UNSCOP to recommend partition. David Horowitz, the first governor of the Bank of Israel, wrote that
"It may be said that Canada more than any other country played a decisive part in all stages of the UNO discussions of Palestine."
A Canadian official who assisted Ivan Rand on UNSCOP stated
"The Arabs were bound to be vocal opponents of partition but they should not be taken too seriously"
Engler argues persuasively that the decisive factor motivating Canada was the desire to help the US establish a solidly pro western outpost in a strategically crucial part of the world. Decades before Harper's Conservatives received international ridicule for taking positions more pro-Israel than the US [3], Canada's voting record at the UN consistently backed Israeli aggression. In 1987, a survey of U.N. members ranked Canada second to the U.S. in perceived support for Israel.
The 1997 Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement (in contrast to an EU agreement) included the Israeli occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip as part of where Israel's custom laws were applied.
At a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2007, Canada abstained from a vote that asked Israel to place its nuclear weapons program under IAEA controls.
END OF EXCERPT
The following is an Internet radio interview with Yves Engler on this new book of his. The audio is 17:44.
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/33512
The following is an article by him and this is specifically on this book.
"Canadian Politics, Economy and Foreign Policy
Web exclusive: The Black Book on Canadian Foreign Policy",
by Yves Engler, May 6, 2009
http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2292
Again, there are other reviews and possibly interviews linked in the website for his book.
Not about Canada vis-a-vis "Israel-Palestine", but certainly the Canadian government and foreign policies in wars (of aggression) is the following piece of his.
"The Profit Behind the Myths
New documentary refutes "benevolent" Canada",
by Yves Engler, Mar 20, 2009
http://www.dominionpaper.ca/articles/2546
That's about the doc. film entitled 'Myths for Profit', which he says was written and directed by Amy Miller. He says it's good, but can be possibly confusing to or for some people; however, I viewed the video yesterday and it didn't confuse me at all, given that I'm accustomed to video compilations similar enough to this one.
A 10:28 clip from the film is the following.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsAOoGapKMk
One guy who is interviewed in that part of the documentary is Scott Taylor and he has his own website as well as Youtube channel. The website is www.espritdecorps.ca , which has links, direct or indirect, to his Youtube channel. And, btw, he's a former Canadian Army soldier who has learned a lot over the past ... over two decades and tells enough about criminal Canadian government participation in wars (of aggression).
Anyway, Palestinians have more than some grounds for suing the Canadian government and I think this above documentary clip does include a short, but nevertheless serious piece of incriminating information on Canadian government and military criminality towards Palestinians. I'm not going to re-view it now to double-check, because I'm presently loading a video clip; but am pretty sure this above piece does include Canadian war crimes against Palestinians.
Canada has the right (and arguably the obligation) to remind the government of Israel of its duty to abide by the Geneva Convention: Art.1 of the Fourth Geneva Convention requires all state parties to "respect and ensure respect" for the treaty.
The articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention are incorporated into Canadian federal law under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Statute (2000).
Bringing this case to Canada could have two benefits. Corporations might think twice about embarking on illegal settlement projects. It could also remind the business community and the government that the continued erosion of international law needs to stop.