Iran Ups Media Crackdown as Reformers Plan Rally
TEHRAN - Iran's opposition stepped up its challenge to the Islamic regime on Wednesday as the authorities intensified a crackdown on the media to try to contain the biggest crisis since the 1979 revolution.
Defeated presidential challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi and his supporters called for a new round of public demonstrations and laid down the gauntlet over the disputed election that returned Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power.
Grappling with the biggest wave of public anger in three decades of Islamic rule, Iran has lashed out at enemy "plots," hauling in foreign ambassadors and rounding up scores of reformists.
In the latest moves, the authorities threatened legal action against Iranian websites which publish material that "creates tensions" and issued a new warning to the foreign media, already facing restrictions on their work.
World governments voiced increasing alarm about the situation in Iran, but US President Barack Obama, while raising "deep concerns" over the election, said Washington would not meddle in the affairs of its archfoe.
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini pledged to consider a partial recount after the opposition staged massive protests over what they charge was blatant vote-rigging in the election that gave Ahmadinejad another four-year term.
Supporters of Mousavi said they have called another rally in Tehran at 1330 GMT, despite a ban on such gatherings, saying it will be held "in silence without slogans."
Mousavi himself called on his supporters, who have been wearing his trademark green during their demonstrations, to also hold marches and a day of mourning on Thursday for protesters slain in the post-election clashes.
And he repeated his demand for the results of what he branded a "shameful fraud" to be annulled and a new vote called.
At least seven people have been killed and many more wounded in clashes, with protests reported not only in Tehran but also other major cities after an election that has exposed deep divisions in the oil-rich Shiite Muslim nation.
Witnesses said some clashes also erupted late on Tuesday between groups of young men and members of Iran's volunteer Basij militia.
Ahmadinejad remained defiant, saying his landslide victory in Friday's vote was proof of the people's faith in his government of "honesty and service to the people."
Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters of state, said he was asking the election body the Guardians Council and the interior ministry to examine the allegations of vote-rigging.
"If the examination of the problems require recounting of some ballot boxes, it should be definitely done in the presence of the representatives of candidates so that everybody is assured," he said.
The rights group of Iranian Nobel peace laureate Shirin Ebadi called for the authorities to put a halt to the violent crackdown it said was orchestrated by the police and the Basij.
In the latest demonstrations on Tuesday, supporters of Ahmadinejad and Mousavi staged rival rallies, each calling out hundreds of thousands of people on to the streets of Tehran, state media said.
Iranian newspapers published pictures of the demonstrations, which the foreign media were banned from covering under tough new restrictions.
Footage broadcast on the Internet has shown dramatic and chaotic scenes of violence, including one purportedly showing a protestor shot dead and others of riot police beating protestors.
The authorities have warned they would nip in the bud any "velvet revolution" and have rounded up scores of people in Tehran and other cities, including prominent reformists close to former president Mohammad Khatami.
Reformist sources and the press said on Wednesday that several more prominent political activists and journalists had been arrested.
Iran issued a new warning to the foreign media, saying some outlets had become the "mouthpiece of the rioters' movement" and warning them to their their "approach towards Iranian events."
The Revolutionary Guards, set up to defend the Islamic republic from "internal and external threats," also threatened action against the online media it charged were backed by the US and British secret services.
"We warn those who propagate riots and spread rumours that our legal action against them will cost them dearly, especially since some of the youth of this land were killed by the thugs' action, so we urge them to delete such material from their sites," a statement said.
Some phone, texting and Internet services have also been disrupted, and protestors have been turning to Twitter to spread word of the dramatic events.
Obama, who has turned his back on the policy of predecessor George W. Bush and called for dialogue with Iran after three decades of severed ties, took a cautious line on Tuesday.
He said he had "deep concerns" about the election but added: "It is not productive, given the history of US-Iranian relations, to be seen as meddling -- the US president meddling in Iranian elections."
Obama said Washington would still need to pursue "tough diplomacy" towards Iran over its nuclear drive, saying there appeared to be little difference between the policies of Ahmadinejad and Mousavi.
"Either way we were going to be dealing with an Iranian regime that has historically been hostile to the United States, that has caused some problems in the neighbourhood and has been pursuing nuclear weapons."
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, in the strongest remarks so far by a Western leader, said there was election "fraud," while other European nations have also expressed concern about the vote and the ensuing crackdown.
Hundreds of protesters have also taken to the streets of European cities and in Iran's neighbours in the Gulf in support of Mousavi, who was premier of Iran in the post-revolution era during its war with Iraq in the 1980s.
Iran has responded to international criticism by summoning EU envoys and lashing out at foreign meddling by its "enemies," accusing the United States, Britain and Israel in particular of trying to fuel chaos.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show AllAt least they have enough freedom to have a media WORTH oppressing.
They'll be happy to hear that some American think they have enough freedom for something.
"Either way we were going to be dealing with an Iranian regime that has historically been hostile to the United States, that has caused some problems in the neighbourhood and has been pursuing nuclear weapons."
Who has been historically hostile to who?
At least in Iran, it is clear who is in charge, no matter which puppet is installed as president, whereas here in the good old US of A, we can see that the president does not really matter, but we are not as transparent about who is behind the scenes pulling the strings. Who are our mullahs anyway?
If you're being, tortured, killed, imprsioned for speaking your mind, do you really take much comfort that it was because of something the Ayatollah ruled instead of the western military industrial complex? Take into account that you may or may not still have your fingernails as you ponder this.
Oppression = oppresion no matter where or by whom.
Notice how the mass media fails to put the events into any context, e.g. fails to review the previous administration's record, fails to reiterate the presidential role in the power structure, fails to review the Iranian people's plights, aspirations, views. Instead, it fills the story with garbage quotes from foreign politicians. Insight is a privilege/advantage for the rich. Be sure to support the information hierarchy with your establishment vote in 2010.
There is a certain hypocrisy going on here.
Counterpunch on Obama and Iran: http://counterpunch.org/lindorff06172009.html
Thank you! Excellent article.
Mainstream America didn't care when police violence was used against protesters here in the US, and the supposed free speech zones surrounded by fences were set up away from the public eye and media.
The Iranians, and other oppressive regimes learned from our government and police entities the correct way to do it.
And remember, we have had 2 presidential elections that were fundamentally fraudulent, a sham of supposed democracy. We accepted it more quietly.
And I'm sure that the US is funding much of 'Iranian' protests. Sadly, all those people will be disappointed after the US imposes the puppet government, like we did years ago with the Shah of Iran, a cruel and money grubbing dictator.
While I agree with most of what you said, the United States is not funding the 'Iranian' (your quotations) protests at all. No Iranian reform group would be stupid enough to accept any help from the US at the risk of being completely discredited. While Mousavi wants better relations with erveryone, he is not going to accept any help from our government. The reason Mousavi is such a threat is that he accepts all of the principles of the Islamic Republic, and his outrage and defiance is being channelled through the existing constitution, which is why Khamenei cannot dismiss him quite easily.
This is real frustration by a generation of Iranians who did not grow up fearing the repercussions of the government, which has been much milder in the last decade or so. This is a generation that is not bound by the nationalistic fervor from the Iran-Iraq war, and they feel absolutely robbed, marginalized and ignored. They are risking much to fight for their voicies to be heard and it is insulting to them to dismiss them as US proxies. In fact they are far braver than we are, we stood by while they robbed us of our votes, as you noted quite accurately.
Some Iranians are accusing the Voice of America and BBC Persia of inciting riot.
And the USA does fund terrorism in Southeast Iran through terrorists emanating out of Baluchistan.
Why would anyone support MOUSAVI WHO WAS PRIME MINISTER DURING THE EXECUTION OF 30,000 POLITICAL PRISONERS 1981-88?
Previously he shut all Universitys for four years.
His base is the wealthy elite.
"Some Iranians are accusing the Voice of America and BBC Persia of inciting riot."
"Some" Iranians? You can't even name them? And if you type "Khamenei executions", there are also a bunch of links.
Also, actually you are doing the same thing that the mainstream reporters are. You are ASSUMING that Moussavi's, and Ahmadinejad's, supporters, fall into simplistic categories.
Great post. The support from the global community (citizens not gov'ts)for the Iranian protesters has been astounding and uplifting, but I hope it in no way diminishes the bravery they've shown. And Americans think they've cornered the market on expression of freedom. Hardly.
This really is an aweful lot of fuss for what is supposed to be a ceremonial post. As the article states 'Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters of state' it's the clerics who really rule Iran. Surely the people of Iran know that the president isn't that important of a person, so what's really going on?
Is this a protest against theocracy, could it be that foreign gov't are indeed formenting revolt amongst the people of Iran, or are these really rallys in favour of democratic government?
Google: Mousavi Executions ------ Mousavi is a mass murderer under Kohemeni(sp?)
30,000 jailed Political Prisoners executed while he was Prime Minister '81-'88
Mousavi prior to mass murder closed all Universitys for four years.
WHY IS THIS NOT BEING PUBLICIZED?