Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
USA, Canada to Modernize Great Lakes Water Quality Pact
NIAGARA FALLS, New York, June 15, 2009 (ENS) - The United States and Canada have agreed to update the 37-year-old Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement that commits both countries "to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem."
Niagara Falls, view from Ontario (flickr photo by Baloulumix) U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon met Saturday at the Rainbow Bridge that connects the two countries to announce their intention to modernize the agreement.
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement addresses threats to water quality in the Great Lakes and in the portion of the St. Lawrence River that straddles the Canada-U.S. border.
"We have to update it to reflect new knowledge, new technologies and, unfortunately, new threats," Secretary Clinton said.
When the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was first signed in 1972, the major issue was phosphorus over-enrichment. The agreement was updated in 1978, when the major issue was ridding the Great Lakes of persistent toxic substances.
The pact was amended in 1987, when new annexes focusing on nonpoint sources of contaminants in groundwater and sediment as well as airborne toxic substances were added.
Now, the threat of climate change and other problems have emerged to make another renegotiation necessary, the officials said.
"The agreement was last amended in 1987, and since then, new invasive species have appeared in our lakes, new worrisome chemicals have emerged from our industrial processes, our knowledge of the ecology of the region and how to protect it has grown considerably. In its current form, the Great Lakes agreement does not sufficiently address the needs of our shared ecosystem," Clinton said.
"These inland waters are the largest system of fresh surface water in the world, part of our natural heritage and the foundation for billions of dollars in trade, shipping, agriculture, recreation and other sectors," said Minister Cannon. "In seeking to amend the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, we will modernize it to address new challenges and reduce pollution."
"Joint stewardship of the environment is a cornerstone of the Canada-U.S. relationship," Cannon said. "This aspect of our long history of collaboration will remain strong as we begin a second century of jointly managing our shared waters, which have served as both a treasured resource and a critical transportation link."
The announcement came during the official celebrations for the 100th anniversary of the Canada-U.S. Boundary Waters Treaty, of which the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is a part.
Clinton said, "We are celebrating, because the 100th anniversary of the signing of the Boundary Waters Treaty marks a recognition of a ground-breaking agreement, one of the first in the world to recognize the environmental consequences of managing our natural resources, ensuring clean drinking water, protecting the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system, the Niagara Falls and Niagara River that are such magnificent treasures.
"The Boundary Water Treaty of 1909 made official something that people on both sides of the border had known for generations," Clinton said. "That the rivers, the lakes, the streams, the watersheds along our boundary do not belong to one nation or the other, but to both of us, and we are therefore called to be good stewards in the care of these precious resources."
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is considered a model of international cooperation and has achieved numerous successes, including a reduction in the levels of pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls, mercury, dioxin and furans.
But the Great Lakes are still at risk from current and emerging challenges such as increased population and urbanization, land use practices, invasive species, new chemicals and the impacts of climate change.
Negotiations over the coming months will aim to better address these perils.
The nonprofit coalition Great Lakes United applauded the announcement that the two countries will renegotiate the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
"Citizens and organizations from across the region have been calling on the Canadian and United States governments to truly commit to the binational protection of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River," said John Jackson, director of clean production and toxics at Great Lakes United. "With this announcement I'm more optimistic than ever that our governments will reinvigorate their dedication to shared responsibility and stewardship over these vital waters."
In 2007, the coalition identified 13 principles to guide renegotiation and member groups are now working to further detail these and ensure that they are included in the agreement.
"Any renegotiation must involve the public, and it must build a framework for addressing the issues that the Great Lakes will face over the coming years and decades," said Jackson. "Making the announcement is the easy part. The real work has only just begun."
The announcement of Canada's intention to amend the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was made after considering input from the Government of Ontario, First Nations, municipalities, nongovernmental organizations and other Great Lakes stakeholders.
Cannon said continued engagement of these partners will be important to ensure that an amended agreement establishes a cooperative agenda for action by all parties in order to continue to improve Great Lakes water quality and aquatic ecosystem health.
- Posted in



8 Comments so far
Show AllSo far, I haven't seen any discussion of what is perhaps the greatest problem of the Great Lakes--increasing surface water temperature, which is increasing twice as fast as the air temperature in the region.
Increasing surface temperature has caused an increase in the population of invasive species (sea lamprey which needs temperatures greater than 15 C to develop in the streams feeding the Lakes) and the warming has reduced the populations of nearly all native species of fish (e.g. pike, walleye, whitefish).
Higher temperatures have cause a drop in the level in the lakes because the percent covered in ice during the winter, which reduces evaporation, has been drastically reduced from historical levels. Lack of ice also causes a faster rise in temperature during the spring of the year, also increasing evaporation.
The lower level interferes with shipping, while the higher winter lake temperatures increases "Lake-effect" snow and intensity of of storms. I believe the crash on Feb. 12 in Buffalo may have be caused in part, by climate change due to open water on both lakes Erie and Ontario-- the nearby lake surfaces would normally have been covered with ice at that time of the year.
There is a technology that has the potential to solve all these problems, called the Atmospheric Vortex Engine, invented by a Canadian, Louis M. Michaud (aka the Wizard of On) living on the southern tip of Lake Huron (Sarnia, ON). The AVE he invented can not only cool the water it processes, it will create a cloud cover downwind which will reflect sunlight back into space and cool the region. Added cold rainfall will also help reduce temperature.
But most important of all, electrical energy can be harvested cheaply from the device, which provides a basis for economic recovery in the region as a result of increased manufacturing it would enable. Ref: http://vortexengine.ca
To all agribusiness, suburban communities in the desert with green lawns and golf courses, all cities like Las Vegas:
You touch one drop of our great lakes water and there will be hell to pay.
Hey Cowboy--I wouldn't lose any sleep over this. The cost of pumping the water up from the lake level, even up to the altitude of the western prairie, much less to Las Vegas, would be prohibitive.
Las Vegas can solve its energy problems with geothermal, or Concentrating Solar Power, when combined with the Atmospheric Vortex Engine to harvest the waste heat from either of these. With the resulting cheap electric power, their water problems can also be solved. They have to understand that California won't be able to help them out any longer due to the current crises, and figure out ways to become self-sustainable in food for example--try http://www.seawatergreenhouse.com
In any event, it would be better if Las Vegas residents would...lose the lawns. Also, if you put up an AVE as a "tourist attraction", it would be a big hit, IMO.
The cost of pumping water from Hoover dam to LA ain't cheap but they do it.
I think you would be surprised at how much money some people have and what it will buy.
Water isn't pumped from Hoover Dam to LA, but rather from Lake Havasu to a Reservoir near the LA-Riverside county line. While it is pumped over a few intermediate passes, there is little "net" elevation of the water. Most of the pumping cost is to overcome "fricton" in the line, and this line is less than 250 miles.
You would be talking about a pipeline 10 times that long to bring in water from Lake Michigan to LV or LA--ain't never gonna happen with the "cash-strapped" governments we have. And, if they do the "green" thing properly, GL water should never be needed in the West.
You obviously know more about this than I. You may be right. this country has always behaved as if money were no object. Those days may be over.
Hey extraterrestrial alien dude, thanks for posting those valuable and insightful links!
I've been reading up on the AVE (Atmospheric Vortex Engine) that you are so passionate about and the Seawater Greenhouse as well. Veddy inteddestink I must say.
Here's those links again:
http://vortexengine.ca/index.shtml
http://www.seawatergreenhouse.com/index.htm
I'm grateful you came to our world to share this valuable information with us struggling earthlings. And glad you took a crash course in English so we can understand your cosmic message. You may have unintendedly saved the human race from itself. Without your benevolent intervention we would assuredly have starved, gone thirsty and ran out of electricity, eventually.
Now anything is possible and we're free to urbanize the entire planet. Thanks! Got any ideas how we can begin to colonize other planets? This one may start to get a bit overcrowded.
May you live long and prosper!!
You are welcome, Moon Dog Guy.
These technologies have proven their worth in other worlds.
With cheaper electricity without carbon emissions, which can be used to eliminate pollution flowing to the sea, and by obtaining food only from the land, the Oceans of the World can be given the rest and recovery time they need, which would be at least one decade.
Earthlings will again be in control of their own destiny. To maintain biodiversity, Earthlings need to cede a larger portion of the Earth's surface back to nature. If they refuse, choosing instead to increase their numbers irresponsibly, and continue with their unsustainable ways, even unlimited amounts of "free-energy" will not be able to save Earth from Earthlings.