Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- What If All the World’s Debt Just Went Away
- Gun Lobby Speaks: We Need More Guns, Especially in Schools
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
- Bolivia's Morales Calls for New Era of 'Peace and Unity' to Break Greed of Capitalism
- Thinking the Unthinkable: On Mental Health, My Son, and Gun Violence
Popular content
Today's Top News
Tense Iran Braces for Anti-Ahmadinejad March
TEHRAN - Iranian opposition supporters staged a defiant rally against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election on Monday, with his defeated rival set to appear in public for the first time since the vote triggered the worst unrest in a decade.
A Iranian riot police officer sprays tear gas at a supporter of defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi attacking him with a police stick during riots in Tehran. A tense Iran was gearing up for more street protests against the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after authorities banned a nationwide march by his defeated rival. (AFP/File/Olivier Laban-Mattei) Iran's supreme leader has also ordered the country's top election supervisory body to look into the complaints raised by former premier Mir Hossein Mousavi, who has branded Friday's election a vote-rigged "charade."
Mousavi, a moderate who lost by a wide margin to the hardline Ahmadinejad, is planning to attend the march despite a ban, his website said, setting the stage for possible confrontations with security forces.
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei however told Mousavi to pursue his complaints against the most hotly-disputed election in the Islamic republic through legal and peaceful means, state television reported.
Mousavi's website had said the rally would go ahead despite a ban ordered by the authorities, which have come under fire from governments across the world and rights groups for their crackdown on opposition protesters.
"No authorisation for a march or gathering has been issued and any kind of gathering or march is illegal," an interior ministry spokesman said.
But hundreds of people were gathering in the streets of Tehran on Monday in defiance of the ban.
Mousavi lodged a formal appeal on Sunday for the cancellation of the election results that have brought to the fore deep divisions in Iran after three decades of Islamic rule.
"You should follow the matters peacefully," the television quoted the supreme leader as telling Mousavi, a moderate 67-year-old who mounted a spirited campaign that appeared to have huge support among Iran's urban youth.
Khamenei said the 12-member Guardians Council had been advised to "precisely examine" Mousavi's letter. A spokesan for the body said it would announce its decision in 10 days.
Monday's opposition demonstration comes a day after Ahmadinejad himself addressed a victory rally of vast crowds of supporters in Tehran to defend his victory.
"Elections in Iran are the cleanest," he said. "Today, we should appreciate the great triumph of the people of Iran against the united front of all the world arrogance (the West) and the psychological war launched by the enemy."
The authorities have warned that they would crush any "velvet revolution" in Iran and police said they have rounded up 170 people over the protests, including a number of reformist leaders.
Relatives of those arrested protested outside Tehran's main revolutionary court. "You can beat us as much as you can, but take us to our children," shouted a woman as a policeman nearby was beat a man in order to disperse the crowd of around 200.
Riot police on Sunday fired into the air to break up a demonstration, while about 200 Mousavi supporters shouting "Death to the dictator!" lobbed stones at police who fired back with tear-gas.
On Saturday, Tehran witnessed widespread clashes between baton-wielding police and stone-throwing protestors who set bins and vehicles on fire in violence on a scale not seen since 1999 when student demonstrations led to a week of deadly nationwide unrest.
The election campaign, unprecedented in its fervour with mass carnival-like street rallies and the hurling of insults between candidates, appears to have galvanised a grass-roots push for change.
But it highlighted deep divisions in society, with Ahmadinejad commanding massive backing in the rural heartland and among the poor, while Mousavi gained ground among the urban youth calling for a less confrontational stance towards the West and easing restrictions in society.
US Vice President Joe Biden said on Sunday there was "an awful lot of doubt" about the vote, but nevertheless reiterated Washington's willingness to engage in talks after three decades of severed ties.
Washington has extended a hand for dialgoue with Tehran since President Barack Obama took office in January.
Amnesty International called for the Iranian authorities to immediately investigate the crackdown on demonstrators.
"The shocking scenes of violence meted out by the security forces need to be urgently investigated and those responsible for human rights violations must be brought to justice," it said.
Iranian analysts have warned that the disputed nature of Ahmadinejad's victory could weaken Iran from within and isolate it further from the outside world.
"The perception of many Iranians that their vote was not taken into consideration will weigh heavily on the legitimacy of future elections," said Tehran-based analyst Sayeed Laylaz.
Ahmadinejad's first term in office set Iran on a collision course with the international community over its nuclear drive, his anti-Israeli tirades and restrictions on society.
And Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak, on a visit to France, said Ahmadinejad's win was "bad news."
"I am not sure if the results reflect the real will of the Iranian people," he told journalists.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

20 Comments so far
Show All1) Last week there was a surge in terrorist activities by the CIA funded terrorists originating in Baluchistan and attacking Southeast Iran.
2) USA has increased it's Cyberwarfare profile, who did shut down those sites? Mousavi's seems to be working again.
3) The USA used exactly the same scenario to overthrow the first democratically elected Iranian President in 1953( minus cyberwarfare of course and USA press I would guess) .
4) Immediate, Massive and Blaring declarations by the Media that the vote was rigged. ( whereas the missles in Pakistan even today are "suspected US missiles).
5) Calls not to arrest pipe wielding, arsonist rioters?
6) If this is such an evil authoritarian regime why are they breaking up riots riding around like circus clowns on little motorbikes?
7) According to poster "insurgent", Mousavi is responsible for the execution of 7,500 innocent Iranians for being "Corrupt of the Earth".
"6) If this is such an evil authoritarian regime why are they breaking up riots riding around like circus clowns on little motorbikes?"
To whit: "Amnesty International called for the Iranian authorities to immediately investigate the crackdown on demonstrators."
"The shocking scenes of violence meted out by the security forces need to be urgently investigated and those responsible for human rights violations must be brought to justice," it said.
Hard to say yet who is doing what. Suffice it to say that brutal beatings are being meted out, whether by circus clowns on motorbikes or otherwise. A little beating goes a long way to intimidate people.
It's too early for me to say what is going on. Is the CIA involved? Undoubtedly. Was there vote fraud? Probably. Was fraud justified in light of CIA involvement? No.
AS we know in the USA beatings and terrorist charges go a long way towards stifling dissent, of election fraud and other grand crimes.
The difference is the USA beatings and election fraud get less press in the USA,
"To whit: "Amnesty International called for the Iranian authorities to immediately investigate the crackdown on demonstrators.""
Amnesty International's job is to call for investigations. A call for an investigation is NO PROOF the Iranians are at fault.
Why don't we concentrate on our war criminals? I AM PERSONALLY INTERESTED IN SEEING THOSE THOUSANDS OF PICTURES OF OUR HEROES IN ACTION AT ABU GHRAIB AND OTHER US WORLDWIDE GOULAGS.
I couldn't care less about sore losers in Iran making a fuss to encourage US/Israeli action against their country. If I ran Iran, I would lock them up for treason, as their power lies in their knowledge that their nutty demonstrations will be exploited by western media to encourage genocide on Iran.
"Why don't we concentrate on our war criminals?"
We should concentrate on our war criminals...where appropriate. This thread is about the elections, riots, and possible revolution in Iran. What is happening there is instructive for the U.S. When there is vote fraud, or even the semblance of it, the people should go to the streets and demand justice. Apparently, we need to learn this from the Iranians.
"...that their nutty demonstrations will be exploited by western media to encourage genocide on Iran."
WHAT!?
You have that exactly backward. If masses in Iran are against Ahmadinejad, because of his chicken hawk militarist ways, and the international community is against him for the same reason, how could that be exploited toward Iranian genocide?
If anything, I think they're making Iran less likely to be attacked for spreading the knowledge that many Iranians are freedom minded and willing to give their lives to win freedom and prevent their only minutely scary government from being an international nuisance.
Apparently the Iranian Interior Minister, Ibrahim bin Harris, an Ahmadinejad appointee, certified his boss's landslide election a few hours after 35-40 million paper ballots were delivered to him for counting. Perhaps Ali Kentar Blackwell had hundreds of thousands of people at the Ministry, ready to quickly hand-count the ballots.
Obviously, Mahmoud learned something from President Junior, and Joe Stalin: "Those who cast the votes mean nothing; those who count the votes mean everything." Only Iran's A-Man forgot to keep it a more realistic 51 to 48 percent win, which might have been credible.
Relative-moderate Mousavi's stunning loss may well lead to sweeping changes in Iran -- the populace, mostly under 25 and tired of the old mullahs' oppressive Islamic Sharia law, could very well use this election theft to foment a new social revolution. As the massive post-election street demonstrations show, the Iranians aren't quite as complacent and bovine as we Americans are.
We have Islamic rule in Iran only because the USA overthrew their democratic government in 1953.
How do you answer the poster "insurgent" claim that Mousavi presided over the execution of 7,500 innocent Iranians on "Corrupt of the Earth" charges?
If you certify an overwhelming victory in a few hours, does that prove it was not an overwhelming victory?
Why is all of the USA MSM so sure it was vote rigging within minutes of the election?
"Why is all of the USA MSM so sure it was vote rigging within minutes of the election?"
The DO NOT. You HAVE TO READ THIS, from the Washington Post: "our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin -- greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday's election..."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/14/AR2009061401757.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
US media bosses and reporters have put most of their eggs in one basket: war stocks. They are inciting us to war, and are pretty shameless about it.
Soution: Let's take back our media from those 3 families, and let's concentrate on stopping genocides, not on brewing a new one.
"If you certify an overwhelming victory in a few hours, does that prove it was not an overwhelming victory?"
Glenn ford, what it proves is that the 35-40 million paper ballots could not possibly have been hand-counted within a few hours of the polls closing by the small number of Interior Ministry employees. Also, it's now developed that the result was announced BEFORE all the votes were in. Moreover, it's improbable in the billion-to-one range that Mousavi lost his hometown of Tabriz where he was wildly popular.
Add those three points up and you have massive vote fraud and a stolen election. About the only trick Ahmadinejad missed was 3,000 'accidental' votes for Pat Buchanan.
"Apparently the Iranian Interior Minister, Ibrahim bin Harris, an Ahmadinejad appointee, certified his boss's landslide election a few hours after 35-40 million paper ballots were delivered to him for counting. Perhaps Ali Kentar Blackwell had hundreds of thousands of people at the Ministry, ready to quickly hand-count the ballots."
No, no - he ran it by the U.S. Supreme Court.
As an American who had to endure the Bush error, I must hand it to the Iranians who are demonstrating a lot passion for the future of their nation than couch potatoes who let five Supreme Court justices select the President in 2000.
What is ironic is that the position being disputed has nowhere near the power of the US executive.
Nate unless the rioters are paid USA stooges as they were in 1953.
Israel to Obama -------- I will not nuke Tehran if you destabilize Iran.
Here's the problem:
Given the long history of disinformation in service of Zionism, given the false flags, the spying, and the general corruption of the body politic here by Zionists
it is only reasonable to immediately discount any criticism or reporting that furthers the Zionist cause.
glenn ford, the first post I believe, and Wanderer, Hello, Your two posts say it ALL.
Glenn Ford is right. Anyone would have to be a dupe and ignorant of history not to see the hand of the U.S. in this, as it is in every country with resources and economic systems or politics the U.S. doesn't like. Venezuela, for example. These people "protesting" are thugs.
For another view of Iran and the elections:
http://notsylvia.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/why-ahmadinejad-won-the-iranian-elections/
It appears that Mousavi's support comes mostly from urban youth who would invite USA, Inc., in to setup shop, and rule Iran via corporate oligarchy, destroying its cultural heritage and the people's economic/political autonomy. If a group wishes to dissent against a particular form of oppression, e.g. the Iranian theocracy or whatever the incumbent president stands for, it should demand universalism instead of an alter-oligarchy. It is the myriad splintering and shape-shifting of oppression that divides/conquers the people pitting them eternally against each other.
To rtdrury, emma, et al: It's true that the young people in Iran want to be free of Sharia law and live a more 'Westernized' life, which would entail Walmart, Burger King and other benighted corporate entities entering their culture. However, you might consider that the American neoconservatives, hard-right Israelis, and AIPAC are delighted over the 'reelection' of hard-liner 'face of Iranian evil' Ahmadenijad. The right-wing has spent a fortune demonizing Ahmadenijad; they would have to start over with Mousavi, and Mousavi's more moderate stances would be more difficult for them to propagandize. Why do you assume that Mahmoud is not taking a little under the table from the CIA, Mossad, AIPAC or other agency to play the scary Holocaust-denying fool?
It's much easier to set up a false case for war with Ahmadenijad in power than Mousavi.
Excellent comments all. Good, this time around people are not being duped by the Mainstream media. Collectively we have moved a step forward and have learned our lesson.
Its a clear established fact that our media is 100% corrupt and is a propaganda machine, welcome to Oceania!!
Indeed who is the "Kermit" behind this "Black Op"?
Inspite of having Obama at the helm, its clear that the "agenda" as so clearly printed in Z. Brezinki's book " The Grand Chessboard , is on track. Let us also remember " Confessions of an Economic Hit Man"....when the "Jackels" fail, the next option will be on the table. If this "mini coup" fails, I assure you Israel/USA will attack Iran.
Anyhow, to all, congrats and well done.