Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Invokes Jesus More Than Bush
He's done it while talking about abortion and the Middle East, even the economy. The references serve at once as an affirmation of his faith and a rebuke against a rumor that persists for some to this day.
U.S. President Barack Obama (C) and German Chancellor Angela Merkel (L) are joined by church leaders as they tour the Church of Our Lady in Dresden in Germany June 5, 2009. From L-R are: Merkel, Bishop of Saxony Jochen Bohl, Obama, and the Prime Minister of Saxony Stanislaw Tillich. (REUTERS/Larry Downing) As president, Barack Obama has mentioned Jesus Christ in a number of high-profile public speeches - something his predecessor George W. Bush rarely did in such settings, even though Bush's Christian faith was at the core of his political identity.
In his speech Thursday in Cairo, Obama told the crowd that he is a Christian and mentioned the Islamic story of Isra, in which Moses, Jesus and Mohammed joined in prayer.
At the University of Notre Dame on May 17, Obama talked about the good works he'd seen done by Christian community groups in Chicago. "I found myself drawn - not just to work with the church but to be in the church," Obama said. "It was through this service that I was brought to Christ."
And a month before that, Obama mentioned Jesus' Sermon on the Mount at Georgetown University to make the case for his economic policies. Obama retold the story of two men, one who built his house on a pile of sand and the other who built his on a rock: "We cannot rebuild this economy on the same pile of sand," Obama said. "We must build our house upon a rock."
More than four months into the Obama presidency, a picture is emerging of a chief executive who is comfortable with public displays of his religion - although he has also paid tribute to other faiths and those he called "nonbelievers" during his inaugural address.
Obama's invocation of the Christian Messiah is more overt than Americans heard in the public rhetoric of Bush in his time in the White House - even though Bush's victories were powered in part by evangelical voters.
"I don't recall a single example of Bush as president ever saying, ‘Jesus' or ‘Christ,'" said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Christian group Family Research Council. "This is different."
To Perkins, Obama's overtly Christian rhetoric is a welcome development from an administration that he largely disagrees with on the issues, though Perkins sees a political motive behind it, as well.
"I applaud that. It gives people a sense of comfort," Perkins said. "But I think it's a veneer, a facade that covers over a lot of policies that are anti-Christian." That includes, in his view, Obama's stance in favor of abortion rights.
The Rev. Barry Lynn, the executive director of the group Americans United for Separation of Church and State, doesn't like the trend with Obama: "I don't need to hear politicians tell me how religious they are," Lynn said. "Obama in a very overt way does what Bush tended to do in a more covert way."
Obama's public embrace of his Christianity so far has not included choosing a church in the capital, and he has attended Sunday services only once since his election, on Easter Sunday. The White House said at the time the family was still looking for a spiritual home in Washington.
But inside his White House, Obama has placed his Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships - run by a 26-year old Pentecostal minister named Josh DuBois - under the White House's Domestic Policy Council. That was widely seen as an effort to involve a religious perspective in the administration's policy decisions.
Also, religious leaders meet with White House policymakers on a regular basis - and help to shape decisions on matters large and small. A White House speechwriter working on Obama's Egypt speech called several faith leaders to get their thoughts. After the White House unveiled its budget in April, officials convened a two-hour conference call with religious leaders to discuss how the spending plan would help the poor.
"President Obama is a committed Christian, and he's being true to who he is," DuBois told POLITICO. "There's an appropriate role for faith in public life, and his remarks reflect that. And they also reflect a spirit of inclusivity that recognizes that we are a nation with a range of different religious backgrounds and traditions."
Still, it is ironic that Obama, who rode a wave of young, Internet-savvy and more secular voters to the White House, would more freely invoke the name of Jesus Christ than did Bush.
In his first year as president, Bush mentioned "Jesus" or "Christ" a handful of times - but only in innocuous contexts, such as his Easter proclamation, a Christmas message and a proclamation on "Salvation Army Week."
To be sure, Bush talked openly about his faith. On the day of his second inauguration as governor of Texas, Bush reportedly told Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention, "I believe that God wants me to be president." As a Texas governor running for president, Bush declared in a presidential debate that the philosopher he most identified with was Jesus.
And in an interview for Bob Woodward's 2004 book "Plan of Attack," Bush was asked whether he'd talked to his father, the President George H.W. Bush, about the decision to invade Iraq.
"There is a higher father that I appeal to," Bush said.
But there are different political imperatives driving the two presidents. Obama has every incentive to broadcast his Christianity, while Bush, for other reasons, chose to narrowcast his religious references to a targeted audience.
For Obama, Christian rhetoric offers an opportunity to connect with a broader base of supporters in a nation in which 83 percent of Americans believe in God. What's more, regularly invoking Jesus helps Obama minimize the number of American who believe he is a Muslim - a linkage that can be politically damaging. According to a Pew Research Center study, 11 percent of Americans believe, incorrectly, that Obama is a Muslim; it's a number that is virtually unchanged from the 2008 presidential campaign.
Yet Obama has targeted his messages, too. He used speeches in Turkey and last week in Egypt to highlight the Muslim relatives in his past as a way to draw a connection with his Muslim audiences - something he shied away from during his presidential campaign.
For Bush, invoking Jesus publicly was fraught with political risk. He was so closely politically identified with the Christian right that overt talk of Christ from the White House risked alienating mainstream and secular voters. Bush instead quoted passages from scripture or Christian hymns, as he did in his 2003 State of the Union Address when he used the phrase "wonder-working power." That sort of oblique reference resonated deeply with evangelical Christians but sailed largely unnoticed past secular voters.
.
To some, the difference between the two presidents goes beyond rhetoric. David Kuo, a former official in Bush's faith-based office who later became disillusioned with the president he served, worries that both men have exploited religious phraseology for political gain. "From a spiritual perspective, that's a great and grave danger," he said. "When God becomes identified with a political agenda, God gets screwed."
And he suspects that Obama has an even larger goal: the resurrection of the largely dormant Christian Left, a tradition that encompasses Martin Luther King's civil rights leadership and dates back as far as Dorothy Day, the liberal activist who co-founded the Catholic Worker movement in the 1930s.
Recast in 21st Century terms, that long-dormant stream of American political life could become a powerful political force. A Pew survey released May 21 found that even as Americans remain highly religious, there has there been a slow decline in the number of Americans with socially conservative values - especially among young voters. That creates an opening for Obama, especially at a time when some conservative evangelicals are telling pollsters they are frustrated and disillusioned with politics.
"In the long term, this could be huge," said Stephen Schneck, director of the Life Cycle Institute at The Catholic University of America, who is active in left-leaning political efforts. "There are swing Catholics and swing Protestants even within the evangelicals. To the extent Obama can mobilize those people as part of a new Democratic coalition, that marginalizes Republicans even further."
- Posted in



39 Comments so far
Show AllWhich proves he is secretly a Muslim.
"Which proves he is secretly a Muslim." (Zmann)
Exactly!!!...lol (They will print anything here)...I really must do a Cheney and simply say...So........
Its all about marketing. The Obama campaign is so good at marketing, and the American electorate so poor at critical thinking, Obama can sell them yesterday's newspaper at full price.
Oregoncharles
Your enlightening reference to Obama as "selling" and "marketing:"
It's true, he's hired as a high end sales person. He has no real power. Just like the fancy, well dressed diamond ring salesperson or those slicksters who sell BMWs, Obama sells the American empire to distressed, ill-informed, hapless citizens who have not learned to demand anything but continue to be led around by their noses.
Fine, then the same goes for Bush.
how often did he invoke Bush?
I used to sell newspapers and when customers complained about paying full price for yesterday's paper (if available) I always said we should charge more, since it was rarer and on its way to an antique. That's critical thinking!
Which proves Bush wasn't so bad!
If Obama really believes what he spouts about religion and is not merely trying to stay in the American mainstream of superstition to be re-elected, then it is very sad. Politicians feeling the necessity to endlessly spout their religious beliefs in public show just how far gone we are as a people. What these posers claim to believe is not what they practice in the real world so why bother publically displaying their hypocrisy? (Who would Jesus bomb to keep our failing economy and nation-state running?) Believers in such fantasies believe they are selected to do, in their mind, 'god's will' here on earth. They are delusional and probably shouldn't be allowed anywhere near national public office.
I see a belief in religion as part of the infancy of the human race and as such, like nursery rhymes or fairy tales, may have served a transitory purpose when we were too young and ignorant of the phenomenol world to know any better. I think we now know better how the world works, or can know better.
Growing up is hard. One must shed one's childlike views and adopt more mature views of existence - or remain a child all one's life; even in the life of the species as a whole. To believe in fairy tales, while acceptable in a child, is dysfunctional if not embarrassing in an adult.
"Growing up is hard. One must shed one's childlike views and adopt more mature views of existence - or remain a child all one's life; even in the life of the species as a whole. To believe in fairy tales, while acceptable in a child, is dysfunctional if not embarrassing in an adult."
This brings back to the front of my mind, even at the height of summer, American Santa...when can we throw this Coca-Cola-red-and-white, planet-killing and debt-ridden SOB and all of his Christmas crap onto the garbage heap for which he's largely responsible?
Sorry...
Don't worry dubet, Santa has been in Quantanamo since 12/24/06.They got his sleigh,reindeer,bag of coal everything.Cheney got his naughty nice list and Cell phone too.We won't see that ol elf for awhile. peace
Don't worry--he doesn't really believe his drivel. He's just trying to out-Bush Bush. Oh great, another phony Christian president. And people really fall for this nonsense?
for about 2000 years now.
the apostles were among the original spin doctors.
Jesus died 2,000 years ago. He has nothing to do with either bush or Obama. What's also obvious is that neither bush nor Obama have studied his teachings.
"What's also obvious is that neither bush nor Obama have studied his teachings."
I guess that would be true for all of us.....Jesus (As presented to us in the gospels) raised the pole very high......A hard act for any of us to follow....... Politicians (Or used car sales people) are not necessarily attempting to impose their belief systems but rather manipulate the beliefs of others (Religion, family values, the institution of marriage,taxes...etc..etc..)....Always appealing to a carefully measured demographic.... (Like the 24hr cable news system.) That is politics in the United States....
Is it true that Jesus lost his temper only once? Seems it was in the temple when He kicked over the proceeds of the money exchangers. Let's see. People 2000 years ago dealing in the exchange of money. Sounds a lot like today's modern capitalists. Oh where oh where is Jesus when we need him?
more to the point - when JC said "render unto Caesar" he wasn't talking about paying your taxes - he was advocating giving all money back and creating a real value system for exchange.
Then this "real historical figure" turned into a zombie and flew into the sky.
Sioux Rose
THE LORAX: Vitally true. However, Christian coding works as a popular brand name and makes for a more reliable voters' base. So easy to pass off the nonchalant slaughter of other nations' peoples when you're utterly convinced your commander of chief is getting his marching/shooting orders from "the big guy," better known as Mars. It's nothing that Jesus would do, for certain!
_"...Still, it is ironic that Obama, who rode a wave of young, Internet-savvy and more secular voters to the White House, would more freely invoke the name of Jesus Christ than did Bush...."_
There is no irony. Obama frequently used a format that evoked rapture in his audience.
_"...For Obama, Christian rhetoric offers an opportunity to connect with a broader base of supporters...."_
Because the type of Christian rhetoric Obama prattles resembles a type of Protestant worship that reinforces faith minus reason. Couple it with the less overtly Protestant Evangelical message of "believe;don't be a cynic", and you have a recipe for faith without reason marching into.... "have you read the good news?"
_"In the long term, this could be huge,"...._
Mega-Church campaigning by the charismatic leader fills the pews.
"And we are a benevolent people. A good people. A light on the hill, filled with promise. For we bring peace and democracy. Why do the cynics only bring war? We do not go to war for conquest, but because we have no other choice but to confront these cynics, these haters. But fear not, for I have faith in you. For we will once again become the light of hope in the sky for the poor, starving child who's heart is broken by the bad man, the war maker. If only they would accept peace and stop their warmongering. But do not fear. We will once again become the beacon on the hill to shine down on the valley and spread our goodness across the land. To bring peace and prosperity...."
So much analysis over what are merely words...actions are where one's focus ought be...amazing how little conversation is actually functional...
I hope Jesus does come back, to kick some faux-Christian ass...
With apologies to any and all, I do not consider myself a Christian, but do hold these verses (among others) attributed to Jesus high:
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?
And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
(For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.
Every word, miracle, or characteristic (being born of a virgin, curing the sick, feeding the multitudes, raising the dead, death and reincarnation, etc) attributed to Jesus was stated by or attributed to earlier 'moralists' or 'deities'. Jesus did nothing original or unique. My guess is that the figure we call Jesus is a convenient perhaps mythological reposity for far earlier wisdom.
it is interesting, and a bit disappointing, to see how easily a population accepts whatever story is presented, even if it's a 'cover' of an earlier 'hit' by a different 'group'...if you don't know it's a cover, you just think the new band wrote the song...the commonality of theme implies deep knowledge of the human psyche, and the manipulation thereof...even as a cyincal skeptic, I'm surprised, myself, at how easily I can manufacture feelings of worship, especially when bolstered by familiar verse and truly moving music...as a musician, I am sometimes ashamed of religion's usurpation of this powerful form of art and communication...bring back the days of tribal music, with many people directly involved in the playing, singing and dancing, celebrating...
One of my favorite exercises: if none of the world's religions were known to you, what would your version of the origin of life, and the purpose of life, be? Mine has something to do with mutually-advantageous multiple-spirit-alliances within and without a physical, planet-donated body, and a philosophy of compassionate celebration and proactive preservation of the natural order...
good exercise.... mine (regarding purpose.... origin is much toooo mysterious to me) is that beyond the confines of time, each being gets to (or is condemned/blessed to, depending on shall we say karmic point of view...) experience the life/lives of each and every other being ---so it behooves us all to be mindful of our interbeing and align ourselves with the forces that cooperate compassionately/harmoniously with the vast ecology of this arrangement, rather than attempt to gain an (always false, really) sense of advantage or power/control over the whole shebang, or any part thereof, without consideration for (and humility within) the unfathomable interconnections.
Long live deep ecology!
I'm not so sure that swinging protestants or catholics or marginalizing republicans or democrats or whoever is what's at issue here. i think what's up here is (HOPEfully) an opportunity to broaden public discourse about 'spiritual' matters... i.e. ethics. it will be interesting to see if/whether obama has a more matured take on 'christianity' than his predecessor, who was obviously of the spiritually dissociative type... believing that christ 'died for our sins', a disconnected-from-form way of discarding responsibility for the ENFLESHED spirit of humanity (thereby jettisoning any need to seriously consider how one's acts impact human rights, ecological balance etc). looked at within a HISTORICAL, real-world human context, any student of history knows that WHY jesus was killed had more to do with his denouncing the mammon-worshipping culture in which he lived than to do with intentionally getting himself tortured/killed to benevolently, magically wipe away human error or 'sin'. it remains to be seen whether obama has the guts or intent to delve into social inequities through the lens of spiritual ethics. the us, as we were reminded by dr. king, is still indeed the greatest purveyor of violence on the planet and still neglects programs of social uplift in favor of shoring up the status quo and further enriching the already excessively wealthy. that he hasn't taken the bankers (let alone torturers!) or corrupt corporatocracy to task (instead continuing to supply them with endless bailouts) a stronger stand against zionist militarism, and militarism in general shows that he is still trapped within the dominant paradigm's delusions of 'might-makes-right'.... but the fact that in cairo he actually used words like empire and colonialism (if i recall correctly) leads me to understand he is a mortal being attempting to wrap his mind (and eventually, his actions, which, like most humans, lag significantly behind his ideals, given the powerful momentum of the false self system in place that surrounds him) around the realities of the situation, even as the false realities of the commodified world seem to dictate his every move. how this plays out politically, at the grassroots, individually and collectively, is something we don't have very good language for, since for so long we have been hampered by a learned helplessness and fervent belief and hope that we can continue in peaceful slumber while the dualistic forces of good and evil battle it out, supposedly outside of our control. maybe as a species we are maturing. maybe regressing. same as it ever was and this time it's different too.
I am happy to know that Obama invokes the name of the "Lord"--he (Obama) is going to need all the help he can get to be a two-term POTUS.
lard jeebus, we thank you you have given us, your stupid offspring, a nugget of wisdom for seeing thru religious con-artists of all types: not everyone who sayeth Jeebus Jeebus, etc.
this kind of stuff is totally irrelevant for analyzing their "fruits", what they do. a perfect specimen of fake journalism. bush says i love jesus. obama says it LOUDER. so politico tries to determine who loves jesus more.
meanwhile they are both stealing everything from the collection plate, raping the altar boys, and fire-bombing the mosque down the street.
Thousands of years ago, in the desert of what we call the Middle East, a tribe of Hebrews conjured a powerful God to rule their people. The God, Jehovah, was a vengeful, fear mongering, God of war that exacted revenge on the faithless, demanded blind obedience, made females subservient, instilled guilt into the minds of the innocent. Dominion over the beasts of the earth was granted, as well as permission to destroy the natural world, since this earth was not the real world. The real world lay in another place, his place, if one was obedient enough they would be allowed entrance to this "other world".
Eventually these authoritarian, guilt ridden, nature destroying, war-like Hebrew tribes inspired others who formed their own versions of the abstraction called Jehovah. A seemingly more benign version in the form of a Jesus cult grew, but it too continued the autocratic rule by fear, despite it's sweet talk of peace and love. Islam, another branch, focused the theme of blind obedience, and demanded submission, at the point of a sword.
As Nietzsche wrote:
"We know, today our conscience knows, what these uncanny inventions of the priests and the church are really worth, what ends they serve in reducing mankind to such a state of self-violation that its sight can arouse nausea: the concepts "beyond," "Last Judgment," immortality of the soul," and "soul," itself are instruments of torture, systems of cruelties by virtue of which the priest becomes master, remained master.
Everybody knows this, and yet everything continues as before."
Sioux Rose
REBEL: Presuming "everybody knows this," (I don't agree here), then the argument for repeating the pattern would probably revolve around the fear of what would exist were human beings to set themselves free. To those that would argue that equivalents of "sin, hell and damnation" would escalate, my response would be more in alignment with what Gandhi said in answer to the question, "What do you think of Western CIVILization?" And his reply, "I think it WOULD be a good idea." In other words this civil alternative has never really been tried; and while it will prove quite a massive task to summon civil behavior out of a humanity thoroughly conditioned by centuries cast in blood, terror, and the marginalization of at least one group to take on the collective shadow and serve as the "enemy," we have no other choice if WE as a species are to survive. This is why an understanding of a celestial model that postulates more than ONE size intended to fit all makes not just good cosmic sense.
"...invoking Jesus helps Obama minimize the number of American who believe he is a Muslim..."
BOTH Obama and Bush should STOP exploiting Jesus
I ask you this - WHO WOULD JESUS BOMB?
answer; NO ONE! Jesus was a Pacifist for sure!
Jesus also HATED the Money Changers, ie the BANKERS
BOTH Bush and Obama are WAR MONGERS and Murderer's
We ALL Know of Bush's WAR Crimes - And to ALL the Obama Bots that want to Deny it;
Obama is CONTINUING With Bush's WAR Crimes and Going Further, extending them in Pakistan!
Obama got blood on his hands within his first two weeks in office ordering DRONE Plane Attacks on Pakistan, KILLING CIVILIANS!
and Back to the Money Changers, the Banksters;
BOTH Bush and OBAMA are supporting the Banksters Giving them BAILOUT MONEY
Arrest BUSH and IMPEACH Obama!
Save America! Save The World - RON PAUL for PRESIDENT 2012!!!
Obama actually speaks favorably of Jesus?
Boy, if people ever find out that Jesus was a left-wing socialist radical pacifist, there could be trouble!
Awriiight! Marginalize those Republicans even further...
Well, I am an agnostic, but I invoke Jesus every time Obama mentions health-care, banking, Afghanistan, Iraq, torture . . . Actually, it seems like I invoke Jesus every time Obama opens his mouth. Jesus!
I believe it should come out more like "Jay-zus!"
I have been saying the same thing! It is such a ploy. But then again. Who knows? It is sickening!
"I applaud that. It gives people a sense of comfort," Perkins said.
-- i am not comforted by obama's invocations.
"83 percent of Americans believe in God."
-- wow, now i feel very uncomfortable. god bless america....
...peace...
There's an amusing anecdote Lincoln told about the woman who firmly believed in divine Providence (as they would put it at the time) until the wagon wheel came off "and then she didn't know what on airth she was going to do".
Americans believe in the God of crossing home plate and the God of the B-1 bomber flyover, the God who watches over the puppies and grandmas in the hospital but doesn't seem to have much time for the victims of one of his tsunamis -- "whoops, sorry 'bout that" -- or plagues ("they must've had it comin', not believin' in Jesus or somethin' like him"). And they believe in the divinity that made them live in the land of the fuhree.
But an actual divinity that might kick THEM arse-over-teakettle, the divinity that Jeremiah Wright believes in, who might -- HORRORS! -- DAMN the US for, oh, genocide, slave-trading & mass rape of African slave-women . . . well, concerning THAT divinity (wherever he might be), they are thoroughgoing atheists . . .
Sounds like Owenbama needs to cling to his guns & religion too...