Biden Tells Governors to Plan for Rail-Line Stimulus Money
The first payments of $8 billion in financing for high-speed trains on lines such the Philadelphia-Pittsburgh corridor will be made by late summer, Vice President Biden said yesterday.
Biden met with state governors, including Gov. Rendell, at the White House yesterday to urge them to think boldly in planning for trains that could travel up to 150 m.p.h. He said funding from the federal economic stimulus package could "jump-start" a high-speed rail network to improve the nation's "terrible passenger rail system."
The federal government is to issue detailed guidelines to the states by June 17 on how $8 billion in stimulus funding is to be awarded. Biden said the first payments, "by the end of the summer," would go to improving systems where work could begin quickly with measurable results. One such system is the Keystone Corridor between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
The state in 2006 completed a $145 million upgrade to the Philadelphia-Harrisburg portion of the Keystone Corridor, allowing state-subsidized Amtrak trains to make the one-way trip in about an hour and 40 minutes.
With the faster trips and additional trains, ridership between Philadelphia and Harrisburg has increased by 26 percent in the last two years, state officials said.
The Keystone Corridor is one of 10 corridors identified as potential high-speed rail routes eligible for funding from the $8 billion. In addition to the stimulus money, President Obama has requested $5 billion in his budget for high-speed rail.
Speaking to reporters after the White House meeting, Biden said the United States needed a high-speed rail system like those in France, Spain, and parts of China.
"We do know that $8 billion won't put in place an entire high-speed rail network . . . but it's 8 billion times more than we had," Biden said. He said such a network would reduce highway and air-traffic congestion and reduce air pollution.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation planners are looking at using stimulus money for improving the Philadelphia-Harrisburg route, adding service to the existing one daily round-trip between Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, and restoring rail service between Scranton and New York.
A draft of a national rail plan is supposed to be ready by mid-October, outlining a nationwide system of linked rail corridors.
"It's close to embarrassing internationally that we have such a terrible passenger rail system, relatively speaking, in the United States," Biden told the governors yesterday.
Biden has long been an advocate of rail travel, as a regular Amtrak commuter between Washington and Wilmington during his tenure as a U.S. senator. He said he had made about 7,900 round trips of 250 miles a day.
The Obama administration, with its focus on rail travel, has reversed long-standing efforts to reduce or eliminate federal aid to Amtrak.
Citing the creation of jobs and other "long-term economic and environmental consequences," Biden said a national effort to build high-speed rail lines could transform national transportation much as the building of the interstate highway network did in the 1950s and 1960s.
"The question gets down to how are we going to rebalance the transportation network," Biden said.
Some critics contend that Obama's proposal is doomed to fail because the country is not dense enough, even in the Northeast, to support a costly investment in upgraded rail service.
In addition to Rendell at the White House yesterday were governors from Illinois, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Also attending the roundtable session were transportation officials from New Jersey, Delaware, California, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Rhode Island, and West Virginia.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show AllP.S. Amtrak passenger trains must always sit on side tracks and wait while a hundred freights loaded with Chlorine, Hydrochloric Acid, gasoline and other scary stuff fly by.
aw
And now about some lines West - say from Chicago to Seattle, San Fran or LA?
From my own Erie PA things have improved but the one Eastbound is at 7 AM (Maybe) and the arrival Westbound at about 2 AM.
I do credit Amtrak with decent real dining cars on some trains (besides the awful microwave hamburger lounges on some).
Here we have a charade airport (aka "Tom Ridge Field" - that's more appropriate) that calls itself "Erie International" but you can't get anywhere except on a DeHavilland Turbro Prop thing and via a change in Cleveland, Detroit or Philadelphia.
The high speed rail line proposed between Los Angeles and San Francisco would be very practical, taking many cars off the highway and tons of carbon emissions out of the air from the hundreds of daily flights. Factoring in the times getting to and from the airports, the TSA and luggage hassles, etc., it would probably not take any longer than flying, either.
I'm told there used to be a very reliable railroad running on the lower level of the Bay Bridge between San Francisco and the East Bay before the oil companies managed to get rid of it in favor of dirty diesel buses. That's something to think about when you are stuck in the endless traffic jams that now plague the area.
A large segment of the U.S. population is retired and would
enjoy traveling by rail, but it's almost impossible to get
to many rural areas that once were accessible by rail. I
grew up in Montana and traveled by rail to colleges in
Nebraska and Minnesota. I would love to travel by rail
once again now that I'm retired, but the trains go nowhere
near my destinations. In Europe and Japan, rail travel is
affordable and practical.
Look at how many flights or lanes of roads would be needed to replace the ancient underfunded existing rail lines, then tell me that an investment in a more modern system will not be worthwhile.
I think it would take 12 lanes of freeway each way to replace the New York - Washington D.C. corridor - if I remember a CSPAN panel from about 10 years ago correctly. Do we really want that much more pavement.
Every form of transportation is subsidized. Even sidewalks and city streets are paid for by taxpayers (sidewalk and street assessments) not the people who use them. I lived in a city and none of the people walking on the sidewalk in front of my house paid a toll. I even had to shovel the snow or the city would do it and add the cost to my tax bill. Not complaining, just counteracting the stupid right wing diatribe about how only riders should pay for rail systems. That kind of thinking leads to billing rape victims for the kit used to get evidence of the crime.
This will be competing with short-hop plane transportation, but the "insufficient density" argument is hog-wash from the longer flight companies. The RR's were the major means of transportation until Ike put the money in highways instead of rebuilding the system which was cannibalized to support the WWII effort. Comparing cost/usage against building and maintaining more automobile systems makes the figures look quite different. It's much more fuel efficient, and the technology exists now for a cost effective long range high speed system, to say nothing of local light rail. It will provide products for the remnants of the failing auto industry, and should be built as part of the socio-economic restructuring which is both needed and inevitable.