Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Maryland's Donna Edwards: Emerging Leader, Liberal Maverick
State's first black congresswoman opposes Obama war-funding plan
WASHINGTON - When Congress gives President Barack Obama more funds later this month for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, only one Maryland lawmaker is expected to dissent: Democratic Rep. Donna F. Edwards.
Donna Edwards at the Take Back America conference in 2008 (photo by OurFuture.org) Edwards believes the president is taking the U.S. in the wrong direction in Afghanistan. She argues that Obama has no plan for winning and no strategy for getting out.
Congress "failed" its responsibility to challenge President George W. Bush's policies in Iraq, Edwards said in an interview. "And we can't make that mistake with President Obama."
After less than a year in the job, the first black woman elected to Congress from Maryland has stamped herself as the most liberal member of the state's congressional delegation. She is also building a national following on the left.
"We see her as an emerging leader, and I think she will really be a dynamic force in the Congress," said Robert L. Borosage, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, which gave her a prominent place on the agenda at the liberal group's conference in Washington this week.
It's a heady ascent for the 50-year-old lawyer from Prince George's County, who had never held public office until last June. But standing up to a highly popular president from her own party - one whose margin of victory in her district was larger than any other in the state - seems right in character.
Edwards got her start in politics as a local activist, fighting plans for the $2 billion National Harbor project on the Potomac. The developer eventually agreed to her demand for residential housing at the hotel-retail complex.
The single mother of a college-age son then took on Rep. Al Wynn, her one-time boss as a Maryland state senator. Running to his left and attacking his support for the war in Iraq, she nearly upset the veteran Democrat in the 2006 primary; last year, she finished him off.
Like others on the left, Edwards is unhappy with some of Obama's early pragmatic decisions, such as withholding photos of Abu Ghraib detainee abuses (releasing them would be "part of how we reach the rest of the world," she contends) or taking a single-payer health care option off the table before congressional negotiations even started ("not helpful").
"I think at his core the president is one of us," Edwards told activists during a panel discussion at the conference. By bringing pressure from the left, liberals can "open up the political space for this president to do what his gut wants him to do anyway."
Three weeks ago, Edwards took the House floor in opposition to Obama's Afghanistan policy.
The president, she said, would "commit our servicemen and women to a war without end."
She was the only Marylander to vote against Obama's $96.7 million war funding request, which gained initial House approval on a bipartisan vote of 368-60, with 51 Democratic liberals opposed. A final vote is expected Friday.
Her "no" vote put her at odds with some on the left whose enthusiasm for Obama outweighs their doubts about his war plan. Moveon.org, which gained power as an antiwar group and was an influential part of an online coalition that backed Edwards, did nothing on the war funding vote, for example.
The hawkish Washington Post editorial board criticized her, but Edwards said she had given the issue considerable study and traveled to Afghanistan just days before opposing Obama's request.
They "may have called me naive for that" vote, she told the liberal activists. "But if we don't ask the questions now, we'll be asking ourselves these questions ten years from now, I guarantee that."
Another foreign-policy move that generated criticism was her refusal to support a measure that recognized Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas and blamed the Islamist movement for casualties in Gaza Strip fighting that flared in late December 2008. The Jan. 9 resolution was approved 390-5, with Edwards and 20 others voting "present."
It was "the wrong resolution at the wrong time," and not in the best interest of resolving the crisis, she explained after the vote. But Politico reported this week that Edwards had alienated some in the Jewish community in the Washington suburbs, who question the depth of her support for Israel.
"Look, I voted 'present' on a resolution that was apparently very important to the Jewish lobby. And so, obviously, that's going to result in an expression of, whatever, concern and questions," Edwards said during the interview in her House office.
She calls Israel "a really important ally" and says she's a strong supporter of the Jewish state. But "even with allies and partners, it's important for the United States also to stake out our own security interests and work with our allies and partners on those."
Edwards recently came back from a six-day trip to Israel, sponsored by the nonpartisan New America Foundation, that included a visit to the Gaza Strip. She said she backs Obama's efforts to secure a Mideast peace, including his call for a freeze on the expansion of Jewish settlements on the West Bank.
In another foray into foreign policy politics, she was one of five members of Congress arrested and taken into custody in late April outside the Sudanese Embassy in Washington in a protest against that government's human rights record in Darfur.
Her involvement raised questions about what kind of representative Edwards intended to be: a gadfly or a workhorse, a bomb-thrower or a serious inside player?
"I want to do what's right by people in my congressional district and in the country," she said. "I think people, at this early stage ... would describe me as somebody who's really thoughtful and careful and who does her homework."
At this early stage, some Democratic activists also describe the ambitious newcomer as a future statewide candidate, one with significant potential in party politics.
"She's a true believer," which would be an advantage in a Democratic primary contest, said Eddie Eitches, president of an American Federation of Government Employees local.
Edwards admits that she doesn't see "congresswoman" as the last job title on her professional resume. But she laughs off speculation about a run some day for the Senate.
"Oh, gosh," she responded and, referring to herself in the third person, added that "she's going to do her job in the United States Congress, is what she's going to do."
That, and move soon into a new home - a luxury National Harbor condo that she fought to make part of the waterfront development.
- Posted in

38 Comments so far
Show All"Congress "failed" its responsibility to challenge President George W. Bush's policies in Iraq, Edwards said in an interview. "And we can't make that mistake with President Obama."
Thank you, Donna Edwards!
Watch out Ms. Edwards, the Dems. with the help of their zionists handlers AIPAC will pull a Cynthia McKinney on you.
What??? She isn't paralyzed by lobbyist money?? Give her electric shock therapy!
Another African American from Maryland once said:
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.
Frederick Douglass
Douglass also said:
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without its many waters, they want crops without plowing the soil."
Right now Donna Edwards reminds me of Shirley Chisolm whose slogan was "unbought and unbossed". May she continue to lobby for the electorate who elected her to Congress in the first place. How different would that be?
Poet
Hi Poet. Good post.
I lived in Shirley Chisholm's district and worked on her election committee. That is my one political experience that was successful in both important respects: We won AND the candidate delivered on her basic promises once elected. It is so rare that it has happened to me only once in over 40 years of being a citizen.
We need to elect more "unbought and unbossed" candidates. Not just to praise them, not just to cast a wistful vote for them, but to build a support system for them and ELECT them.
Now let us see if Donna Edwards will give us another such opportunity, perhaps in the next Presidential election. We should be looking for people with integrity who we can work to elect.
Joe
Poet, excellent quotes still powerful and relevant today.
Let's hope Ms. Edwards escapes the Washington beltway Conscience-removal lobotomy machine.
A most estimable woman, indeed!
I hope she is able to keep up the fantastic work when the power brokers move against her. We shall see.
Black women and Kucinich are the last remaining remnants of the US Constitution. Get Pelosi out. Maxine Waters or Barbara Lee for Speaker.
You are absolutely correct. Edwards is a woman after my own heart. Also check out Marcy Kaptur, a white woman from Ohio who often votes with Kucinich, fought against NAFTA, criticized TARP, etc. I'm not in her district, but when I check voting records she is in the right (progressive) column. Too bad we can't get rid of that @sshole John Boehner who brings shame to Ohio.
I was thinking along the same lines and wish Donna well. You can tell when anyone in congress is treading on expensive toes when their critics start calling them names ("gadfly", "bomb-thrower") in the hope that is all they will be remembered by.
Absolutely!
How sad that we have so few who have managed to maintain integrity.
Right on! Let us hope, no, let us work, to make this a sign of things to come. Congress is due for a real shaking up. But who is going to do that? How can we wake America up from it's dream?
OK I'll vote Democratic again if it is her.
Donna Edwards -- Palin?
"bombthrower" ------- an activist Congress person with integrity is slandered as gadfly and bomb thrower, how shameful.
Socrates: the gadfly of Athens.
By labeling her as a gadfly, they are honouring her, even if they are too stupid to realise it.
Looks like we've got her good work until AIPAC destroys her career in the next election cycle.
Thank you Donna and Maryland. More proof that the party is reformable and a third party is unnecessary.
We'll see. One dynamic person alone is not a reformation.
Joe
Re Po Thead June 4th, 2009 1:04 pm,
who asserts that Donna Edwards is "...proof that the party is reformable and a third party is unnecessary."
What she proves is that the Ds have been forced to make room on their left flank because of the growing third-party threat---precisely its proper function in a non-parliamentary system.
Sadly, as others have pointed out, the Ds can count votes as well as the Rs. When the roll is called, each rightward lurch will pass handily in a heartwarming display of "bipartisanship," while the votes of Kucinich, Feingold, Waxman etc. in opposition will give comfort, even "hope," to the lesser-evilists and DPAs.
Interesting conspiracy theory but I don't see much third party pressure; apart from comments on this site- Obama still has broad support.
I'd like to see congress full of independent progressives with no party affiliation.
Just phoned Waxman's Washington office since I could not imagine him voting NO on this appropriation. Sure enough, he's voting FOR the WAR MONEY. As one of his constituents, it would really be GREAT if he were to VOTE NO. But, I've come to expect the opposite.
He does great investigations, however, and really good press conferences about the findings. But where to they go? Who is prosecuted for the abuses, for instance, as a result of any of these highly publicized events?
Kucinich, Waters, Edwards, Lee, Kaptur...
Start of a list of people we can protect and support.
Joe
Support for Edwards, like any of the other Dems you like, is based on quicksand. The Dem central command has in the past used corporate cash (and whatever you can spare) to challenge their own "supposedly" members, when those members stray too far off script (remember Kucinich having to drop out to fight a challenge from his own party?)
Democrats get their money from the same place the Republicans do, from the same big businesses. Until you create a funding structure for progressives to rely on, any nominal progressives, whether they are Rs or Ds, will collapse like a house of cards, the moment their votes are needed.
A progressive party must have funding from the people it represents, namely mom and pop businesses, single parent families, veterans etc. Expecting GM and Citibank to pay for candidates that don't put corporations first is, obviously, pointless.
I agree. When I say "protect", I mean just what you say. A good candidate will be hung out to dry if we do not raise funds, organize volunteers and spread their message. They will not be able to rely on support from their party if their positions are too honest and progressive.
Joe
Joe, it's a pathetically short list. It's time to look/work for people to add to that list in 2010.
Paul West what do you mean--bomb thrower. You don't have a clue.
WAKE UP and stop writing this garbage
By bringing pressure from the left, liberals can "open up the political space for this president to do what his gut wants him to do anyway."
bush prided hisself on his GUT FEELINGS, too.
only proved he had SHIT FER BRAINS.
don't need any more of that.
from the heart is where it should come.
WOW!!! GREAT TO SEE SOME REAL OPPOSITION to what is a war policy indistinguishable from the last. We voted NO on war when we voted for Obama, but he didn't seem to hear that message.
BTW, Donna, please go over to Congressman Waxman's office and let him know that CALIFORNIANS DON'T WANT A WAR BUDGET either.
NOTHING GOOD can come to our country as long as we are continuing to fund the largest war machine and EMPIRE the world has ever seen.
"Her involvement raised questions about what kind of representative Edwards intended to be: a gadfly or a workhorse, a bomb-thrower or a serious inside player?"
By "Her involvement" West is referring to her having guts. So without the typical msm euphemisms the article reads more clearly like this:
The fact that Edwards has guts (or character if you don't like slang) raises questions about her ability to be a serious toady.
"I think at his core the president is one of us," Edwards told activists during a panel discussion at the conference. By bringing pressure from the left, liberals can "open up the political space for this president to do what his gut wants him to do anyway."
Donna Edwards is correct.
Obama practically begged the left to make him do what needs to be done. While he's not helping the left in some regards, what Edwards is doing is showing us the way. We need to support her and anyone else who takes it to the status quo, and we need to do it loudly.
Obama is a disappointment to some. That should be an invitation to join Donna Edwards and others to change Obama's direction. If all he hears are crickets, he'll think he's doing swell.
"That, and move soon into a new home - a luxury National Harbor condo that she fought to make part of the waterfront development."
?
it's known as graft.
It's called innuendo from a couple of weasels. Or one weasel pretending to be two.
"TAKE BACK AMERICA"
(demand a refund.)
This is somehwat okay on the part of Ms Edwards, but if she seriously did her "homework", then she would not be so damnably polite about the government of Israel and its hellbent crimes; she wouldn't be siding with the Bush-Cheney fallacy of genocide in Darfur and that the Sudanese government is most responsible; and so on.
She clearly has some serious homework that's left undone, so far. But she's at least better than not acceptable at all about the war in Afghanistan. She could improve in this regard, but she's saying clearly more than by far most members of the U.S. Congress and Senate have said.
There's definitely "room for improvement" on her part, but she's welcome in terms of definitely seeming to be better than most U.S. politicians.
I don't know that I could vote for her though. She doesn't strike me as someone who takes "homework" seriously enough. And better than most politicians doesn't say much for a person, because most politicians are schmucks, idiots, incompetent, hypocrite, and ... etcetera, anyway.
She needs to do more.
Hey, elect me ... to kick your asses. I have my Herman Survival boots on.
"Ted Markow June 4th, 2009 8:28 pm
"I think at his core the president is one of us," Edwards told activists during a panel discussion at the conference. By bringing pressure from the left, liberals can "open up the political space for this president to do what his gut wants him to do anyway."
Donna Edwards is correct.
Obama practically begged the left to make him do what needs to be done. "
YES, BUT ONLY on the [surface]. It's only what Obama [appeared], seemed, and pretended to do. What was there deep down in "his gut"?
There we could find a starkly contrasting reality; in "his gut". If he truly wanted people to move him and his presidential administration to do what's right and needed, then he'd [listen], but he doesn't do this [at all]!
He [is] war criminal many-times-fold already since the inauguration in January, and this is besides his years of corrupt or criminal conduct in the U.S. Senate.
So, no, deep down in "his gut" we will find what's there; sh*t!
He is another liar, etcetera. What he pretends that he wants the anti-war, ... people of the USA to do is all pretense. If these people take this baiting, then it'll keep them occupied while he and his boss ruling elites will continue with their agendas less opposed.
After all, Obama, if he's truly a real law graduate, knows damn well the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan are unjustifiable, he would know that it's far more difficult to argue that a war is justifiable, as opposed to arguing that a war is unjustifiable, and he would know that plenty of the 9-11 Commissioners have denounced the inquiry they were supposed to lead, stating that the Bush-Cheney administration (criminally) corrupted this inquiry and that it needs to be re-done, with [independent] investigation. Those are two things a true law graduate would know if he or she was in U.S. politics, but while Obama knows these things, he roguely disregards these and other critical realities that illustrate other ways in or due to which he's criminally conducting the role of U.S. President.
If Obama had any good in "his gut", then he would call off the drone attacks, the escalation in Pakistan, the massacres of villages of civilians, and so on.
Ms Edwards is dreaming about what's in Obama's "gut", and so are people who side with the imaginery notion that there's anything good there.
Okay, I think I'll also go fishing.
"Shadow of the Hawk", movie review by Roger Ebert, Aug. 25, 1976
(url broken over two lines)
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
article?AID=/19760825/REVIEWS/608250301/1023
Hey, we're talking about the evil U.S. government, presidential administration supposedly having something good or kind in the president's "gut", and so on, and I'm checking to see if there's a late-night movie to be entertained by and it doesn't seem like I've found one; but did find the above is airing at 12:30 a.m. and there's a really weird Pontiac car in the film, and evil spirits. I'll buy Japanese, instead, for a car; although it seems like this won't be happening until my "next life" in this world, and given I don't believe in returning to this hellbent world, well, ... in my dreams, then.
Does that sound crazy to you? It might.
I'm just punning for funning around.
Otoh, people should cease their butt-kissing ways with Obama and, instead, use my Herman Survival boots, which are nearly 40 years old, but still in good shape. I could give monsieur Obama a "swiftie" or two.
Like the evil-driven Pontiac in the above movie, Obama keeps popping up where we shouldn't want him. And if it's not Obama, then it's his VP, or Bush (Sr and Jr), Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Ashcroft, Rove, Powell, Rice, Clintons (Hillary and Bill), Gore, and many more "people"; or the new cmder of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Obama's "good hunch gut pick", Lt Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who evidently is a hellbent covert ops s.o.b. of many, many years of experience.
Obama's "gut" has good in it? Dream on!
you got it, Mike.
the world doesn't need a foreign policy determined by IBS.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome.