EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pakistan Plan to Attack Taliban Haven Promises Wider War
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Waziristan, the remote area that's the epicenter of Taliban and al Qaida militants in Pakistan, is set to become the next war zone in the nation's fight against Islamic extremists, where clashes between insurgents and the army erupted over the weekend.
Pakistani soldiers patrol on a mountain near a military post overlooking Wana, the main town of the South Waziristan region, near the Afghan border April 11, 2007. Revenge for army action in Waziristan could cause carnage across the country, severely testing hard-won public support for taking on the Taliban, even destabilizing the country. It would also add to the humanitarian crisis of people displaced by fighting, which stands now at some 3 million. (REUTERS/Maqsood Mehdi)
So far, there are just skirmishes in Waziristan but the key U.S. ally
plans a full-scale military offensive there this summer, according to
Pakistani and Western officials, a fight that is certain to be deadlier
than the current operation in Swat valley and with profound
international repercussions.
Western leaders have repeatedly said that international terrorist plots are being hatched in Waziristan, while the area provides a sanctuary for Afghan insurgents and al Qaida leaders, possibly including Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri.
South Waziristan, a part of the wild tribal territory that lies along the Afghan border, houses Pakistan's public enemy number one, warlord Baitullah Mehsud, who has thousands of armed followers around him. The insurgency across the country is fueled by fighters and suicide bombers sent by Mehsud. North Waziristan is also under the control of a Taliban warlord.
Pakistani forces are making rapid progress through Swat valley, in the North West Frontier Province, and they've previously claimed to have cleared two other areas that were under Taliban domination, Bajaur and Mohmand, which are part of the tribal territory.
But the specter of Waziristan, the fountainhead of extremism, now looms.
"The final battle will be fought in South Waziristan," said Asad Munir, formerly head of military intelligence for the tribal area and the North West Frontier Province. "They've started it (the offensive against the insurgents) and if they leave it mid-way, they should be mentally prepared to hand this country over to the Taliban. They have to complete it. There is no other way."
Pakistan has launched multiple operations against Taliban on its soil since 2004 but critics say that each time they have been half-heartedly pursued and ended with a truce that left the militants in control, including a peace deal in South Waziristan in early 2008.
But, under intense international pressure, the current offensive in Swat, and before that the recent operation in Bajaur, have finally hit the insurgents hard.
Failure now would hugely embolden the militants, Asad said. Taking back Swat and the tribal area, especially Waziristan, would deny the insurgents the vast tracts of territory that they now control, where training camps and schools for indoctrinating suicide bombers are freely run.
While Washington and other western allies pressed Pakistan to take action in Swat, which lies just 100 miles from the capital Islamabad, the valley is not thought to be a significant base for Afghan insurgents or al Qaida. But Waziristan is seen by Western countries, from the United States to Spain, as crucial to their homeland security.
"Waziristan is at the heart of Western counter-terrorism interests in this region," said a Western security official based in Pakistan, who could not be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. "Waziristan would hit the sweet spot for us. But we'd rather not have a campaign than a campaign (in Waziristan) that failed."
Waziristan provides a crucial safe haven to Afghan insurgents, as well as a launching pad for Pakistani jihadists heading to Afghanistan. It is also a headquarters for international terrorists.
The offensive in Swat has led to bloody terrorist reprisals, with a chilling threat issued last week by the Taliban to escalate the attacks by striking some of Pakistan's biggest cities.
Revenge for army action in Waziristan could cause carnage across the country, severely testing hard-won public support for taking on the Taliban, even destabilizing the country. It would also add to the humanitarian crisis of people displaced by fighting, which stands now at some 3 million.
Militarily, Waziristan poses a huge challenge to Pakistani forces. Its harsh mountainous terrain is ideally suited to guerrilla warfare, while the Taliban is concentrated in the area, where they have been entrenched for years, allowing them to build tunnels, bunkers and fortifications.
Unlike Swat, where the population largely welcomed the army once they saw that it was a serious operation, the fierce tribal people of Waziristan are deeply hostile to outsiders, including the Pakistani military.
South Waziristan, covering 2,500 square miles, has lawless regions to three sides - North Waziristan to the north, Baluchistan province to the south and the Afghan province of Paktika to the west, providing ready escape routes to the insurgents.
Analysts said that a successful operation would need to seal off South Waziristan, especially the option of retreat into Afghanistan, requiring strong co-ordination with the U.S.-led forces across the border. Joint Pakistan-U.S. planning for the operation is likely to be underway, mirroring the collaboration undertaken last year when the Bajaur offensive began and U.S. forces intercepted fleeing Pakistani Taliban in the bordering Afghan province of Kunar. The Waziristan campaign should coincide with the arrival of the extra "surge" of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
"They should co-operate with the Americans and employ the classic 'hammer and anvil' technique, with Pakistan forces isolating South Waziristan and pushing them (the Taliban) towards the border," said Javed Hussain, a former Brigadier with Pakistan's Special Services Group commando unit. "That's where the American forces should act as the anvil, and the Pakistani forces as the hammer. In between the two, the insurgents are crushed."
The operation in Swat valley, launched on 7 May, could be over in "two to three days" senior Pakistan defense official Syed Athar Ali told a conference in Singapore Sunday. There is speculation that Waziristan could follow as early as this month (June), though July or August may be more likely given the need to stabilize Swat.
Sensing the coming showdown, Taliban in South Waziristan have started to attack army bases and check posts in the area, with 25 militants and at three soldiers reported killed by the authorities Sunday.
Shah is McClatchy's special correspondent in Pakistan and is based in Islamabad.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

20 Comments so far
Show AllSo they say the Swat Valley war is going great ...with 3 million refugees.
I wonder if these new Homeless folks were the welcoming committee.
It's the War economy people and Obama better wake up.
But he probably wont.
Endless war cost--a trillion here, a trillion there. I'll eat my hat if we can keep this empire going for another 10 years...
Your hat is safe.
dr and jim: i think the truly sad part of the whole economic situation worldwide is that there is no other currency which could serve as a reserve currency
i'm pretty sure that the chinese government - and the japanese, saudi governments as well - have figured out that they are getting stiffed for the cash owed to date - the treasury bills in the trillions
but they are hooked like crack hoes
the saudis need the backing of the us intelligence/military to hang on to power
japan has been under occupation since 1945
and who else is going to buy all the crap the chinese dump on us through wally wally mart
there is no other game in town
just american dollars
sad.....we are truly locked and loaded into the debt machine like it or not - most of us don't
but this war in pakistan i believe is going to rip the head off all of us
we are in deep doo
many of us will wish that we had done more politically and otherwise after this dust up gets going
this fabricated conflict thrust upon us as a strategy by the nwo is - i think - the big gambit of the nwo to finally and completely grab the gas and oil in the region
that brings russia and china into the conflict zone
and then of course there is always the situation with pakistan and india ready to blow at a moment's notice
we are throwing a match on a tinder box and we are going to regret it
...plans a full-scale military offensive there this summer, according to Pakistani and West...."
Got Hope? Got War! Obama speech in Egypt to Arab Muslims "we are not fighting you, we are fighting "Asians"...uh, this is not a war on religion.... uh, we bring you peace.
I wait for the political fallout stateside around mid-August. If domestic misgivings don't largely register by the beginning of Fall 2009, there will be none at all.
He really said that???
Asians will love him.
I thought we were at war with Eurasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia...
eur asian, I'm asian....
"we are an ocean people, we bring peace and liberty.... Western port societies bring liberty..." said Admiral Redcoat of the Queen's Navy.
or was it R Kaplan?
Excuse me, I had to go to the vomitoreum.
I guess we and our minions and mercenaries will bring peace and democracy to Afghanistan and Pakistan if we have to kill and starve every Afghan and Pakistani in both countries. God knows we've been practicing in Iraq long enough.
As long as We the Sheeple can be conned into believing that every Afghan peasant is spending his time plotting how to attack the United States and so must be killed, these wars will continue.
I find a little hope in the soldiers that are starting to refuse duty; who have come to believe that our wars are illegal and unjust.
Somebody, I've forgotten who, said during Vietnam, "What if they gave a war and nobody came?" What a wonderful concept!
Destabilize and wonder why? Afghanistan, Iraq, Somolia, Pakistan and now Iran.
Dying Empires, as do Sharks, flail about violently as they expire.
Well said.
I hear Muslims are telling their children that we are evil, and that they need to grow up and take over the world to save it from us. By God, what would YOU teach your children, had you been subjected to what we bring to the Muslim world?
I thought the Government of Pakistan were asking the IMF last month for 8 billion because they didn’t have enough to ensure basic services or service their already important national debt (The estimate of foreign debt was close to US$40 billion in 2005 and $45 billion 2007 while GDP 1n 2008 was only 504 billion)
Quoting from the Pakistan Daily Times:
Pakistan’s public debt is estimated to rise by over 30 percent this year alone because of massive depreciation in the value of the rupee and the external loans being rapidly obtained for financing the balance of payments. According to figures compiled by the Ministry of Finance, the foreign currency debt will reach Rs 4,811 billion and domestic currency debt will stand at Rs 3,120 billion by the end of June 2009. The public debt share as percentage of the GDP will have rise to 59 percent from 56.3 percent in the last financial year.
The people of Pakistan cannot afford to let their government pander to the WOT fantasies of the Western World. There is no military resolution possible by fulfilling the dream scenarios of; Western security official based in Pakistan, who could not be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. "Waziristan would hit the sweet spot for us. But we'd rather not have a campaign than a campaign (in Waziristan) that failed."
The Americans with their imperial wet dreams should be taken out the back and shot. What they are doing is creating the need for insurrection then running their empire of basket case economies on war and more war and endless debt.
The sooner the insurrection comes home to the USA the better it will be for all the people of the world.
It was the intention of the Bush administration to chase the Taiban into Pakistan, use them as an excuse to fire drones, and try to kill two birds with one stone,-[so to speak], and rid as many Arabs as posible, hitler style. Obama has continued on, with the same blood thirsty generals and Gates, perhaps out of fear from the Bush CIA.
I think our citizenry today are much like the German, Italian, and the Japanese people were post, and during WWII. We are divided, and polorized between the absolute necessity of "staying the course" and the absolute necessity of "reversing the course". If the people in this country had any courage, we would probably break out in civil war. It's heading that way, but,courage will not be necessary when enough rage develops.
I think our citizenry today are much like the German, Italian, and the Japanese people were pre-, and during WWII. We are divided and polorized between the absolute necessity of "staying the course" and the absolute necessity of "reversing the course". If the people in this country had any courage, we would probably break out in civil war. It's heading that way, and courage will not be necessary when enough rage develops.
Funny, what a pro-war, in defense of Obama sounding piece.
Does that writer work for the new 2009 moveon.org?
I am sure that it wasn't written by Eli Praiser.
Obama's dam sign is still in my front yard, so STFU in advance. I worked hard for Obama, and yeah, I am F-ing pissed.
The people on this site, are just not buying more war.
We are not buying the "right war".
There is simply no military solution.
We are not talking about defense, we are speaking of offense.
You don't have to be a lefty to figure out that it didn't work then, and it doesn't work now, now matter how many years you have been eating that bullshit they put out as news.
Obama promised more war in his bid for the White House.
Thats some campaign Bullsh*t.
Promise more war so that the war profiteers will vote for you? How the hell did he know what, when, or why he was going to execute his mission of destruction when he was not even president?
What is the common dream here?
What is the actual end result?
War begets war.
If you bomb my house, I wanna kill you.
Not very complicated.
If you re-built my country that you destroyed, I would not be as interested in killing you.
And that would actually be cheaper.
Of course Obama promised war...Being the Dem candidate assured him of the antiwar vote no matter what. So why not try to reel in some pro-war moderates, and disgrunteled reds as well?
"International terrorist plots are being hatched Waziristan ".
How do they arrive at that conclusion ? Why could they not be hatched in say London, or Madrid or in Arizona?
Crimes are plotted all the time here in Canada by groups like the Hells Angels or other such gangs.
It seems to me that once more there a GIVEN outcome wanted, that being defeating any groups that would slow or halt the building of a pipeline from the Caspian though Afghanistan and down through Pakistan.
In order to get that to happen the west needs reasons other then "we want their resources" so use "Terrorist plots are being hatched in the region we need this pipeline built"
The idea is to destabilize the most powerful Muslim nation, so that we may abuse lesser Muslim states with impunity.