Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Ex-US Envoy May Take Key Role in Afghan Government
WASHINGTON - Zalmay Khalilzad, who was President George W. Bush's ambassador to Afghanistan, could assume a powerful, unelected position inside the Afghan government under a plan he is discussing with Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, according to senior American and Afghan officials.
Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Zalmay Khalilzad speaks to the media after a meeting of the Security Council to discuss the conflict between Russian and Georgia at United Nations headquarters in New York in this August 11, 2008 file photo.
(REUTERS/Keith Bedford) Mr. Khalilzad, an American citizen who was born in Afghanistan, had considered challenging Mr. Karzai for the presidency in elections scheduled for this summer.
But Mr. Khalilzad missed the May 8 filing deadline, and the American and Afghan officials say that he has been talking with Mr. Karzai for several weeks about taking on a job that the two have described as the chief executive officer of Afghanistan.
Such an alliance would benefit Mr. Karzai by co-opting a potential rival. For its part, the White House has made no secret of its growing disenchantment with Mr. Karzai, and some Afghanistan experts said that enlisting Mr. Khalilzad would have the virtue of bringing a strong, competent leader into an increasingly dysfunctional Afghan government.
The position would allow Mr. Khalilzad to serve as "a prime minister, except not prime minister because he wouldn't be responsible to a parliamentary system," a senior Obama administration official said. Taking the unelected position would also allow Mr. Khalilzad to keep his American citizenship.
Administration officials insisted that the United States was not behind the idea of enlisting Mr. Khalilzad to serve in the Afghan government, and they gave no further details on what his duties might be.
They said that Mr. Karzai had sought out Mr. Khalilzad, but that the idea of enlisting a chief executive had also been raised by Gordon Brown, the British prime minister.
American and British officials expressed concern that any belief that the West was behind the plan would harm its chances inside Afghanistan. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
"This has the makings of a really bad movie," said Teresita C. Schaffer, a South Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
"The idea of having an American as a major senior official of Afghanistan is a very risky one both for the Afghan government and the person in question."
But she added: "Whoever is going to run Afghanistan will have to have both feet on the ground there, and I know Zal has intimate knowledge of the country and was involved to a degree that was virtually unheard of for an ambassador."
Mr. Khalilzad met with Mr. Karzai about the job when Mr. Karzai visited Washington two weeks ago, and they discussed the proposal then.
Mr. Khalilzad then flew to Kabul, the country's capital, several days ago to continue talks with Mr. Karzai, whose re-election campaign comes at a time when security in Afghanistan is deteriorating.
During his visit to Washington, Mr. Karzai also outlined his plan to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Richard C. Holbrooke, the special representative to the region, the officials said.
Administration officials say that President Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Holbrooke all told Mr. Karzai that it was up to him and Mr. Khalilzad to decide whether to proceed.
A plan that puts Mr. Khalilzad near the top of a Karzai government would provide the Obama administration with a strong conduit to push American interests in Afghanistan, particularly in cracking down on corruption and the drug trade, which American officials say has helped to fuel the resurgence of the Taliban.
While Mr. Khalilzad served in the Bush administration - including as ambassador to Iraq and the United Nations - he has maintained ties with the Obama administration as well, and has twice been to the State Department to meet with Mr. Holbrooke.
Mr. Khalilzad could not be reached for comment on Monday.
Mr. Karzai has already successfully defused the candidacies of other potential rivals for the presidency.
One of them, Gul Agha Shirzai, the popular governor of Nangarhar Province, announced after a four-hour meeting with Mr. Karzai that he was pulling out of the presidential race.
Another, Muhammad Qasim Fahim, a former warlord who later became defense minister, was identified by Mr. Karzai as one of two vice-presidential running mates, in a move widely interpreted as an attempt to bolster Mr. Karzai's standing among former mujahedeen parties.
Kai Eide, the United Nations special representative to Afghanistan, criticized the choice of Mr. Fahim because of human rights concerns.
It remains unclear whether Mr. Karzai and Mr. Khalilzad can strike a deal on an alliance, the American and Afghan officials said.
Several of Mr. Karzai's own ministers have opposed such a pact, they said, and it is not certain whether Mr. Karzai remains willing to bring Mr. Khalilzad aboard now that the filing deadline for presidential candidates has passed.
Mr. Karzai and Mr. Khalilzad have had a long and sometimes bumpy relationship. They worked closely when Mr. Khalilzad was ambassador to Afghanistan, from 2003 to 2005, and Mr. Karzai, the new president of a fledgling democracy, was viewed as a darling of the West.
But as the United States and Britain have become increasingly disenchanted with Mr. Karzai amid widespread corruption allegations, the two men have also put some distance between themselves, which expanded further as Mr. Khalilzad began to make plans to run against Mr. Karzai for president.
While he was working for the Bush administration, Mr. Khalilzad often brushed up against other officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
He got in trouble for appearing on a panel with Iran's foreign minister without getting permission from the White House first. And he annoyed State Department officials when he arranged to meet in Dubai with Asif Ali Zardari to talk about Mr. Zardari's bid for the presidency of Pakistan, just when the United States was trying to convince Pakistanis that America was not interfering in their internal politics.
- Posted in



19 Comments so far
Show AllAnyone who has remained alive and kept his government functioning on any level in the Afghan situation is not only strong and competent but especially in Karzai's case blessed with very good luck.
Corrupt? The USA, Nation of unaccounted for pallets of cash blowing away in the Iraqi winds, judging someone corrupt?
USA Military gifting each other with pizza boxes of cash, saying someone else is corrupt?
Nation who's CIA ran the Golden triangle heroin trade, who funded the Contra terrorists by supplying Cocaine to L.A. worried about someone elses drug policy?
Khalilzad was the Ambassador in charge when the USA was funding the Warlords instead of backing Karzai with reconstuction aid.
It was the USA that went moronically lurching off to attack Iraq and left Karzai holding the bag with practically no resources.
And it was Karzai who was democratically elected in a extremely successful election process, unlike the two previous regime cycles in the USA.
It was Karzai who was in charge when the Afghans smoothly created a new currency.
It is Karzai the Afghan people look to to be protected from the USA military.
The corruption they speak of is the compromises Karzai makes with other officials in his attempt to keep the prospect of improvement possible.
But I forget Karzai is democratically elected and not a USA stooge so he must be replaced by a USA dictator.
Eureka !!!! The deal is take Khalilzad or be a victim of McChrystal.
It would appear as if Zalmay Khalilzad has been recruited to ride herd (or appear to) on Hamid Karzai. This very much has the appearance of a recalcitrant client ruler being "assigned" a new proconsul. It would not be surprising in the least if Khalilzad did what Karzai has done, look to preserve his own neck.
khalilzad is in the upper levels of the neocons. for him to come back should tell the american people that all is well in noecon land.shame shame shame for obama, and these endless wars.
Hell, this is more disturbing to me than the troop surge or McChrystal's appointment to command there.
Watchout Karzi or you could end up like Saddam! You must be getting on the nerves of the power, elite for condeming the bombing and killing of innocent civilians. They are appointing a new sychophant, puppet to keep an eye on you to make sure you do not get too far out of line.
What people whispering in Karzai's ear should be teling him is: Remember what happened to the Diem family in Vietnam.
you don't have to go all they way back to Vietnam.
...there are plenty of examples of entire wedding parties being killed off....
"one fell swoop" and swoosh, three generations are taken out! I'm sure these raids are just a fluke, collateral damage....
A plan that puts Mr. Khalilzad near the top of a Karzai government would provide the Obama administration with a strong conduit to push American interests in Afghanistan, particularly in cracking down on corruption and the drug trade, which American officials say has helped to fuel the resurgence of the Taliban.
Send in Chuck Norris instead. Khalizad is just another diplomatic Willy Sutton. The American government and foreign policy establishment are full of them.
Chuck Norris doesn't need to go to Afghanistan, Afghanistan will come to him :-)
And then they can annex it into the Republic of Texas.
Afghan Mujahideen....
Khalilzad under Bush was Ambassador to Afghanistan (03-05), then Iraq(05-06), then UN(06-09)
1980s, Khalilzad and Brzezinski were in Afghanistan under Reagan... and there under Carter... Big Zbig masterminded the "Soviets Vietnam", but Khalilzad was his Afghan connection. Back when the US denied involvement.
Front company I attributed to Reagan Era is back in play with Obama
Both sons of diplomats. One from Poland, the other from Afghanistan. They taught political science at Columbia University when Obama was earning his BA.
Zbig has always been a great supporter of Obama, and also a champion of Khalilzad's role in the Bush Admin. El Salvador Option happened in Iraq in 2005....
Everyday, I get a creepier and creepier feeling of being right.
it's so sad we can't just blame the Bush Era as the beginning and end to all of this madness....no, it's a long and dark history which Obama is likely to put back behind the curtain....
front company....
chuk --- your facts scare me more than my pessimistic imagination. But nevertheless thank you.
Another reptile.
Joe
here you will find a great bio on the uber neocon------http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/beta/profile/Khalilzad_Zalmay/------------------great search engine too. this should tell the rest of the peeps, that obama is in the club. he is paying his dues.
This is just like the CIA's Kermit Roosevelt installing the Shah in Iran.
Or the CIA installing Saddam in Iraq. Expect long term disaster.
These creepy psychopaths keep getting recycled through one American administration after another. It just goes to show how little difference there is between the two parties. I would think the Afghani's would be outraged while our fellow citizens take no notice at all.
norman; with all due respect,the only difference between the two parties is ===lip service===. they select, so we may elect===.
Putting this criminal, already, in the Afghan government too clearly infers or implies [imperialism], .... The war on Afghanistan clearly isn't over yet and evidently isn't planned to be ended in any near future.
Yes, even the formerly blind such as me can't deny it's imperialism any longer.