Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
IAEA Chief Warns of New 'Virtual' Nuclear Powers
LONDON - Between ten and 20 countries will likely soon develop the capacity to build nuclear weapons unless major powers take steps to disarm, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said in an interview.
Between ten and 20 countries will likely soon develop the capacity to build nuclear weapons unless major powers take steps to disarm, according to the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog (AFP) In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei predicted a surge in the number of "virtual nuclear weapons states" who can produce plutonium or highly enriched uranium and know how to make warheads.
While they would likely stop short of assembling a weapon, thus remaining technically compliant with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), they could be within a couple of months of deploying and using a nuclear bomb.
"This is the phenomenon we see now and what people worry about in Iran. And this phenomenon goes much beyond Iran," said ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy (IAEA).
"Pretty soon... you will have nine weapons states and probably another 10 or 20 virtual weapons states."
Western powers fear Iran is secretly trying to build nuclear weapons, a charge denied by Tehran, which says its nuclear programme is for civilian use.
ElBaradei, who is due to leave his job in November, said the regime built around the 1970 NPT to stop the spread of nuclear weapons risked collapse.
"Any regime ... has to have a sense of fairness and equity and it is not there," he told the Guardian.
He added: "We still live in a world where if you have nuclear weapons, you are buying power, you are buying insurance against attack. That is not lost on those who do not have nuclear weapons, particularly in [conflict] regions."
ElBaradei expressed most concern about the spread of nuclear technology in the Middle East, which he said was a "ticking bomb".
The only solution was for established nuclear powers to disarm as rapidly as possible and pass internationally agreed bans on nuclear tests and on the production of weapons-grade fissile material, he said.
"If some of this concrete action is taken before the NPT [conference next April], you would have a completely different environment " he said.
"All these so-called virtual weapons states, or virtual wannabe weapons states, will think twice ... because then the major powers will have the moral authority to go after them and say: 'We are doing our part of the bargain. Now it is up to you."
- Posted in



3 Comments so far
Show AllNuclear power and weapons are the modern equivalent of Pandora's Box.
Exactly NateW.
Additionally the unchecked advancement of technology itself is a Pandora's box.
As soon as someone invented spears, everyone had to have one.
As soon as someone invented guns, everyone had to have one.
As soon as someone invented tanks, everyone had to have one.
As soon as someone invented nukes, now everyone wants one.
Same thing goes for 'non weapons technologies'... ie. cars, planes, power plants, ect.
I'm not excusing any of it. It seems to me that technology itself is in a fight for it's own evolution and survival- practically out of control from the humans who dream this stuff up. What's going to happen when someone invents an even more powerful dooms day weapon? Everyones' gotta have one? Is this how we want our human civilization to evolve? A second class civilization always subjugated to the latest machinations of first class technological 'triumphs' of some chunk of steel? Even though I'm employed in a technological field... I can't bring myself to agree that technology is inherently good or that it's goodness depends on the person who is using it. Quite the opposite- technology is inherently amoral and rife with problems that contradict life.
We need complete transparency and cooperation, not competition in the sense that we know it now.
Let the people decide.