Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bhopal Residents Bring Toxic Warnings
CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Sarita Malviya wasn't born when an explosion at a Union Carbide chemical plant in Bhopal, India, on Dec. 3, 1984, sent a cloud of deadly gas containing the compound methyl isocyanate into the old section of the city, searing the lungs and causing the deaths of at least 4,000 people.
Sarita Malviya, 16, of Bhopal, India, tells an audience at West Virginia State University that contaminated drinking water and a birth-defect rate five times the national average are among the lingering effects of a 1984 MIC release from a Carbide chemical plant that killed thousands in her hometown. (photo: Kenny Kemp) When her family moved to Bhopal years after the world's worst industrial disaster, "we had no idea that Union Carbide left toxic waste in three ponds," she said through an interpreter.
Heavy metals and toxins were seeping into the groundwater, she said, contaminating drinking water used by 30,000 people, including members of her family.
"Now, all my family has medical problems," she said. "The skin peels off my hands every four or five weeks, and my hands are always sweaty and cold."
Two years ago at the age of 14, she became a founding member of Children Against Dow/Carbide, an organization trying to force the former chemical giant and the company that bought it to fix lingering environmental problems and fund the study of related public health issues.
"On the night of the Bhopal disaster, 40 tons of MIC was being stored by Union Carbide," Malviya said to a group of West Virginia State University students and residents of the Institute-West Dunbar area gathered at the Wilson Student Union Building on Friday.
"I understand more than 100 tons are being stored by the factory here. I can only imagine what would happen to a community like this if that much MIC was released."
Malviya was one of three Bhopal area residents who spoke during Friday's meeting, sponsored by People Concerned About MIC. Their appearance is part of a 25-city tour of the United States taking place on the 25th anniversary of the Bhopal disaster, sponsored by the International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal.
Also speaking were Safreen Khan, also 16, and Rachna Dhingra, an activist with the International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal.
The three were all aware of last August's explosion at Bayer CropScience's Institute plant, which killed two workers and narrowly missed damaging a container of MIC.
"On the day of the Bhopal explosion, a refrigeration system that cost $30 a day to operate was turned off and a runoff tank wasn't working," Malviya said. "We have to learn from what happened in Bhopal. We fear that the company operating here, Bayer, will make a second Bhopal here."
Khan said both her parents were exposed to MIC on the night of the Bhopal explosion.
"I have seen a factory here that is almost double the size of the Bhopal factory," she said. "It saddens me that similar things are being done here. ...Maybe I don't understand all the complexities of the issues, but I wonder why the people in this community are not fighting. Who really needs these toxic chemicals?"
Dhingra said that no medical monitoring is being done in the Bhopal area by the Indian government or by the chemical companies, despite a birth defect rate five times the national average.
"Studies done as recently as 2008 show high levels of heavy metals like mercury in the soil. A plastic liner in one of the Union Carbide waste pits breeched, allowing toxins to seep into the ground water."
Dhingra urged those attending the meeting to contact members of their congressional delegation to urge them to hold hearings on the Bayer explosion.
"There was an explosion at the Bhopal plant two years before the 1984 disaster," she said. An engineer had warned that a disaster could happen but was transferred, and a journalist who did the same was sued.
Unless people let their elected officials know how they feel about chemical plant safety, "no one will care," she said.
Bayer spokesman Tom Dover issued a statement regarding the Bhopal Survivors event, which began by extending the company's sympathies to "all those affected by the tragic incident in Bhopal in 1984."
That incident, according to the statement, "emphasizes that safe production must be the primary objective at all chemical manufacturing sites throughout the world. The Institute site has multiple levels of prevention and safety measures using modern technologies to help ensure our safe production. The safety of our employees and the community remains our highest priority."
- Posted in



8 Comments so far
Show AllIt costs too much, so they find a remote and poor population where they can get away with it.
Mostly used in pesticides, it also has been used in the manufacture of rubber.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_isocyanate
Here is a link to Dow Chemical's "contact us" on their corporate responsibility page
http://www.dow.com/commitments/contact/
Based on year 2000 data,[36] researchers at the Political Economy Research Institute determined that Dow Chemical was ranked eleventh among corporations in a measure of toxicity of airborne pollutants emitted in the United States, releasing more than 14 million pounds of toxins into American air in that year. (The statistics given are not correlated to the volume of production.)[37] According to United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents Dow has some responsibility for 96 of the United States' worst Superfund toxic waste dumps, in tenth place by number of sites. One of these, a mining site, is listed as the sole responsibility of Dow: all the rest are shared with numerous other companies. Fifteen sites have been listed by the EPA as finalized (cleaned up) and 69 are listed as "construction complete", meaning that all required plans and equipment for cleanup are in place.[38]
In 2007, Dow was awarded an American Chemical Council (ACC) award of 'Exceptional Merit' in recognition of its longstanding energy efficiency and conservation efforts. Between 1995 and 2005, Dow reduced energy intensity (BTU per pound produced) by 22%. This is equivalent to saving enough electricity to power eight million US homes for a year.[39] The same year, Dow subsidiary Dow Agrosciences won a United Nations Montreal Protocol Innovators Award for its efforts in helping replace methyl bromide - a compound identified as contributing to the depletion of the ozone layer. In addition, Dow Agrosciences won an EPA "Best of the Best" Stratospheric Ozone Protection Award. [1]. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) named Dow as a 2008 Energy Star Partner of the Year for excellence in energy management and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.[40]
In 2008, Dow was reported[41] as being the major supplier of pesticides based on aminopyralid which had contaminated manure and caused widespread loss of vegetable crops in allotments and gardens across the UK.
[edit] Board of directors
Current members of the board of directors of The Dow Chemical Company are:
Arnold Allemang - Adviser, The Dow Chemical Company
Jacqueline Barton - chemistry professor
James A. Bell - former Boeing manager
Jeff Fettig - Whirlpool Corporation, Chairman and CEO
Barbara Franklin - former U.S. Secretary of Commerce
Andrew N. Liveris - Chairman and CEO, The Dow Chemical Company
Geoffery E. Merszei - CFO, The Dow Chemical Company
James Ringler - Vice chairman, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Ruth Shaw - President, Duke Energy Corporation
Paul Stern - Chairman, Claris Capital; Dow's presiding Director and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.)[42]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Company#Dow_Corning_Breast_implants
Sioux Rose
OLD GOAT: Thank you for this most important post! I HATE Dow! And like you, am all too aware of the cost to Indigenous populations from the machinations and mechanisms used in the name of technology to work against Mother Nature. There are always costs later to pay, but of course these don't turn up on the balance sheets used by today's captains of industry, each his own master of disaster-style capitalism. The debt to nature and indigenous populations is staggering. I know we can work for change, but the lobby "culture" of Washington makes it so hard to shift policies when a lot of money is at stake. Ultimately, karma will catch up with all those who played fast and loose with others' health by destroying ecosystems merely to save a few pennies on their end.
I believe that India recieved a small bribe from Dow which never got to any of the murdered and maimed.
Dow was also the manufacturer of the napalm used on people in Vietnam. The product was developed by prestigious chemists at Harvard, purchased by you and me with our tax money (without our permission) and deployed by the military.
The name Dow is associated with so many diabolical products that I would never buy any consumer product made by them. It is not a rational political boycott, just an emotional reaction.
Joe
Be sure to check out www.dowethics.com, a well done spoof website of www.dow.com
"While the Codes of Practice may vary from US to foreign countries such as India, the spirit of Responsible Care is the same: to ensure a perception of responsible stewardship that will protect chemical companies from unnecessary government regulation."
The site looks and sounds so reasonable that the website owners have been invited to speak at industry gatherings where the people inviting actually thought that they were inviting the real DOW.
General Electric ( G.E) The company that brings good things to life, manufactures military equipment. I wonder what other deadly things they manufacture.