Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Australia Muscling up as America's Power Wanes
AUSTRALIA needs to massively bolster its military capacity to deal with the rise of China and the possible decline of American influence in the region, according to a Defence white paper to be released today.
Australian Army armoured personnel carriers drive towards the town of Kinglake, 55 km (34 miles) northeast of Melbourne in this February 9, 2009 file photo. (REUTERS/Mick Tsikas/Files) The paper also redraws the policies of the Howard era, making it clear that Australia would not necessarily follow its main ally into expeditionary conflicts such as the Iraq war unless there was a threat to our "wider strategic interests".
"We must never put ourselves in a position where the price of our own security is a requirement to put Australian troops at risk in distant theatres of war where we have no direct interests at stake," it says.
The white paper - the first in nine years - says that after the defence of Australia, the nation's next priority is to ensure "stability and security in the South Pacific and East Timor".
It details the purchase of a massive list of military hardware expected to cost more than $100 billion. The weapons include a new generation of very long range submarines to provide "strategic strike" with cruise missiles and 100 state-of-the-art Joint Strike Fighters.
The paper points to China as a possible threat in a future world where the power of Australia's key ally, the United States, gradually declines.
In his preface to the document, Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the world had changed significantly since 2000, with the increased threat of terrorism and cyber warfare. But the biggest change had been the rise of China, the emergence of India and the beginning of the end of the dominance of the US, Mr Fitzgibbon said.
The report goes on to predict that "shows of force by rising powers are likely to become more common as their military capabilities expand".
The paper has already alarmed China with a Chinese diplomatic source telling The Age on Thursday it now looks like Prime Minister Kevin Rudd "wants to act on behalf of America against China".
In an apparent reference to Afghanistan and Iraq, the paper says: "The Government has decided that it is not a principal task for the ADF to be generally prepared to deploy to the Middle East, or regions such as Central and South Asia or Africa."
On the extent to which Australia can rely on the US for protection, the paper asks: "Will the United States continue to play over the very long term the strategic role that it has undertaken since the end of World War II?"
While acknowledging that no other power will have the capacity to challenge US global primacy over the coming two decades, it says the US might find itself "preoccupied and stretched in some parts of the world such that its ability to shift attention and project power into other regions, when it needs to, is constrained".
The plans outlined in the white paper will change the Australian Defence Force from a broadly defensive organisation with a bit of everything to a much more focused force able to launch damaging attacks vast distances from home.
The plan is for a potent defence force to deal with strategic uncertainties and military modernisation in the region.
The submarines, to be built in Adelaide, will be equipped with 20 or more cruise missiles, probably US Tomahawks, capable of hitting a target smaller than a car 2500 km away and delivering special forces to their destinations.
Similar cruise missiles will be fitted to the Navy's potent air warfare destroyers and new frigates.
And the Navy's anti-submarine capability will improve significantly with a new class of frigates designed to hunt down and destroy submarines. The oceans closer to home will be protected by a new class of warships, Offshore Combatant Vessels. They will be used for border security, to protect offshore resources, to carry out hydrographic and environmental research and potentially, to clear anti-shipping mines.
The ADF is likely to get seven large unmanned patrol planes - probably the US-built Global Hawk - capable of staying airborne for days at a time and covering huge areas in search of terrorists, enemy forces and smugglers of people and drugs.
Australia's agencies will also be given the resources they need to engage in cyber warfare - defending Australia's computer systems against sabotage and attacking an enemy's computer systems to cause economic chaos. Intelligence gathering resources also get a big boost.
By 2030 Australia's annual defence spending is likely to have jumped from its present $22 billion to nearly $40 billion.
To help pay for it's new equipment, the ADF has been told to find internal savings of $20 billion.
That would be enough to cover the $16 billion cost of the strike fighters and some of the submarines at $3 billion each but some in the Government are concerned that Defence will not get anywhere near this target.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull warned the Government could become fixated on China in its strategic thinking to the exclusion of other nations and other issues.
"Let me state this plainly: it makes no sense for Australia in 2009 to base its long-term strategic policy on the highly contentious proposition that Australia is on an inevitable collision course with a militarily aggressive China."
China was but one major power among several major powers in the region, Mr Turnbull said.
With AAP
- Posted in

30 Comments so far
Show AllIf there is any nation aside from China out there with the capacity, energy, & willingness to fulfill the coming void from Bush error caused decline of the USA, it is Australia. However, they need to avoid the same mistake the USA made and make sure a douche bag like Howard never rises to power again. As recent American history has shown, all it takes is one idiot to destroy an empire. For the Australians, it is Howard.
The only good empire is a destroyed empire. Empire means masive theft accompanied by genocide, pornographic torture and disco rapes.
The population of Australia is lower than that of Canada. I highly doubt either of those countries is going to build an empire, or try to move into a position to capitalize on the weakness of the usa...
You're right, Saturnalia. Canada could only have a world empire if it were to use Americans as slaves, and that's not going to happen if Canadians aren't allowed to control American media.
Well, maybe we can join with Cuba, then enslave the yankees. Yah, that'd work. Evil overlords here we come! Martha! Where's my rolling papers!
Re: "evil overlords here we come!..." Are you referring to the death and destruction of the First Nations people? Or Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Perhaps Vietnam, or Korea? Maybe Panama? Grenada? Iraq I and Iraq II? Is is Afghanistan you're referring to? Tuskeegee? The slave trade? The church bombings? The lynchings? The merciless bombing of civilians and civilian infrastructure in Germany?
About the rolling papers: Would you like Big Bambu, Small Bambu, EZ Wider, fronto leaf, Dutch, Philly or an alternative brand?
[Are you referring to} lots of examples;
Well, I was being a bit silly. I was trying to imply that we canucks would become the next evil overlord of the earth after forming a partnership with Cuba...
Rolling papers; there are only one kind - Zig Zag.
Gotcha!
You're projecting. Australia has not only too small a population, but also one that is too fearful of immigration. Indonesia is far more likely to fulfill any void than Australia.
The oil wars are picking up momentum.
While I have enormous respect for individuals and units serving the Australian military (who routinely humiliate equivalent units from the US), Australia is but a gnat on the global military battlefield. Australia may well prove itself in a battle, but would be lost in the noise of a war.
This is a watershed for Australia, a country much traumatized by its memory of Gallipoli and Vietnam. A country that I remember as being thoughtful before venturing into battle. It also led the way in brokering many international peace treaties; Chemical Weapons, Nuclear Test-Ban and Mines. It now seems that it has caught the MIC disease.
Australia's strengths are its natural resources (which clearly need defending) and its smart, and hard-working people. To promote Australia as a military force of global significance is to detract from its strengths and leadership role in peace.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his moccasins - Native American proverb.
Re: "Australia's strengths are its natural resources" LOL! Which part of Europe did you bring those natural resources with you from? Aboriginestan? You're pretty comfortable with Australian history, aren't you? I'm waiting to see how evolution settles the score...Maybe my grandchildren will see that day.
www.meetyourworld.com
I'm sorry, I don't understand your comment. Could you explain?
By strengths, I mean mineral and gas resources.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in their moccasins - Native American proverb.
Including, very unfortunately, uranium.
...And lots of coal and greenhouse gases. Except for a few places in the SE mountains and Tasmania, the whole place may well be become uninhabitable in a few more decades.
Too right mate.
Well said
What? I thought if the nasty old US could just be gotten rid of, then the rest of the world would hold a tea party.
This is of course a joke. Yes they need to ramp up as we withdraw our protections from some of the world, but that was always going to be the case. This is reality, not a Don's tea session.
Look Out!! Its the Kangaroo Kavalry!!
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
No worries mate. You're too far down under.
Too far down under and 'gravity' is only a theory. They will fall off their continent as their water did.
Hey, the white man's burden must be borne.
Why is Australia's attitude towards China a hostile one? Answer = Because they arn't white. I think racism is real motivation behind this response.
Wouldnt it make more sense to have full diplomatic relations with China and ally with them too?
Surely making an enemy of the world's future superpower is a bad idea
Did you see any mention in this article of India? Not white. Indonesia, which is far closer to Australia than China, and also has a huge population, and growing economy? Also not white.
China's intentions and goals are legitimate concerns for all countries in (east) Asia. And Australia is an Asian country, no matter how much they often like to pretend otherwise.
This is what the world REALLY needs .... another superpower composed of the same genetic material as earlier superpowers !! Imagine if the same reasons and justifications to spend a billion dollars on arms was given by a Sheikh in the middle-east or even some other brown-skinned country. Id love to see the liberal response to that.
Australia has little chance of being a (white) superpower, it's (white) population is way too small. If Australia were to become a superpower, it would need to welcome, to embrace, a multitude of (non white) immigrants, something it hasn't really done.
Australia: you will service China.
Australia the intellectual, manufacturing and financial power house with a dwindling white population hopes to fill the void that will be left by the Americanos? Wow! Like the brother has just said: Australia: you will service China.
Well 100 billion dollars is a lot of money. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to enter into a defense treaty with China to prevent any animosities between the two parties. Anyway I really think if Australia has a problem with any country it won't be China but Indonesia. The Australian government should foster very good relations with China to counter Indonesia should the need arise.
Australia's white paper release and it's strategic intentions represent a very sensible perspective.
Had the US spent more energy and money developing a defensive tact in building its military, much the same as the Swiss Army has, rather than the imposing one we've had ever since who knows when, we might have had a better and more productive effect on the nations around us.
Strong defense policies, less global militarization, more amiable relations with nations we've been a little too firm with will help greatly to ensure stronger and more secure allied relations - we'll certainly want that if someone wants to test the waters with us in a serious way.
Having signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty Australia is not allowed to have nuclear weapons. Without nuclear weapons Australia has no credible defense against any of the nations that do have nuclear weapons. It must become a client state to a patron state that does have nukes. It wants to pick one other than the US that leaves Russia, China, France, Israel, India and Pakistan. I wonder which they will pick?