Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US to Limit Guantanamo Releases
Between 50 and 100 detainees held by the US at Guantanamo Bay cannot be released or put on trial, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates has said.
A guard patrol the maximum security Camp V part of Camp Delta on the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay in 2007. US officials planning the closure of Guantanamo prison are weighing the cases of about 50 to 100 detainees who cannot be tried or released, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said. (AFP/File/Paul J. Richards) The fate of those detainees "is still open", Mr Gates told members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The detention centre was set up in January 2002 for those captured in the US "war on terror".
Some 245 men are still held. In January President Barack Obama signed an order to close the prison within a year.
The US Justice Department is trying to determine which detainees will be taken by other countries or placed on trial.
'Open question'
"The question is what do we do with the 50 to 100 - probably in that ballpark - who we cannot release and cannot try," Mr Gates told the committee.
"I think that question is still open."
When pressed on where the remaining inmates would eventually be held, Mr Gates declined to answer.
Mr Gates confirmed that although many of the detainees who are to be released without charge would be sent to other countries, some of the 17 Chinese ethnic Uighurs are likely to be allowed to settle in the US.
"What I have heard people talking about is our taking some of the Uighurs, probably not all," he said.
And he argued that if the US decided to take in some of the freed detainees, it would be easier to persuade other countries to accept them.

6 Comments so far
Show AllAre any of the commenters on this site still willing to be apologists for Obama?
'Between 50 and 100 detainees held by the US at Guantanamo Bay cannot be released or put on trial, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates has said.'
Are they determined to be violent if released? Or informative? What right do you have to curtail another's liberty without quick resolution, either guilty or non, of charges against? People have a right to their lives, including their liberty...can one be incarcerated against potential future crimes or divulgences? No...
Exactly so. If we can't prove them guilty of something then, by default, they are guilty of NOTHING and MUST be released. If they then go out and do something THAT WE CAN PROVE without violating their rights as HUMAN BEINGS then we can arrest and prosecute them. This isn't a difficult concept to understand or to enforce.
'Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.' - Pete Townsend
I believe Obama left loopholes in his "closure" which will allow them to be held by the US at other US facilities (like in Afghanistan), but it also allows for detainees to be shipped to other countries... .where, guess what, Chuk? US public has no authority, nor oversight.
I can see the new release now: "Obama release the last remaining detainees of GITMO to Egyptian, Saudi, and Moroccan Jails...."
Getting off the tiger's back is more difficult than getting on.
Jimmy Carter sure nailed it when he said this would be a catastrophy.
A catastrophe for Joe public. A victory for disaster capitalists.