100 Days Later, Nation Waits for FDA Overhaul
Agency is so understaffed, it inspects less than 1 percent of imported food
The Food and Drug Administration may be the only federal agency that both political parties agree is in desperate need of an overhaul.
President Barack Obama
is promising action, though progress has been slow in the first 100
days. His choice to head the FDA - Dr. Margaret Hamburg - still has not
been confirmed by congress.
Assuming Hamburg is confirmed, she will head an agency whose own Science Board concluded more than two years ago "is at risk of failing to carry out its mandate, leaving our citizens at risk of grievous harm."
The FDA is responsible for overseeing the safety of the nation's foods, drugs, medical devices and consumer products. In each of those areas, the agency is widely regarded as having fallen down on the job.
But its biggest black eye comes from the way the agency has handled its food safety responsibilities.
Safety of the food supply The president has promised to act quickly to ensure the safety of the nation's food supply, following the most recent salmonella outbreak involving peanut butter that has sickened nearly 500 people and killed 10.
That outbreak follows others involving baby formula, pet food, spinach, jalapenos, cooked ham, anchovies - and the list goes on.
After pointing out that America's food safety laws have not been updated since they were written during Teddy Roosevelt's administration, the president announced the creation of a new "Food Safety Working Group." The group's mission is to determine how our food safety laws need to be overhauled.
During an interview with NBC's Matt Lauer on the Today Show, Obama said "at a bare minimum, we should be able to count on our government keeping our kids safe when they eat peanut butter."
"That's what Sasha eats for lunch," he added, referring to his daughter.
Among the FDA's handicaps is enforcing food safety; it does not have the authority to order a recall on its own. It relies on the cooperation of food providers to voluntarily recall products.
Complicating efforts, the FDA is not alone in policing food safety. Even though the FDA is responsible for 75 percent of the food supply, the USDA actually gets 80 percent of the food safety funding, though its responsibilities are limited to meat and poultry.
Marion Nestle, the author of "Safe Food" and a professor of food studies and public health at New York University, writes in the San Francisco Chronicle "this weird division of responsibility began in 1906, and it's breathtaking in its irrationality. The FDA oversees the safety of cheese pizza; the USDA oversees pepperoni pizza."
Meanwhile, the FDA is so understaffed, it's only able to inspect roughly 1 percent of foods that are imported into the country. And the rate of inspections at U.S. plants isn't much better. The FDA had not inspected Peanut Corporation of America's Georgia plant since 2001. Investigators say PCA's own internal tests repeatedly found salmonella traces, but it continued to sell peanut butter products.
The Obama administration has already signaled that it intends to streamline the entire food safety process.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsak told NBC News in February that "we need to figure out how to coordinate what FDA does and USDA does and ultimately merge those entities into a single food agency that would be responsible for all food products so that there's no possibility of something falling through the cracks."
Don't be surprised if a central theme in the president's Food Safety Working Group includes merging the responsibilities of the USDA and FDA into a single agency.
However, experts also suggest food safety will not improve unless cities and states also improve their food safety procedures.
A stronger FDA Look for Obama to increase oversight of imports and closer inspection of domestic food production as well, though it's unlikely a new food safety agency would have the manpower necessary to inspect every import and every U.S. plant involved in food or drug manufacturing.
The FDA's own Science Board notes "there are 375,000 establishments making FDA-regulated products."
"In just a decade, there has been a ten-fold increase in imports, coming from more than 100 other countries. Over 50 percent of drugs are imported, along with 15 percent of our food supply," according to the report.
Former FDA Associate Commissioner William Hubbard told NBC News "I think the agency is at a tipping point. If change doesn't come in terms of new management and resources, they could be a failed institution."
While former President George W. Bush preferred a market-based approach to food and drug safety, Democrats in Congress are already moving toward giving the FDA more power.
The House passed a bill on April 2 that would give the FDA the power to change the ingredients in cigarettes and mandate new warning labels. However, the bill stops short of giving the FDA the authority to ban tobacco products or nicotine. A similar bill is under consideration in the Senate.
Tobacco is considered a leading cause of preventable deaths in America, killing more than 400,000 people each year. Yet until now, tobacco products have been among the least-regulated products in the nation. Even Obama has been trying to wean himself off the habit.
Assuming she is confirmed by the Senate, Hamburg will have her hands full when she takes over as FDA Commissioner.
Her track record suggests she's up for the challenge. Her resume includes stints as the senior scientist for the Nuclear Threat Initiative where she also served as vice president of biological programs; assistant secretary for planning and evaluation at the Department of Health and Human Services; New York City health commissioner.
She's also held positions with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion at HHS.
The White House's priorities, and her own, will likely be revealed during her confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
20 Comments so far
Show Allwww.cdc.gov has a good article on salmonella. Basically, wash your hands after handling animals, wash your food, and cook your food to kill salmonella.
"the USDA actually gets 80 percent of the food safety funding, though its responsibilities are limited to meat and poultry."
From Darth Viper's perpsective, the meat industry must acquire the lion's share of resources. Meat involves ten times the economic activities per finished calorie than plant food. To maximize economic activity, you attend to the more productive channel. Yes, the key product is the economic activity. Only in the USA.
many years ago I discovered that many of our 'regulatory' agencies were actually industry fronts in disguise...leadership positions occupied by those high in the industry, propaganda created to endorse 'healthy' choices that are anything but, weak stautes and self-policing allowing penalties to go forever without appearance...these are not the kinds of things that change over time, they are built into the human character...once this is learned, one need not relearn it...how many of your heroes have fallen lately?
each individual must, once again, take up the abdicated responsibility for their own survival, and insist upon the squelched inherent rights that accompany...we must feed ourselves again, clothe ourselves, shelter ourselves, heal ourselves...we must assist those around us in doing the same...we must start growing food now, and turn off the switches of industry and electricity on Global Start Date: Sept. 22, 2012...property ownership and housing must metamorphose...
our lives depend on this...
Wasn't FDA the same agency that approved of aspartame and high fructose corn syrup despite its harmful side effects and yet partially banned stevia despite the fact that it was a natural sweetner? I used to be addicted to HFCS and aspartame flavored drinks but ever since coming across stevia in the organic stores a couple of years ago, I have noticed a significant drop in heart palpitations. FDA looks like nothing but a anti-health terrorist puppet agency.
Instead of giving more money to the FDA to test food, we could stop giving agribusiness massive amount of corporate welfare, stop subsidizing transportation, and end the patent laws that make Monstanto's bogus lawsuits possible. Then the dinosaur of inefficient agribusiness will be an embarrassing relic and food will be grown locally and competitively so it will be easy for people to figure out if their food suppliers are using unsafe methods and to switch if they are.
Imagine in the local exchange market, the small producer and the local consumer both knowing the small but important body of info to keep the food supply safe. Both knowing, thanks to a culture of free info exchange among people, and widespread determination to filter out the elite propaganda.
As long as "organic" stays organic, I'm okay.
"Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsak told NBC News in February that "we need to figure out how to coordinate what FDA does and USDA does and ultimately merge those entities into a single food agency that would be responsible for all food products so that there's no possibility of something falling through the cracks."
Common Sense 101. How long did it take us to figure this one out?
Well, I guess if the business world can do "hostile takeovers", why not the government.......especially if it will save the taxpayers some money?
On the other hand, lobbyists will be able to save $MILLIONS in legislation buy-offs after the "merger" takes place. Paying-off one government entity is far more cost effective than paying-off two!
I wonder if they would like some peanuts with their champagne?
China, Russia and Taiwan began planning to put anyone with symptoms of the deadly virus under quarantine. . .
Others were increasing their screening of pigs and pork imports from the Americas or banning them outright . . .
Oh what fun! This is like playing Russian roulette in the supermarket.
Heckuva job, Brown Eye!
A March NY Times article revealed that US goverment food inspectors recently purchased 40 different foods and food products from supermarkets in each 4 major US cities in an attempt to see if the origin and sources of the foods and product components could be traced.
Of 40 diverse products (packaged/mfgr'd food; labeled produce; packaged meat, poultry/dairy, etc.) only an average of 5 products and/or product components per city could be traced to any original source -- there being no enforced/comprehensive system in the US that creates such data.
As dramatically more food/food products continue to enter the US each year from countries with even less safety regs/programs than the US (namely, from countries with no safety regs/programs whatsoever), the risk of both accute poisonings and sub-accute accumulation of toxins to US eaters is increasing dramatically just in this category alone {another reason to grow and eat only local foods, while using caution even in these instances.]
While mass-economy food safety is an increasingly nightmarish and complex problem to solve, or even half-way improve upon, ---what could be a more important task for government to adequately fund?
The building of empire armaments? The payoff of banksters?
Obviously, don't pose this question to corporate America, which continues to insist that any new [food} regs be 'voluntary.'
jj apple,
This is reason enough to eat only organic food, no red meat, and nothing from China.
Well, now a swine flu pandemic has arrived. Mr. Obama has not pushed through his candidate.
Mr. Obama is sure change we can believe in, isn't he?
Congress has been mired in lethargy for decades. Nothing can be expected from that body.
But, Mr. Obama campaigned that he was "change we could believe in."
In this case I blame Congress more than Obama. Why is it taking so long to confirm Margaret Hamburg? She is a well-qualified, well-respected professional with a good resume. Let her get to work fixing this broken agency. Congress, you marginal humbugs, do your job and confirm Margaret Hamburg.
Joe
So Obama promises not to raise tax on anyone under $250,000 and then glowingly signs a 2,000% tax increase on one of the poorest well-defined minority groups in the country, those forced to roll their own cigarettes from shreds of loose tobacco and scraps of paper.
He goes on to hire William Corr, one of the most well-established antismoking lobbyists in the country into his "no lobbyist" administration.
And he then pushes to take an FDA that can barely inspect 1% of our imported food products and give it a whole NEW job of having to be responsible for overseeing a hundred billion cigarettes being sold here every year.
Who's going to take the blame when the tobacco black market sends us back to the days of Al Capone with a nasty Bin Ladin element added, when the lobbyists are exposed as corrupt and in bed with the NicoGummyPatchyProductPeople at Big Pharma, and when the overstretched FDA results in thousands of deaths and illnesses from school lunches?
The antismoking movement may end up doing more to destroy Obama's presidency than the trillion dollar bailouts. Sad.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
M.J.M. , where can I read your book sir?I am one of that well defined minority group you mentioned.Like the president I am struggling to quit smoking.Rolling cigarettes Bugler ,at about $2.50 a pack (about2/3oz.with 40 papers)was my nicotene source of choice.The price has now doubled to over $5.00.Smokers buying manufactured cigarettes are now paying $8.00 and over a pack!This is a huge tax increase for some of the poorest folks in the country.
I don't know if I should thank Obama for forcing me to quit or start to plant tobbacco again.I was never able to cure tobacco to my tastes.I think the B+W tobacco company has a special blend (probably G.M.O. X1) with tons of nicotene because it is the worst addiction to conquer.
I have no idea how the F.D.A. could possibly regulate big tobacco.All the additives and blends are "proprietary" information.How do you regulate an addictive poison?Would they ban conventional fertilizers because of the radioactive polonium traces?Force the labling of additives.Very strange indeed! peas
Johnny, your best bet is Amazon.com
And you're right about the over-regulation thing. I don't know if you remember a story that made headlines about two weeks ago that was causing a panic about formaldehyde in baby shampoo. Even though the news sources didn't add the obligatory "used to preserve dead bodies" that always gets tagged on when they talk about formaldehyde in secondary smoke, it STILL had parents going bananas until followup stories appeared reassuring everyone that the concentrations/amounts were too small to worry about.
The funny thing is that the shampoo concentrations of 610 parts per million were "too small to worry about" while the concentrations in ordinary exposures to secondary smoke are .007 parts per million.
The baby shampoos had literally 87,000 times the concentration of this "deadly" substance as ETS and yet we're told not to worry about them.
As for polonium... Go to Global Health Law at:
http://globalhealthlaw.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/third-hand-smoke/#comment-52
and read my posting there. Bottom line: don't let your baby lick floors every day for 2.74 trillion years or they'll end up like a Russian KGB agent!
:>
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
FDA stands for the Fast Dollar Agency. It reminds me of the scene in "Fight Club" where Edward Norton tells someone that aircraft manufacturers do the math and decide it's cheaper to let people die in air crashes than make the planes safer. I imagine the government's response to salmonella, etc. will be more or less the same. If Obysmal will nothing about torture, what is salmonella compared to that? Come back in two years and see how much has changed.
Sioux Rose
So 400,000 die each year from tobacco, 40,000 on roadway accidents, and I don't know how many from bad surgeries or the effects of multiple pharmaceutical drugs inter-acting. And then there are the gun deaths. Who needs terrorists? We have so many of our own internal devices, products, and agencies guaranteed t0 usurp health and basic security in the Homeland (in)Security State. What priorities!
Mr. Obama first drags his feet like a teenager told to clean his room; then he waffles on his promises to do so.
This guy is a phony, lying sack of shit, aka a lawyer.
Look at this article from the Philadelphia Inquirer for further proof:
"Obama's first 100 days littered with broken promises"
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/43735227.html
Excerp:
"Given all the hoopla and high expectations surrounding the new president, it's easy to overlook how he has shifted since the election in both tone and substance.
As we approach the 100-day mark of his presidency, Barack Obama has broken or bent many tenets of his campaign, including promises on war, spending and good government."
Genetically Modified Organism food should be banned. It is not needed and is dangerous to humans, other animals, and the environment. However, big AG makes tons of money with GMO's.
Mrs. Obama plants an organic garden, meanwhile her husband will bend over for big AG.
Looks as if they are to busy trying to use the FDA for their own political agenda to make sure it is looking after the safety of our food supply.
One of the things that I find interesting is that, though the majority of illnesses, etc., are attributable to agribusiness and the big feed lot slaughter houses, pig farms, etc., the Congress and the FDA and other government agencies seek to "solve" the problem by coming up with ever more draconian regulations against the small farmers and organic farmers, with proposed huge staffs to enforce this stuff, while mandating only minimal oversight of agribusiness.
Read the NAIS act, which is working its way through the house. Read the new Food Safety Bill. They get a lot of press to the effect that these things are necessary to protect the people from food borne disease, etc., but it is largely protectionist legislation for the mega food producers and to incidentally destroy the small farmer through huge bureaucratic and paperwork intensive obligations, which will eventually make it impossible for one to buy decent produce at a farmer's market, thereby forcing us to the big chains, to buy GM Frankenfoods from the big producers, with lower quality and taste and higher cost to the consumer.
Ah well, apparently it is now "The American Way."