Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Health Risks of Shipping Pollution have been 'Underestimated'
One giant container ship can emit almost the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars, study finds
Britain and other European governments have been accused of underestimating the health risks from shipping pollution following research which shows that one giant container ship can emit almost the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars.
90,000 cargo ships travel the world's oceans. Photograph: Peter Maenhoudt/AP Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.
Pressure is mounting on the UN's International Maritime Organisation and the EU to tighten laws governing ship emissions following the decision by the US government last week to impose a strict 230-mile buffer zone along the entire US coast, a move that is expected to be followed by Canada.
The setting up of a low emission shipping zone follows US academic research which showed that pollution from the world's 90,000 cargo ships leads to 60,000 deaths a year in the US alone and costs up to $330bn per year in health costs from lung and heart diseases. The US Environmental Protection Agency estimates the buffer zone, which could be in place by next year, will save more than 8,000 lives a year with new air quality standards cutting sulphur in fuel by 98%, particulate matter by 85% and nitrogen oxide emissions by 80%.
The new study by the Danish government's environmental agency adds to this picture. It suggests that shipping emissions cost the Danish health service almost £5bn a year, mainly treating cancers and heart problems. A previous study estimated that 1,000 Danish people die prematurely each year because of shipping pollution. No comprehensive research has been carried out on the effects on UK coastal communities, but the number of deaths is expected to be much higher.
Europe, which has some of the busiest shipping lanes in the world, has dramatically cleaned up sulphur and nitrogen emissions from land-based transport in the past 20 years but has resisted imposing tight laws on the shipping industry, even though the technology exists to remove emissions. Cars driving 15,000km a year emit approximately 101 grammes of sulphur oxide gases (or SOx) in that time. The world's largest ships' diesel engines which typically operate for about 280 days a year generate roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx.
The EU plans only two low-emission marine zones which should come into force in the English channel and Baltic sea after 2015. However, both are less stringent than the proposed US zone, and neither seeks to limit deadly particulate emissions.
Shipping emissions have escalated in the past 15 years as China has emerged as the world's manufacturing capital. A new breed of intercontinental container ship has been developed which is extremely cost-efficient. However, it uses diesel engines as powerful as land-based power stations but with the lowest quality fuel.
"Ship pollution affects the health of communities in coastal and inland regions around the world, yet pollution from ships remains one of the least regulated parts of our global transportation system," said James Corbett, professor of marine policy at the University of Delaware, one of the authors of the report which helped persuade the US government to act.
Today a spokesman for the UK government's Maritime and Coastguard Agency accepted there were major gaps in the legislation. "Issues of particulate matter remain a concern. They need to be addressed and we look forward to working with the international community," said environment policy director Jonathan Simpson.
"Europe needs a low emission zone right around its coasts, similar to the US, if we are to meet health and environmental objectives," said Crister Agrena of the Air Pollution and Climate Secretariat in Gothenburg, one of Europe's leading air quality organisations.
"It is unacceptable that shipping remains one of the most polluting industries in the world. The UK must take a lead in cleaning up emissions," said Simon Birkett, spokesman for the Campaign for Clean Air in London. "Other countries are planning radical action to achieve massive health and other savings but the UK is strangely inactive."
The calculations of ship and car pollution are based on the world's largest 85,790KW ships' diesel engines which operate about 280 days a year generating roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx a year, compared with diesel and petrol cars which drive 15,000km a year and emit approximately 101gm of SO2/SoX a year.
Shipping by numbers
The world's biggest container ships have 109,000 horsepower engines which weigh 2,300 tons.
Each ship expects to operate 24hrs a day for about 280 days a year.
There are 90,000 ocean-going cargo ships.
Shipping is responsible for 18-30% of all the world's nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution and 9% of the global sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution.
One large ship can generate about 5,000 tonnes of sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution in a year
70% of all ship emissions are within 400km of land.
85% of all ship pollution is in the northern hemisphere.
Shipping is responsible for 3.5% to 4% of all climate change emissions.

12 Comments so far
Show AllJust great.
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, the biggest turkey of all comes home to roost.
The Naked Lie of Globalization was there all along, and Global-transnationals covered it up.
Let's reprogram the preditor and Globalhawk drones to attack these killer ships before we all choke.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
What a wonderful place to experiment with hydrogen fuel cell power. Imagine how easily a low emission diesel engine could convert all that available salt water into clean efficient hydrogen for electric generation, for electric drive systems, and a much more efficient source of power for shipping. Trains already use diesel to generate electricity which powers the train, perhaps it's time to begin the change over. The savings involved would also include tremendous weight of the fuel we burn so inefficiently now.
Now we're talkin'! We see the problem, we offer the solution.
"Where there's a will, there's always a way" -Bob Marley
I really like that idea. Large scale fuel cells are very doable right now.
Don't you sometimes get the impression that multinationals LOOK for ways to pollute excessively?
I really like the idea of putting sails up against the wind. Just like in the days of old. I'm sure the wind didn't stop blowing. It's free and non-polluting. Cool.
And to answer your question, yes, of course they do. Bastards!
This is depressing to say the least. We in the West are liable once again and its only a question of time before we start blaming China !!
Funny. No doubt.
Buy local. Grow yer own. Compost. Go barefoot. Sleep naked. Worship the sun. Cherish the earth. Respect the waters.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model which makes the existing model obsolete"
-R. Buckminster Fuller
Any studies on the incidence of disease in tanker crews?
Particulates in the atmosphere, especially sulphur, reflect some of the sun's rays back into space. When we clean up the atmosphere of pollution it accelerates global warming. We are ------ no matter what we do!
So the more we pollute, the cooler it gets. Right. And when the sulfur and CO2 in the atmosphere turns the oceans acid and kills all marine life, Wall Street will fix it. Plus we always have our faith to turn to.
Neo-liberal globalization = Entropy = death.
-30-