Poor Pay Price of Progress in India
'Ragpickers' face grim future as New Delhi decides to use modern means of collecting the city's waste
NEW DELHI - One recent morning, as she'd done most days over the past 20 years, Fatima Begum left her hovel in a slum tucked in the corner of this city's diplomatic enclave and shuffled to a nearby dumpster to begin her work day.
As Begum began to root through refuse, searching for bottles, old light bulbs, and anything else that might be recyclable, someone punched the 65-year-old in the back of the head. She collapsed. Her attacker continued to punch and kick her.
"It was a man who said he would do worse to me if I came back there again," Begum said, her arms and hands still scraped from fending off her attacker two weeks ago. "He said he worked with a company that had a contract with the city for the garbage from that dump."
One of about 150,000 so-called "ragpickers" in New Delhi who've spent their lives rooting through waste, Begum is a testament to a battle over garbage that's being waged across this fast-growing capital city.
New Delhi will host the Commonwealth Games next year and, as part of a push to modernize and clean up, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has awarded waste-collection contracts to private companies in eight of its 12 zones. The move may improve cleanliness on garbage-strewn streets here but also stands to leave thousands of already impoverished ragpickers like Begum with no way to earn a living.
"Privatizing garbage collection is a death knell for these people," said Bharati Chaturvedi, who works with Chintan, a support group for ragpickers. "The Delhi government wants to show it's a world-class city; it's much the same syndrome we saw in Beijing before the Olympics when they shut down factories to improve air quality. India cares about its image, not its poor. The ragpickers are being pushed out of their jobs and left with nothing, and the government doesn't care. These people simply don't matter."
Private companies are paid by the city based on how much waste they actually deliver to local dumps. Chaturvedi said Begum may have been attacked by someone who had paid a local company for the right to search "its" dumps for recyclables.
Crouching in front of her hovel as she cooked some lentils under a scorching afternoon sun, Begum said she doesn't know how she'll get by without the $3 a day she made rooting through dumpsters. A week earlier, the widow, who supports two grandchildren, sold her cycle rickshaw for $40. Now, that money's running short.
"I'm totally washed out," she said.
New Delhi trucks much of its garbage to the eastern suburb of Ghaziabad. But recently, Ghaziabad announced plans to close its massive landfill and reopen it as a waste-to-energy plant. In a city where power outages are a near-daily event, that's good news. Yet here, too, progress comes at a cost.
Roughly 1,500 garbage collectors make their living on the 60-metre-high mountain of foul-smelling garbage, scouring rotting food, wilted flowers and a myriad of fast-food containers for old copper wire, newspapers and discarded metals.
Bhojari has worked here since he left his parent's home in Calcutta 25 years ago for this city of 18 million and its opportunities. The 45-year-old starts his day at about 4:30 a.m. He typically finishes by 4 p.m. and on this particular day, the father of three grinned as he recounted his day's efforts.
He'd collected about $2.50 worth of recyclables, enough to buy a litre of buffalo milk (62 cents), three eggs (30 cents), and a kilogram of beans (40 cents).
"I know we don't eat a lot. We had chicken for the last time about three months ago, but I'm doing the best to get food for my children; I'm no different than a father in your country," said Bhojari, who, like many Indians, only uses one name.
"What am I going to do when they close the landfill? I have no idea," he said, sitting in his darkened hovel as his wife hammered the bottoms off old light bulbs.
There's no easy fix to the uncertain future ragpickers face.
Many residents here say that while the current waste disposal system might provide the 150,000-some ragpickers with a meagre livelihood, it leaves New Delhi looking second-class. "Most parts of this city are stinking and filthy," said Vinod Kumar Jain, a professor of environmental science at Jawalharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. "If private players are being engaged it's only because of inefficiencies of the current system."
Chaturvedi sadly disagrees.
"We've had private waste disposal in some parts of the city for three years and those parts are no less filthy," she said.
"If these ragpickers are squeezed out, we'll see them cutting back on what they eat, they'll stop feeding their children milk, and we'll see more women entering the sex trade. Is this progress? I don't think it is."
Watch The Star's video here.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllDeepa
In a world where a person's economic status determines human dignity, value and rights, it is no wonder that poor are "NO PEOPLE" in our societies. India, which has blindly and slavishly embraced "American Dream" and so its socio-economic system, is fast becoming a DEMOCRACY OF THE RICH, FOR THE RICH AND BY THE RICH (like the US). Instead of being concerned about the economically poor, the elite regard the poor as despicable, dishonored and ugly, and treat them with contempt. That is why you find numerous places like SKIDROW (in Downtown Los Angeles), which are secluded from the society. Politicians, whether in India or the US, talk about WAR ON TERRORISM, BUT NOT WAR ON POVERTY. You find this increasing rhetoric coming out of India (this should be seen in the light of India-US Nuclear Deal; and the increasing flow of weapons from Israel into India).
In the present system where human life is privatized (that is, in the hands or under the control of private companies), it is no wonder that ragpicking is privatized in India. Poor are there only to vote and elect rich/corrupt politicians, so that the latter in turn make the life of the former more miserable. Just think of New Orleans after the Hurricane Katrina.
One of my Indian friends, who live in California, write about four European Americans (one of them is a woman). He watches them every day collecting food from the dumpsters near his house.
In this context the words of Francis of Assisi are very relevant:
“It is the poor one who saves: Middle-class rich boy that I was, I never would have thought that it would be the poor who would be my salvation. Owing to the upbringing I had received at my mother’s hands, as well as the attitude of the church I had been attending up until that time, I had always thought that it was we rich and well-to-do who would be the ones to rescue the poor. The latter depended on us, it seemed, and our generosity was their salvation. Without us they would have been destined to death. What blindness was ours and mine! The truth was just the contrary, and now life was demonstrating this to me. It was the poor who would be my salvation, and not I theirs. It was they who would put me back on my feet.”
He further said: “Basically I was giving the middle class a slap in the face. My poor garments said, “Don’t you see that it is you who are the thieves? That it is you who reduce your fellow citizens to poverty? You, Peter di Bernardone, you have grown rich only by squeezing the last drop of sweat out of your workers, and you live and thrive on the tears of those who worked for you before and who now, unemployed and enfeebled, lie begging alms on the steps of the churches of Assisi.”
Deepa
I just happen to read this piece of news on www.democracynow.org. This is in continuation of what I wrote about how the poor are treated in our "civilized" societies.
"In California, a Los Angeles area psychiatric hospital has admitted to abandoning more than 150 mentally disabled homeless patients in dangerous neighborhoods over a two-year period. College Hospital will pay a $1.6 million penalty under a settlement with city attorneys. So-called “hospital dumping” is believed to be a widespread practice in the United States."
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/4/9/headlines#13
Oh, if the present day Fransiscan friars and nuns still followed Francis's radical message instead of running right-wing institutions like the University of Steubenville.
I think it varies. There are some parish priests in the Franciscan tradition. (St. Francis is one of my favorites.)
Joe
India has plenty of billionaires, but the government is too busy catering to the rich to level the playing field. India has a problem with literacy as well. Even Bangladesh does better than India in literacy.
The poor need to read, and the poor farmers need Monsanto kicked out. The billionaires need to be taxed, and the way needs to paved so that others can enter the business realm as well. Maybe India can take some lessons from China or Thailand in that matter.
Even communism would be an improvement.
Actually, the southern Indian State of Kerala has been governed by a Communist Party of India - Marxist (CPI-M) Majority for a long time. Kerala consistently gets high rankings for quality of life and literacy compared to most other Indian states. This is in spite of (or maybe because of) the state not having big industrial or high tech investment, like adjoining Tamil Nadu State.
More recently, the CPI-M also governs poorer West Bengal, but their record is not so good because of considerable cronyism with big industrial corporations like the Tata Car Company and proposals for a huge petrochemical complex which would displace thousands of small farmers. Nontheless the car manufacturing plant's construction was halted, and Tata was forced to look for another site becasuse of mass resistance by the small farmers and the displaced around the plant site. I'm not soure if the chemical plant complex is going forward or not.
It's nice to know that someone somewhere is standing up for the rights of the poor. Thanks.
Joe
Yes, the the someone is the poor themselves, plus a few middle class Indians like unpopular-in-India Arundhati Roy or Vandana Shiva.
Thanks for the information.
The manner that India's elites dissapear and deny's their country's poverty is unexcelled. No wonder they were so angry about the movie "Slumdog Millionaire".
Between the Bollywood glamour movies (the stars always being wealthy, and much lighter complected than average Indians) and their supposed status as a high tech-tiger (Hyderabad being nicknamed "Cyberabad" and all that), one would never know that India was ranked 132 in the latest UNHDR Report. That's well behind the poorest American country - Guatamala, but a bit ahead of Haiti.
By the way, the USA was ranked 15 - behind Canada (No 3), most of Europe, and Japan.