Walling Off the Slums…or ‘Eco-Barrier’?
RIO DE JANEIRO - While the government of the state of Rio de Janeiro insists that a wall being built around a poor neighbourhood is designed to protect what remains of Brazil's Atlantic rainforest from further encroachment by the slum, human rights groups say it is designed to further separate the rich and poor.
While the residents of the slums, known as favelas, built on the mountains surrounding the city are used to hiking up and down the steep stairs and alleyways of their neighbourhoods several times a day, climbing up to the wall is difficult for an outsider.
But that is not only because of the physical challenge involved. It is also easy to get lost in the maze of narrow, dark corridors of the favelas.
However, there is a now a new landmark that has become a "must" destination for journalists in Rio since construction began in late March - the so-called "eco-barrier." Even before a reporter manages to ask where the wall is, the attentive, helpful residents of the Santa Marta favela point out the way, providing detailed instructions on how to get there.
Some even help lead the way, gracefully and effortlessly climbing the slope, trailed by this panting, gasping reporter who tries to look dignified while barely able to ask questions about the first few metres being built of the already famous wall.
The state government's plan is to build 11 kilometres of concrete walls around 19 Rio favelas by the end of the year.
In his blog, Portuguese writer José Saramago compares the wall to the Berlin Wall or the Israeli West Bank barrier, while other critics liken it to the wall between the United States and Mexico, and the Brazilian human rights groups Global Justice said it would create "social apartheid."
The head of the state's public works department, Icaro Moreno, told IPS that it is an environmental barrier to prevent further deforestation of the already decimated Atlantic rainforest, an ecosystem that once covered a large part of Brazil's Atlantic coast area but which has lost 93 percent of its forest cover.
"The boundary was invisible, and now it is physical," said Moreno. "Like at our house, when we buy a plot of land and use walls to mark the boundary and show ‘this is my part.' What the state is doing is saying: if you go beyond this or break it, you are violating public property."
But Nandson Ribeiro, a computer technician who lives in Santa Marta, says the wall is like "a cage."
Down below, "the police keep constant watch over the area," since the administration of Governor Sergio Cabral occupied the favela, using both a heavy police presence and social projects to try to eradicate drug trafficking violence.
"On the other side is the wall. And over there is the jungle," says Ribeiro, pointing to describe the new geographical limits of his neighbourhood.
When we reach the edge of Santa Marta, we run into the wall. It is three metres high and separates the forest from the bare brick houses - the homes of the most privileged slumdwellers - or shacks on stilts that dangerously crowd the hillside.
According to the government, this is another reason for the wall: to prevent environmental catastrophes, because in the last few years, deforestation and the continued construction of housing on the slopes have accentuated the problem of mudslides, which frequently claim lives in the favelas during Rio's rainy summers.
But slumdwellers, social analysts and human rights activists say the steel and concrete wall, which is to cost 18 million dollars, will also reinforce the segregation between rich and poor.
"That's not true at all," responded an indignant Moreno. People "are completely free to come and go as they wish. The wall is just a barrier to protect the forest."
Alarming statistics on the destruction of the Atlantic rainforest contributed to the idea to build a barrier.
A study by the city government's Pereira Passos Institute showed that half of Rio's 750 favelas, home to 1.5 million of the city's residents, doubled in size between 1999 and 2004.
The study, carried out using satellite images, confirmed what was readily visible to observers.
Lacking open space for expansion in a city that is virtually surrounded by forested hills and the sea, the favelas stretch up the steep mountains, which are lined with irregularly built homes, sometimes two or more stories tall.
Rocinha, the city's biggest favela, where 200,000 people live, is the clearest example of this phenomenon. Construction only stops there when houses run up against rocky crags or other physical barriers.
The longest stretch of the wall is to be built around Rocinha.
On the south side of Rio, the Tabajara favela spreads across what was once a forested hill, up to the edge of the municipal cemetery.
Other slums are expanding into environmental protection areas.
Moreno admits that the best thing would be to monitor, in order to curb further construction. But that is not an easy undertaking, he pointed out, because people carry in building materials in the silence of the night, "under the trees," and in the morning, a new house has appeared in the forest.
Several governments have attempted to carry out reforestation efforts by drawing in the local population of the favelas to take part in the task.
Some have also resorted to less popular methods, like the one adopted by the previous state environment secretary, Carlos Minc - who is now Brazil's environment minister - which involved the demolition of homes - both the shacks of the poor and the mansions of the rich - that had been illegally built in protected areas.
But all of the measures came up against the country's severe housing deficit, which stands at nearly eight million units, according to the most conservative estimates - the official figures.
Some of the most pressing situations are found in the southern states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Minas Gerais, whose wealthy capitals are the biggest magnets for poor Brazilians from other parts of this country of 190 million people.
"The city government is trying to control urban development by defending the environment," said José Hilario dos Santos, president of the Associations of Residents of Santa Marta.
But it is late for that, he told IPS, because "now the communities have grown, and people still don't have a place to live."
A few days before construction of the wall began, Governor Cabral - an ally of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, with whom he is carrying out joint social and income-generation projects in the favelas - announced an ambitious housing programme that will include the state of Rio de Janeiro.
The 15.4 billion dollar housing programme is aimed at reducing the country's housing deficit by 14 percent by building one million housing units by 2010.
In dos Santos's view, the only "wall" that could have any real effect is a "social" barrier built by investment in housing, culture, sports and employment, "to keep young people from being idle and pull them away from drugs," and in education and day care centres.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
22 Comments so far
Show AllI've lived in south america and let me tell you from what I see in the pics they'll be over this in about 5 minutes after its finished.
The unfortunate part of this confrontation is that yes, indeed, the favelas are encroaching on wild habitat and also, the walls are constraining the inhabitants of the favela from moving freely.
Not all, not even most, of the favela inhabitants were moved off their lands by large landowners or what have you. Most of them just couldn't make a living where ever they came from because of both habitat degradation and human overpopulation so they moved to the cities. This is a worldwide phenomenon, the urbanization of practically everywhere.
In one of the poorest areas of Bolivia I saw this phenomenon in action. Visiting a pueblito in the Cordillera one father told me that when the first settlers, his father and that generation, moved to the valley, there was plenty of land for everyone. But now his kids have to leave because the land has been so subdivided by inheritance that each family doesn't own enough to support it. Believe me, there wasn't a large landowner in sight. It was too far in the back beyond.
I think what you saw is an exception. It is the forces of global neoliberal capitalism - the WB and IMF, which have made life untenable for rural farmers in Latin America - forcing them to the slums. The rural areas are depopulating - just like they are here in Pennsylvania.
Scratch below the surface of the overpopulation argument and one usually sees at least a bit of racism and nativism. Capitalism is the problem. Under capitalism, ther will be gross economic inequality even if the world population were only one million.
We are virtually eating, screwing and crapping ourselves out of house and home. Have you every heard of the Quiverful folks that state that the woman must be ever preggers to have as many kids as possible for Jesus because we all know how the mean liberals are trying to stiffle their religion. The idea that you must have as many kids as possible because of their souls reminds me of a good "Catholic lady I interviewed for Obama; If the Pope wants all those kids let him pay for them" Sounds good until you stop and think what the cost to the world will be. Condoms yes and any other device to limit reproduction in humans.
Do the terms "shepherd" and "flock" mean anything?
Is most of Brazil run by the old guy in the skirt and funny hat who declares that use of condoms increases HIV/AIDS?
And of course there are the folks that want to have as many kids as they possibly can so as to spread the word of Jesus ever more rapidly. "Be fruitful and multiply" says the Book. The multiply part is easy but where is the fruit going to come from when all the trees are destroyed and the rest of the land chopped up to support the products of Burger King?
James Bond's "Octopussy" was ahead of her time. Who picked up the tab for the dozens of medical people needed to produce that litter and how will they be fed and educated? I bet not the same source to help the families with 1 or 2 or 3 kids whose parents were sacked from their jobs.
aw
And who is building this wall...Israel??? Is this how we hide our shameful lack of compassion towards the poor?
In Britain they give girls money and free apartments when they have babies, and if they have lots of babies they get a house. Decent people are taxed to pay for this idiocy. Still, it provides work for social workers, the police and, later, the prison service.
Anyone who thinks encouraging an increase in world population is a good idea is either nuts, or a religious fundamentalist - which means nuts again.
Brazil is a Catholic country with a culture of irresponsible hedonism and poor education. See City of God and learn that the country has no more future than the rest of us, all because of the usual human motivators of greed, selfishness, ignorance and myopia.
Yet another story directly related to over-population. And still people worship and flock to see social and environmental criminals, like the pope.
These people need birth control and education.
If people around the globe don't stop breeding like rabbits, severe, draconian measures will eventually need to be imposed. People have the right to have children, but no one has the right to destroy the futures of everyone's children.
And I'm talking about you, mother of octuplets in California!
signs of anger demonstrate the need to curb our appetite to ravage the earth. one octuplet mom may incite other lonely souls to procreate for whatever reason; but, as social science has proven, the better the health, the less the need to multiply beyond a few children.
as for the favelas of Rio, they are symptomatic of the invasion of natural lands by select few who enrich themselves at the cost of displaced civilization.
check out what other cities across Brazil are doing for their poor. Frances Moore-Lappe has an excellent article on the subject of hunger, worth reading..
One way to end poverty is to stop breeding into it. We don't hear the stories about those that make hard choices and sacrifices, regardless of their color, to either remain childless or have only the number of children that they can feed and educate. I don't think it takes all that much education but I agree the Catholic church in Central/South America doesn't help.
Another problem is believing the path to political/economic power, and therefore entitlement, is not education and sacrifice but rather having representation thru sheer numbers.
Where have the folks in the favelas come from? From the rural areas where large landholding drove people away from simple subsistence lives. Where massive infrastructure floods forest; where forest is razed for cattle; where massive monoculture toxifies soil and water, poisoning people and killing the "weeds".
Our problem is the way we think. The economic crisis is a crisis of perspective and way of being.
Eco architecture and biomimicry in human habitats is a growing discipline that looks at how nature produces materials. For instance the abalone shell. How does abalone produce the incredibly strong and pearly irridescent coatingon the inside of the shell? How does a spider make the web fibre? What is color?
An important book that expands on the corporate capitalist creation and maintenance pf slums is Mike Davis' Planet of Slums.
Isn't this just the same as "gated communities" in the US?
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his moccasins - Native American proverb.
Air-drop Planned Parenthood.
good idea............worldwide.
The urban Latin American slums exist because rural farmers are driven off their land by neoliberal agricultural policies. Population growth has nothing to do with them.
A single, white, non-breeding US suburbanite consumes more resources and pollutes more than a hundred households in the Brazilian favelas. I suspect we could get a whole lot more bang for the buck by focusing on the lifestyles of the wealthy, than arrogantly telling brown and black people to have less children.
Really? How about a single Black US household? Or, an Asian US household?
Predjudice is as Prejudice says.
"The urban Latin American slums exist because rural farmers are driven off their land by neoliberal agricultural policies. Population growth has nothing to do with them."
Look here Mr. Ratzinger, I think you're taking this infallibility bit a little too far.
This has already happened in this country. Try driving thru any large city (over 250K) and you will see this already they're official name is "sound barriers" but you don't see them around "white" neiborhoods.
Yes, you do. And they really are sound barriers. Look along any interstate city bypass and they are wherever there is a settlement of McMansions along the highway.
Then they must be there to keep the 'darkies' at bay. ;)
are you talking about the u.s.????