Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
- State Dept. Releases Keystone XL Environmental Impact Statement
- Obama Offers to Cut Social Security, Medicare and Popular Programs (Again)
Popular content
Today's Top News
US and Iran at Afghan Talks
The United States was meeting today with countries from around the world, including its adversary Iran, to seek support for its new strategy to end a stalemate in Afghanistan.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not expected to hold substantive talks with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammad Mehdi Akhoundzadeh at the meeting in The Hague.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, left, and Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai, right, are seen at the start of a meeting at the Afghanistan Conference in The Hague, Netherlands, Tuesday March 31, 2009. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong) But the conference would nonetheless bring the two together as Washington tries to enlist regional support in tackling Islamist militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Richard Holbrooke, US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said Iran's presence at the conference was a logical part of efforts to produce peace for Afghans.
"How can you talk about Afghanistan and exclude one of the countries that's a bordering, neighbouring state?" he told reporters in The Hague. "The presence of Iran here is obvious."
Ahead of the conference, Akhoundzadeh repeated Iran's opposition to the presence of US troops in Afghanistan.
"The presence of foreign troops cannot bring peace and stability for Afghanistan," he was quoted as saying by Iran's official IRNA news agency.
"It encourages radicalism," he said. "This policy (that the Western countries) decide for the Afghan nation and for the Afghan officials does not work out any more."
Shi'ite Iran worked with Washington after the United States ousted the Sunni Taliban from Afghanistan 2001.
But it backed off after being branded by former US president George W Bush as part of the "axis of evil".
It has denied US accusations that it has supported the Taliban as a way of keeping at bay the United States, which has troops in both Iran's neighbours - Iraq and Afghanistan.
In a reversal of the policy of the former Bush administration, Obama's team views Iran as vital to any lasting solution in Afghanistan, and has sought engagement despite the continuing stand-off over Tehran's nuclear programme.
Clinton, who said she has no plans for direct talks with Iranian officials at the conference, said she wanted Iran's help on border security and fighting drugs in Afghanistan.
European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana said he hoped Iran would "take a responsible position".
"There is no doubt that Afghanistan cannot be stable without a stable region," Solana told reporters at the forum, which was chaired by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the Dutch foreign minister.
More than 70,000 US and Nato troops are in Afghanistan battling a growing insurgency by the Taliban, which is also spreading its influence in Pakistan.
Since taking office in January, Obama has ordered 17,000 extra troops to Afghanistan to tackle violence ahead of elections, and a further 4,000 to help train the army.
Clinton announced $40m in new US aid for a UN fund to prepare for Afghanistan's election in August, and an effort to encourage other nations at the conference to provide assistance. The 27-nation European Union announced $60m in aid before the talks.
"We do want to encourage the participants to begin thinking hard about what their contributions will be," Clinton said.
Dutch organisers said 72 out of the 73 countries invited confirmed their attendance, with only Uzbekistan bowing out. With international groups and observers, the total is 87 with nearly 700 delegates attending.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


4 Comments so far
Show All"The presence of foreign troops cannot bring peace and stability for Afghanistan," he was quoted as saying by Iran's official IRNA news agency.
This short Iranian statement makes more sense than the volumes our government has spewed in the last 6-7 years. Perhaps through a negotiated withdrawl we could secure an assurance that all occupied countries by the U.S. would remain free of groups seeking to do the U.S. people harm if we pulled back and helped, with no strings attached, rebuild and, to the degree that the inhabitants want, modernize infrastructural and agricultural technologies in the areas affected. With our troops back to non-combat status, defense budget money could be redirected to rebuilding at home and in those promised areas.
What? And reduce the profits of the Carlyle Group et al.? For the right people, continually expanding war, death and brutalization of whole peoples is just an enormous opportunity for profit.
Any nation that we attack is already guilty of terrorism. By our definition. Any neighbor that helps his neighbor is also a terrorist and must be destroyed or occupied.
To paraphrase another late world dictator wannabe, "Today America, tomorrow the world!" I'm sure that, if they weren't so busy killing peasants in their own occupied zones, the IDF would be right alonside us bringing "truth, justice and the American way" to thousands of Afghan peasants as a stepping stone to their overwhelming desire to destroy Iran.
"Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad." Euripides (484-400 BC)
Shucks, I'm always called an Obamabot, told the 2 parties are the same. And here is an ex of BO better, different & better than bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran McCain who is now working to escalate the war in Af/ w/ William Kristol and co.
So here an ex of BO doing better, and no one drops by the thread...
We should leave AfPak. McInsane would be carpet bombing Iran & AfPak. Right On Barack, talking w/ foes might help w/ one's woes, rarely does trying to kill them.
Well, my friend, the bombing of Pakistan has begun and the area is being expanded. Limited, true, unless you are one of the civilians who is hit. If we don't push back, it will grow. It always does.
Joe