Vow to Fight Raises Question: Is Calm in Iraq Just the Eye of the Storm?
GARMA, Iraq — Mohammed walked in disbelief through the rich green grass that carpets the farm behind his modest family home. For more than three years, he'd seen no green, no hanging branches in the orchards near his home in Garma, in Anbar province in western Iraq.
For more than three years, he'd worn a yellow jumpsuit in the U.S. detention center of Bucca in the hot desert outside Basra, hundreds of miles from home. He waited for his family's rare visits, and his heart lifted.
Between those visits, there was darkness. He was convinced that he'd never see this familiar place, his fiancee or his family again.
"Sometimes I ask myself, 'Am I truly here or am I dreaming?' " he said.
Even with his release, however, the 23-year-old never surrendered his principles, though he learned what he had to say in order to be freed: "Yes, I fought you. No, I won't do it again."
In America, the U.S. "surge" of additional troops to Baghdad is heralded as a success, and President Barack Obama has said he'll draw down American forces in Iraq and turn his attention to Afghanistan and Pakistan. In Iraq, however, what the U.S.-led invasion and occupation started is far from over.
Most Iraqis think that today's lower level of violence is the eye, not the end, of the storm, and that the decisive power struggles are just beginning. The U.S.-backed Iraqi government is widely regarded as an undeserving group of exiles who returned to Iraq on the backs of American tanks.
Over the weekend, fighting broke out between Sunni Muslims and Iraq's Shiite Muslim-led security forces, and it's unclear whether the security forces, still heavily backed by U.S. air and ground support, are loyal to their nation rather than their sect, tribe, town or ethnicity.
Although the Sunni insurgency that earlier had battled U.S. troops and Iraqi security forces and killed thousands of civilians is weakened, Mohammed is one of many Iraqis who still believe in what he calls the muqawima, the resistance. He always will.
Mohammed is one of the thousands of detainees who're being released from U.S. detention centers as America prepares to withdraw forces from Iraq. There are about 13,400 detainees in U.S.-run prisons, and on average 50 are released each day. Some are guilty of crimes, others are innocent, many have never been afforded due process and some have become radicalized by their time in prison.
A U.S. military study of 138,000 Iraqi detainees found that economics motivated 70 percent of them and local issues another 20 percent; fewer than 10 percent were Islamic radicals.
Iraqi officials worry that releasing detainees will trigger a new wave of violence. In some cases, local police are using vigilante law and killing people who've been released from U.S. detention centers, according to residents in Anbar. Most are too afraid to talk about it.
Mohammed came home late last year still determined to resist. He has one rule: Target only American troops, never civilians.
However, the resistance, a movement that he believes is the only way to restore dignity to the Iraqi people, was damaged by zealots who used a warped interpretation of Islam to justify killing Iraqis by the thousands. Damaged by the fatigue and terror that the sectarian war of 2006 and 2007 instilled in every Iraqi heart. Damaged by money and damaged by greed.
"There are people who are just killers, and then there are people who are resistance," Mohammed said. "I am resistance."
Mohammed is from a family of "resistance." His late father, Farouq, is almost legendary in nearby Fallujah. He's known as the first man to face American forces in that town, once the heart of the Sunni insurgency and a death trap for U.S. forces.
Farouq was detained shortly after the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003. For months, his family didn't know where he was. That May, he came home a changed man, said his brother Abu Sleiman. Farouq became obsessed with avenging his personal and national humiliation.
"They wanted to mold him like dough in their hands," Abu Sleiman said of the Americans. "He was so hurt."
Farouq organized with others in Garma, and the emerging resistance fighters trained in the vast land behind his home as U.S. tanks drove through the streets and American soldiers raided homes.
At the end of 2003, Farouq went to the outskirts of Fallujah with nine other men to attack the Americans. He and his compatriots wouldn't plant a bomb and run away, as others had. For them, there'd be no retreat.
Mohammed followed his father to the battle. Farouq protested, so Mohammed trailed the fighters by almost a mile.
In the dark of night, he watched the tracer fire of the battle. His father didn't retreat. The lone survivor of the battle said that Farouq had drawn fire to himself to help him get away. His family says that Farouq became a martyr that day, a hero.
"This was my brother, strong to the end," said Mohammed's uncle Abu Sleiman, who's a teacher.
Farouq's wife — Mohammed's mother, Umm Mohammed — was widowed with her seven children, and Abu Sleiman became a father figure to his nieces and nephews. Her grief, however, was mixed with pride.
"I tell my children to follow his footsteps. Walk the same path your father did," Umm Mohammed said. She cradled her 7-year-old daughter in her arms. "The Americans have done us an injustice, a very big injustice."
She ticked off the men in her family, one of them her young son, whom U.S. troops have killed; some with stray American bullets, others as they attacked the Americans.
She thinks that her 16-year-old son was caught in a crossfire and killed by the Americans. Others, however, say that out of desperation and sadness, he turned to al Qaida in Iraq, seeking revenge. U.S. troops killed him while he was with the radical Islamists, and his family never got his body back from the group, and never buried him.
Abu Sleiman still sobs when he's reminded of his nephew's death. He couldn't protect the boy, and his silence carries the guilt that he cannot voice.
"An uncle is not a father," is all he can say.
Mohammed and the rest of his family never worked with al Qaida in Iraq. When the militant group made it halal, or permissible, to kill Muslims, specifically Shiites, it undermined what the family calls the "honorable resistance."
"Al Qaida broke the back of the resistance," said Mohammed's uncle Abu Sleiman.
Another one of Abu Sleiman's brothers, a religious sheik, left the country for a time rather than work with al Qaida in Iraq. Abu Sleiman blames America for the rise of the violent extremist group, which emerged only after American tanks rolled into the country.
Still, Abu Sleiman and his family will continue to resist.
"This generation has learned to hate, more and more," Mohammed said
Throughout the war, the family members joke, their home was a pit stop for American soldiers. Every time a tank passed, another member of the clan was picked up. Almost every man in the family was detained. Mohammed and his uncle Abu Izzuddin, a tribal sheik, spent the longest time in prison.
Abu Izzuddin wrote poetry to remind himself of his loved ones and his beloved town. A respected leader in the community, he was detained in his home in front of a crowd of guests. Only one other act could be more humiliating: his guests being detained in his home.
Mostly, Abu Izzuddin wrote about love and his longing for his wife and children:
"And in me is grief and pain that hurt me in a way"That no pen and paper can describe
"Injustice, subjugation and deprivation are crushing me
"And the wounds of my heart are oozing pus and pain
"When I see you, I see Paradise approaching
"Towards me, and all the wounds of my soul will heal."
. Before they were detained, the U.S. fought two bloody battles to try to retake Fallujah from Sunni fighters, and the city morphed into a prison. Residents were forced to walk in and out of Fallujah through U.S. checkpoints with American-issued IDs.
While Mohammed and his uncle waited in prison, stripped of power and forced to follow the orders of foreigners, Iraq changed. The schism between Sunnis and Shiites grew, and the corpses of people killed in sectarian feuds were thrown into the streets.
Al Qaida in Iraq, initially an ally to Sunni "resistance" fighters, grew stronger and eventually declared an Islamic state in Anbar and other Sunni areas. The extremists forced the population to live under their brand of Islamic law.
A new, U.S.-backed central government formed in Baghdad.
The Sunni Awakening sprang up when tribal leaders grew tired of al Qaida in Iraq assassinating prominent leaders, forcing local women to marry fighters and in some cases cutting into smuggling profits. The U.S. military started doling out cash to Sunni fighters and others to stop shooting or join the fight against al Qaida in Iraq.
After three years, Mohammed lost all hope of returning home. Three times, he was called before an American panel to review his case. Three times, the Americans asked him whether he'd attacked U.S. forces. Three times he denied it.
"Terrorist," they called him, and back to detention he went.
The fourth time he told the truth.
"I am resistance. I had weapons," he said.
"Why?" they asked.
"You are an occupier. You humiliate our people," he replied.
"Will you continue to do it?" they asked.
"No. You were acting bad, but I hear you're behaving in a better way."
A little more than a month later, his jailers let him go.
Mohammed had told one lie, however. He'd never abandon the fight.
"I wanted to save myself," he said, explaining why he'd faked rehabilitation.
The day after he was released, Mohammed married his fiancee. His wife is four months pregnant now.
Mohammed scorns much of the Sunni Awakening, now known as the Sons of Iraq, for selling out its principles, taking cash from the occupier and turning against its own people.
"The people who are with the occupier, we consider him an occupier. These are the same looters, criminal gangs and killers who were in for money," Mohammed said. "If the resistance is stopped, the U.S. will not leave. . . . They want Iraq to be subjugated and to strip it, and now the police and sahwa (Awakening) do their work for them."
The police, known for brutalizing anyone slightly under suspicion of connections to al Qaida in Iraq, detained and beat one of Mohammed's brothers. When he was released, his mother sighed with relief, even at the sight of her son's bruises.
"I thanked God he was released; so many boys never come back," she said.
Mohammed was offered a job with the police. He refused it. He paused and thought about why. Would he be able to detain all these men that Americans said were terrorists?
"If I became a policeman, would I shake the hands of the Americans when they came to the police station?" he asked. "If I was ordered to detain a man whom I knew to be resistance, could I say no?"
"At this moment, it is better for us to sit and be quiet. Once we start fighting . . . ," Mohammed said, and then his words trailed off. "Everything I'm doing is being watched."
As Umm Mohammed offered fruit and other food to her guests, the gracious host stood firm in her beliefs. She needed it to be understood, however, that it isn't Americans she wants to fight, or her children to fight, it's the occupier. If it were any other foreigners, she and her family would fight them, as well.
"The Americans should get out of Iraq, leave Iraq to the Iraqis," she said. "What happened here is because of them, and they will be held accountable."
No one thinks that the Americans will leave, despite Obama's promises to draw down troops. Iraqis have heard American promises before, promises that never came to be.
"History will not have mercy on America," Abu Sleiman said. "I believe that it reached its peak, and now it is on its way down. America was hijacked from the Americans."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
21 Comments so far
Show AllExcellent reality check for everyone.
But Where is the mention of the fact that Stupendous amounts of cash, loans, machinery and technical help will be required to bring Iraq and Afghanistan back to their Pre-war levels....The laws of nations and of decent and moral peoples require it, and it seems that few in the benighted USA remember this simple fact. We are not talking just a few billion, either. The Amerrikun troops must leave, and massive amounts of help must be appropriated for the police, water, sewer, phone, electrical, road, building, school, transport, government, etc.,etc., etc., Rebuild the Infrastructure....!!
For probably a decade?..... 100 billion?....
So get ready to debate it and get ready to shell out folks. It was the government of the "american" people who blew those countries up "for their own good", just as it was in Vietnam.
The US gov't. didn't apologize for the A-bombs in Japan, because they felt justified by the intelligence estimates ( "it saved lives"). The Iraq/Afghan wars were purely aggressive and even if amends are made (highly doubtful unless there is a profit to be made) the karmic debt is sufficient to sink the USA republic through moral decay. Don't think I'm kidding here.
lt looks like Obama is the smartest president the country has ever had...but it will take more than brains to figure how to outwit the fascist warmongers. Get out on the streets and speak the clearest truth you can muster. Times a wastin'....
Hope everyone has a good day.
"greatbear215 March 31st, 2009 11:13 am
This was an illegal, criminal occupation to begin with-and my country has done so much damage to Iraq. The "architects" of this occupation need to be on trial answering for their offenses. I do not even know how this will ever "be made right." I don't think there is a way to rectify this amount of damage."
I wholly agree with that post, but will only add that my view is stronger than, "I don't think there is a way to rectify this ...". Imo, there [is] no way to [rectify] what's been done. That, note, is not to say that the USA et alia must not withdraw, for they definitely must and as quickly as possible, it's long past due time for withdrawing, so the more quickly it happens now the better; while recognising that Iraqis will certainly have "matters" to work out after the foreign forces withdraw, but the withdrawal must happen nonetheless. Once the withdrawal does happen, and I mean [full] withdrawal, then I do not see a way to [rectify] what's been done.
Iraqis may come to [forgive] their offenders or aggressors, some day, but how can what's been done be really rectified, that is corrected? We can't raise people to life after they're dead. We likely or surely can't decontaminate Iraq of all of the D.U. that was additionally spread in huge amounts during this war on Iraq. What can be [rectified] of what's been done?
Well, one thing that might be rectifiable is eliminating theocratically based government in Iraq. Also rectifiable would be having made it a puppet govt, to cease forcing the Iraqi govt to serve in any puppet terms; leaving it totally free of rein by U.S. elites. Even if the Iraqi govt is not totally puppet, I believe it's still much enough puppet, and this can certainly be rectified. Simply good will and honest U.S. government actions that are all that's needed to see to rectifying these two matters.
Much else is not rectifiable though; a very important much else. Buildings or civilian infrastructure can be rebuilt, but still much can't be rectified.
And this is speaking of this present criminal war and criminal occupation alone, so not including the many crimes of the U.S. government, along with its international allies, during plenty of years before.
A Quisling is a Quisling is a Quisling. However you name it and whatever you try to cover it up with, it is still a Quisling government. At least, the Norwegians hanged Vidikun Quisling.
"minitrue March 31st, 2009 5:13 pm
...
It is beginning to look like We the People may well have to start fighting here to protect us from occupation by our own greedy, hubris laden, government, or the trolls that pull the strings."
Well, I guess that government has been militarising the USA for quite a long time already, but it certainly brought troop units back from Iraq starting in Sept. or Oct. 2008 and for militarising the USA, the streets of cities and towns, neighbourhoods. It's believed by many people or analysts that the purpose is related to being prepared for too much "civil unrest" and to support the programs of the SPP and NAU, which apparently some elites want renamed, because these names have already attracted a little too much "heat" for the elites behind or driving these programs.
Am not sure, but believe www.democracynow.org provided some content on this above topic, among other websites that did, certainly including www.globalresearch.ca . According to what I've read on the dual topic, the two programs are for extending or expanding the NAFTA that should've never been established and was wrong to establish. Fair Trade Agreements would be okay if they were applied or governed in fair manners, but [Free] Trade is bs, corrupt, driven by greed, ... and the related efforts for conquest and domination by all means and in all profitable terms or ways.
Most people would think that militarisation wouldn't be necessary, that the police forces employed by The Peoples but working for the elites would suffice; but apparently elites think a "little" differently.
"DavidG. March 31st, 2009 8:06 pm
That America won't leave is a fact."
REALLY a prediction, to be precise about it; but given history, the prediction will surely turn out to be very accurate. Yet maybe the Iraqi Reistance groups uniting or now united will help to make a significant difference in good terms. There's one article about this linked in my prior post, and there have been other recent articles at Uruknet about this.
DavidG:
"Iraq, like Afghanistan, will descend into anarchy when the U.S. leaves which will mean a million plus people will have died for nothing."
WE DO NOT have to wait to learn that this criminal war (of aggression) and occupation (of aggression) will have caused many Iraqis, and enough U.S. troops, to die "for nothing". We already know this for a fact, if we've been reading at all seriously. It's not for nothing in the unethical, diabolically twisted, demented, obsessed, greedy sense in which the ruling elites of corporate-fascist USA and its allies think and plan, but their greed, narcissism, sociopathy, [psychopathy] will have turned out unfruitful for them. It's already unfruitful for them; just that they're blind to this fact.
Given the U.S. launched was was already and obviously unjustifiable war, Iraqis started dying for nothing, that is, for other people's greed, as of day 1 of the launching of the war in March 2003. Again, the Iraqis did not literally or really die for nothing; they died, unwillingly, for and due to other people's GREED.
DavidG:
"America's Manifest Destiny seems to be to stuff up the world! ..."
"to stuff up the world"? With what? And how? What does this mean, precisely? To try to conquer and dominate worldwide is one thing, logically understandable, while criminal as hell and obviously unacceptable, but still logically understandable in terms of semantics. But "to stuff up the world"? That has an odd meaning for what's actually meant, whatever it is.
But "to stuff up the world"? That has an odd meaning for what's actually meant, whatever it is.
David G is saying in a polite way that the USA government's "Manifest Destiny" is to FUCK UP the world. Does that help you understand what he means?
Leila Fadel says, "Vow to Fight Raises Question: Is Calm in Iraq Just the Eye of the Storm?", but while I haven't really noticed much, if anything at all, posted at CD for some time on violence in Iraq, I've certainly seen articles posted at Uruknet.info. So if Leila Fadel doesn't refer to these cases in her article, which I haven't yet read, then it wouldn't be a wrong thing to suggest to pay some attention to articles posted at Uruknet, where there are often articles providing information we basically never see mentioned here at CD and at probably many other websites.
In any case, I'll have to read this article by her before knowing what it says; just that the title saying "Calm in Iraq" seems a little questionable given articles I've seen posted at Uruknet.
The following is a video roughly 12 minutes long or short (very decent length for a news media report, imo) with Leila Fadel, the same one, and what I guess to be on the same topic, or much enough the same anyway.
"Video: Betrayed in Iraq
Leila Fadel: Leaders of Awakening Councils are arrested, tortured and killed by Iraq government",
TheRealNews.com, Mar 30 2009
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m53019
Maybe the following is relevant enough too. It says that the Iraqi Resistance groups are uniting or united and that they and AMSI want the foreign occupation ended, etc.
"Iraqi Resistance and Arabic Summit in Doha",
ANTIIMPERIALIST MEDIA, Mar 30 2009
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m53023
The continuation of conflicts and US occupation both in Iraq and Af-Pak regions will be good for the economic recovery in the long run.
That America won't leave is a fact. After all, they're still in Japan and Germany and those wars ended in 1945! And they'd still be in Vietnam too if they hadn't had their butts kicked.
Iraq, like Afghanistan, will descend into anarchy when the U.S. leaves which will mean a million plus people will have died for nothing.
America's Manifest Destiny seems to be to stuff up the world! They're even doing it to the world economic and financial system.
www.dangerouscreation.com
You mean a million and a half Muslims will have died to benefit US military industrial employees, enabling them to pay off their second vacation homes in Cancun and send their kids to college in brand new SUVs.
What's It All About?
"One is either on the side of the slave or the slaveowner."
"In Iraq who's the slave?"
"The Iraqi people."
"Based on?"
"U.S. troops having occupied their homeland."
"And the slaveowner?"
"The American occupier."
"Based on?"
"Taking over someone else's homeland is an act of enslavement."
"The answer being?"
"Troops out now."
"Otherwise?"
"How does it feel to be on the side of the slaveowner?"
Pull the plug.
What will be will be.
We need to sever us from the past to create something new.
prior to the Nov 2006 mid-terms, we were promised the war in Iraq would be ended. And Obama promised it too. MoveOn says the war is over.
Is this young man any different from anyone whose nation has been occupied by foreign troops, whose children have been murdered, whose nation is in wreckage? Of course not! The propaganda machine spews out tales of terrorists seeking to come to the USA and wreak havoc. Yet the truth remains that AlQaeda is barely 30,000 strong and the great majority of those who take up arms against our soldiers are simply patriots.
The surge worked.
NOT.
On August 9th, 2003 Common Dreams published an article I wrote, titled:
A Fatal Flaw in our Alleged Foreign Policy
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0809-03.htm
The article was picked up and circled the globe, translated into many languages. The only country that didn't listen was the United States.
What Mohammed said in the above article reinforces what I was trying to point out so long ago. We still have learned nothing. So very sad.
It is beginning to look like We the People may well have to start fighting here to protect us from occupation by our own greedy, hubris laden, government, or the trolls that pull the strings.
This story made me cry, no it made me sob. It also got me off my butt and jolted me into action, so thankyou Leila! I will be traveling for two days with little money and a vehicle that needs constant compliments and encouragement to arrive at a site and join with others who feel deeply that what the rich and powerful people who run this country are doing is very wrong. It will not be easy for me as health and strength are waning. I'm hoping that there will be many young people there as sometimes I get too depressed and feel like a dying breed! Anyway...what I really want to say is...people...get off your asses!
And guess what we're facing in Afghanistan...? Bush, Obama, all the so-called experts, all fail to ask the most important question. If the United States were invaded, would its people ever stop fighting to drive them out? And once you answer that question you have to ask what makes the experts think the Iraqis or the Afghanis will ever stop killing American troops in Iraq or Afghanistan?
My money's on the Iraqis and Afghanis.
This was an illegal, criminal occupation to begin with-and my country has done so much damage to Iraq. The "architects" of this occupation need to be on trial answering for their offenses. I do not even know how this will ever "be made right." I don't think there is a way to rectify this amount of damage.
What we have done to the people of Iraq is a national disgrace. It is a War Crime-it is a Crime Against Humanity-and it needs to be answered for. We must, as a people, work toward this goal. We must work together to secure this end. Nothing less will do. War Criminals require full and vigorous prosecution. We should not rest until this becomes a reality. It is the least we can do-and probably all we can do-for the people of Iraq.
:::Even with his release, however, the 23-year-old never surrendered his principles, though he learned what he had to say in order to be freed: "Yes, I fought you. No, I won't do it again."::::
So this is the new pledge everyone will have to recite, and probably everyday, to show his/her allegiance to the new world order to appease the 'elite', if you don't you get imprisoned.
Looks like Obama,and America is in for a very rude awakening. I wonder when that billion dollar embassy will come under attack.