Wind Industry Expects its Slowdown to be only Temporary
WALLED LAKE, Mich. - Michael and Sharon Medwid did what other family businesses are trying around the country: They invested in a new shop and machinery to build parts for wind turbines and to reap the benefits of America's expansion of wind energy. Then the recession clobbered them.
Now they're running lean to survive until credit flows again and they can be part of a wind energy initiative to reach a national goal of doubling renewable energy in three years.
The recession has slowed down the whole wind industry this year, from materials to final assembly of turbines. Experts say that getting it up to speed to produce the number of turbines needed to generate large amounts of renewable energy will require more government support and innovation to make the parts lighter, stronger and cheaper.
Despite the hurdles, manufacturers in the wind business sense opportunity.
"We're creating an industry we can manufacture here," said Michael Medwid, 63, who started as a 19-year-old apprentice to his uncle's tool and die business and began his own company in Detroit in 1971 supplying the auto industry.
President Barack Obama says the energy revolution from fossil fuels to the efficient use of clean energy such as wind will yield millions of jobs. Those jobs will be important for building support for Obama's plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with what scientists say is necessary to control global warming.
Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan is one of 15 Democratic senators who are withholding support from the idea of mandatory emissions limits until they see how their states fare.
"I know our energy policy and our climate change policy will work if we focus on jobs," Stabenow said Thursday at a hearing of the Senate Energy Committee.
Stabenow has been saying often lately that each wind turbine has more than 8,000 parts and adding, with a smile, that "every single one of those is going to be made in Michigan."
That's unlikely, of course, as the country has more than 100 wind turbine and turbine parts factories in 40 states from the Southeast to the West Coast.
Christine Real de Azua, a spokeswoman for the American Wind Energy Association, said wind energy should drive economic recovery by offering a broad range of jobs and business opportunities. There are 85,000 jobs in wind power already.
However, a "mind-boggling number" of the turbines installed so far have been imported from Europe and Asia, said George Sterzinger, who works on ideas for expanding domestic production as the executive director of the Renewable Energy Policy Project in Washington.
The 127 turbines at Puget Sound Energy's Wild Horse Wind Power Project, which opened in 2006 near Ellensburg, Wash., for example, were built by Denmark-based Vestas.
"Right now we're buying a lot of technology from European countries: Germany, Spain and Denmark. But there's absolutely no question that 20 years ago we led the world in photovoltaics and wind, and we have the resources to at least be on par again," Sterzinger said.
The U.S. excels in the "manufacturing intelligence part," including design, engineering and finding ways to lower production costs, said Dan Radomski of Detroit-based NextEnergy, a nonprofit corporation. It finds potential wind-parts suppliers, helps them secure financing and then connects them to turbine assembly companies, which outsource most of the parts they assemble.
Wind turbine companies haven't been able to find enough suppliers, Radomski said. Wind is a mechanical system, much like an automobile, he said. Michigan has lost thousands of auto jobs and has hit 11.6 percent unemployment, the highest in the country.
"Knowing that they were desperately trying to line up suppliers and we had a very hungry manufacturing base here in Michigan, we set out to go to the next level, to get the two groups connected," he said.
He said that Vestas of Denmark and other turbine-assembly companies were looking for U.S. suppliers to save on transportation, exchange-rate swings and import duties. Partnerships make logistics easier, too.
Some Michigan companies say they can take American engineering and business ingenuity - and some of the manufacturing techniques from making auto parts - and do a better job than wind turbine manufacturing so far.
"There are lots of things to be fixed and lots of ways to cut costs," said Jeff Metts, the president of Dowding Machining in Eaton Rapids, Mich.
Metts said his company, which recently built a new factory to produce wind turbine parts, had a plan to modernize the machining of turbine hubs from 24 hours to fewer than four hours.
The downturn has cost Dowding, however. Its core business is down by half and it's laid off 103 of its 250 employees.
"It's a very difficult time. We should be miserable," Metts said. "But I am so excited about the immediate future, where we're going."
The United States installed 4,000 wind turbines last year, but it will have to add more than 10,000 annually to reach the Obama administration's goal of 25 percent renewable-energy production by 2025, he said.
"This business is just unbelievable. I have so much hope for it. And this downturn; where you couldn't talk to anybody before, now people want to hear your ideas," Metts said.
He said that skilled machinists at his nonunion company earned $25 to $30 an hour. Medwid's company is also nonunion and pays up to $28 an hour.
Like Metts, the Medwids think they'll make it through the recession. The other parts of their business - oil and gas equipment and auto parts - also are down. Last year they bought an empty industrial building and machines to produce wind turbine parts, expecting to create about 20 jobs. Each machine needs one operator at a time.
Recently the Medwids' company, Three M Tool and Machine, and a sister firm laid off 19 of their 75 employees, but still lost money.
"You get geared up for a certain volume and you can't dump your overhead," Medwid said. "But if you don't have the equipment, you can't get the orders."
Radomski, of NextEnergy, said that the credit crunch had hurt the wind industry. The stimulus bill and the extension of tax credits should help some projects get financed, but much will depend on whether banks can get rid of their bad assets and resume lending. He predicted that the industry will grow quickly again and that someday 2009 will look like "nothing more than a blip on the screen."
Donald Grimes, a senior researcher in the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations at the University of Michigan, said wind energy wouldn't result in a large net increase in jobs, partly because it would replace jobs making equipment for existing power plants. Most of the 3.5 million green jobs the president promises are likely to be in construction for weatherization, not in manufacturing, Grimes said.
Sterzinger, the renewable energy analyst, said part of what's needed in the U.S. was manufacturers and research universities collaborating on technology innovation, the key for keeping a competitive advantage globally.
Sterzinger argues that without more federal support, the U.S. will miss out on creating new manufacturing, which in turn will drive up the costs of renewable energy.
The U.S. wind industry group said the boost it needed was the national commitment to 25 percent renewable energy by 2025 and more investment in transmission lines.
"The country has missed out on this opportunity in past years and the Europeans have been the ones to really build up their own renewable energy industry," spokeswoman Real de Azua said. "It's time for us to do that here."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
14 Comments so far
Show AllI believe progressives have to pay some close attention to a future for coal-miners as we propose to phase out coal. It is a serious practical and ethical problem that could also be used demagogically to squelch support for clean energy in certain states. We must help the hard-working people find their new places in industry or other enterprise. They will be suspicious of anything promised, and rightly so. I have no ready answers, but we need to get the opinions of coal workers and their unions - encourage them to move with the times before the times move past them.
Miners have often been misused and have had to fight like hell for everything they have. (My own grandfather was a coal miner, killed in an accident in 1922.) A certain intransigence against change ultimately worked against steelworkers and longshoremen in the middle and late 20th century. I hope that the coal unions can keep their union militancy and at the same time take more initiative in defining and demanding what would work for them as we move toward green energy.
Joe
Let's get started making windmills here. We import too many valuable things that we should be making, including windmill parts and subway cars. If we make our own, we help solve problems of jobs, the environment and trade balance. We would not be so stymied on the auto industry if, instead of trying to get rid of hard-earned pensions, we would concentrate on how to convert to manufacturing worthwhile products.
Some of the stimulus money could go to startups in this important area. If private industry doesn't bite, the startups could be municipal. We need emergency professional training programs for everyone from engineers, to construction workers to community advisors. We need to raise consciousness so that people from home owners' associations etc., whose sensibilities may be stuck in the 1950's, can open their minds to esthetic changes associated with green energy.
We could have responsible profits from windmills instead of windfall profits from irresponsible money mills.
Joe
Barack Obama has pledged 15 billion a year for solar & wind energy. His Energy Plan attempts to move us away from total fossil fuel dependance. This is the opposite of the gop.
His harping critics will find fault in this too.
He does right & wrong. But a wide range of insulting people call me and my ilk Obamabots, and refuse to ever see any good in this president.
However right is right. And Obama is right on this one. Unless one's blind hatred precludes ever seeing anything right with BO. I smell racism inside the hate at times. But of course no one in America is racist! Just hateful!
$15,000,000,000 for Solar & Wind, jobs, less oil, progress.
It's All Good.
I agree that the pledge to spend money on this is a positive move. Anyone with brains and concern about the earth and future generations should be on board with it.
But I worry that so-called clean coal and the nuclear industry are so powerful they could succeed in diverting funds and undermining or co-opting efforts to build green energy. Be assured, there will be a battle of propaganda and pressure. We must be ready to fight it through.
Joe
So if one lives in an apartment, condo, or even a townhouse, how will they get to generate their own electricity from wind turbines when it's highly unlikely that their HOA will even allow them to think about it? And even if you own a home, if you're under HOA hell, forget it unless you can get your neighbors to team up and reform the HOA agreement in your neighborhood.
Senator Stabenow's optimism is misplaced concerning conventional wind technology, which may have it's place, but cannot even come close to replacing the base electrical load generation capacity currently supplied in the US by coal, natural gas and nuclear-based plants.
What they should be building in Michigan, instead of parts for conventional windmills, are the deflecting airfoils and turbo-expander fans enclosed in an Atmospheric Vortex Engine structure, which is able to capture Convective Available Potential Energy that Michigan is so rich in. Then, after a prototype demonstration, they should be building the actual AVE plants (http://vortexengine.ca) that can produce electricity cheaply at the right time of year and day, and then FINALLY, manufacturing plants that use the inexpensive electricity produced by the Atmospheric Vortex Engine, should be built there to produce goods more cheaply than competitors.
Since I'm not from Michigan, it would be great if someone who knows her personally would deliver this message to Senator Stabenow. Michael Moore, Pat Thurston, or especially Prof. Nilton Renno--are you listening?
I gave up on what you call "an Atmospheric Vortex Engine structure" over 40 years ago even though the details of my idea were better. I didn't and still don't think it is as good as today's regular wind turbines. Perhaps you know more about it than I do. If there are some good links you can share, please do.
The difference is that the AVE can be installed in many places (southeast US) where the horizontal wind fields are, for the most part, insufficiently intense or lacking the consistency necessary to support economic wind harvesting.
Instead, the AVE system "reorganizes" the "updraft field" over a region (i.e. the earth's surface is the "collection panel") and concentrates it into one large rotating updraft (artificial tornado, if you will). Winds are thus "created" at the surface, which are harvested just before the convergence point inside a structure. At this location additional thermal energy (waste heat) may also be added to increase the buoyancy, and therefore "drafting" effect, of the rising vortex.
At the vortexengine.ca website, there are dozens of links to scientific papers and presentations which you may use to get more information. I would especially recommend the FAQs.
Windpower can be generated without expensive machined turbines, transmissions, gears and alternators. Check out the WINDBELT!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ0v-CK63-4&feature=related
I don't know if an array of these would harm birds, but perhaps wind generator plants could be combined with catfood factories?
Just make sure it cant kill birds.
Green energy isnt truly green if it causes bloodshed to innocent passersby.
Using the excuse that domesticated cats kill more birds isnt a defense, since cats shouldnt be domesticated, and they arent pretending to be advocating a greem energy source.
Webber,
As you know since we've been in these threads before, it ain't just cats. Scientists agree that wind power is a minor threat to birds compared to many other threats.
Here's a (slightly edited) repeat of a post i logged on a previous thread in November:
**********************************************************
Regarding the repeated and repeated mythology about wind power supposedly being not OK because of some horrific impact on birds:
You give no citation for your bird claim. Check this article out:
http://www.awea.org/faq/sagrillo/swbirds.html
Here's a clip:
In December of 2002, the report "Effects of Wind Turbines on Birds and Bats in Northeast Wisconsin" was released. The study was completed by Robert Howe and Amy Wolf of the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, and William Evans. Their study covered a two-year period between 1999 and 2001, in the area surrounding the 31 turbines operating in Kewaunee County by Madison Gas & Electric (MG&E) and Wisconsin Public Service (WPS) Corporation.
The report found that over the study period, 25 bird carcasses were found at the sites. The report states that "the resulting mortality rate of 1.29 birds/tower/year is close to the nationwide estimate of 2.19 birds/tower.16- The report further states, "While bird collisions do occur (with commercial wind turbines) the impacts on global populations appear to be relatively minor, especially in comparison with other human-related causes of mortality such as communications towers, collisions with buildings, and vehicles collisions. This is especially true for small scale facilities like the MG&E and WPS wind farms in Kewaunee County."
The report goes on to say, "previous studies suggest that the frequency of avian collisions with wind turbines is low, and the impact of wind power on bird populations today is negligible. Our study provides little evidence to refute this claim."
So, while wind farms are responsible for the deaths of some birds, when put into the perspective of other causes of avian mortality, the impact is quite low. In other words, bird mortality at wind farms, compared to other human-related causes of bird mortality, is biologically and statistically insignificant. There is no evidence that birds are routinely being battered out of the air by rotating wind turbine blades as postulated by some in the popular press.
Here's another clip about other human-caused bird deaths:
Utility transmission and distribution lines, the backbone of our electrical power system, are responsible for 130 to 174 million bird deaths a year in the U.S...
Collisions with automobiles and trucks result in the deaths of between 60 and 80 million birds annually in the U.S...
Tall building and residential house windows also claim their share of birds... the best estimates put the toll due collisions with these structures at between 100 million and a staggering 1 billion deaths annually.
Lighted communication towers turn out to be one of the more serious problems for birds, especially for migratory species that fly at night... Current mortality estimates due to telecommunication towers are 40 to 50 million birds per year. The proliferation of these towers in the near future will only exacerbate this situation.
Agricultural pesticides are "conservatively estimated" to directly kill 67 million birds per year...
Cats, both feral and housecats, also take their toll on birds. A Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) report states that, "recent research suggests that rural free-ranging domestic cats in Wisconsin may be killing between 8 and 217 million birds each year. The most reasonable estimates indicate that 39 million birds are killed in the state each year."
There are other studies on the impacts of jet engines, smoke stacks, bridges, and any number of other human structures and activities that threaten birds on a daily basis. Together, human infrastructure and industrial activities are responsible for one to four million bird deaths per day!
What should happen to the millions of animals that have evolved to live with / be dependent on us? Our cat was found on the street in winter with a serious eye injury and infection that would probably have killed him without vet care and shelter.
Are you suggesting that cats, dogs, parakeets etc. should be sterilized, euthanized, freed to the streets, allowed to die of starvation and disease? The only halfway acceptable practical approach seems to be spay and neuter. (By the way, feral cats kill birds too, obviously.)
I agree with the GregR who said that carbon burning and nuclear energy are more harmful to animals, wild and domesticated, than windmills and solar panels.
Joe
As an alternative, global climate change will wipe out whole species of animals. A nuclear accident could be kinda bad too, ya know?
A month or two ago, I signed a contract to possibly put a wind tower or 2 on my farm. I do have NIMBY thoughts, but realize it's good for all of us.