EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- The Sick Madness of Tom Friedman's Culture
Popular content
Today's Top News
Labor Agency Is Failing Workers, Report Says
The federal agency charged with enforcing minimum wage, overtime and many other labor laws is failing in that role, leaving millions of workers vulnerable, Congressional auditors have found.
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis speaks during a town hall meeting Monday, March 2, 2009 in Miami. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee) In a report scheduled to be released Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office found that the agency, the Labor Department's Wage and Hour Division, had mishandled 9 of the 10 cases brought by a team of undercover agents posing as aggrieved workers.
In one case, the division failed to investigate a complaint that under-age children in Modesto, Calif., were working during school hours at a meatpacking plant with dangerous machinery, the G.A.O., the nonpartisan auditing arm of Congress, found.
When an undercover agent posing as a dishwasher called four times to complain about not being paid overtime for 19 weeks, the division's office in Miami failed to return his calls for four months, and when it did, the report said, an official told him it would take 8 to 10 months to begin investigating his case.
"This investigation clearly shows that Labor has left thousands of actual victims of wage theft who sought federal government assistance with nowhere to turn," the report said. "Unfortunately, far too often the result is unscrupulous employers' taking advantage of our country's low-wage workers."
The report pointed to a cavalier attitude by many Wage and Hour Division investigators, saying they often dropped cases when employers did not return calls and sometimes told complaining workers that they should file lawsuits, an often expensive and arduous process, especially for low-wage workers.
During the nine-month investigation, the report said, 5 of the 10 labor complaints that undercover agents filed were not recorded in the Wage and Hour Division's database, and three were not investigated. In two cases, officials recorded that employers had paid back wages, even though they had not.
The accountability office also investigated hundreds of cases that it said the Wage and Hour Division had mishandled. In one, the division waited 22 months to investigate a complaint from a group of restaurant workers. Ultimately, investigators found that the workers were owed $230,000 because managers had made them work off the clock and had misappropriated tips. When the restaurant agreed to pay back wages but not the tips, investigators simply closed the case.
In another case, the accountability office found that workers at a boarding school in Montana were not paid more than $200,000 in overtime. But when the employer offered to pay only $1,000 in back wages as the two-year statute of limitations approached, the division dropped the case.
"We have a crisis in wage theft, and the Department of Labor has not been aggressive enough in recent years," said Kim Bobo, executive director of Interfaith Worker Justice, a group that advocates for low-wage workers. "The new secretary of labor says she's the new sheriff in town, but I'm concerned she's facing the wild, wild West of wage theft."
Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis said she took the report's findings seriously.
"I am committed to ensuring that every worker is paid at least the minimum wage," Ms. Solis said, "that those who work overtime are properly compensated, that child labor laws are strictly enforced and that every worker is provided a safe and healthful environment."
Ms. Solis said the Wage and Hour Division planned to increase its staff by a third by hiring 250 investigators - 100 of them as part of the federal stimulus package - "to refocus the agency on these enforcement responsibilities" and "ensure that contractors on stimulus projects are in compliance with the applicable laws."
Ms. Solis said the hirings would "reinvigorate the work of this important agency."
Ms. Solis's predecessor, Elaine L. Chao, often defended the Wage and Hour Division, saying it had concentrated on larger, tougher cases, and secured back wages for more than 300,000 workers a year and collected more than twice as much annually as the division had done in the final years of the Clinton administration.
The report concluded that the Wage and Hour Division had mishandled more serious cases 19 percent of the time. In such cases, the accountability office said, the division did not begin an investigation for six months, did not complete an investigation for a year, did not assess back wages when violations were clearly identified and did not refer cases to litigation when warranted.
"When you have weak penalties and weak enforcement, that's a deadly combination for workers," said Representative George Miller, Democrat of California, who, as chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, asked the accountability office to do the report. "It's clear that under the existing system, employers feel they can steal workers' wages with impunity, and that has to change."
Mr. Miller, whose committee is scheduled to hold a hearing on wage and hour enforcement on Wednesday, said he would push to enact tougher penalties for wage violations and laws that made it easier for workers to join class-action lawsuits.
The report said undercover agents recorded Wage and Hour Division officials urging workers who complained to file lawsuits. And on one recording, an investigator appeared to back off quickly on demanding back pay when an undercover agent posing as a wage-violating employer said he was financially stretched.
According to the report, the employer said, "Well, you know, like I said, all of our contracts have dried up, we really don't have anything coming in, so. ... ."
The investigator responded, "O.K., so you're not in a position where you can pay him?"
When the employer said no, the investigator seemingly gave up, saying he would let the worker "know that he has a private right of action to pursue the funds."
The report expressed dismay with that approach. "Low-wage workers may be unable to afford attorney's fees or may be unwilling to argue their own case in small-claims court," it said, "leaving them with no other options to obtain their back wages."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

15 Comments so far
Show AllKudos to the GOA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dubya accomplished more in his eight years in office than the past ten presidents combined !
Too bad all of his accomplishments undid progressive programs that took a century to implement.
Wage theft? Its hilarious to see complaints about wage theft considering how many support an avoidance of law regarding labor in America. And I include Unions in this group.
Selective compliance and enforcement has produced the sorry state employees are in today and many well meaning folks have aided this situation.
Elaborate?
---USAn---
As a labor lawyer, I feel that the Dept of Labor (DOL) would more aptly should be called Dept of Corporations. The DOL not only failed to protect workers, but went out of its way to protect corporations. Wage and Hour Division of the DOL was headed by former Walmart Attorney, that should give everyone a fairly good idea of the Division's priorities. But, the sad reality is that it's not just the DOL or the Wage and Hour Divisions (Federal and State), it's the whole system. The system is skewed so heavily against the employees. The judges are appointed for their pro-business bias and they usually come through for businesses. Ask any NELA (National Employment Lawyers Association) and they will tell you how difficult these cases become to fight on behalf of the employees when the entire process is stacked against the employees--from the initial complaint to the jury trials (if one can even get to that stage). Most of these cases are killed by the courts in denying class treatment of these cases so that they can be litigated as class actions on behalf of all the employees.
In one of the cases against Walmart the judge actually said that the employees violated their contracts with the company by doing off-the-clock work (which they were forced to do by the managers). That is just one example of how the system is setup by and for the corporations against the wage slaves.
I think the answer to this is Unionization. At least collectively the workers have some power to negotiate the terms of their employment. Unions may be corrupt, but they do give a collective power to workers to stand together and have a voice in the market place against powerful corporations.
Think what progress could be made if the enforcers of labor laws simply did their jobs. The pretense of not being able to accurately track Social Security numbers may be ending, slowly. I hope progressive-minded people will keep respect for labor laws at the top of our priorities, since it could help solve lots of problems, including some of our illegal-immigration and environmental problems, without turning workers into criminals.
Come on people. Give Solis some time. She just came in after getting persecuted by those filthy disgruntled Rethuglicans and I'm damn sorry I voted for Thune. Just like the environment, labor will get a chance to see the light of day. Don't give up hope. Fight for it. You have an administration who lend you a hand to pull you out of the pit. Use the chance, don't lose it !
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
All US law has been turned utterly into one big ugly joke and Labor Law is no exception. The laws are simply on the books to protect the corporate world and not the average American, and Barack Obama's big give away to the super rich is is not going to be any Change for the better.
I understand your concern but you have to understand that half the electorate thinks they're really richie rich despite their actual economic plight. I do take concern about Obama caving in to bailing out Wall Street even as Main Street expresses a strong disapproval against it but the problem is Main Street is divided amongst itself. My conservative friends and coworkers still think they can get rich with tax cuts for the wealthy even when none of them earn even 100k a year let alone 250k and higher and they still think the markets will take care of themselves and believe that gambling on the stock market ala daytrading will make you rich. If we can snap these kinds of people out of their insane thinking, maybe then will Obama have a united Main Street that can fight Wall Street and take control of Congress and the White House.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
I agree, a lack of class consciousness - and the idea that the wealthy-investor class and the worker's interests are NOT the same.
I know a lot of 6-digit earners who think of themselves as just gool ol' middle class boys. Then there are those earning no more than $8.50 per hour, who think of themselves as "middle class".
Everyone is "middle class" even the supposed Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders talks of "defending the middle class".
---USAn---
Obama doesn't want to fight Wall Street, Terrance. He IS Wall Street.
SumOne said...
Actually a question, if I may. Would it make sense to, instead of bailing out companies that have already proven their inability either to plan, or manage, their futures, with billions of $$, divide the billions by the number of citizens and disperse the money to them, thereby determining which companies we-the-people want to support by how we spend those $$?
Live!
January 22, 2009 5:22 PM
Mike Morin said...
Interesting thought.
I'd say, that if we did such a thing, the amount of money to be disperesed to each individual should be related to each individual's need. But, that would be impossible to determine and administer.
I favor a small guaranteed income for all individuals, increasing with age. Such would help us transition to an economic system that would provide a living wage for everybuddy.
Which brings me back to financial systems reform. Think about the unfair racket that the current Federal Reserve System embodies. The Treasury makes loans through a huge bureaucracy to investor-owned banks who then loan money to others on usurious terms.
Wouldn't it be better to have the Treasury make direct payments to workers who are planning and implementing an economic system of neighborhood/inter-community/inter-regional (and worldwide)ecological economic redevelopmemt with the mission of peace, equity, humanity, sustainability, and quality of life.
(Eventually, I envision one world currency).
Mike Morin
www.peoplesequityunion.blogspot.com
PJD-Poverty has its stigma no doubt. I remember kids who were eligible for free lunches skipping them altogether because they didnn't want anyone knowing they were poor. It's why people put on appearances, going into debt to buy designer clothes.
TMinSD-The working-class conservatives I know who aspire to be rich just play the lottery or work 2-3 jobs (poor saps falling asleep at breaktime). Some of them marry into rich families somehow. Or they're more concerned about guns, gas, and identity politics.
I remember calling Wage and Hour a number of years ago because my then boss was making us work 9-10 days in a row before we got a day off. She'd have you off Sunday and Monday, then you'd have to work Tuesday-Saturday, which would be your 5 day 40 hour week. But instead of being off Sunday and Monday, you'd work straight through until Thursday. She'd have you on overnight shift, and then give you a day or two off and then put you on daylight for another long stretch. It was called "maximizing coverage with minimal workers." For some reason though, she always worked banker's hours.
Anyway, I called Wage and Hour to report this and got this as a response.
"So? They're allowed. Go look for another job if you don't like where you are."
Then the person hung up on me.
Workers and the poor are always made to feel that their dissatisfaction is the result of personal failure and that they're being punished for not being talented or disciplined or educated or proactive enough. It's the story of my life, and people wonder why at times long to break the capped teeth of guys in suits with titles. Not all of them mind you. :) I'm sure some of them post here and are on the right side and God bless 'em.
"The report expressed dismay with that approach. 'Low-wage workers may be unable to afford attorney's fees or may be unwilling to argue their own case in small-claims court,' it said, 'leaving them with no other options to obtain their back wages.'"
And that's another thing people never seem to talk about. Most people can't afford a lawyer, and employers know that and count on it.
I'm so sick of having my nose rubbed in shit.
People say I'm crazy when I suggest that we should have a minimum living salary of $880 a week, which would be the equivalent of $22 an hour and a 40 hour work week. Of course, if we make having a job a right, we would increase the pool of workers, meaning we could reduce everyone's hours. So people might only have to work a 4 day week.
Imagine all the happy burger flippers and janitors and waitresses and bank tellers and pharmacy tech, etc. out there if this were to take place. I'm sure that would get people off of welfare. If they have kids, make day care a right and thusly create more jobs.
I dunno what I'm talking about. I guess I should just go sit on a barstool and let the intellectuals, most of whom have no real stake in this kind of change, stroke their frontal lobes in front of each other. lol.
It's so simple. Really. Am I the only one who sees this?
No, I think you're normal and in fact you are. What we have been witnessing is the massive brainwashing of the masses into gleefully drubbing themselves and developing an amoral characteristic of causing others loads of pain and suffering and even having sadistic pleasure at it. If one can take what conservatives like the most and map it onto something you'd like to fight for, then they'll accept albeit for a different reason. For example, conservatives not like hemp because they view it on the issue of pot. However, bring up hemp for industrial purposes and amazingly you'll see a huge split within the conservatives and you'll be able to get enough of them to end the war on drugs. The trick conservatives have used on us was divide and conquer and slippery slope. We progressives can do the same and have been working on it. We just need to right leaders to carry it out.