Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Richardson Abolishes N.M. Death Penalty
New Mexico becomes the 15th state to ban capital punishment
With his signature, Richardson made the Land of Enchantment the 15th U.S. state to ban capital punishment and pushed it into the worldwide community of states and nations that have abolished the death penalty, including many countries in the European Union.
“I do not have confidence in the criminal justice system as it currently operates to be the final arbiter when it comes to who lives and who dies for their crime,” Richardson said. “If the State is going to undertake this awesome responsibility, the system to impose this ultimate penalty must be perfect and can never be wrong.”
The news excited supporters who had been pushing for the repeal.
“This is a great day for New Mexico” said Juan Melendez, who spent 18 years on Florida’s death row before being exonerated of a murder he didn’t commit. Melendez, who lobbied lawmakers this year, lives in New Mexico now. In his case, the real killer confessed, making him the 99th person exonerated across the nation, he said.
Richardson’s decision, Melendez said, can help teach “the children that killing is wrong.”
He also said that New Mexico’s example will serve as inspiration for other Western states that are looking at repealing the death penalty, including Colorado.
“Gov. Richardson’s courageous and enlightened decision should send a powerful message to other states, governors and Americans about the need to take a hard look at our error-prone, discriminatory and bankrupting system of capital punishment,” John Holdridge, director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project, said in a release.
“It is a system incapable of ensuring that innocent lives are not unjustly taken. It is a system plagued by racial, economic and geographic discrimination. And it is a system that police chiefs, criminologists and statistical experts around the country agree does not deter crime. Gov. Richardson deserves enormous credit for acting in the best interests of the people of his state and the people of this country,” the release continued.
The law also creates a sentence of life without parole to replace the death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
The governor’s decision came after New Mexicans by the thousands called, e-mailed and visited with him over the weekend after the Senate passed HB285 by a vote of 24-18 on Friday.
Of more than 11,760 calls, e-mails and walk-ins on legislation, 8,718 were for repeal compared to 3,046 against, the governor’s office said Wednesday afternoon.
Among those urging Richardson to sign the bill was Lt. Gov. Diane Denish.
“I support replacing the death penalty with a sentence of life in prison with no chance of parole,” Denish said in a news release Wednesday. “If you’ve committed murder, you will be behind bars the rest of your life, no exceptions. I will continue working with our police officers and prosecutors and with victims’ families to make sure justice is served.”
The lead up to Richardson’s decision attracted attention across the country as well as beyond its borders.
Viki Elkey of the New Mexico Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty said Wednesday she had conducted more than 50 media interviews in recent days. And most of the reporters she spoke to hailed from European countries.
The respected British magazine, The Economist, exemplified the interest European countries have in the death penalty. The magazine had a story about the U.S. considering the abolishment of the death penalty, including New Mexico.
New Mexico’s repeal is part of a larger national trend, partly because of the number of death row inmates who have been exonerated in recent years, according to supporters.
About 130 people in 26 states have been exonerated since the early 1970s, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. That number includes four people from New Mexico.
Another factor driving other states to consider abolishing the death penalty is the cost of prosecuting capital murder. Appeals over a several-year period often drive up the costs, say death penalty opponents. The dollars-and-cents argument comes at a time when the economy is in a shambles and many states are struggling to balance their budgets, including New Mexico.
New Mexico has executed one prisoner since 1976 — Terry Clark in 2001.
Opponents have argued unsuccessfully that abolishing the death penalty would remove a deterrent to heinous crimes. They also said a repeal would amount to a rollback of thousands of years of practice and would put police and correctional officers in harm’s way. Richardson acknowledged them in his announcement, saying, “Yes, the death penalty is a tool for law enforcement. But it’s not the only tool. For some would-be criminals, the death penalty may be a deterrent. But it’s not, and never will be, for many, many others.”
Opponents also have recalled crimes striking in their horror, including Terry Clark’s rape and murder of Dena Lynn Gore, a little girl he killed.
New Mexico has executed one prisoner since 1976 — Terry Clark in 2001.
Other U.S. states considering whether to abolish the death penalty include Utah and Colorado, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
- Posted in

11 Comments so far
Show AllI used to be one that was all for the death penalty! But, no longer. To many men have wound up on death row and been proven to be completely innocent. The advent of DNA has proven that our justice system is to fallible. I will agree with Richardson the system should be perfect if it is going to put someone to death. But, I do say this. Life in prison should mean exactly that. There will never be any possibility of parole for these people convicted.
"There will never be any possibility of parole for these people convicted."........................Until/unless they are proved innocent through DNA or some other means...................
"They also said a repeal would amount to a rollback of thousands of years of practice"
How is this ever considered a valid argument? Just because something was practiced for thousands of years in the past, it is good and acceptable?
Sacrificing a lamb is so 10th century BC
On the other hand, our Montana governor is sitting on the fence as Richardson was, so because Richardson did this and I think Schweitzer and him are buddies, this should help Montana abolish it. This bill is passing well in the legislative for being Montana I think.
Welcome to the civilized world, New Mexico!
There should be an exception. For people who torture, rape & murder children.
Call it the The Kill a Child & Die Rule.
People who are innocent do not confess and leave their DNA in/on their victims.
Anyone kills, rapes/kills a child, children, and they confess, or their DNA convicts them, their semen is found inside a two year old, they should to be put to Death.
And a video of the execution shown to other sex offenders before these predators are released.
People "Given Life" after they take a childs, who go on shucking & jiving with the homey's during chow while worms crawl through the rotting boddy of their little victim?
I have buried a child, and I will bury a child-killer if I ever get the chance.
JOE. That was JOE.
But Azjoe,
Wouldn't it be better to keep him alive and torture him for the rest of his natural life? Just because they're banning the death penalty doesn't mean we can't come up with worse ways to punish these scum of the earth. Personally I think death is letting them off easy. Let them hang by their ankles under a dripping faucet for the rest of their lives. It's a far worse fate, and I can't see the reasoning of a supreme court justice who will call that cruel and unusual punishment in light of the crime they've committed...
jove4015
Wellll, as long as you mention it,
Could they go to Gitmo for 6 months?
And be waterboarded, maybe they can rat out some other child molesting scum so they can come join them. Nobody likes to be tortured alone.
But after that, unless their child victim has been resurrected, laughs on their way to class again, plays with puppies, the effin killer takes it behind the ear. On CCTV in the PC pens where they cater to these predators, serve them lunch, fix the tv if it breaks.
Some things are sacred, the lives of children certainly,
The rights of childkillers certainly not.
Joe.
I am against the death penalty mainly because I dont think it makes sense to say that if you kill its wrong, so the state will do the same to you.
Old Testament justice has really helped foster a more civilized Middle East hasnt it?
They used to hang people and cut out their entrails and burn them in a public square--or pour hot lead down their throats. Or stone them to death.
I am surprised the medical community hasnt been itching to use prisoners for medical research. The Egyptians did, and you would think if they are ok with using the innocent(non human animals, or embryos) they would be more anxious to use compatible biology.
If its ok to maim and kill people in war for ideology or oil, why not in the fight against cancer?
Humans have strange priorities. Either fighting cancer is important or it isnt. Morality has never stopped science in the past.
Hopefully Richardson will repent about his support for cockfighting and canned hunting next.
I wouldn't lump cockfighting in with canned hunting. Moralizing aside:
In cockfighting a rooster gets a chance to do what he wants to do and if he's a good fighter with the best DNA, he gets retired to breed with a harem of hens instead of having it's throat cut and hung to bleed to death in a factory farming conveyor belt.
In canned hunts the animal has no chance and the best of the species with the best DNA gets taken out of circulation to weaken the species as a whole, it's head hung on a wall to collect dust and scare children and it's meat put in a freezer to later get discarded because people don't like the taste.
"With his signature, Richardson made the Land of Enchantment the 15th U.S. state to ban capital punishment and pushed it into the worldwide community of states and nations that have abolished the death penalty, including many countries in the European Union. "
Not "many countries" but ALL countries of the EU. No DP is a requirement for entry into the EU. Sorry, but the US wouldn't be admitted into our community.
http://www.eurunion.org/legislat/deathpenalty/eumemorandum.htm