Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Groups Bash US Health Care for Detained Immigrants
MIAMI - U.S. immigration authorities routinely delay, deny or botch medical care for immigrants in detention, according to separate reports by two advocacy groups released Tuesday.
Meghan Rhoad, center, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, looks to former detainee Marlene Jaggernauth, right, as she speaks during a news conference along with Cheryl Little, left, executive director of Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center, Tuesday, March 17, 2009 in Miami. U.S. immigration authorities routinely delay, deny or botch medical care for immigrants in detention, according to separate reports by the two advocacy groups released Tuesday. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee) Human Rights Watch and the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center said immigrants detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement routinely receive inadequate medical care in poorly equipped facilities nationwide.
They blame the problems on unskilled or indifferent staff, overcrowding, bureaucratic red tape, language barriers and limited services available to detainees. The groups contend that many medical problems could be avoided if the agency did not lock up people who are elderly, have health issues or lack criminal records.
Advocates argue that alternatives to detention, like requirements to check in by phone or in person, are "more humane" and cost taxpayers as little as $12 a day, compared with $95 a day to keep someone in immigration custody.
"ICE needlessly detains people with severe illnesses and those who pose no harm to U.S. communities. Doing so drives up ICE costs even as the agency provides increasingly inadequate medical and mental health care to those in its custody," said Cheryl Little, FIAC's executive director.
ICE detained more than 300,000 people in the fiscal year 2007, with a daily average of nearly 30,000. Most were held in state and county jails under contracts with ICE. Some detainees are held for months, even years, though ICE says the average time is 31 days.
The agency responded that its Division of Immigration Health Services gives detainees general and emergency health care, dental, chronic and mental health care.
"ICE is committed to providing all detainees in our care with humane and safe detention environments and ensuring that adequate medical services are provided to all in our care with timely and appropriate treatment, to the tune of nearly $100 million annually," ICE spokeswoman Nicole Navas said.
Current and former detainees around the country complained that medical staff at ICE facilities routinely violated their own standards in areas including continuity of care, quick response to medical complaints, informing inmates about the availability of services and providing medical screenings and follow-up care.
Female detainees particularly suffered because routine reproductive health issues failed to receive adequate attention in a system that emphasized emergency care and treating conditions that might affect a detainee's deportation status, according to Human Rights Watch.
Women told the group's researchers that they had been shackled while pregnant, missed appointments for mammograms and Pap smears or failed to receive prenatal care while in immigration custody.
"This overall approach, as well as specific restrictions on Pap smears, hormonal contraception, and access to specialist care, undermined the health of a number of women," according to the Human Rights Watch report.
Some inmates and former detainees told advocates that they eventually dropped their requests for medical care or refused follow-up treatment to avoid being shackled in transit or because they believed their attempts to obtain adequate care were futile. They also reported that security officers inhibited their access to medical care by refusing to call medical staff or violating their privacy by openly discussing their health problems and observing medical exams.
A former detainee who spent 11 months in ICE custody said she and fellow inmates languished without proper care in four different county jails in Florida. Mentally ill women were sent to solitary confinement, sleeping inmates weren't wakened when medications were distributed and guards refused supplies to menstruating women, said Marlene Jaggernauth, 43, a native of Trinidad. She said her own request to see a gynecologist needed approval from ICE officials in Washington, which never came.
"Part of the problem is that officers are not trained and they don't really understand what a detainee means," said Jaggernauth, whose case was finally resolved in June, five years after she was initially detained in 2003. "They think that all immigration detainees are just going to be deported, so they can be ignored."
Advocates allege that the inadequate medical care may have contributed to the deaths of some detainees in ICE custody or soon after their release. FIAC's report cites the deaths of two men whose cancers went untreated, a man whose cardiac infection went untreated, an elderly Haitian minister who was hospitalized in leg restraints after being accused of faking his violent vomiting and a young Haitian man who suffered from seizures and psychiatric problems.
According to ICE, 77 immigrants have died in detention in the last five fiscal years, although it did not specify the causes.
Advocates are not alone in criticizing ICE health care for detainees. The Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General found instances of noncompliance with medical standards in 2006 and 2008 audits.
- Posted in

10 Comments so far
Show AllBy 'immigrants in detention' do they mean 'illegal aliens' or legitimate college students here on a visa?
Frankly, I'd be outraged only if this happened to someone with a green card. If you sneak in like a thief, take your lumps. We don't want you, and I as a taxpayer am not interested in paying your medical care when I can't afford insurance for myself.
And your uncompassionalte attitude is exactly why no poor US citizens have health care either. It is only a tiny step from the prevailing attitude that even US citizens without health insurance shouldn't get healthcare either - it's their own fauly, they are lazy, and shouldn't burden hard working USAns with more taxes.
Salvadorans, Nicaraguans, and Mexicans come up here because thanks to US neoliberal economic hegemony over their nations, the only other alternative for many of them is starvation. What would you do?
---USAn---
Obviously what I've been doing. Live my life without breaking and entering, 'enjoying' my citizenship as I work everyday. I don't have any sympathy for criminals, beggars, flowers, or clouds. Charity is a personal choice, and not one I'd like made for me. If it IS made for me, it is simply imperialism.
As to why no poor US citizens have health care, it's all about the money. Laziness has nothing to do with it; you can be lazy and have money and vice versa.
If those Salvadorans, Nicaraguans, and Mexicans want better lives, they should stay in their own countries and work to change things there.
The Nicaraguans and Salvadorans tried to change their their countries, but were murdered by the tens of thousands for it.
The Mexicans tried too, mostly peacefully for now, but their ballot boxes got stuffed.
And actually, no, Charity isn't entirely personal - "personal responsibility responsibility" simply means "personally able to respond". If you pass by a critically injured person you could help through no risk to yourself, and you don't help them you are potentially chargable with manslaughter.
---USAn---
Change isn't easy or free. I heard the Salvadorans scored a 'great democratic victory' on this very site this very week. Good for them; I wish them nothing but the best, as long as they stay out of my country when not on vacation.
Charity is entirely personal. 'No risk to yourself' does not mean 'potentially chargeable', which implies a risk.
If that critically injured person shot my wife while attempting to rob me, you can bet I'd be helping her, no matter how 'minor' the bullet wound was. I can also make unsupported 'if' statements sound perfectly reasonable.
Anything that is not optional cannot be charity.
Talk about a disconnect. It was the United States that fueled a vicious civil war in El Salvador during the eighties turning many El Salvadoreans into refugees. They fled to the US only to come up against blatant hostility by clueless Americans like yourself. Is it ok for the US to be a homerwrecker like it did with El Salvador and then turn around and blame the victims like a bully does?
I am annoyed at the attitude of some of the posts. They talk as if all immigrants are hard-working people who only want to improve their lives. This is not always the case. I live in an area that has become almost all hispanic. Some of the people are good neighbors. Others aren't. There are three abandoned houses within visual distance of my house - one is right next door. My next door "neighbors" were anything but neighbors. The bought the house three years ago, trashed it, and then simply disappeared last fall, leaving garbage and junk. Since they were not here legally, I suppose they could be irresponsible. I couldn't (and wouldn't want to) get by with that. On the other hand, my neighbors across the street and one house down are lovely people. In spite of the language barrier, we sometimes talk about the deplorable state of the area.
I also am angry at the idea that I'm lazy. I have always worked hard. I'm 73. When I was young, you could get a work permit at 15 1/2. I did. I worked from then until I retired. There were many times in my life when I didn't have health insurance or a decent place to live because I didn't have much money. I was nearly 50 before I could afford this house. At that time, this was a respectable working-class area. Now it's become a neighborhood with "For Sale" signs, "Rent to Own" signs, and abandoned properties. I can't afford to move.
I do not like the idea that people are locked up without decent care. On the other hand, I don't like having to exist like I do.
What this article describes are the symptons of a corrupt society. The kind of society that values human worth via the profit-motive. And the kind of society that creates Judahs by the handful.
"Advocates argue that alternatives to detention... cost taxpayers as little as $12 a day, compared with $95 a day to keep someone in immigration custody."
Nonsense.How then the private prison industry and its investors will profit?
See
http://www.counterpunch.org/barry03132009.html
The open fascistic position of same people on 'Common Dreams' would be more appropiate on sites with titles as 'Uncommon Dreams' or 'Only America Dreams'.
The health conditions on these prisons are worse than all the other in the system including the 'non combatant' prisons. We obtain better profits if we exclude human considerations.
As the global situation deteriorates we are sending non criminals to hell after profiting them in all conceivable forms: through overseas 'investing', 'intervention', 'corruption', through slavery wages, through overextented imprisonment.
Always we have an alibi for our crimes: always we justify that these victims are the cause of all our disgraces thence we persecute them, jail them, psychologically torture them, expulse them.
We co-opt our illegality in the national and international
sphere against the weakest of the weakests in the world arena.
But wait, are not all these actions happened before against
undefended groups of people before the second world war?
May be we need to add these hating trends to all the others
that define our dangerous approach to our 'Weimar Moment'.
God there are lots of American creeps out there! My friend got deported by Immigration last year and they held him in their jail for 3 months without any decent treatment, medical or otherwise. Our wonderful USA had gone to his country and blown off his arms when he was only 16 years old. It really gets to me listening to these self righteous know-nothings always railing against 'breaking the law' and all their usual Ditto Head BS even on the more liberal websites. They have neither compassion nor knowledge.