Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Suburban Peace Activists Say Obama Withdrawal Plan Is Not Enough
Hell no. These suburban peace protesters won't go.
Andre Sheldon, left, and Libby Gerlach, both of Newton, kept vigil on the corner of Centre and Beacon Streets in protest of the Iraq war. (Patricia McDonnell for The Boston Globe) President Barack Obama's plan for withdrawing troops from Iraq doesn't go nearly far enough, say local peace activists - many of whom are in their sixth year of grueling weekly public vigils against American foreign policy.
The president's plan to leave a contingent in place through 2011 and deploy 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan, as well as recent hostilities in Pakistan, leaves plenty to demonstrate about, they said.
‘‘Iraq is a symptom of a foreign policy and priorities that I disagree with,'' said Susan Mirsky, 64, who was holding a sign saying, ‘‘Enough! Bring the Troops Home Now!'' at a recent vigil organized by Newton Dialogues on Peace and War.
‘‘I believe we are making a difference. People see us and we make an impact, however slight, but you never know how it ripples out,'' said Mirsky, 64, whose own activism began as a student during the Vietnam era.
Their determination is played out in more than 35 local vigils - involving groups from Needham, Natick, Sherborn, Holliston, Hudson, Waltham, Watertown, Wellesley - that sprang up on street corners shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the US-led invasion of Afghanistan. Once war began in Iraq, they settled in for the long haul.
Today, nearly all the vigil groups have a core that is still active, though some have joined forces with neighboring towns or reduced their demonstrations to once or twice per month.
‘‘The invasion of Iraq was a horrible thing, so I started coming because I thought I'd go out of my mind if I didn't do something,'' said David Ascher, 61, who protested at anti-Vietnam sit-ins as a student at City College in New York, before moving to Newton and working as a software consultant. ‘‘I'm still here because there are still many, many unresolved questions about this war. When I stop feeling this way, maybe I won't come anymore.''
The mainstays of the suburban vigil movements are nearly all over age 60, and some, like longtime protester Marvin Miller, who has carried the same slightly battered, hand-lettered placard reading ‘‘Peace Liberty Justice'' in Newton since 2001, are past 80.
Barbara Boltz, 76, of Arlington is part of a group of weekly peace demonstrators from Arlington and Lexington who gather Mondays at 5 p.m. on Massachusetts Avenue in Arlington. She plans to keep it up indefinitely.
‘‘Some people do think we should give Obama more time. But he is talking about troops in Iraq for three more years and more people in Afghanistan, which I see as just another quagmire,'' said Boltz, who said her activism dates to the civil rights movement.
The suburban peace groups are occasionally bolstered by students from Boston College, Brandeis University, and other local schools, but by and large, young peace activists do not demonstrate on a weekly basis.
Since January 2007, a small groups of religious leaders, faculty and students at Brandeis University in Waltham have held a weekly outdoor peace vigil.
The lunchtime session, which usually lasts about 20 minutes, will continue for the foreseeable future, said Alexander Kern, a university chaplain.
‘‘We'll do it until the war ends, and it hasn't ended yet and there is a lot to be resolved. We feel we have to keep the pressure on,'' he said.
Brandeis sophomore Lev Hirschhorn said student peace activists feel as committed to their activism as ever.
‘‘We also need to empathize with the people whose lives have been destroyed by this war and their suffering just goes on and on,'' said Hirschhorn, 19.
Students tend to be more active in on-campus and online peace efforts, while the older activists say they feel there is no substitute for the old-school approach of standing out in public with a sign.
Linda Stern, 67, of Newton, was active in demonstrations during the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 as a student at Carleton College in Minnesota, and marched to protest the Vietnam War in Washington D.C., where students were tear-gassed and attacked by dogs.
The retired MassBay Community College librarian said the lack of a draft for the Iraq war was probably a large factor in the shortage of on-the-street young demonstrators.
‘‘They may think this approach is passé, and they certainly have other international issues they are involved in,'' said Stern. ‘‘But people see us and know us, and more and more often say ‘thank you' for being here. So I think we have an impact.''
Newton demonstrators did consider ratcheting down the protests after Obama's victory in November, but decided to keep up the weekly Thursday afternoon pace, at least through this coming summer.
Over the years, participation ranged from several hundred during special events commemorating the anniversary of the war, to just a half-dozen on the coldest and rainiest winter evenings, Ascher said.
These days, support for their antiwar cause is easier to come by.
During last week's vigil, several men and women driving Priuses beeped and waved, and a half-dozen pickup-truck-and-minivan owners offered thumbs-up.
An SUV driver at a stoplight rolled down a window and hooted into the icy air, ‘‘Bring my brother home!!''
The preschooler in the SUV's back seat waved and clapped. The vigilers cheered back.
The vigils were not always such amiable scenes. Newton demonstrators, like every group, have had their share of boos and hurled insults (Most common, ‘‘Go home, commies!'' Second place was, ‘‘Nuke 'em all!'') There was even a near-fistfight a few years ago, when a heckler pulled up on the curb and screamed an anti-Semitic insult.
For a few weeks, a counter-demonstrator stood across the street with a ‘‘WMDs Found'' sign. (Weapons of mass destruction were never actually found in Iraq, the vigil participants are quick to point out.)
Weeks also went by where the general mood was widespread indifference, demonstrated by a regular stream of cars who pulled over not to talk politics, but to ask directions to the Mass. Pike, said Ascher.
Even though the tide of public opinion on the war has turned, many in the peace movement feel that the time is right to become even more visible.
Vigilers from across the suburbs plan to join together on Thursday in Watertown Square from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. for a candlelight vigil commemorating the sixth anniversary of the US ‘‘Shock and Awe'' military attack on Baghdad.
Now that public opinion has swung against the war, ‘‘it's time to show people there is an active peace movement in the United States,'' said Marilyn Levin, a United for Justice with Peace activist from Arlington who plans to attend a planned national March on the Pentagon, sponsored by dozens of peace groups, this Saturday in Washington DC.
‘‘We are the only force that can stop our government,'' she said. ‘‘It is only the power of the American people that can change foreign policy.'

12 Comments so far
Show AllGood for these activists. Trying to get most local 'peace' groups to do anything out in public these days that might offend Obama Nation is like trying to squeeze water out of a rock.
A group of hundreds of returning Iraq vets gathered in Maryland last year (March 08) to testify to the attrocities that they, themselves had committed in that beaten-down war-torn country. All were deeply ashamed. If one wishes to view the hearings as they took place live go to democracynow.org and scroll down the left side of the page until you come to WINTER SOLDIER. You may then click on and view all of the testimony in all of its gory details. The hearings were sponsored by IRAQ VETS AGAINST THE WAR.
Suburbanites against the war ? YES YES YES !!! Maybe Rural America will be the next and final to join the fight against these wars and the need to withdraw ! Obama had better pay attention because without the suburban vote, he would have lost like Kerry and Gore did. I may live in rural SD but I can already tell you that of all the economic damage these past 4 years alone, Suburban America has been hit the hardest especially on foreclosures and bankruptcies even more than the inner cities.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
What fools! Obama is ending the Iraq war in the safest way possible. As Juan Cole has pointed out, saying "OUT NOW" is reckless and short-sighted.
"Personally, I think "US out now" as a simple mantra neglects to consider the full range of possible disasters that could ensue. For one thing, there would be an Iraq civil war." - Juan Cole August 2005
Obama is acting in what he somehow thinks is America's self-interest. He's making deals with the local heroin warlords to kill any dissenters, including anyone who doesn't want to grow heroin. Doesn't that make you feel all-American? As a side effect he's lowering America's trade imbalance with cheaper heroin.
I should add that he's dropping hellfire missiles at anything that moves inside the territory of a country with 50-100 nuclear weapons. Hmm, what's the 100th largest city in the U.S.? Anyhow, this nuclear country is close to a failed state, where hundreds of young lawyers armed with sticks will charge a police line. Does this seem odd?
I trust this was written tongue in cheek. Good grief, Cole said that 3 1/2 YEARS ago. We are still there and you say that it is reckless and short-sighted that we Peace Activists want the troops brought home as quickly as is physically possible and all the military bases shut down as they leave. Our small band of Lovers Of Peace, Not War have been standing on the street corner in a small town in the redneck farm country of eastern Washington State since August of 2005. We have had insults hurled at us regularly. Now, however, that happens less and less. Even small town America is realizing that spending billions on decimating a small middle eastern country which did us no harm is causing our economy to slide into the toilet.
Peace Now!!!
It is just as true now as when Cole first said it.
Also, Cole supports Obama's 19 month withdrawal plan.
"Obama cannot afford to make his calculations about Iraq solely with an eye to domestic American politics. He extended his original proposal of a 16-month withdrawal of active combat brigades to 18 months so as to leave more troops in place to help with the next Iraqi parliamentary elections, scheduled for December 2009. It is stil the case that Iraqi elections can only go forward if the country is locked down and vehicular traffic forbidden, preventing car-bombings and coordinated guerrilla strikes. It might be possible for the Iraqi military to provide security for national elections in 2013 should the country's future ruler or rulers deign to hold them, but the Iraqi military cannot hope to do so this year."
"Iraq's military also continues to need logistical support from U.S. forces."
"Obama is) attempting to provide for an orderly withdrawal that will ensure that U.S. troops are not drawn back in by a subsequent security collapse." Juan Cole March 2009
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/03/02/obama_iraq/
It appears that you are unable to think for yourself and can only spout someone else. Perhaps you ought to read more than one person's thinking. Ever heard Ray McGovern? Or Ann Wright? Or any number of other thoughtful, intelligent people?
If Iraq requires our military so that they can hold "democratic elections" then there is not much of a democracy there, is there? Also, in a democracy, last time I checked, there were no RULERS, just elected officials who are allegedly LEADERS, not RULERS and they can be removed by those who elect them. Of course the US is not a very good example of a democracy any more as we didn't have the courage to rid ourselves of the poor excuse for a President that held office for 8 years while committing various impeachable offenses. Perhaps the current President will step up to the Constitutional plate and begin a criminal proceeding against Bush, Cheney and all the rest of the murderers... But I am not holding my breath.
I was only responding to your comment that Cole felt that way three years ago, but does not feel that way now. I was only pointing out that you were mistaken about Cole.
No, I am not. He supports the whole foolish Obama plan. Sorry, we'll just have disagree on this issue.
Usually I do not dignify your statements with a reply. What nerve you have to call these people fools. They, and other groups, including one in Rockland County, have been going out every weekend since at least 2003 in all kinds of weather to alert passing motorists to the folly of our invasions and occupations.
I have been on the Rockland County vigils near a shopping mall a few times to accompany a ninety year old uncle who never missed a week for years. In the beginning the group was small and was berated by people leaning out of trucks and SUVs shouting rude things. As time passed, the protest group grew and the response became more and more friendly, including from those in pickup trucks and SUVs. It is Americans like these who speak the truth before it is popular to do so who kept our country from drifting further and further toward groupthink and totalitarianism.
Right now, despite Obama's mixed messages about war during the campaign, he is allowing bombing of Pakistan, escalating our military presence in Afghanistan without an understandable objective and fashioning a half-hearted and incomplete withdrawal from Iraq.
I supported Obama in preference to McCain/Palin and to people who had not built a base of support. But I NEVER expected that my job as a citizen would end if he were elected. It is people who sit back and passively expect the government to resist all the powerful interests and to do the right thing who are the fools.
Joe
Ironically, when re-reading Hayden, et al's argument for electing Obama over Hillary Clinton the primary issues was Obama's Iraq War promise. Hayden's argument for Obama was qualified by Hillary's pledge -which they called open ended- which they argued was designed to leave a residual force. The irony is that Obama is effectively doing what Hillary Clinton promised....
"Progressives should support Obama's sixteen-month combat troop withdrawal plan in comparison to Clinton's open-ended one, and demand that both candidates avoid a slide into four more years of low-visibility counterinsurgency....
"...She now promises to "end the war" but will not set a timeline for combat troop withdrawal, and remains committed to leaving tens of thousands of counter-terrorism troops and trainers in Iraq amidst a sectarian conflict. While Obama needs to clarify his own position on counterinsurgency, Clinton's "end the war" rhetoric conceals an open commitment to keep American troops in Iraq until all our ill-defined enemies are defeated--a treadmill that guarantees only the spawning of more enemies.
but, I think this silly Iraq stuff (snark) was overshadowed by the popular appeal and audience/mob size Obama commanded...
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080407/hayden_et_al