Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Consumers Curb Medical Treatment to Save Money
More heart attacks, fewer breast implants. More ER visits, fewer trips to the doctor's office. More aspirin, fewer echocardiograms. And many people are afraid to miss work for healthcare because they fear it might cost them their jobs.
A doctor walks through a mock graveyard at a rally against health care cuts in February 2009 in San Francisco. (AFP/Getty Images/File/Justin Sullivan) That's the anecdotal evidence from several dozen healthcare providers in South Florida about how the deepening recession is effecting treatment.
While it has been well-publicized that many people are losing health insurance when they lose their jobs, doctors and hospital leaders have been surprised about how many who still have coverage are scrimping on care because they can't afford the co-pays or time away from work.
Take South Dade Realtor J. Berry Hamilton, 57. She's gone to a policy with a $5,000 deductible, meaning she has to pay most costs out of her own pocket. Recently, she brushed off her doctor's request for a diagnostic exam when she got a sinus infection. As her business has declined, she figures: ``Let me see if the antibiotic works first, and if it doesn't then maybe I'll have the X-ray.''
''Patients are spending less, no question about it,'' says Bernd Wollschlaeger, a primary care doctor in North Miami Beach. ``A patient needs a echocardiogram. And they say they can't afford the $100 or $200 co-payment, so they're deferring. In the long run, this just can't be good for healthcare.''
People are certainly pinching their pennies. For the five hospitals in Baptist Health South Florida, Vice President Karen Godfrey reports that patients are now hesitating on tests and procedures even with co-pays as low as $15, ``which is very surprising.
''One of the registration managers was telling me some are negotiating for services. If a woman gets a prescription for a mammogram and an ultrasound, she wants to know the co-pay for both,'' then pick the test with the cheaper co-pay.
Some experts wonder whether stress caused by economic worries is leading to more heart attacks. South Florida facilities in the HCA hospital chain, which include Aventura and Plantation General, reported seeing 20 percent more heart attack patients in the fourth quarter.
At Baptist Hospital, Becky Montesino, vice president for nursing, says, ``we have experienced an increase in all cardiac and stress related illnesses. . . . In two of the months thus far we have seen double the STEMIs [a type of heart attack] over last year.''
Some other large hospital groups, however, are not seeing any change in heart attack rates, and the Centers for Disease Control, which collects health data, says it will be several years before 2008-2009 statistics become available. Still, a Plantation interventional cardiologist, Murry Drescher, believes the recession is taking a toll on the heart.
''I've noticed a lot more heart attacks over the last six, seven months,'' says Drescher, who is on call for Broward emergency rooms to insert stents to prop open clogged arteries of heart-attack patients.
''Stress is worse than high cholesterol. Especially the kind of stress that you can't do anything about -- like when you can't find a job or you're in a financial hole you can't get out of,'' says Drescher.
For some, the stress comes in dealing with expensive care. ''As a man in my mid-40's living in South Florida, I'm as angry as I am terrified,'' says Kevin Dunleavy, a contract worker in Key West, who knows that in today's economy he may soon be unemployed and uninsured.
His insurance deductibles keep going up, and his care keeps going down. ''I've always been proactive about healthcare: Early detection is best.'' But now he's thinking he needs to save his money for unforeseen circumstances.
When he hurt his toe in an accident, he went to rehab until the insurance stopped paying. He's still in pain, but he refuses to pay $200 for each rehab session. ''When it hurts, every step you're reminded of it,'' says Dunleavy, ``but that's just the way it is.''
Many women, meanwhile, are deciding against cosmetic surgery, which is rarely covered by insurance. Stephan Baker, a plastic surgeon in Coral Gables, is one of several who reports seeing a ''significant drop in breast augmentation. It's one of those luxury items'' that women often can't afford now.
Breast implants tend to be a younger woman's concern -- something that can be put off, says Baker. ''They're nervous about spending the money. We are hearing a lot of requests for financing. And everyone's shopping around. A lot of requests for discounts, trying to find a decent deal.'' He says he occasionally offers a discount, ``We're trying to offer some flexibility without being too silly about it.''
Face lifts tend to be older women, who have sometimes saved up, says Baker. 'They're in a better financial position to start with, and they think there's more of a sense of timing. `I'm 65. I'm not going to wait until the recession is over.' ''
EYES ON THE PRICE
Another area of decline: The University of Miami reports fewer people are seeking Lasik eye surgery to correct their vision because that's usually something the patient pays for.
Last fall, as the economic crisis exploded, Mercy and the five hospitals in Baptist Health South Florida saw spikes in some outpatient procedures. ''We had a very strong October,'' says Godfrey at Baptist. ``That surprised us a little bit.
''I would guess to some extent people were rushing to get elective services done while they still had a job and still had insurance.'' But then Baptist system saw a ''significant drop'' in outpatient services in November.
Meanwhile, the Memorial Healthcare System, Baptist and Mercy report that ER patients tend to be sicker these days. ''We are seeing the phenomenon of very sick people waiting too long to seek treatment for fear of missing work,'' says Baptist's Montesino.
They're also more likely to seek free care as the ranks of the uninsured grow. Charity care for the five hospitals in Baptist Health South Florida is up 27.9 percent in the most recent quarter compared with the same period a year ago. In South Broward, people seeking treatment in Memorial's public clinics has risen 27 percent in the past year.
SAME STORIES
Everywhere, administrators are being told the same stories. At the Memorial system, which has seen a significant decline in outpatient procedures, in everything from hand surgery to arthroscopic procedures on the knees, Chief Financial Officer Matt Muhart says: 'We're hearing two things. No. 1: `I don't have the money for the deductible.' No. 2: 'My job pays me when I'm there. I don't want to take a week off. I don't want to be noticed as missing, anything that interrupts the natural flow of things. I'm worried my boss isn't going to keep me around.' ''
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

7 Comments so far
Show AllThis is why we desperately need single-payer healthcare for all. Insurance companies must be removed from health care. We now rely on government for firefighting, policing, maintaining roads & bridges, and other necessary common services, so why not for the the necessary common service of healthcare? A February, 2009 CBS/NYT poll found that 59% of Americans prefer government-provided healthcare.
HR 676, Medicare for All, would incrementally expand Medicare to cover all Americans; have no deductibles, co-payments or premiums (it would be paid out of payroll taxes as Medicare & Social security now are); allow complete patient choice of physicians and hospitals; provide millions of jobs and also retrain health insurance company employees to work in the new system; be portable for those who change jobs and still provide healthcare for the increasing unemployed; and save many private industries (such as auto) and businesses now crushingly burdened by health insurance costs they cannot afford.
As every other industrialized country has found out, single-payer healthcare is much more humane, inclusive, and efficient than any private health insurance system. Medicare spends only 3% on administration, as contrasted to the 30% the current inefficient, inhumane private health insurance (mess)system wastes.
Call your Representative (202-224-3121) and urge her/him to co-sponsor HR 676 (which already has 78 co-sponsors).
And this is EXACTLY the economic corral that the Blue Cross, Aetna, and others forced us into. They are laughing all the way to the bank. I'm sure they are going to want credit for saving the country from a social security crises because of increased american deah rates. For profit health care is inhuman. Don't buy stock in health insurance corporations.
We DO need quality single-payer health care in this country, that's for sure. Even GM might agree to that now...
Funny, though, you can tell this article was written from a south Florida perspective in that it applies the seriousness of the whole piece to the decline in women being able to get breast augmentation. When I think of all the reasons why we desperately need socialized healthcare, cosmetic boob-jobs are certainly not anywhere near the top of the list... Or even on the list. In fact, the elective cosmetic surgery angle kind of undermines the integrity of this piece. I could just see some middle-of-the-roader or conservative coming upon this and thinking, "damn liberals, now they want me to pay for boobie jobs..."
Of course, what's funny, is that allot of those cave-dwelling buffoons probably DO regard such things as necessary and important! :D
Just when the multi-abused, (and cultivated to be masochistic) mainstream US citizenry finally gets politically brave enough to consider supporting a single payer health care system, their goddam government becomes financially bankrupt (bankrupt, thanks to those same passive citizens, and that same outrageous government's, long-standing ethical bankruptcy.)
Now, the controlling oligarchs whose boundless personal greed earlier-demanded and got, through their purchased lawmaking puppets, that the US financial system be radically-deregulated to the poiint of absurdity (and which oligarchs then managed thereby to steal $trillions in public and small-scale private dollars/investments) --now these same proven pigs-and-their-puppets say there's '...no way..' a single payer/tax-suppported HC system can be 'afforded.'
Faux progressive lawmakers like Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) who since 2007 has chaired the Senate Finance Committee -- he being an entrenched 'liberal' power broker who never, ever spoke out against the oligarchs' neo-con games (foreign or domestic) even when he had a 'politically-safe' chance to do so after the 2006 election, today, instead, suddenly and unprecedented for the chronic milksop Max Bausus has alwasy been -- gets up on his preachy haunches to pro-actively denounce the single payer concept as being --- of all things --- "...un-American."
What slimey Baucus-types mean to bamboozle your head about (and hope you'll forget) is the fact that thanks to political sell-outs like him [faux progressives who for years legislatively enabled America's domestic robber barrons and MI-complex blood suckers to bankrupt the nation], average citizens now have no choice but to pay-off the ruinous System-wide robbery by the rich -- thereby such misrepresented citizens once again ('patriotically') denying themselves a workable national heath care plan -- in exchange for swallowing the debt that saves the country.
{What increadible bullshit! How can a presumably sane and psychologically-normal population of electoral sovereigns eat such poisonous dung....?}
Of course, Max and his worse-than-Republican fellow Democrat-oligarch-colluders now want to make any such single payer plan now look not just ' very expesnive' but, at this point, downright 'un-American' in order to convince you that he and his fellow congressional Dems are, 'as always, loyally looking-out for average-citizen interests.
Even though The US government IS, probably now, too financially stretched to imediately adopt a single payer system, The People should demand it nevertheless -- and exactly for that reason.
Citizens' making such a demand arguably could force a decisive reallocation of public and private money (and virtuous changes in political control of money) AWAY from corporate-domestic pillaging/government-empire military spending, TOWARD domestic US human needs and a saner, non-empirist US foreign policy.
To paraphrase what Ralph Nader said recently in one of his online articles:
"...the overwhelming majority of people -- I mean the people who work for a living and [who] create [their] societie's wealth, really have nothing to fear by turning against their elected officials - and even their government. I'm talking about when their elected officials legalize wholsescale theft of the fruits of their [the people's] labor; ...pensions gone, investments gone, but gone where?.
A government that does this, that allows this....why would anyone except the theives support it...not work to change it...?
You are right. Had we voted in the supposed kooks like Cindy Sheehan to replace Pelosi and Kucinich or Nader to replace the evil W, we would have left Iraq, Afghanistan, 700 overseas bases and there'd be plenty of money for single payer health insurance or totally nationalized free health care for that matter. Think about this: $12,000 a year is the cost of reasonable health insurance with low co-pay and low deductible. three hundred million times $12,000 equals 3.6 trillion dollars. They've given more than that to the banks without batting an eye. They give 1 trillion to the pentagon a year without batting an eye. If all three hundred million were covered, the cost per person would probably be about a quarter of $12,000 a year. It's like you say, "All song and dance". The lies, posturing and distracting drivel never end unless we throw them out.
And the next time they start talking about how important to national security a new jet fighter or bomber is but we still can't afford health care, tell them that we know national security means a congress person's security and our sucker-ity.
The only people congress put first are the lobbyists.
But we have too many people. Less is more, right?
This is not my view, but seems to echo the neo-malthusian theme here on CD.